Docstoc

Assessment Career Change - Excel

Document Sample
Assessment Career Change - Excel Powered By Docstoc
					Program Outcomes Assessment
               Program    Master of Science Career & Technical Education
            Department    Career and Technical Education
         College/School   Community and Technical College
         Academic Year    2009

 Assessment Coordinator Sally Spieker
                                                                                     TABLE 1
                                                                           PROGRAM MISSION AND CONTEXT
                                                                                 Program Mission

The Master of Science Career and Technical Education (MSCTE) program provides professional career and technical education
  leadership development for secondary and postsecondary teachers, administrators, industry trainers, and other workforce
development professionals. The program influences systems change by providing guidance on best practices for the education
                                         and development of the future workforce.
                                                                      Program Context and General Comments

 The Master of Science Career and Technical Education degree opened for admission in December 2007. This is the first report
  for the MSCTE. The last Master of Science Vocational Education student finished this year. That data is not included in this
                                                          report.
                                                                            Location of Published Outcomes


            Master of Science Career and Technical Education outcomes are published with the program's catalog copy.
                                Use this space to note where the program outcomes are published.




  Submitted 6-16-09                                                  e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls   Mission & Context
   Program Outcomes Assessment
            Program                                Master of Science Career & Technical Education
         Department                                Career and Technical Education
      College/School                               Community and Technical College
      Academic Year                                2009
        Assessment                                 Sally Spieker
                                                                                                                TABLE 2
                                                                                                  PROGRAM OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT RESULTS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Current
                                                                                                                                                                                 Measures                                                                                            5 Year Trend Data
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Year




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Weighted Average
                                                                                                              Philosophy Paper




                                                                                                                                                                                  Project or Thesis
                                                                                                                                 Sample size for




                                                                                                                                                               Sample size for




                                                                                                                                                                                                      Sample size for




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Sample size for




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Sample size for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Project/Thesis




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       automatically)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Presentation




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         (Calculates
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Oral Exam




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2003/2004

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       2004/2005

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2005/2006

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               2006/2007

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           2007/2008
                                                                                                                                                   Unit Plan
                                                                                                                                   measure




                                                                                                                                                                 measure




                                                                                                                                                                                                        measure




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       measure




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       measure
                                                    Defend a philosophy of career and technical       Grade     B                                  NG                             NG                                    NG                NG                B
                                               1      education using literature and personal         Value   3.00                    6                             0                                      0                         0          0        3.00
                                                                   experience.
                                                                                                     Weight 1.00                                   NG                             NG                                    NG                NG
        Published ProgramObjectives/Outcomes




                                                                                                      Grade     B                                  NG                             NG                                    NG                NG                B
                                                   Facilitate discussions on and advocate for or
                                               2                                                      Value   3.00                    6                             0                                      0                         0          0        3.00
                                                   argue against career and technical education.
                                                                                                     Weight 1.00                                   NG                             NG                                    NG                NG

                                                     Design and implement curriculum using            Grade   NG                                    A                             NG                                    NG                NG                A
                                               3   methodology that meets the needs of diverse        Value                           0            4.00             4                                      0                         0          0        4.00
                                                                    learners.
                                                                                                     Weight NG                                     1.00                           NG                                    NG                NG
                                                                                                      Grade   NG                                   NG                             NG                                    NG                NG          #DIV/0!
                                                      Develop, organize, and critically analyze
                                               4                                                      Value                           0                             0                                      0                         0          0     #DIV/0!
                                                         research for a specific audience.
                                                                                                     Weight NG                                     NG                             NG                                    NG                NG

                                                     Apply leadership and management theory           Grade   NG                                    A                             NG                                    NG                NG                A
                                               5         through research and practice in             Value                           0            4.00             4                                      0                         0          0        4.00
                                                                  organizations.
                                                                                                     Weight NG                                     1.00                           NG                                    NG                NG
                                                                                                      Grade   NG                                    A                             NG                                    NG                NG                A
                                               6    Incorporate technology to facilitate learning.    Value                           0            4.00             4                                      0                         0          0        4.00
                                                                                                   Weight NG            1.00        NG      NG           NG
                                                   Blank and shaded = Does not measure this published outcome.
                                                   Weights: 0.5 = Measure gives anecdotal or indirect indication of published outcome, or has a limited sample size.
                                                                1 = Measure provides direct, reliable information on the published outcome.


Submitted 6-16-09                                                                                    e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls                                                                                                                                                                      Outc Results
Program Outcomes Assessment Discussion
       Program    Master of Science Career & Technical Education
    Department    Career and Technical Education
 College/School   Community and Technical College
 Academic Year    2009
   Assessment
    Coordinator   Sally Spieker
                                                                                   TABLE 3
                                                                   ANALYSIS OF OUTCOME ASSESSMENT RESULTS

                                  Outcome                    Result                                                 Explanation of the Results

                    Defend a philosophy of career and
                                                                      The average score of the philosophy papers was 84.42/100. I think it shows that this is a beginning program and while
                  technical education using literature and     B
                                                                      faculty are doing a good job helping students meet the outcomes, there is room for refinement.
                           personal experience.
              1

                 Facilitate discussions on and advocate
                                                                      The average score of the philosophy papers was 84.42/100. I think it shows that this is a beginning program and while
              2 for or argue against career and technical      B
                                                                      faculty are doing a good job helping students meet the outcomes, there is room for refinement.
                                education.


                  Design and implement curriculum using               The average score on the unit plans was 38/40 so I assigned it an A. It might indicate that students get enough
              3    methodology that meets the needs of         A      practice in other course activities to score high on this assessment. Since this is the first assessment, the program
                            diverse learners.                         needs to compare data in future years and still look for areas of improvement.



                  Develop, organize, and critically analyze         Enter your explanation of the results for this outcome. How did you determine the grades you assigned in the outcome
              4                                             #DIV/0!
                     research for a specific audience.              results? What do the results really mean for your program?



                  Apply leadership and management                     The average score on the unit plans was 38/40 so I assigned it an A. It might indicate that students get enough
              5 theory through research and practice in        A      practice in other course activities to score high on this assessment. Since this is the first assessment, the program
                            organizations.                            needs to compare data in future years and still look for areas of improvement.


                                                                      The average score on the unit plans was 38/40 so I assigned it an A. It might indicate that students get enough
                     Incorporate technology to facilitate
              6                                                A      practice in other course activities to score high on this assessment. Since this is the first assessment, the program
                                  learning.
                                                                      needs to compare data in future years and still look for areas of improvement.


                  Notes on #1. The average grade of the students was 84.42 out of 100 points so I assigned a B for the results. It means that we can refine our process of teaching and
                  assessing philosophies of Career and Technical Education.




Submitted 6-16-09                                                      e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls                                                                 Outc Analysis
    Program Improvement Recommendations Based on Assessment
            Program    Master of Science Career & Technical Education
         Department    Career and Technical Education
      College/School   Community and Technical College
      Academic Year    2009
        Assessment
         Coordinator   Sally Spieker


                                                                                    TABLE 4
                                    PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON ASSESSMENT RESULTS: CURRENT YEAR
                                     Recommendation                                  Outcome(s)     Rationale for the Recommendation         Resource Implications
                                                                                                  This is a new degree and there is not
         Continue to refine stategies to improve teaching to help students meet all
                                                                                      1,2,3,4,5,6 enough data to show more specific needs
                                          outcomes.
                                                                                                  at this time.



                                                                    TABLE 5
                             ASSESSMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON ASSESSMENT RESULTS: CURRENT YEAR
                                  Recommendation                     Outcome(s)   Rationale for the Recommendation Resource Implications
                                                                                                   It was difficult to use. There were too
                                   Revise grading rubric.                               1,2
                                                                                                   many items to assess.
                                                                                                   Catalog copy changes and course
     Revise plan to administer Unit Plan assessment in CTE 643 and CTE 411/611 in
                                                                                       3,5,6       scheduling changes make this
                                   the spring semester.
                                                                                                   necessary.
                                                                                                   This was suggested in catalog copy
                                       Review outcomes.                              1,2,3,4,5,6
                                                                                                   revision process this past year.




Submitted 6-16-09                                                  e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls                                     Current Yr Recommendations
Program Improvement Recommendations Based on Assessment
      Program    Master of Science Career & Technical Education
   Department    Career and Technical Education
College/School   Community and Technical College
Academic Year    2009
  Assessment
   Coordinator   Sally Spieker


                                                             TABLE 6
                          PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON ASSESSMENT RESULTS: PREVIOUS YEARS

     Year                             Recommendation                          Outcome(s)     Rationale for the Recommendation   Resource Implications   Actions Taken

                 Left Blank




                                                            TABLE 7
                    ASSESSMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON ASSESSMENT RESULTS: PREVIOUS YEARS

     Year        Recommendation                                               Outcome(s)     Rationale for the Recommendation   Resource Implications   Actions Taken


                 Left Blank




Submitted 6-16-09                                                 e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls                                 Previous Yr Recommendations
                    Values by Tool               Year Average
                     Grade Table                  Grade Table
                     0         F                  A         4
                    0.3        F+                A-        3.7
                    0.7        D-                 B         3
                     1         D                 B-        2.7
                    1.3        D+                B+        3.3
                    1.7        C-                 C         2
                     2         C                 C-        1.7
                    2.3        C+                C+        2.3
                    2.7        B-                 D         1
                     3         B                 D-        0.7
                    3.3        B+                D+        1.3
                    3.7        A-                 F         0
                     4         A                 F+        0.3
                    NG                           NG




Submitted 6-16-09    e6c35567-bd76-4554-be8e-3260d83bed3d.xls    Grade Table

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: Assessment Career Change document sample