Docstoc

Disputed_status_of_Gibraltar

Document Sample
Disputed_status_of_Gibraltar Powered By Docstoc
					From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed status of Gibraltar

Disputed status of Gibraltar
Gibraltar Crown in 1713. This was confirmed in later treaties signed in Paris and Seville. Spain later attempted to recapture the territory militarily, with a number of failed sieges, and reclamation of the territory by peaceful means remains Government policy. For their part, the Gibraltarians reject any claim and no political party or pressure group in Gibraltar supports union with Spain. In a referendum in 2002 the people of Gibraltar soundly rejected a joint sovereignty proposal.[1]

This article is part of the series:

Politics and government of Gibraltar • Monarch • Elizabeth II • Governor • Sir Robert Fulton • Chief Minister • Peter Caruana • Opposition Leader • Joe Bossano • Parliament • Political parties • Elections: 2000, 2003, 2007 • Politicians • Court system • Law of Gibraltar • Constitution of Gibraltar • Constitution Order 1969 • Constitution Order 2006 • Constitutional referendum • Disputed status of Gibraltar • Sovereignty referendum, 1967 • Sovereignty referendum, 2002 • Disputed status of the isthmus • History of Nationality
Other countries

25,000 people demonstrated in Gibraltar on 18 March 2002. Despite this, an overwhelming majority of the population holds the view that better relations with Spain are desirable. A mass demonstration held in March 2002, whilst condemning the idea of joint sovereignty, called for Good, neighbourly European relations with Spain based on reasonable dialogue and mutual respect.[2] The territorial claim was formally restarted by the Spanish dictator Francisco Franco in the 1960s and has been continued by successive Spanish governments. They have insisted that the Gibraltar dispute is a purely bilateral matter and that the current Gibraltarians are mere settlers whose role and will are irrelevant. This vision underlies the United Nations resolutions driven by Spain on the decolonisation of Gibraltar in the 1960s, which focused on the "interests" and not the "wishes" of the Gibraltarians. However, the strategy of ignoring the Gibraltarians has

· Atlas Politics portal

Gibraltar is a self-governing British overseas territory near the southernmost tip of the Iberian peninsula subject to a disputed irredentist claim by Spain. Gibraltar was conquered by Britain from Spain in 1704, during the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714). Spain formally ceded the territory under article X of the Treaty of Utrecht in perpetuity to the British

1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
proven to be a dead end for Spain. Speaking to the UN C24 in 2006, the Chief Minister of Gibraltar, Peter Caruana, stated: "It is well known and documented and accepted by all that, since 1988 Gibraltar has rejected the Bilateral Brussels Process, and will never be content with it."[3] In 2002 an agreement in principle on joint sovereignty over Gibraltar between the governments of United Kingdom and Spain was reached. There was a robust campaign against these proposals by both the Government and people of Gibraltar, culminating in the decisive referendum. Gibraltarians have further argued that one cannot claim to be acting in the "interests" of a population, while at the same time ignoring its wishes and democratic rights. With the election of a moderate left-wing government in Spain (2004), Spanish officials noted that, even if Spain does not give up its claim to assume the sovereignty of Gibraltar, no advance could be achieved without taking into account the wishes of the Gibraltarians. The result of this new approach was the creation of a Tripartite Forum with equal participation by the Government of Gibraltar. Such movement was qualified by Spanish right-wing parties as a surrender. Gibraltarians remain suspicious of the Spanish Government, despite improved relations, and note Spanish intransigence demonstrated with issues like the opposition to Gibraltar’s membership of Union of European Football Associations.[4]

Disputed status of Gibraltar
The treaty stipulates that no overland trade between Gibraltar and Spain is to take place, except for emergency provisions in the case that Gibraltar is unable to be resupplied by sea. In a reversion clause, should the British Crown ever wish to relinquish Gibraltar, Spain was promised it will be offered to it first: “ And in case it shall hereafter seem ” meet to the Crown of Great Britain to grant, sell or by any means to alienate therefrom the propriety of the said town of Gibraltar, it is hereby agreed and concluded that the preference of having the sale shall always be given to the Crown of Spain before any others.

The United Kingdom and Spain are both members of the European Union (EU), with Gibraltar joining as a Special Member State territory under the UK’s Treaty of Accession in 1972. The EU is committed to free movement of goods and services and respect for human rights, thus the UK Government and the Government of Gibraltar claim that this supersedes any outdated "restrictions" contemplated in 1713.

Differing positions
British position
In his evidence to the UK Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee in 2008, Jim Murphy MP, Minister of State for Europe stated: “ The UK Government will never ” "never" is a seldom-used word in politics - enter into an agreement on sovereignty without the agreement of the Government of Gibraltar and their people. In fact, we will never even enter into a process without that agreement. The word "never" sends a substantial and clear commitment and has been used for a purpose. We have delivered that message with confidence to the peoples and the Governments of Gibraltar and Spain. It is a sign of the maturity of our relationship now that that is accepted as the UK’s position.[5]

The capture of Gibraltar and the Treaty of Utrecht
An Anglo-Dutch force led by Admiral Sir George Rooke captured Gibraltar in 1704 on behalf of the Archduke Charles, pretender to the Spanish Throne. The territory was eventually ceded to Great Britain by Spain in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht as part of the settlement of the War of the Spanish Succession. In that treaty, Spain ceded to Great Britain: “ the full and entire propriety of the town and castle of Gibraltar, together with the port, fortifications, and forts thereunto belonging […] for ever, without any exception or impediment whatsoever. ”

2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed status of Gibraltar
other state, therefore Spain’s territorial integrity cannot be affected by anything that occurs in Gibraltar: “ Even if integration of a territory was demanded by an interested State it could not be had without ascertaining the freely expressed will of the people, the very sine qua non of all decolonisation.[7] ”

Gibraltar position
The UK government and Gibraltarians state that the Spanish claims are baseless, pointing to the right to self-determination of all peoples, guaranteed and enshrined by the UN, according to the UN Charter. Its article 1 states that: “ The Purposes of the United Nations are [...] to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples. ”

To the same section 2 of Resolution 1514 (XV) states: “ All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. ”

Furthermore, resolution 2231 (XXI) itself recalls and demands implementation of Resolution 1514(XV) (guaranteeing Gibraltar’s right to self-determination) and therefore the Spanish claim for its territorial integrity (which would not be affected by Gibraltar’s decolonisation) cannot displace or extinguish the rights of the people of Gibraltar under resolution 1514(XV) or under the Charter.[6] Any additional right that Spain could claim by virtue of the "reversionary" clause contained in the Treaty of Utrecht is overruled and annulled under article 103 of the UN Charter: “ In the event of a conflict between the ” obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.

Consequently the decolonisation of Gibraltar cannot affect the territorial integrity of a country of which it does not form part. It further points out that it is not possible to respect the "interests" of the people of Gibraltar, while at the same time ignoring their wishes, and their democratic rights. They consider it hypocritical for the Spanish Government to claim to respect democratic values while at the same time stating that the democratic wishes of 30,000 Gibraltarians are irrelevant. The Gibraltarian point of view can be extensively seen in the speech of Chief Minister Joe Bossano at the United Nations in 1994.[8] In a referendum held in Gibraltar in September 2002, the people of Gibraltar united to reject the concept of even partial Spanish sovereignty.[1] Speaking to the UK Parliament Foreign Affairs committee in March 2008 Peter Caruana the Chief Minister of Gibraltar noted: “ Spain does not dispute that Gibraltar ” is properly, in law, British territory. Therefore, this is not disputed land. She has a political claim to the return of Gibraltar sovereignty, but she does not dispute the fact that in proper international law, she ceded sovereignty to Britain in perpetuity and therefore it is undisputed British sovereign territory.[9]

Finally, it is pointed out that there is in fact no principle in International Law or UN doctrine that can displace the inalienable right to self-determination, and that the UN itself and the International Court of Justice have repeatedly stated that: “ In the process of decolonisation there is no alternative to the principle of self-determination. ”

Spanish position
The traditional Spanish position relies on claiming the right to its territorial integrity. According to the Spanish interpretation, as the UN comprises states, the concept of territorial integrity complements and constrains the right to self-determination, citing UN Resolution 1514 (XV) from 1960 which says: “ Any attempt aimed at the partial or ” total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes

The Gibraltar Government has also argued that Gibraltar is a British territory and therefore by definition not an integral part of any

3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. During the sixties, the UN General Assembly passed two resolutions on the issue (2231 (XXI), "Question of Gibraltar"[10] and 2353 (XXII), "Question of Gibraltar"[11]). The latter states that: “ any colonial situation which partially or completely destroys the national unity and territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and especially with paragraph 6 of Resolution 1514 (XV) of the General Assembly [...] Invites the Governments of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to resume without delay the negotiations provided for in General Assembly Resolutions 2070 (XX) and 2231 (XXI), with a view to putting an end to the colonial situation in Gibraltar and to safeguarding the interests of the population. ”

Disputed status of Gibraltar
this land, which is an integral part of the territory of Gibraltar.

Territorial waters
The Treaty of Utrecht did not specify territorial waters, because the concept did not exist at the time it was signed. By the first half of the 18th century the concept of the 3-nautical-mile (5.6 km) wide sovereign territorial sea emerged, this was eventually adopted by most countries as the basis of marine jurisdiction, until the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles (22 km). Gibraltar’s territorial waters currently extend up to 3 nautical miles, but could be extended if required — the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea set a standard of the latter distance for all of its signatories.[13] Spain included a declaration, the content of which was rejected by the UK. Chief Minister Peter Caruana noted: “ Spain subscribed to that treaty, mak- ” ing no reservation whatsoever in relation to the Gibraltar question. International law makes Spain’s denial of territorial waters in Gibraltar completely unsustainable in law.[14]

From such a point of view, Gibraltarians would be mere settlers from Britain and other places and only their interests, not their wishes (as the right to self-determination would involve), need be safeguarded. With the arrival of the democracy, such a "traditional" position seems to have been softened and aimed to some sort of temporal or permanent joint sovereignty (similar to the agreement announced between the Spanish and British governments in the Spring of 2002, which was eventually shelved after sustained and united opposition by the Gibraltarians).

The Spanish statement upon ratification of the Convention “ 2. In ratifying the Convention, Spain ” wishes to make it known that this act cannot be construed as recognition of any rights or status regarding the maritime space of Gibraltar that are not included in article 10 of the Treaty of Utrecht of 13 July 1713 concluded between the Crowns of Spain and Great Britain. Furthermore, Spain does not consider that Resolution III of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea is applicable to the colony of Gibraltar, which is subject to a process of decolonization in which only relevant resolutions adopted by the United Nations General Assembly are applicable.[15]

The isthmus
The territory of Gibraltar contains an 800-metre (2,625 ft) section of the isthmus that links The Rock[12] with mainland Spain. Spain does not acknowledge British sovereignty over Gibraltar beyond the fortified perimeter of the town as that of 1704. The United Kingdom claims that its title to the southern part of the isthmus is based on continuous possession over a long period. As well as the airport, there are two substantial housing estates, a sports stadium, a secondary school, a marina and a beach on

The British statement upon ratification of the Convention “ With regard to point 2 of the declara- ” tion made upon ratification of the

4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Convention by the Government of Spain, the Government of the United Kingdom has no doubt about the sovereignty of the United Kingdom over Gibraltar, including its territorial waters. The Government of the United Kingdom, as the administering authority of Gibraltar, has extended the United Kingdom’s accession to the Convention and ratification of the Agreement to Gibraltar. The Government of the United Kingdom, therefore, rejects as unfounded point 2 of the Spanish declaration.[16] Article 310 of the 1982 Convention makes it clear that "such statements and declarations cannot exclude or modify the legal effect of the provisions of the Convention" in their application. The dispute over territorial waters, which was rekindled over the fishing dispute seems likely to become more important with the discovery of a British treasure ship, HMS Sussex, and the Black Swan Project controversy. Questions about the waters have previously been asked in the House of Commons, and answered as follows: “ Under international law, States are entitled, but not required, to extend their territorial sea up to a maximum breadth of 12 nautical miles. Where the coasts of two States are opposite or adjacent, the general rule is that neither is entitled, unless they agree otherwise, to extend its territorial sea beyond the median line. The UK Government considers that a limit of three nautical miles is sufficient in the case of Gibraltar. ”

Disputed status of Gibraltar
World War II. British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill denied that he promised to give Gibraltar to Spain. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office conducted a full review of their files to see whether Franco’s claim had any foundation. A confidential memo called the Spanish communiqué "a flimsy and unconvincing document", and the Government put an end to the dispute by refusing to comment on the claims.[17]

Economy
Repeated stories in the Spanish media that Gibraltar banks are used for tax evasion and money laundering have been determined to be baseless after an inquiry by the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee. This found that Gibraltar has always complied with all international and EU requirements to prevent such activity. “ We conclude that the series of alleg- ” ations which Spain makes against Gibraltar appear almost wholly to be without substance. In many cases, it is not just the Government of Gibraltar but the British Government as well which is traduced. It is deeply regrettable that allegations are made that cannot be sustained by a basis in fact. If concrete evidence of wrong-doing were produced, the British Government should act promptly to deal with the problem. But so long as allegations are unsubstantiated, the British Government should continue to rebut them promptly and decisively.[18]

The Government of Gibraltar for its part holds that there is no economic or social need for more than three nautical miles of territorial water.

1953: rekindling the dispute
In 1954, despite objections by Spain, Queen Elizabeth II visited Gibraltar in May. Spanish dictator Francisco Franco had renewed claims to The Rock. Based on British National Archives files from 1953, Franco claimed that Spain had been promised The Rock in return for not attacking the territory during the

Similarly positive assessments have been made by international bodies such as the International Monetary Fund [19][20][21][22] (IMF). According to the executive summary of a 2007 IMF Report: “ Gibraltar has a well-regulated finan- ” cial sector. The Gibraltar authorities are concerned with protecting the reputation and integrity of Gibraltar as a financial center, and are cognizant of the importance of adopting and applying international regulatory standards and best supervisory practices. Gibraltar has a good reputation

5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
internationally for cooperation and information sharing.[20] Along with the Isle of Man and Cyprus, Gibraltar has been used as an international finance centre by the Russian conglomerate Yukos/Menatep.[23] The Spanish Government has also accused Gibraltarian motorboats of engaging in tobacco smuggling. However, since 1996 there has been a law in Gibraltar controlling fast launches licensing their ownership and importation and prohibiting the entry of unlicensed craft into Gibraltar waters.

Disputed status of Gibraltar
Gibraltar for a year before leaving, during which the repair was completed without incident. Subsequently Spanish politicians have complained about every nuclear submarine visit to Gibraltar, and have tried unsuccessfully to get a reassurance that this would totally stop. There have been no further protests against nuclear submarines in Gibraltar. Commenting, the Government of Gibraltar said: “ Nuclear submarine visits to Gibraltar ” are a matter for UK and Gibraltar. Visits for operational or recreational purposes are welcome by the Gibraltar Government [...] To our knowledge, it is not the position of the present Spanish Government or any previous Spanish Government, that it is opposed to visits by nuclear submarines.[26]

Referenda
In a 1967 referendum on sovereignty organised by the British Government, Gibraltarians ignored Spanish pressure and 99.6% of voters voted to remain a under British sovereignty. More recently, in a second referendum on sovereignty held in November 2002 by the Government of Gibraltar, 98.5% of the voters rejected any proposal to share sovereignty between the UK and Spain. The wording of the question being: “ Do you approve of the principle that ” Britain and Spain should share sovereignty over Gibraltar? [24]

The result was a decisive 17,900 NO, 187 YES[25].

Recent disputes
2000 - An issue of contention was the repair of the nuclear powered submarine, HMS Tireless. The Government of Spain expressed its concern about the effective safety for the inhabitants of Gibraltar and those living in the Campo de Gibraltar the adjacent area in Spain, some 250,000 people. The inhabitants of the area saw this repair as a precedent of future repair operations in Gibraltar rather than the one-off emergency the British Government has claimed (no other nuclear submarine has been repaired in Gibraltar since). On the other hand, the Government of Gibraltar accused Spain of using this incident as an excuse to justify its 300 year old sovereignty claim to Gibraltar. Despite many protests, the Government of Gibraltar allowed the work to be done after employing its own experts to confirm it could be undertaken safely. The submarine was in

2002 - In the months that predated the referendum called by the Gibraltar government on the joint sovereignty agreement disagreements could be categorised as: • Control of the Military Installations. Spain wished to control the military installations of the territory, even in the event of joint sovereignty. This pretension was considered unacceptable by the British Ministry of Defence. • The Referendum itself. Both the Spanish and British governments stated that the referendum had no legal effect, but it clearly indicated the democratically expressed will of the people of Gibraltar to “not be Spanish”. As the British Government is committed to respect those wishes, the idea of a joint sovereignty deal has been abandoned. 2004 - A visit by The Princess Royal in June 2004, the brief return of HMS Tireless in July 2004, together with the Tercentenary Celebrations of the capture of The Rock were subjects of complaint by the Spanish Government. A new round of talks on a tri-lateral basis were proposed in October 2004 to discuss regional co-operation. In February 2005 the first talks took place at a meeting held in Málaga and subsequently in Portugal and London. This is the first sign of formal recognition of the Government of Gibraltar, and has been generally welcomed. The main issues of the

6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
talks have been a new agreement on the airport, the pensions of the Spanish workers that worked in Gibraltar during the sixties, and the removal of Spanish restrictions on telecommunications. 2006 - Those issues were successfully resolved in September 2006 in the Córdoba Agreement. The process continues. 2007 - A bulk carrier, the MV New Flame, ran aground south of Europa Point in Gibraltar and broke up on the reef in August 2007, generating accusations of pollution in Spain and claims not only against the Government of Gibraltar but also against that of Spain.[27] Its cargo was scrap metal and the vessel’s fuel was promptly drained. The Government of Gibraltar claimed in December 2007 that the operation did not represent a material risk to the environment since the vessel had been defuelled and only small, remnant amounts of fuel remained in the engines themselves.[28] The Spanish branch of Greenpeace claimed that, as late as February 2008, fuel spills from the New Flame had polluted Spanish beaches around the Bay of Gibraltar.[29] Official Spanish sources played this down stating that the fuel reaching the beaches of Algeciras was in "insignificant amounts".[30]

Disputed status of Gibraltar
Madrid by 28 September due to "economic reasons", namely, lack of demand. This left Gibraltar, once again, without any air links with Spain.[32]

Political development
The Gibraltarians have sought a more modern status and relationship with the United Kingdom reflecting, and expanding the present level of self-government. A new constitution was approved in a referendum in 2006 which moved Gibraltar to a more Crown dependency-like relationship with the UK, rather than the previous colonial status. [3] The new constitution came into effect in January 2007. In a letter to the UN the British representative, Emyr Jones Parry, writes: “ The new constitution provides for a ” modern relationship between Gibraltar and the United Kingdom. I do not think that this description would apply to any relationship based on colonialism.[33]

Chief Minister Peter Caruana addressed the UN Special Committee on Decolonization regarding the new constitution in 2008. He put forth his Government’s view that: “ As far as we are concerned, the decolonisation of Gibraltar is no longer a pending issue.[34] ”

Spanish restrictions
Despite both Gibraltar and Spain being members of the EU, Spain continued to place restrictions on communications with Gibraltar, which affected telecommunications and blocks any EU or international agreements, like the Hague Convention 1996 that mention the Gibraltar Airport. Under the Lisbon agreement of 1980: “ Both Governments have reached ” agreement on the re-establishment of direct communications in the region. The Spanish Government has decided to suspend the application of the measures at present in force.

Parallel with this, the Government of Gibraltar has engaged in talks with Spain to resolve other disputes, setting aside the issue of sovereignty.

Sources
British sources
• ^ Hills, George (1974). Rock of Contention. A History of Gibraltar. London: Robert Hale. ISBN 0-7091-4352-4. George Hills was a BBC World Service broadcaster, Spanish Historian and Fellow of the Royal Historical Society. Although listed as a ’British’ source, Hills supports the Spanish view of Gibraltar. He died in 2002. His research documents are now available at King’s College, UCL as a separate collection. • ^ Jackson, William (1990). The Rock of the Gibraltarians. A History of Gibraltar (2nd

This was to include re-instatement of a ferry service from Algeciras, which has yet to happen. At the end of 2006, the restrictions on the airport were removed as a result of the Córdoba Agreement (2006) and direct flights from Madrid by Iberia started operation. [31] However, On 22 September 2008, Iberia announced that it would cease its flights to

7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ed.). Grendon, Northamptonshire, UK: Gibraltar Books. ISBN 0-948466-14-6. General Sir William Jackson was Governor of Gibraltar between 1978 and 1982, a military Historian and former Chairman of the Friends of Gibraltar Heritage.

Disputed status of Gibraltar
[5] Answer to Q257 at the FAC hearing [6] Joe Bossano addresses the UN [7] "Full text of an address by the Chief Minister of Gibraltar Peter Caruana to the United Nations Committee of 24.". http://www.gibnet.com/texts/ pcun0601.htm. [8] Joe Bossano (1994). "The Fight for Self Determination. Joe Bossano at the United Nations". Gibraltar... The unofficial homepage. Reference Documents about Gibraltar and its political struggles. http://www.gibnet.com/texts/jbun1.htm. Retrieved on 2005-12-16. [9] Answer to Q215 at the FAC hearing [10] UN General Assembly (1966). "Resolution 2231(XXI). Question of Gibraltar" (PDF). Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during its TwentyFirst Session. United Nations. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/21/ ares21.htm. Retrieved on 2005-12-16. [11] UN General Assembly (1967). "Resolution 2353(XXII). Question of Gibraltar" (PDF). Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during its TwentySecond Session. United Nations. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/22/ ares22.htm. Retrieved on 2005-12-16. [12] Gibraltar is frequently known as The Rock [13] UN Convention on the Law of the Sea [14] Q218 FORAFFCOM evidence 2008 [15] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Declarations made upon signature, ratification, accession or succession or anytime thereafter (Spain) [16] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Declarations made upon signature, ratification, accession or succession or anytime thereafter (United Kingdom) [17] Files reveal 1953 Gibraltar row [18] [1] [19] Detailed Assessment Report on AntiMone Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism [20] ^ Assessment of Financial Sector Supervision and Regulation [21] Detailed Assessment Report of Observance of the Insurance Core Principles [22] Detailed Assessment Report of Observance of the Basel Core Principles [23] [2] [24] 2002 Referendum question

Spanish sources
• ^ Sepúlveda, Isidro (2004). Gibraltar. La razón y la fuerza (Gibraltar. The reason and the force). in Spanish. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. ISBN 84-206-4184-7. Chapter 2, "La lucha por Gibraltar" (The Struggle for Gibraltar). Isidro Sepúlveda Muñoz is a Contemporary History Professor in the UNED ("Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia"), the biggest Spanish university. • ^ Cajal, Máximo (2003). Siglo XXI Editores. ed. Ceuta, Melilla, Olivenza y Gibraltar. Donde termina España (Ceuta, Melilla, Olivenza y Gibraltar. Where Spain ends). In Spanish. Madrid. ISBN 84-323-1138-3. Máximo Cajal is a Spanish diplomatist, ambassador in different countries and currently the special representant of the Spanish Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, in the Alliance of Civilizations. He was the only survivor of the assault of the Embassy of Spain in Guatemala by the forces of the Guatemalan dictatorship in 1980.

Notes
[1] ^ "The 2002 referendum". Gibnet. 7 November 2002. http://www.gibnet.com/ texts/ref2.htm. Retrieved on 2008-09-15. [2] "The March 2002 Demo". Gibnet. 18 March 2002. http://www.gibnet.com/ images/demo2.htm. Retrieved on 2008-09-15. [3] Caruana, Peter (5 October 2006). "Press Release: Chief Minister’s address at the United Nations Fourth Committee on 4 October 2006." (PDF). Government of Gibraltar. http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/ latest_news/press_releases/2006/ 291-2006.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-17. [4] Govan, Fiona (27 December 2006). "Rocky road for Gibraltar’s footballers". The Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/27/ wgib27.xml. Retrieved on 2008-09-15.

8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed status of Gibraltar

[25] Referendum result Special Committee on Decolonization [26] Government of Gibraltar. "Press release: Ninth Meeting. United Nations. Trilateral Forum - Submarines". http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/ http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/latest_news/ 2008/gacol3179.doc.htm. Retrieved on press_releases/2005/223-2005.htm. 2009-03-01. Retrieved on 2008-10-17. [27] El New Flame ha vertido a la Bahía de Algeciras, 2007 October (Spanish)) • Disputed status of the Falkland Islands [28] Government of Gibraltar Press Release between the United Kingdom and on the New Flame (24 December, 2007) Argentina [29] Greenpeace señala la gravedad del • Disputed status of Olivença between último vertido del New Flame, 2008 Portugal and Spain. February 11th (Spanish). • Sea of Japan naming dispute between [30] Spanish Environment Minister Cristina Japan & North and South Korea. Narbona comments • The Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and [31] "First Iberia flight". gibnews.net. 2006. Melilla, disputed by Morocco. http://www.gibnews.net/cgi-bin/ • The History of Gibraltar gn_view.pl/?GPIX061216_1.xml. Retrieved on 2007-03-10. [32] "Spanish Airline Suspends Flights". Sky News. 22 September 2008. • "Gibraltar: The Legal Issues" academic http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/ paper by J. E. S. Fawcett in International Business/Spanish-Airline-IberiaAffairs (Royal Institute of International Suspends-flights-between-Madrid-andAffairs), Vol. 43, No. 2 (Apr., 1967) Gibraltar-For-Economic-Reasons/Article/ • BBC – Files reveal 1953 Gibraltar row 200809415104894?lpos=Business_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15104894_Sp • Map of Gibraltar and the isthmus (PDF Retrieved on 2008-09-22. file). In green the area that according to [33] Letter to the UN Spain was not ceded by the Treaty of [34] UN General Assembly (2008). "As Utrecht. Special Committee on Decolonization • A legal opinion on the issue of territorial considers question of Gibraltar, waters, by a Gibraltar lawyer with an territory’s chief minister says its official map decolonization ’no longer pending.’".

See also

External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputed_status_of_Gibraltar" Categories: Politics of Gibraltar, Spain–United Kingdom relations, History of Gibraltar, Territorial disputes of Spain, Territorial disputes of the United Kingdom This page was last modified on 22 April 2009, at 19:57 (UTC). All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) taxdeductible nonprofit charity. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers

9


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:39
posted:5/20/2009
language:English
pages:9