Michigan Law Statute of Limitations - Excel
W
Description
Michigan Law Statute of Limitations document sample
Document Sample


dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Casename
Pub_lawy
Certdeny
Pub_law
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
2 3 Rake v. Wade 508 US 464 1 Thomas 0 19930607 13 4 103-394 94
Pennsylvania Dep't of Public
3 17 Welfare v. Davenport 495 US 552 1 Marshall 0 19900529 1 13 1 101-647 90
4 40 Columbia Gas Systems, Inc. 33 F.3d 294 2 3rd Sloviter 1 19940829 11 4 103-394 94
Hillis Motors Inc. v. Hawaii Auto
5 39 Dealers Ass'n 997 F.2d 581 2 9th Reinhardt 0 19930628 11 1 105 98
6 20 Chabot 992 F.2d 891 2 9th Sneed 0 19930416 7 4 103-394 94
7 43 Dixon 885 F.2d 327 2 6th Krupansky 0 19890919 13 4 103-394 94
8 36 Liming 797 F.2d 895 2 10th Logan 1 19860729 998 1 103-394 94
9 37 Johnson 708 F.2d 865 2 2nd Per Curiam 19830519 13 1 98-353 84
10 16 Covey 650 F.2d 877 2 7th Sprecher 0 19810602 7 4 98-353 84
11 51 Durrett v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. 621 F.2d 20 2 5th Smith 0 19800711 11 1 98-353 84
12 4 New Valley Corp. 168 BR 73 5 N.J. Winfield 1 19940506 11 1 103-394 94
13 12 Hausladen 146 BR 557 5 Minn. Kressel 0 19920924 13 4 103-394 94
14 29 Richardson 102 BR 254 5 M.D. Fla Paskay 0 19890630 7 5 103-394 94
Pennsylvania Peer Review
15 55 Organization, Inc. 50 BR 640 5 M.D. Pa. Woodside 0 19850628 11 4 99-554 86
16 13 Lyons Mach. Co., Inc. 28 BR 600 5 ED. Ark. Fussell 0 19830404 11 4 103-394 94
17 49 Spirited, Inc. 23 BR 1004 5 E.D. PA. Twardowski 0 19821104 11 4 98-353 84
18 30 Wahl 14 BR 153 5 E.D. Wis Hilgendorf 0 19810918 7 1 98-353 84
Page 1
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
P Q R S T Y Z AA
Section1
Section2
Section3
Section4
Section5
Efficacy
Holding
Method
1
Oversecured home mortgage holder entitled to interest on arrearages,
including interest-on-interest not available under otherwise applicable
2 1123(b)(5) 1123(d) 1222(d) 1322(c) nonbankruptcy law. 1 3.2
Criminal restitution obligations dischargeable under Ch. 13, limiting Kelly v.
3 1328(a)(3) Robinson. 1 2
Bankruptcy estate cash must be invested in government securities or
4 345(b) insured deposit accounts absent posting of bond. 1 4
Regulatory acts to control property of estate not excepted from stay by
5 362(b)(4) §362(b)(4). 1 3.3
Judgment lien burdening future appreciation of homestead property does
6 522(f) not impair an exemption under §522(f). 1 2
Judicial lien does not impair homestead exemption limited to protecting
7 522(f) property from involuntary debt collection. 1 4
8 522(f)(3) Non purchase money lien in tractor avoidable without regard to value. 1 3.1
Permits successive Ch. 13 filings notwithstanding failure to appear in first
9 109(g) case & <180 days between dismissal & refiling. 1 2
10 303(b) Creditors holding disputed claims may join in involuntary petition. 1 4
11 101(54) Real estate foreclosure sale avoidable as constructive fraud. 1 1
Unimpaired claims against solvent estate not entitled to post-petition
12 1124(3) deleted interest. 1 3.2
13 J02(b)(4) 726(a) Tardily filed claims allowed. 1 4
Reaffirmation hearing required even if attorney files declaration in conformity
14 524(c) 524(d) with §524(c). 1 4
Personal services contract may not be assumed by debtor in possession
15 365(c)(1)(A) absent nondebtor party's consent. 1 2
16 503(b)(3)(F) Creditors committee members not entitled to expense reimbursement. 1 3.2
Retained shareholders interest are deemed to reject because plan does not
17 1126(g) provide "payment or compensation." 1 4
Each knife, fork and spoon in sterling silver set is an item individually subject
18 522(d)(3) to $200 limit without aggregate limit. 1 4
Page 2
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
Comments AB
1
2 Addition of §1123(d) draws into question allowance of post-petition interest on unimpaired claims.
3 Dissent by Blackmun. Re-amended 1994 to exclude fines from superdischarge.
4
Other contra authority Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n, 132 F.3d 591 (10th 1997); Javens, 107 F.3d
5 359 (6th 1997). Overturned by Chemical Weapons Convention §603 (Oct. 22, 1998).
See §303 Sec-by-Sec. Descrip. See Silviera, 141 F.3d 34 (1998) on efficacy of overruling;
6 Gonzalez, 149 B.R. 9 (Bankr. D. Mass 1993).
7
8 See criticism in Ehlen, 202 BR 742 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1996).
See NBRC Rep. discussion of serial Ch. 13 filing problem & recommendation for additional
9 restrictions.
10
Botched overruling recounted in Souter dissent in BFP v. Resolution Trust Co., 511 U.S. 531 (1994).
11 Case arose under Ch. XI of 1898 Act.
12
13 This case decided en banc by bankruptcy court D. Minn. See Sec. by Sec Descrip. §213.
In the ordinary case the hearing requirement would operate to protect debtor, but in the court finds
14 the debtor in this case estoppel.
15
16 Now unclear whether attorneys fees of creditors on committee reimbursable.
17 Link to Marston Enterprises, 13 BR 514.
18
Page 3
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Casename
Pub_lawy
Certdeny
Pub_law
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
19 50 Marston Enterprises 13 BR 514 5 E.D. NY Duberstein 0 19810511 11 4 98-353 84
20 56 Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc. 12 BR 977 5 N.D. Ga. Norton 0 19800815 11 4 98-353 84
United Savings Association v.
21 2 Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc. 484 US 365 1 Scalia 0 19880120 11 1 103-394 94
22 57 Vecchio 20 F.3d 555 2 2nd Walker 0 19940405 7 4 103-394 94
23 44 DeSeno 17 F.3d 642 2 3rd Roth 1 19940215 11 1 103-394 94
24 35 Rosteck 899 F.2d 694 2 7th Manion 0 19900413 7 1 103-394 94
25 46 Parr Meadows Racing Ass'n, Inc. 880 F.2d 1540 90 2 2nd Pratt 0 19890724 7 4 103-394 94
Levit v. Ingersoll Rand Financial
26 8 Corp. 874 F2d 1186 2 7th Easterbrook 0 19890512 7 2 103-394 94
27 32 Goldrich 771 F.2d 28 2 2nd Meskill 0 19850827 7 4 103-394 94
Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co. v.
28 26 PBGC 39 BR 974 4 N.D. Ohio Krenzler 0 19830913 11 1 103-394 94
29 10 Ionosphere Clubs, Inc. 112 BR 89 5 SDNY Lifland 0 19900402 11 1 103-394 94
S.D.
30 22 Continental Airline Corp. 57 BR 854 5 Texas Roberts 0 19850812 11 1 103-394 94
31 9 Broadcast Management Corp. 36 BR 519 5 S.D. Ohio Newsome 0 19831027 11 5 98-353 84
S.D.
32 14 Sombrero Reef Club, Inc. 18 BR 612 5 Florida Gassen 0 19820324 11 1 98-353 84
33 7 United States v. Nordic Village, Inc. 503 US 30 1 Scalia 0 19920225 1 11 4 103-394 94
Page 4
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
P Q R S T Y Z AA
Section1
Section2
Section3
Section4
Section5
Efficacy
Holding
Method
1
Presumed acceptance of plan is rebuttable if majority of unimpaired class
19 1126(f) vote to reject plan. 1 4
Personal services contract may not be assumed by debtor-in-possession
20 365(c)(1)(A) without non debtor party's consent. 1 2
No post-petition adequate protection payments to undersecured creditor
21 101(51b) 362(d)(3) based on use value of collateral. Overrules American Mariner (9th Cir.). 2 3.1
Late filed priority claims retain priority status subject to equitable discretion
22 502(b)(9) 723(a)(1) of bankruptcy court not to compel disgorgement. 2 4
Permits modification of home mtg under Ch.11 plan. Roach prohibits cure
23 1123(b)(5) after foreclosure judgment entered. 2 4
24 523(a)(16) Post-petition condo assessments dischargeable. 2 3.1
25 362(b)(18) Post petition tax liens void under §362(a). 2 4
Creditor holding insider guarantee subject to extended preference period as
26 550(c) the initial transferee of insider preference. 2 3.1
State agency may deny student loan application based on prior bankruptcy
27 525(c) discharge of other loans. 2 3.1
PBGC not a person and therefore ineligible to serve on creditors
28 101 committees. 2 3.2
Secondary holding appears to be that trustee holding security interest on
29 1110(a)(3) behalf of another not protected by §1110. 2 4
30 1110 Section 1110 does not protect non-purchase money security interest. 2 4
Creditor's Committee counsel may not represent individual creditor in same
31 1103(b) proceeding. 2 3.1
Time share contracts may be rejected and time share owner divested of
32 365(h) right to use premises. 2 3.1
33 106 Federal government immune from suit for affirmative monetary recovery. 3 4
Page 5
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
Comments AB
1
Separate holding (that §1129(a)(10) requires one class of impaired claims to accept plan) codified
19 by Pub. L. 98-353 amendment to §1129(a)(10)). Link to Spirited Inc. 123 BR 1004.
20
Overruled only as to cases less than or equal to $2 million. This result seems unstable. Not clear
21 how many cases resolved under new (d)(3).
22 Result partly codified, partly overturned by 1994 amendment.
23 §-by-§ Description §206. No apparent basis in statute for a contary result, given Toibb v. Radloff.
Compare Rosenfeld, 23 F.3d 833 (4th Cir. 1994). Not clear whether post-pet. assessments not
24 based on physical occupancy governed by Rosenfeld or Rosteck.
Bizarrely post-petition interest on pre-petition tax claims is a valid lien, but not post-petition taxes.
The interest holding is compelled by Ron Pair Enterprises, 109 S. Ct. 1026 (1989). Purported
25 nontextual policy analysis is very weak.
26 See Tabb at 368-369 on efficacy of overruling.
Scope of nondiscrimination policy remains unclear. See Toth v. Michigan State Housing
27 Development Authority, 136 F.3d 477 (6th Cir. 1998).
28 69 Am Bankr. L.J. 349 (1995) 1351-353.
29
This seems a policy change. Doubtful that there was any basis before amdt. to bring non-PMSI
30 within statute. Link to IONOSPHERE CLUBS, INC. 112 B.R. 78 (same issue).
31 Compare substance over form approach of Lion Group, 44 BR 684.
32 See Sen. R. 98-345 pp. 5-7. §§402-403 of 1984 Act.
Dissent by Stevens +1. Odd form of nontextual interpretation in judicially crafted unmistakeably
33 clear rule.
Page 6
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Casename
Pub_lawy
Certdeny
Pub_law
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
34 24 First Nat'l Fidelity Corp. v. Perry 945 F.2d 61 2 3rd Stapleton 0 19910911 13 4 103-394 94
35 33 Lugo v. Paulsen 886 F.2d 602 2 3rd Scirica 0 19890928 7 4 101-647 90
36 54 Gusam Restaurant Corp. 737 F.2d 274 2 2nd Pierce 0 19840618 11 1 99-554 86
37 53 Foster 670 F.2d 478 2 5th Randall 1 19820301 13 2 99-554 86
38 41 Cannady 653 F.2d 210 2 5th (A) Randall 1 19810810 7 1 98-353 84
39 59 Korvettes 67 BR 730 4 S.D.N.Y. Haight 0 19861126 11 1 103-394 94
40 47 Carlton Restaurant, Inc. 151 BR 353 5 E.D. PA Scholl 0 19930224 7 5 103-394 94
41 5 Young 152 BR 939 4 Minn. MacLaughlin 0 19930414 7 2 105-183 98
Connec-
42 38 City of Bridgeport 128 BR 688 5 ticut Shiff 0 19910722 9 1 103-394 94
43 52 Baldwin-United Corp. 38 BR 802 5 S.D. Ohio Newsome 0 19840229 11 5 98-353 84
Page 7
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
P Q R S T Y Z AA
Section1
Section2
Section3
Section4
Section5
Efficacy
Holding
Method
1
Ch. 13 debtor may not restructure home mortgage debt over life of Ch. 13
34 1322(c)(2) plan even if balance becomes due during plan period. (balloon mtg) 3 3.2
35 523(a)(9) Insurance surcharge on account of drunk driving not dischargeable. 3 4
36 105(a) Court lacks power to sua sponte convert Ch. 11 case to Ch. 7. 3 3.1
When a debtor chooses to disburse mortgage payments directly to a
mortgagee rather than through the trustee, trustee's percentage fee should
still apply to those payments, although it may be reduced in discretion of
37 1302(e) court. 3 3.1
38 522(b) §302 Spouses may separately elect state & federal exemptions. 3 4
Debtor in possession not subject to two year statute of limitations under
39 546(a) §546(a). 3 4
Tenant may hold premises under rejected lease terms only by remaining in
40 365(h)(2) physical possession. 3 3.1
41 544(b) 548(a)(2) 548(d) 1325(b)(2)(A) 707(b) Titles voidable under §548 as constructively fraudulent. 3 3.2
Express state authorization for municipal corporation to file under Chap. 9
42 109(c)(2) not required. 3 4
101(41)
43 ("person") FDIC may not sit on Creditors Committee. 3 3.1
Page 8
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
Comments AB
1
Relies heavily on Roach Sec by Sec Description §301 See also Seidel, 752 F.2d 1382. Unintended
34 consequence for Nobelman. See Tabb, Law of Bankruptcy 943 (1997).
35 Redundantly overruled by P.L. 101-581 & P.L. 101-647. Looks like they finally got it right!
3. W. Norton, Norton Bankr. L. & Prac. 2d §79.2. Subsequent case law suggests this power should
be exercised with great caution. It appears to be infrequently exercised §203 of 1986 Act. See
36 criticism of amdt. in Collier.
§1302(e) was deleted and replaced by 28 U.S.C. 586(e)(2). Overruled by statute per 8 Collier's
1302.05. NBRC Rep - suggests overruling the overruling because case law outside 5th Circuit is
37 not consistent. NBRC Report p. 44-1009 et seq. (Oct. 20, 1997).
38 Senate Rep. notes statutory glitch & objects to it but provision passed anyway. §306(a) & BAFJA.
3 courts of appeal rejected this interpretation before the 1994 Amendment. Century Brass, 22 F.3d
37 (2nd Cir. 1994); Softwaire Centre, 994 F.2d 682 (9th Cir. 1993); Zilka Energy, 920 F.2d 1520
(10th Cir. 1990). Korrettes discussed as "leading case" by Pullman Constr., 132 BR 359 (Bankr.
39 N.D.Ill. 1991) and Century Brass , supra.
Still not dealing with the underlying Andrews/Westbrook issue. See also Harborview Dev. 1986 Ltd.
Partnership, 152 B.R. 897 (D.S.C. 1993) & Arden & Howe Assoc., Ltd., 152 B.R. 971 (E.D. Cal.
1993) Sec. By Sec. Descrip. §205 (1994). Posture a bit unusual here. Debtor & Bankruptcy
Trustee of tenant assert rights to assign previously rejected lease under §365(f) & (h). Reorganized
landlord opposes. Ruling actually advantages debtors in most case by limiting §365(h) rights,
40 although debtor here loses.
Subseq. History: aff'd 152 BR 939 (D. Minn. 1993) RFRA passed 1993, 42 USC §2000bb. Rev'd 82
F.3d 1407 (8th Cir. 1996). RFRA declared unconstitutional City of Boerne v. Flores, 117 S. Ct. 2157
(1997). See Shihula, 234 BR 240 (Bankr. DRI 1999) illustrating possible abuse of amended code
41 provisions).
Given paucity of cases under Ch. 9 unclear whether overruling will create new litigable issues.
Orange County Investment Pool not authorized, 183 BR 594 (C.D. Cal. 1995). 12 states have
42 specifically authorized municipal findings NBRC Rep. reprinted in Colliers 44-980 n.2431.
Klee & Shaffer, 44 So. Car. L. Rev. 995, 1006 (1993). Creditors' Committee prevailed over an
43 individual creditor (FDIC). Subsequent amendment required re:PBGC.
Page 9
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Casename
Pub_lawy
Certdeny
Pub_law
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
44 34 Kuepper 36 BR 680 5 E.D. Wis. Shapiro 0 19831203 7 1 98-353 84
45 58 Williams 9 BR 228 5 D. Kan. Pusateri 0 19810220 7 1 98-353 84
Hoffman v. Connecticut Dep't of
46 6 Income Maintenance 492 US 96 1 White 0 19890623 2 1 7 4 103-394 94
47 21 NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco 465 US 513 1 Rehnquist 0 19840222 1 11 1 98-353 84
Sullivan v. Town & Country Nursing
48 25 Home Svcs., Inc. 963 F.2d 1146 2 9th Godwin 0 19920505 11 1 103-394 94
49 11 Roach 824 F.2d 1370 2 3rd Stapleton 0 19870731 13 4 103-394 94
50 19 Butner v. U.S. 440 US 48 1 Stevens 0 19790221 11 2 103-394 94
51 15 Lybrook 951 F.2d 136 2 7th Posner 0 19911218 7 2 103-394 94
52 42 Simonson 758 F.2d 103 2 3rd Gibbons 0 19850325 1 7 4 103-394 94
53 60 AFCO Development Corp. 65 BR 781 5 Utah Clark 0 19860822 7 2 103-394 94
Lubrizol Enterprises v. Richmond
54 45 Metal Finishers 756 F.2d 1043 86 2 4th Phillips 0 19850315 11 1 100-506 88
Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport
55 48 Board v. Braniff Airways 26 BR 628 4 N.D. TX Mahon 0 19821217 11 1 102-365 92
Page 10
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
P Q R S T Y Z AA
Section1
Section2
Section3
Section4
Section5
Efficacy
Holding
Method
1
44 523(a)(9) Drunk driving damage claim dischargeable. 3 3.1
45 524(a)(2) Liens do not survive discharge under §524(a). 3 4
Congress failed to abrogate state sovereign immunity with unmistakeably
46 106 clear statutory language. 4 1
Collective bargaining agreement may be rejected based upon balance of the
47 1113 equities, after reasonable efforts to negotiate a modification have failed. 4 4
Section 106(a) same transaction implied waiver applies when U.S. recoups
48 106(b) overpayments without filing proof of claim. 4 4
Ch. 13 debtor may not cure and reinstate home mortgage during post-sale
statutory redemption period. No cure possible after foreclosure judgment
49 1322(c)(1) entered. 4 3.1
50 552(b) Mortgagee's security interest in rents determined by state law. 5 3.1
Property acquired during Ch. 13 case remains property of estate after
51 348(f) conversion to Ch. 7. 5 4
Intervening judicial lien not avoidable if exemption property overencumbered
52 522(f)(2) by nonavoidable consensual liens. 5 4
Statute of limitations runs from the appointment of each successive
53 546(a) bankruptcy trustee. 5 4
101(35A),
54 365(n) (39) Licensee's rights under rejected license avoided. 7 3.1
Debtor is not required to accept or reject leases for airport facilities within a
55 365(d)(5-9) specified period of time from when bankruptcy petition was filed. 7 3
Page 11
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
Comments AB
1
This interpretation of 523(a)(6) generally upheld by Sup. Ct. under Kawaahaa v. Geiger, but new
exception for drunk driving has grown since 1984. See e.g. 101-647 & 103-394. Cases contra
44 include Galvan, 39 BR 663 (D. Colo. 1984); Wooten, 30 BR 357 (N.D. Ala. 1983).
45 Criticized 811 F.2d 186; 804 F.2d 577; 970 F.2d 299; 765 F.2d 547
WHITE opinion 4 person plurality; O'Connor concurs; Scalia concurs in judgment. Marshall +3
46 dissent. Attempt to overrule unconstitutional under Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996).
Brennan +3 dissent. Textualist as to whether CBA is subject to §365. Nontextualist as to standard
for approving rejection. Brennan dissent limited to unfair labor practice issue. One oversight was
failure to consider possibility of rejection of collective bargaining agreement under Ch. 9 (Orange
47 County).
48 Statutory fix unsettled by Seminole Tribe.
See Sec. by Sec. Descrip. §301. Unclear how post-foreclosure sale redemption rights affected by
49 amendment.
50 Case decided under 1898 Act.
51 Case converted from 13 to 7. See §311, Sec. by Sec. Descrip.
Dissent & majority agree statutory text cannot resolve case. Differ on appropriate policy analysis.
52 1994 Act adopts dissent's view.
53 Rejected by Lyons, 130 BR 272 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 1991). This case was converted from Ch.11.
Larger issue of general effect of rejection in other cases (e.g., personal property leases) left
unresolved. NBRC recommends further clarifying amendments. Difficult to classify reasoning in
this case. Policy arguments offered by Lubrizol are not given any weight. But the opinion seems
driven by an underlying assumption that rejection implies avoiding Lubrizol's right. The basis for this
54 assumption is not clear. Close to ipse dixit.
At this time 365(d)(2) was not restricted to residential real property or personal property (was so
amended in 1984). Long time between decision and overruling; amendment only applied to cases
for 12 months beginning 9/3/92. Per Congressional floor statements, motivated by pending TWA
55 situation. Note this seems like special interest legislation.
Page 12
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Casename
Pub_lawy
Certdeny
Pub_law
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
56 31 Bogosian 112 BR 2 5 R.I. Votolato 0 19900308 11 1 103-394 94
57 18 Ashkenazy Enterprises, Inc. 94 BR 645 5 C.D. Cal. Ashland 0 19860523 11 1 103-394 94
58 61 Murray 5 BR 732 5 Md. Goldburn 0 19800903 7 2 98-353 84
59 28 Utter 3 BR 369 5 WDNY Hayes 0 19800415 13 4 98-353 84
Page 13
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
P Q R S T Y Z AA
Section1
Section2
Section3
Section4
Section5
Efficacy
Holding
Method
1
Bankruptcy Rule 4001(a)(2) time limits not enforceable in lift stay
56 362(e) proceeding. 7 3.1
57 552(b) Hotel revenues are not real property rents under §552(b). 7 3.1
No good faith defense for purchaser of lands located within county of
58 549(c) bankruptcy case under 549(c). 7 4
Separate classification of co-debtor obligations not permitted under Ch. 13
59 1322(b)(1) plan. 7 3.1
Page 14
dae7ad30-82b3-4fa4-87ec-8ea61167f0af.xls, "O" Group
Comments AB
1
"Compelling circumstances" will justify extension under new statute. Unclear whether this will result
in a substantive change. In refusing to apply BR 4001 court cites Roberts, 68 BR 1004 (Bankr. E.D.
56 Mich. 1987). No policy or textual analysis apparent on face of opinion.
Superseded by statute as stated in Hotel Sierra Vista CTQ Ptnrshp., 112 F.3Q 429 (9th Cir. 1997).
57 Reasoning very conclusory.
See also Mongiore, 9 BR 34 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1980). Centre de Tricot de Gaspe, 782 F.2d 905 (11th
58 Cir. 1986) Conclusory reasoning
Relies on persuasive precendent. Still great uncertainty about ability to separately classify in Ch. 13.
59 Link to MONTANO, 4 BR 535 (same issue).
Page 15
Control Grp.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Casename
Cert.Den.
Certdeny
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
Merchants Grain,
2 19 Inc. 93 F.3d 1347 519 U.S. 1111 97 2 7th Manion 0 19970827 11 4
DP Partners Ltd
3 3 Partnership 106 F.3d 667 118 S. Ct. 63 97 2 5th Politz 0 19970228 11 4
4 52 Bibo, Inc. 76 F.3d 256 519 U.S. 817 96 2 9th Kleinfeld 0 19960124 11 4
5 48 Levy 951 F.2d 196 504 U.S. 985 92 2 9th Fletcher 1 19911206 7 1
The Mansfield
6 10 Tire & Rubber Co. 942 F.2d 1055 502 U.S. 1092 92 2 6th Kennedy 1 19910828 11 4
7 24 Frieouf 938 F.2d 1099 502 U.S. 1091 92 2 10th Seth 0 19910710 11 1
Colony Square
8 20 Co. 779 F.2d 653 2 11th Per Curiam 19860110 11 4
9 13 Lovitt 757 F.2d 1035 474 U.S. 849 85 2 9th Alarcon 0 19850409 7 4
Rodrock v.
Security Industrial
10 40 Bank 642 F.2d 1193 2 10th McWilliams 0 19810302 7,13 4
Lady H Coal Co.,
11 38 Inc. 99 F.3d 573 520 U.S. 1118 97 2 4th Murnaghan 0 19961029 11 1
12 15 Taffi 96 F.3d 1190 521 U.S. 1103 97 2 9th Noonan 0 19960917 11 4
Meredith Hoffman
13 28 Partners 12 F.3d 1549 512 U.S. 1206 94 2 10th Anderson 0 19931228 7 2
14 44 Hucke v. Oregon 992 F.2d 950 510 U.S. 862 93 2 9th Nelson, T 0 19930505 13 4
15 14 Wade 991 F.2d 402 510 U.S. 870 93 2 7th Cudahy 0 19920519 7 2
De Laurentiis
Entertainment
16 47 Group, Inc. 963 F.2d 1269 U.S. 918 506 92 2 9th Nelson 1 19920507 11 4
Page 16
Control Grp.
O P
Holding
Method
1
statutory liens not avoidable under §545 if lien affixed at time debtors
2 obtains interest in property 1
claimant seeking fees and expenses under 503(b)(3) and (4) need not
3 provide advance notice 1
4 sua sponte appt. of trustee authorized by §105(a) 1
5 punitive damages for fraud dischargeable 1
excise tax on withholding entitled to priority notwithstanding punitive
6 nature and not subject to subordination 1
bankruptcy court lacks authority to prohibit future filings upon dismissal
7 of pending case 2
automatic stay in subsequent Chapter 11 case doesn't bar bankruptcy
court with retained jurisdiction over confirmed Ch. XII plan from
8 transferring title under terms of defaulted plan 2
9 unscheduled leases deemed rejected by operation of law after 60 days 2
retroactive application of substantive 522(f) avoiding power required by
10 statute but prohibited by Fifth Amendment 2
section 363(f)(5) authorizes sale free & clear of obligations under Coal
11 Act to Miners Pension & Benefit funds 3
12 collateral retained under plan valued at f.m.v. to debtor 3
"ordinary business terms" requirement of §547(c)(2) refers to what is
ordinary in normal financial relations not what is ordinary for distressed
13 debtors 3
revocation of probation on account of debtor's attempt to modify
14 criminal restitution obligation does not violate automatic stay 3
15 court may not close case until trustee files final report 3
16 set off rights survive §1141 discharge 3
Page 17
Control Grp.
Comments Q
1
2 Purports to rely on Farrey v. Sanderfoot 500 U.S. 291 (1991).
3
Statute seems to expressly provide for sua sponte actions by court, based on 1986
4 Amdt.
5 Overruled by de la Cruz v. Cohen, 118 S. Ct. 1212 (1998).
Result affirmed by US Sup. Ct. in US v. Noland, 517 US 535 (1996). Prevailing party
6 was U.S.
7
8
Case decided under 1898 Act predecessor statute to §365(d). Relies heavily on
9 Tonry, 724 F.2d 467.
Cert granted & reported at 459 U.S. 70(1982). Tenth Circuit reversed on statutory
construction point to avoid constitutional issue. Supreme Court decision is
10 nontextualist. Various cases raising retroactivity issue consolidated for appeal.
11
12 En banc decision. Result affirmed in Rash, 117 S. Ct. 1879 (1997).
13 Second half of opinion is a reaffirmation of Robinson Bros. adopting Deprizio rule.
14
15 Appeal dismissed as untimely. Confused reasoning.
16
Page 18
Control Grp.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Casename
Cert.Den.
Certdeny
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
17 26 Looney 823 F.2d 788 484 U.S. 977 87 2 4th Ervin 0 19870714 11 4
Cash Currency
18 39 Exchange 762 F.2d 542 2 7th Wood 0 19850521 11 1
19 5 Ohio v. Kovacs 717 F.2d 984 469 U.S. 274 85 2 6th Wellford 0 19830922 7 1
Southern States
20 8 Motor Inns, Inc. 709 F.2d 647 465 U.S. 1022 84 2 11th Anderson 0 19830711 11 4
21 21 Cohen v. Cruz 106 F.3d 52 521 U.S. 1152 97 2 3rd Hillman 0 19970206 1 7 4
HUD v. Cost
Control Marketing
& Sales Mngmt of
22 49 Va. 64 F.3d 920 517 U.S. 1187 96 2 4th Hall, K.K. 0 19950908 7 4
Checkers Drive-In
Restaurants v.
23 32 Comm'r. 51 F.3d 1078 516 U.S. 866 95 2 DC Edwards 0 19950421 11 4
T-H New Orleans
24 45 Ltd Partnership 10 F.3d 1099 511 U.S. 1083 94 2 5th DeMoss 0 19931217 11 4
Bonner Mall
25 11 Partnership 2 F.3d 899 510 U.S. 1039 94 2 9th Reinhardt 0 19930804 11 1
26 12 Besing 981 F.2d 1488 510 U.S. 821 93 2 5th King 1 19930204 1 11 4
27 54 Laguna 944 F.2d 542 503 U.S. 966 92 2 9th Leavy 0 19910911 13 1
28 41 Atchison 925 F.2d 209 502 U.S. 860 91 2 7th Will 0 19910215 7 1
29 7 Snow 899 F.2d 337 500 U.S. 952 91 2 4th Widener 0 19900403 7 1
Royal Composing
30 30 Room, Inc. 848 F.2d 345 489 U.S. 1078 89 2 2nd Pratt 0 19880527 1 11 1
Page 19
Control Grp.
O P
Holding
Method
1
bankruptcy judge may not sua sponte continue stay pending final
17 hearing under §362(e) 3
18 currency exchange not prohibited from filing under Ch. 11 as a bank 3
19 Ohio injunction constitutes "claim" under §101(4) 3
tax claims restructured under §1129(a)(9)(c) entitled to market interest
20 rate 3
21 punitive damages based on fraud not dischargeable 4
administrative disgorgement order measured by harm
22 nondischargeable under §523(a)(7) 4
automatic stay does not bar non-debtor from filing affidavit in support of
23 continuation of pre-existing service mark subject to dispute with debtor 4
24 hotel revenues are rents subject to mortgagee's interest under §552(b) 4
new value exception survives enactment of bankruptcy code in its
25 traditional form 4
adjudication of debtor's pre-petition cause of action a transfer, but
26 conclusively presumed to be for reasonably equivalent value 4
Ch. 13 plan curing home mortgage defaults need not provide post-
27 petition interest on arrearages 4
debtor's pre-petition disclaimer of inheritance not voidable as fraudulent
28 transfer 4
29 valid judicial lien impairs exemption and may be avoided under 522(f) 4
necessity under §1113 determined by reference to management's
30 proposal in toto, in light of union's refusal to bargain 4
Page 20
Control Grp.
Comments Q
1
17
18
19 See Ohio v. Koracs, 469 US 274 (1985) (earlier proceeding).
20
21 Aff'd 118 S. Ct. 1212. Dissent by Greenberg.
22 Kelly v. Robinson, 479 US 36 (1987), key authority
23
24 Result codified by 1994 Amendments.
25 Overruled by 203 N. LaSalle St., 119 S. Ct. 1411 (1999).
26 Garza concurs on ground of no "transfer." Anticipates Scalia decision in BFP.
Overruled by Rake v. Wade, 508 US 464 (1993) which in turn overruled by P.L. 103-
27 (1994).
28
29 This case anticipates Owen v. Owen with far less reliance on text.
Spirited dissent by Feinberg relies heavily on legislative history of §1113. Decision
30 relies heavily on Carey Transportation, 816 F.2d 82 (2nd Civ. 1987).
Page 21
Control Grp.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Casename
Cert.Den.
Certdeny
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
31 16 Waldron 785 F.2d 936 478 U.S. 1028 86 2 11th Per Curiam 19860401 13 4
Circle K 118 S. Ct.
32 37 Corporation 127 F.3d 904 1166 98 2 9th Canby 0 19971022 1 11 1
33 56 Boodrow 126 F.3d 43 522 U.S. 1117 98 2 2nd Feinberg 0 19970912 1 7 1
34 2 Gendreau 122 F.3d 815 523 U.S. 1005 98 2 9th Choy 0 19970815 7 4
35 22 Barakat 99 F.3d 1520 520 U.S. 1143 97 2 9th Restani 1 19961112 11 4
36 6 Prince 85 F.3d 314 519 U.S. 1040 96 2 7th Kanne 0 19960531 11 4
M&L Business
37 42 Mach. Co., Inc. 84 F.3d 1330 519 U.S. 1040 96 2 10th Henry 0 19960529 7 4
Terry Ltd
38 51 Partnership 27 F.3d 241 513 U.S. 948 94 2 7th Bauer 0 19940610 11 4
BFP v. Resolution
39 18 Trust Corp. 974 F.2d 1144 508 U.S. 938 93 2 9th Sneed 0 19940523 11 4
Boston Post Road
40 34 Ltd Partnership 21 F.3d 477 513 U.S. 1109 95 2 2nd Pollack 0 19940330 11 4
Pengo Industries,
41 46 Inc. 962 F.2d 543 506 U.S. 1000 92 2 5th Goldberg 0 19921130 11 4
42 35 Antweil 931 F.2d 689 502 U.S. 807 91 2 10th McKay 0 19910430 11 2
43 25 Johnson 904 F.2d 563 498 U.S. 1066 91 2 10th Brorby 0 19900607 13 4
44 53 Owen 877 F.2d 44 495 U.S. 929 90 2 11th Roney 0 19890711 7 4
Page 22
Control Grp.
O P
Holding
Method
1
Ch. 13 case filed solely to reject option agreement dismissed as bad
31 faith under §1325 4
32 debtor may renew defaulted leases without assuming them under §365 5
Chapter 7 debtor may retain collateral without reaffirming, redeeming or
33 surrendering by remaining current on its payments 5
spouse's right to equitable division of accrued pension benefit upon
divorce is not a dischargeable debt against ex-husband but a property
34 interest in pension 5
disallows separate classification of deficiency claim and funds tenant
35 deposit claims under assumed leases to be non-voting admin claims 5
orthodontist's practice's goodwill not excluded from estate under
36 §541(a)(6) 5
37 good faith for purposes of §548(c) is tested objectively not subjectively 5
38 senior mortgage may accrue interest at default rate under 506(b) 5
regularly conducted state foreclosure sale not avoidable as fraudulent
39 transfer under §548(a)(2) 5
separate classification of deficiency claim in single-asset case not
40 permitted 5
debt for debt face value exchange offer involving zero-coupon bonds
41 does not result in reduced claim on account of original issue discount 5
42 date of transfer is the honor of a check, not its delivery to payee 5
43 Chapter 20 plans forbidden 5
judgment lien valid against Florida homestead under Florida law not
44 avoidable under §522(f) 5
Page 23
Control Grp.
Comments Q
1
31 Cert. Dismissed.
32 Rymer dissents in part.
33 Shadur dissent emphasizes "plain meaning."
No real text to go on here since §541 does not define "property." Result codified by
34 §523(a)(15)(1994).
35 Heavy reliance of Greystone III, 995 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1991).
36
37 Text is of little assistance here, even to a textualist.
Reasoning based on post Ron-Pair consensus in bankruptcy decisions that
38 appropriate §506(b) interest rate rebuttably presumed to be contractual rate.
Cert. Granted and decision affirmed, 511 U.S. 531 (1994) overruling Durrett, 621 F.2d
39 201 (5th Cir. 1980).
40
41
42 Affirmed sub nom. Barnhill v. Johnson, 503 U.S. 393(1992).
43 Reversed, 501 U.S. 78 (1991).
44 Reversed by Supreme Court Owen v. Owen, 500 U.S. 305 (1990).
Page 24
Control Grp.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Casename
Cert.Den.
Certdeny
Chapter
Citation
Dissent
Gender
Concur
District
Debtor
Judge
Court
Index
Date
1
45 43 Begier v. IRS 878 F.2d 762 493 U.S. 1017 90 2 3rd Scirica 0 19890630 7 4
AH Robins Co.,
46 4 Inc. 828 F.2d 1023 485 U.S. 969 88 2 4th Russell 0 19870909 11 1
Ron Pair
47 50 Enterprises, Inc. 828 F.2d 367 485 U.S. 958 88 2 6th Contie 0 19870904 11 1
48 9 Armstrong 812 F.2d 1024 484 U.S. 925 87 2 7th Campbell 0 19870209 1 11 4
A.H. Robins Co.,
49 36 Inc. v. Piccinin 7788 F.2d 994 479 U.S. 876 86 2 4th Russell 0 19860410 11 1
North American
Coin & Currency,
50 31 Ltd. 767 F.2d 1573 475 U.S. 1083 86 2 9th Canby 0 19850806 11 1
Brentwood
51 55 Outpatient, Ltd. 43 F.3d 256 514 U.S. 1096 2 6th Merritt 0 19941213 11 1
52 27 Ashe 712 F.2d 864 465 U.S. 1024 84 2 3rd Gibbons 0 19830708 1 7 1
53 29 Fobian 951 F.2d 1149 505 U.S. 1220 92 2 9th Fletcher 1 19911224 12 4
Page 25
Control Grp.
O P
Holding
Method
1
payment of withholding taxes from non-segregated funds within
45 preference period not avoidable 5
46 action against non-debtor stayed under §§105(a), 362(a) 5
47 involuntary liens do not accrue interest under §506(b) 5
sale of farm machinery produces farming income, but not lease of farm
48 land 5
49 actions against non-debtor management and insurer properly stayed 5
property subject to constructive trust under Arizona law is nevertheless
50 treated as property of the estate subject to all creditor claims 5
51 tax lien does not secure post petition penalties fees & charges 6
retroactive avoidance of judicial liens under §522(f)(1) permitted,
Security Industrial notwithstanding citing Chicago Burlington & Quincy
52 RR v. Hall, 229 U.S. 511 (1913) 6
court refuses to find undersecured creditor's claim satisfied by
abandonment of collateral under 1225(a)(5)(c). Deficiency survives
53 abandonment absent a mechanism in plan for redetermination 7
Page 26
Control Grp.
Comments Q
1
Affirmed by Supreme Court, 496 U.S. 53 (1990). Scalia railing about reliance on
45 legislative history by majority.
46 Related case Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994 (4th 1986).
Reversed by that textualist classic, US v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 US
47 235(1989).
Concurring in part/dissenting in part opinion by Cudahy. Cudahy would consider rents
48 from farm land. "farm income" on a case-by-case basis. This was an involuntary case.
49
50
51 US v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. 489 U.S. 235 (1989) controls.
GVR'd in light of Security Industrial, 459 U.S. (1982). Dissent by Becker disagrees
52 with majority's characterization of state of lien avoidance law under 1898 Act.
Reasoning very sketchy, but reflects no particular deference to language of statute.
Principal rationale appears to be prior bankruptcy court precedents. Unclear why
53 bankruptcy court couldn't value property upon abandonment.
Page 27
Related docs
Get documents about "