Docstoc

Sample Science Fair Projects

Document Sample
Sample Science Fair Projects Powered By Docstoc
					 RIMS
Regional
Science
  Fair
Judging Science Fair
      Projects
The purpose of the Science Fair
  is to give young people the
         opportunity to:

• Do some science.
• Learn about a new subject – or more about
  an old one.
• Learn what scientists do.
• Have fun doing all of above.
   RIMS Regional Science Fair
• Annual event, held in April
• Includes about 950 student participants
  grades 4 – 12
• Participants usually winners of local school
  science fairs
• Best projects from grades 6 – 12 go to
  California State Science Fair
        The judge’s job is to:
• Probe skillfully and deeply.
• Leave the student feeling positive about
  her/his accomplishments.
• Help the student learn something from the
  experience.
• Determine award winners.
As a judge, what should I expect
       from the students?
• Pride in their projects and accomplishments
• Preparation for the fair and the ability to
  clearly and concisely explain their projects
• Ability to answer questions about their
  projects at levels appropriate to their grades
  and ages
• Wide variety of project quality and
  sophistication
      What should student oral
       explanations include?
• Hypothesis and where it came from
• Experimental procedures
• Experimental results
• Conclusions drawn from experimental
  results
• Thought processes that went into the project
• Outcomes and possible future hypotheses
  and experiments
                The Display
• Major purpose: effective communication of:
  –   Hypothesis
  –   Purpose
  –   Methodology
  –   Experimental outcomes
  –   Conclusions
              The Display
• Effectiveness in communication and
  scientific content should be primary
  considerations.
• As secondary considerations the extent to
  which displays are elaborate or attractive
  may be taken into account.
         Conflicts of Interest
Disqualify yourself and ask to be reassigned if
     a real or perceived conflict of interest
                     occurs.
            Confidentiality
Information regarding findings or conclusions
  must not be revealed to anyone except other
  panel members and Science Fair officials.
             Be an educator
• Treat students with respect
  – Project should be considered a significant,
    serious enterprise.
  – Evaluate but also praise efforts and
    accomplishments.
• Ask questions which will cause the student
  to think and learn, and to explore more
  deeply.
        Preparing for Judging
Before the Science Fair:
• Read the Judging Handbook and be
  familiar with judging guidelines.

• Prepare general interview questions.
At the Science Fair: Pre-Judging
          Activities
• Orientation meeting
• Judging panel preparation
  –   Have all appropriate forms
  –   Determination of average interview length
  –   Locations of categories to be judged
  –   Procedures for turning in judging results
         Interview Procedures
• Introduce yourself and put student at ease.
• Ask student to explain project.
• Ask questions designed to clarify, to establish how
  student got project idea, and to determine
  student’s understanding of project and underlying
  science.
• Find out how student learned about procedures,
  use of equipment, concepts involved.
• If appropriate, ask about help received.
           Interview Protocols
• Judging done by one panel member at a time, not
  by the whole group.
• Each judge should try to interview each student,
  but at least three interviews should be conducted
  for each participant.
• Use about the same amount of time for each
  interview.
• Adhere to the interview sequence as closely as
  possible.
           Determining Awards
• After interviewing all students and evaluating projects
  judges collaborate and rank the category projects
• Judges rank the top two projects 1st and 2nd GOLD. The
  top project in this group will be considered for the overall
  SWEEPSTAKES AWARD.
• Judges then rank the next 5 projects SILVER, noting the
  top project in that group, which may advance to other
  awards.
• All remaining projects are given a BRONZE award and are
  not ranked individually.
         Comparing Projects
• Projects can vary widely in level of
  complexity and sophistication.
• Issue is not tools used but what is done with
  resources available – the better science
  should be given the higher rating.
• Student’s knowledge should be consistent
  with the project and its goals.
Use of Sophisticated Equipment,
 Techniques, and Knowledge
• This by itself should not be given extra
  credit nor should the student be penalized
  for access to it.
• If advanced equipment or techniques are
  used, student should understand them and
  how they relate to the project and its
  conclusions.
             Team Projects
• Allowed 4th to 12th grade
• Judging criteria same as for individual
  projects.
• Look for significant contribution and
  understanding by each team member.
• Direct questions to each team member.
• The best project should win, whether
  individual or team.
     A good science fair project
       is an investigation and includes:
• A clear hypothesis, field research or
  engineering goal based on research and/or
  observation.
• An experimental procedure designed to test the
  hypothesis or goal.
• Execution of the procedure, with repetitions as
  needed.
• Data collection and recording.
• Data analysis.
• Conclusions which refer to the hypothesis.
 Proving the hypothesis
true is NOT the purpose
of a science fair project.
A well supported answer
     to a problem is.
  Inappropriate projects include
• Illustrations of concepts in the absence of
  their use in an investigation.
• Experiments done without sufficient
  background research.
• Displays or collections in the absence of
  their use in an investigation.
• Experiments done without a scientific
  rationale.
  Inappropriate projects include
• Presentation of theories or hypotheses with
  no scientific evidence for them.
• Experimental results without analysis or
  conclusions.
• Experiments which do not check data
  and/or explain anomalous results.
• Procedures using apparatus or procedures
  unlikely to produce good data.
             Judging Criteria
•   Originality/creativity        20 %
•   Comprehension                 30 %
•   Organization & completeness   30 %
•   Effort & motivation           10 %
•   Clarity                       10 %
        Originality/Creativity
• Original problem or unique approach to an
  old one
• Resources used ingeniously
• Application/interpretation of data shows
  original thinking/creativity
• Student shows understanding of
  unanswered questions
         Originality/Creativity
       Does the project show creativity in:
•   The hypothesis or question asked?
•   The approach to solving the problem?
•   Analysis of data?
•   Interpretation of data?
•   Use of equipment?
•   Construction and/or design of new
    equipment?
            Comprehension
• Clear hypothesis and project design
• Depth of study demonstrated
• Experiment effectively tests hypothesis
• Experimental procedures and data
  collection well done
• Data recorded in organized fashion
            Comprehension
Did the idea for the project come from:
• Reading and study?
• Personal experiences or observations?
• A suggestion from a book or the Internet?
• Suggestions from a scientist or engineer?
• Other sources?
            Comprehension
• Results and conclusions logical and related
  to hypothesis
• Implications discussed and further
  experiments suggested
• Knowledge of scientific/engineering
  principles shown
    Organization/Completeness
• The study is complete within the scope of
  the problem
• Scientific literature has been searched
• Experiments repeated as needed and data
  carefully recorded
• Conclusions supported by experimental
  evidence
• Project is well executed
          Effort/Motivation
• Time for project appropriate
• Time on background reading/research
  appropriate
• Student learned considerable amount about
  subject during project
• Display informative, complete, clear, well
  organized, and attractive
                  Clarity
• Original notebook available for inspection
• Notebook well organized, accurate
• Purpose, procedures, results, and
  conclusions clear
• Title accurately reflects project
• Abstract clear and descriptive
• Oral presentations clear, reflect knowledge
  of project and underlying science
    Thank you for
contributing your time
 and expertise to the
  young scientists of
Riverside, Inyo, Mono,
 and San Bernardino
       Counties

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: Sample Science Fair Projects document sample