Implementing USP <797>
Facility, Equipment and Strategizing for USP <797> Compliance Budget Approval
Kate Douglass ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting June 13, 2005 #204-000-05-114-L04
Objectives
At the end of this session learners will be able to: list the critical information and steps to follow to design or retrofit a sterile compounding pharmacy complex list the factors influencing design discuss and employ strategies for gaining budget approval at their hospitals make design and equipment decisions relevant to their hospital
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 3
Start with an Overall Plan
Determine Risk Level Matrix for all CSPs Perform a GAP Analysis comparing USP <797> requirements to actual pharmacy practice and P/P Develop Action Plan Communicate results of GAP analysis and proposed Action Plan to pharmacy staff as well as administrators
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 4
Specific Physical Plant Requirements
Based on CSP Risk Level Matrix (RLM) and GAP Analysis, identify changes required to physical plant Identify alternatives to alter current matrix Present Proposed Physical Plant changes in a White Paper format (see handout) Include alternatives and why they were ruled out
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 5
Plan for Physical Plant Changes
White Paper (proposal) must present rationale for changes that address Regulatory and Accreditation considerations Quality impact focusing on patient safety and risk management (lessening potential for litigation) Fiscal impact: in terms of human resource efficiency; capital expenditures; return on investment Strategic/Tactical considerations that may present a competitive advantage Alternatives considered
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 6
Risk Level Matrix
Helps you determine your needs based on your hospital’s practice Allows consideration of alternatives
∆ products used ∆ compounding methodology Shift workload (from unit to pharmacy; pharmacy to satellite) outsource strategic products
Facility design criteria can not be established until you know what risk level CSPs require Facility Design Criteria fundamental to getting approval and driving design thru vendors
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 7
CSP Risk Level Matrix
CSP prepared in ISO Class 5
Cefazolin 1gm into Minibag TPN Morphine from powder for PCA “Snap togethers” Vial, adapter and diluent bag Bulk 10 gram vial Vancomycin distributed among 10 final doses
Low
1:1
Medium* High
1 : Many or Many : 1 Non sterile, TS, outside ISO Class 5
X X X X X
* Majority of hospital practice falls into Low/Medium Risk Level
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 8
Facility Design Criteria
See example in handouts Vendor selected should receive this and acknowledge in writing that their proposal will result in achievement of these functional criteria This document drives design and engineering meetings Based on Risk Level Matrix Must incorporate current and future offerings
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
9
Derived from CSP Risk Level Matrix
See full example in handouts provided
Drives design and engineering meetings
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 10
CSP Pharmacy Complex
There is no neat answer that defines facility consideration based on hospital size Considerations need to be based upon the CSP Risk Level Matrix Alterations may be made to that matrix Facilities are designed to meet the Risk Level and volume required of a particular organization
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 11
Factors influencing pharmacy design
Volume of overall CSPs Types of CSPs prepared Staffing patterns Dose recycling programs Current physical plant Other planned remodeling
June 13, 2005
Pharmaceutical care Existence of satellite pharmacies either on PCU or in specialty practices Current practices in organization Business environment: mergers/acquisitions
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
12
Wall and General Considerations
Epoxy coated gypsum board Interlocking panels made of cleanroom compatible materials Junction with floor to be coved and sealed.
No ledge or gaps or right angles that makes cleaning difficult
Avoid flat horizontal surfaces that can collect dust such as:
Sills Horizontal exposed piping or conduit Large door jams and window frames Avoid cabinets; use carts restocked 1-2 times daily with essential supplies only
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
13
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
14
Windows
Worth the extra dollars Generally want to see into ISO Class 7 space Ideally:
Aluminum jams and sill, aluminum frame Flush mounted (no sills) Sealed
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
15
Ceilings
Epoxy coated gypsum board Anodized aluminum T grid with Cleanroom ceiling tiles
Tiles to be caulked in place to facilitate service/replacement Smooth, non-porous tiles that stand up to disinfectants
Junction with walls to be coved or caulked
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 16
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
17
Floors
“Wide sheet vinyl flooring with heat-welded seams and coving to side walls”
Must stand up to continuous cleaning with disinfectant agents No gaps or crevices for microorganisms to accumulate and grow Ideally coving and/or caulking at the base of all permanently mounted fixtures to facilitate cleaning If building from scratch, suggest line/s of demarcation built into floor with different color vinyl
No floor drains
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 18
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
19
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
20
Gauges
Pressure differential from ISO Class 7 to non classed area should be ≥ .05 Measure clean room to gowning (anteroom) Gowning to Prep area Total must be ≥ .05 Recommend aiming for ≥ .08
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 21
Pass Throughs
How will you get components in? How will you get finished CSPs out? Staff need to understand use Wall mounted, Cart pass thru
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
22
Lighting
Lighting: flush, sealed, change bulb within room; emergency lighting
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
23
Sinks
Stainless Steel Hands free Wall mounted Eye Wash Unit
Integrated or as shown
Plumbing
Ideally a pump shroud cover should be developed to streamline cleaning
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
24
What about hand dryers?
Encouraged by some Issues with hand driers:
Additional equipment and installation cost Require frequent repair Takes too long to completely dry hands Staff end up taking lint free towels to finish drying so materials waste OR Staff put gloves on when hands not yet dry which increases risk of contamination
Recommendation: use knee valve and lint free wipes
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 25
Furniture
Furniture
Cleanroom grade Stainless Steel preferred Significant portion of budget; $8-16K Mobility Avoid placing against wall
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
26
Furniture
Should be constructed of smooth, impervious materials, such as stainless steel or molded plastic
Cleanable (plastic not as easy to clean) Avoid dead air spaces for particulates to build up
If carts used in a unidirectional space, consider wire shelving to reduce obstruction to airflow
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 27
Electrical/Data
Outlets are GCFI CAT 5 wiring Emergency backup
Dedicated circuits: telephones, lights, outlets, hoods, filters, refrigerator, freezer, computer, printer, etc.
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
28
Electrical/Data
Generator
Dedicated preferred Assess what hospital’s generator capacity is Load primarily from HVAC
ATS (automatic transfer switch) UPS for short term outage: computers, compounders, printers
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
29
Laminar Air Flow Work Benches and Hoods
Laminar Airflow Work Benches
Improved use of space Design critical
Returns unobstructed 100% HEPA coverage preferred to get Class 5 under operating conditions Place 3-4” from wall Lexan shields with stainless steel brackets
Smoke test validation? Lexan expensive
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
30
LAF Work benches
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
31
Traditional LAFH
Traditional LAFH
Reduces usable space Results in increased time and difficulty to properly perform weekly and monthly cleaning (walls and ceilings) Less custom design required
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
32
BSC or Negative Pressure Barrier Isolator
Required for NIOSH classified “Hazardous” drugs Antineoplastics, Ganciclovir, Oxytocin Venting to the outside ONLY required if drugs are volatile Volatility information on MSDS sheets
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 33
Barrier Isolators
Not a panacea; may be option for very small hospitals or hospitals with satellite pharmacies Unidirectional airflow model HEPA filtered transfer chamber Isotech, NuAire, Baker, and Germfree have unidirectional airflow and filtered transfer chambers Evidence is mounting that suggests placement needs to be in an ISO Class 8 or better unless manufacturer can demonstrate effectiveness of engineering controls in an unclassified environment
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 34
Refrigerator/Freezer
Refrigerator/freezer
NIST certification annually Alarm? Temperature recording or temperature scribe Types:
Walk in Vertical Pass Thru
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
35
HVAC
Dedicated unit preferred Tonnage determined by complex size Thermostat in cleanroom Temp preferred 68°F±4 Humidity controls Velocity: minimum at terminal height needs to average 90-100 fpm Smoke Testing validation?
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
36
Temperature/Humidity Monitoring
Can buy unit that comes with software so you can print out readings at specified intervals Allows you to look at room conditions at rest as well as during peak productions Decreases time to document Provides better data
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
37
Temperature/Humidity Monitoring
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
38
Communications
Telephone system
Minimize number of time persons come in and out of cleanroom Facilitate pharmacist supervision of technicians Phone needs to be cleaned per cleaning protocol
Music/Speakers
Institutional policy Recommend that music/speakers not be employed in clean room
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 39
Practical Cleanroom Design
Miscellaneous:
Sprinkler system: local code Fatigue mats: not appropriate for ISO Class 7 room due to difficulty cleaning Stools, if allowed, need to be stainless steel Ergonomic considerations in setting bench and hood heights
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
40
So what next?
Develop CSP Risk Level Matrix Determine if modifications may be in order Look at existing plant
What can be used (rooms, eqt, furniture) What is available space? What is current HVAC? What is current generator capacity?
Develop Facility Design Requirements
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 41
Strategies for Approval
Prepare a “White Paper” on the project Know what you need; Facility Design Criteria Put on business / finance hat Explain it in terms others can understand Get multiple bids from cleanroom vendors
Some have very good ideas They should come on site Will need to show multiple bids to finance
Explain differences between vendors
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 42
White Paper on Proposal
Regulatory requirements: USP, BOPs Accreditation Considerations: JCAHO Quality/Patient Safety/Risk Management
Insurance Underwriters have expressed concern Non compliance with USP puts hospital at risk May increase premiums or decline to cover if not in compliance with USP <797> and have defined CSP Risk Level Matrix
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 43
White Paper on Proposal
Business and Operational Requirements
Define issues specific to your institution and how solution will assist Define positive impact to other internal stakeholders
Strategic Competitive Advantage
How will this provide an advantage to gain greater market share
June 13, 2005
ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting
44
White Paper on Proposal
Capital Expenditure/Cost Summary
Summarize pertinent facts about the expenditure Provide vendor information Information on negotiated discounts (# dollars and %) Negotiated terms and projected $ outlay with dates so project can be fit into projected cash flow
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 45
White Paper on Proposal
Present alternatives considered
Present different vendor proposals as attachments Present other scenarios considered (even if you don’t agree with them) as others will ask and it is important to present an objective picture
Summary: relate back to essential rationale for the proposal and restate how it will create value for the organization
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 46
Project Management and Coordination
Assign ONE (1) person to oversee and orchestrate all vendors on behalf of the project plan steering committee Develop project plan that includes miscellaneous items not directly related to cleanroom vendor (ie; stainless steel) Clean room vendor will either hire own sub contractors or hospital can obtain contractors Establish firm dates for critical elements Suggest legally binding agreement that provides hospital with recourse for substandard work.
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 47
Summary
Securing organizational support for a clean room project requires understanding and communication of engineering, finance, marketing, operations, risk management and other facets beyond pharmacy practice. Design and development of adequate controlled compounding environments depends on:
Pharmacist determination of CSP Risk Level Matrix Organization specific Facility Design Requirements Careful planning and coordination
June 13, 2005 ASHP 2005 Summer Meeting 48