Docstoc

Sample Kindergarten Teacher Resume

Document Sample
Sample Kindergarten Teacher Resume Powered By Docstoc
					Master Teacher Certification
   Redelivery Training

     Presenters: Ginny Elliott
                 Winifred Nweke
                 Tom Higgins
TABLE OF CONTENTS

•   The Legislation and Purpose of the Program (Slides 3-7)
•   Benefits for the School, School System and the Teacher (Slides 8-9)
•   Application process for Master Teacher 2009 (Slides 10-22)
•   Two Application Formats - 3 categories (Slide 22)
•   CRCT Application Format (Slides 23-36)
•   Monitoring Student Progress Application (Non-
    CRCT) Format (Slides 37-48)
•   Specialty Groups - Special Ed, EIP, ESOL, Gifted, Instructional Coach
    (Slides 49-54)
•   Local School System Information (Slides 55-64)
•   Process for Electronic Submission of Application to PSC by Local
    System Operator (Slides 65-81)
•   Closing Remarks and Contact Information (Slides 82-84)
     The Law : Georgia Code 20-2-205

The Professional Standards Commission (PSC) is
             authorized and directed to:

     Establish a Georgia Master Teacher Program
   to be recognition for teachers’ excellence in the
     classroom through student achievement and
                   student progress
The Law : Georgia Code 20-2-205

Establish criteria to include, at a minimum:
- Evidence of student achievement and
  student progress
- Georgia Public School Teacher
- Minimum of 3 years of experience on
  Georgia Clear Renewable certificate
The Law : Georgia Code 20-2-205

 Professional Standards Commission:

 • Reviews each application and determines whether the
   applicant meets the criteria.

 • Develops Master Teacher rules and regulations to govern
   the program.

 • Develops the structure to support the certification and the
   recognition.
• The Law : Georgia Code 20-2-205

Master Teacher designation is valid according to
 PSC rule/regulations:

  – Master Teacher Certificate is valid for six years.

  – Criteria for certification renewal will be available
    in the 2010-2011 school year (the first year of
    renewal)
Master Teacher Certification reflects:

• DOE Georgia Performance Standards (GPS)


• Georgia Framework for Teaching
 Why should systems
 support the
 Master Teacher
 Certification Program?

• Identifies teachers who are having an impact on
  student achievement and progress as measured
  by the CRCT and other assessments
• Can lead to identifying & sharing best practices
  among teachers
• Recognizes additional teachers who have the
  potential to become leaders, mentors, &
  coaches for other teachers and thus, may
  contribute to teacher retention                    8
 Why should teachers
 want to become
 Master Teachers?

• Recognizes teachers for their impact on student
  achievement and progress

• Provides teachers feedback that may not be
  available from other sources

• Gives an opportunity for professional growth
  through sharing, serving, and learning
                                                    9
Application Process




                      10
            Check eligibility…

• Full-time Georgia public school teacher

• 3 Years successful experience in Georgia

• Held a Georgia Clear-Renewable Certificate
  for at least 3 full years

                                             11
Access the web site…

 1.   www.gamasterteachers.org

 2.   Click on “About”

 3.   Carefully read the opening page information

 4.   Click on “Apply” and select the appropriate school level:
      Elementary, Middle, High School

 5.   Refer to “Support Tools” as necessary


                                                              12
13
14
15
16
17
Select the Appropriate
Grade Level Option
The Grade Level Option selected will contain EVERYTHING you need for
  applying:

•   Personal Information page

•   Supporting Documents

    – All directions, templates, and links needed to submit the rosters
      and/or explanation templates

    – Evidence of Professional Responsibilities form

    – Application Verification form

    – A list of documents to be submitted and the file name for each
      document as required in the grade level and/or subject area


                                                                          18
Review Professional
Responsibilities

1.   Applicant reviews the Evidence of Professional
     Responsibilities form

2.   Applicant discusses the Professional Responsibilities with
     the Principal

3.   After review, Principal signs Application Verification form
     and submits application file electronically to the Local
     System Coordinator (LSC)

                                                             19
Professional Responsibilities:

 The teacher must meet the following professional practices. The signatures on the
    Application Verification form will confirm the teacher’s implementation of these
    practices.

 The teacher:
 • Participates in opportunities for Professional Learning reflecting personal goals that
    align with school improvement goals and Georgia Performance Standards (GPS)
 • Implements exemplary practices that connect to student learning and achievement
 • Demonstrates a collaborative and supportive relationship with colleagues
 • Provides frequent information to parents, as appropriate, about the instructional
    program
 • Provides information regarding student progress to parents
 • Responds to parent concerns with appropriate professionalism
 • Develops a classroom management system which is easily understood by the
    students and encourages students to self-monitor
 • Exhibits appropriate communication with administrators
 • Maintains strict adherence to confidentiality
 • Models standards of professional conduct to others


                                                                                       20
Support Tools


   - Critical Vocabulary

   - Chart for Non-Consecutive Years in the same kind
     of data

   - Redelivery PowerPoint

   - Directions for Grades 2-5 Departmentalized CRCT
     and Non-CRCT



                                                        21
Application Formats
1. CRCT-Tested Grade Levels and Subject Areas
     (Grades 2-8)

2. Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT)
    A.   Kindergarten
    B.   1st Grade (No comparison from kindergarten)
    C.   Grades 9-12
    D.   Non-Core Curricular Subject Areas (Writing, Art, Music, P.E., Business,
         Technology, etc.)
    E.   Specialty Groups (e.g. EIP, ESOL, Special Education, Gifted – in most cases)

3. Instructional Coach

**NOTE: Co-teaching in special education may be CRCT or non-CRCT format.
     Please call Master Teacher office if there are any questions.



                                                                                   22
  CRCT Application

 State Assessment Data
Guidelines and Evaluation



                            23
Student Achievement Data -
State Assessment Data Guidelines


To be considered for Master Teacher Certification, an
   applicant must demonstrate evidence of student
   achievement, which must include student progress.

Student achievement CRCT data are required for
   applicants in:
   – Grades 2-8 Self-Contained and Departmentalized Core
     Curricular subject areas

   – Specialty groups in some situations: EIP, Gifted, Co-
     teaching
                                                             24
Student Achievement Data -
Teacher Provides Roster,
State Provides Data
 •   To be of optimal assistance to our teacher applicants, the DOE staff will
     provide appropriate student achievement data from state assessment
     files.
 •   In order to link student assessment data to the teacher who delivered the
     instruction, it is necessary for the applicant to provide a complete roster of
     all students assigned during the 2007-08 and 2008-09 school years.

 •   Rosters must include the 10-digit GTID number for each student listed on
     the required roster template in the application.
 •   Once complete, the Local System Operator will upload the roster along
     with other documents to the secure PSC portal. Rosters must be
     submitted electronically using the original Excel spreadsheet provided –
     scanned rosters or other formats will not be accepted.


 Note: Individuals completing this template will be working with sensitive and
 confidential student data. All necessary security precautions must be followed.
                                                                                   25
Student Achievement Data –
State Assessment Data Evaluation
Alignment of Subjects to GPS
• Between 2005-06 and 2008-09, all Georgia Criterion-
  Referenced Competency Tests were aligned to the
  Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) curriculum.
  Due to this alignment, comparison for student
  progress cannot be made in subjects whose tests
  were aligned in 2008-09. This subject is Social
  Studies for Grades 2-6.


• For more information regarding evaluation
  components, please see the chart on the next slide.


                                                        26
Implications of Alignment for
Determination of Achievement and Gain




                                        27
Student Achievement Data – CRCT
State Assessment Data Evaluation
*Need for Two Consecutive Years of
Same Curriculum based on either QCC
or GPS
 •   Assessment data will be reviewed for evidence of student achievement and gains.

 •   If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data are available, student
     achievement gains will be evaluated by comparing one year’s CRCT data to
     previous year’s CRCT data for each student cohort relative to the state data.
      –   E.g. applicant’s 2008-2009 5th grade class showed comparative progress over their 4th
          grade performance in 2007-2008; and
      –   applicant’s 2007-2008 5th grade class also showed comparative progress over their 4th
          grade performance in 2006-2007.

 •   If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data are not available for one of the
     student cohorts, then the evaluation for that cohort will be based solely on the most
     recent year’s achievement component.

 •   If an applicant teaches multiple subjects or grade levels, data will be gathered and
     evaluated from all subjects or the preparation selected.



                                                                                                  28
Student Achievement Data –
State Assessment Data
Evaluation
*Second Look
 •   Because the Criterion Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) do not provide
     vertically aligned scores from grade level to grade level, the evaluation criteria have
     been developed to allow for the evaluation of CRCT scale scores from one grade to
     the next. The student cohort’s mean scale score in year 2 will be compared to the
     mean scale score in year 1 in standard scores (z-scores).

 •   Second Looks are provided in both achievement and progress criteria.
      – If an applicant does not qualify during the initial review of ACHIEVEMENT data,
        then an additional opportunity is provided to meet a rigorous PROGRESS
        requirement. This SECOND LOOK will allow teachers who are assigned the
        most challenging students an opportunity to demonstrate that they helped
        students make gains.

      – Similarly, if an applicant does not qualify during the initial review of PROGRESS
        data, then an additional opportunity is provided to meet a rigorous
        ACHIEVEMENT requirement. This second look will allow teachers who are
        assigned the highest performing students an opportunity to demonstrate that
        they have helped students make appreciable gains in the year they taught the
        cohort.
                                                                                       29
30
The Decision Process for
Determining If Applicant Meets
Student Achievement and
Gains Requirements




                                 31
The Decision Process for
Determining If Applicant Meets
Student Achievement and Gains
Requirements - continued
 Student Gains/Progress: The mean scale score change for the applicant’s student
     cohort shows that the students have made gains in their scores from one year to
     the next (NOT ALL SUBJECTS AND GRADE LEVELS CAN SHOW GAINS
     BECAUSE OF TRANSITION FROM QCC TO GPS: SEE SLIDE 27 FOR THOSE
     GRADE LEVELS AND SUBJECTS IMPACTED).

 Step 2: Did the cohort in year 2 have a     If YES, THEN possible Master Teacher
     mean scale score* comparatively
     greater than or equal to the cohort’s   If NO, THEN move to Step 2A for SECOND
     mean scale score in year 1? ( See           LOOK
     Slide 27 for grade level and subject
     areas that can demonstrate
     progress)

 Step 2A: Is the mean score at or above      If YES, THEN possible Master Teacher
     350 for QCC or 850 for GPS for each
     of the two years?                       If NO, THEN NOT Master Teacher

 This SECOND look provides the
     opportunity for teachers whose
     students always score at such a high
                                                                                       32
     level that there is no room for
     growth.
CRCT – State and System
Mean Scale Scores & Meets
and Exceeds Data
 The State needs both system and state data to
 determine the comparative achievement and
 progress made by applicant’s student cohort:
    – State level CRCT mean scale scores
    – Percent “meet” and “exceed” for school,
      system & state

    DOE will provide the state, system and school
     level data
    Applicant is responsible for completing the
                                                    33
     student roster.
Wrap up:
CRCT Student Achievement
and Progress
• Key Points:
   Student assessment data must show evidence of
   student achievement and progress.

• Roster Submission Reminders and Tips:

   – Verify that the student GTID numbers submitted are accurate.
   – Verify that all GTID numbers are filled in.
   - Verify that the grade level submitted is the correct grade level for that
     student in that school year.
   - Verify that students are sorted by subject and by grade level (see
     sample).
   – Verify that the school name entered is the correct school for the
     applicant for that school year.
                                                                          34
Samples of Bad and Good Rosters




                                  35
 Any Questions On
CRCT APPLICATION
    FORMAT?


                    36
Monitoring Student Progress

  (Non-CRCT Application)



                              37
Monitoring Student
Progress (MSP)
(Non-CRCT Application)
  - 1 ½ years of student data: 2008-2009 school year
    and first semester of 2009-2010

  - Learning gains based on comprehensive
      Pre-Test to Post-Test comparison

  - A focus on the alignment of assessments to
    clearly identified standards

   - Use of formative benchmark assessment results to
     modify instruction and improve student learning
                                                        38
39
Required Information on
MSP Roster
  •   Learning Standards to which pre/post tests are aligned (state and/or
      national, e.g. GPS)

  •   Subject area AND grade level for each roster (note the school year at the
      top of each roster)

  •   Roster Directions:
       – List all students by entering a teacher-created student I.D. #
         (no actual student names)
       – For each student enter the pre-test score, formative benchmark
         assessment scores, and the post-test score
       – NOTE: Benchmark scores that are NOT quantitative (checks, stars,
         letters, etc.) must be included along with an explanation
       – Kindergarten application has a specialized roster for GKIDS data
           • Assess all content standards and all elements in each standard at pre-test
             and post-test; if behavior is absent, indicate “not demonstrated”
           • GKIDS reports are cumulative, thus make sure to save reports from each
             assessment during the year to avoid previous reports being overwritten.

                                                                                  40
       GKIDS
New Monitoring Student
   Progress Roster




                         41
Assessments:
Student Progress


Provide ONE COPY of the following documents for supporting evidence in
   each subject area that you teach:

   – a) A BLANK COPY OF THE PRE-TEST FOR EACH SUBJECT AREA (Not
       to exceed 2 pages for Kindergarten and 1st grade; not to exceed 5
       pages for all other grade levels)

   – b) Provide ONE SAMPLE of a formative/benchmark assessment that
        that you used with your students IN EACH SUBJECT AREA

   – c) A BLANK COPY OF THE POST-TEST IN EACH SUBJECT
       AREA (Not to exceed 2 pages for Kindergarten and
       1st grade; not to exceed 5 pages for all other grade levels)




                                                                         42
Formative Benchmark
Assessments
 Start of course/term/year                             End of course/term/year
 Pre-Assessment:                                   Post-Assessment: Aligned
 Aligned with standards                            with standards
 to be mastered                                    Did they master the
                                                   standards?
      Unit          Unit     Unit        Unit          Unit            Unit
       1             2        3           4             5               6


             #1 Formative           #2 Formative
                                     Benchmark          #3 Formative
              Benchmark                                  Benchmark



                                Use information to
                             adjust/change plans and
                                deliver instruction
                                                                              43
Formative Benchmark
Assessments


     The essence of good instruction lies
     not in presentation of content – but
     in assessing student learning and
     coaching students toward better
     performance.
                           Grant Wiggins



                                            44
Formative Benchmark
Assessments
 •    Definition: Regularly scheduled assessments throughout the year to
      measure students’ progress toward mastery of standards and provide
      teachers with information about how to adjust instruction to improve the
      learning

 •    Based on identified learning standards

 •    On-going checkpoints to measure the progress students should make
      toward mastery of the standards by the end of the term/year/course. Where
      should students be at different intervals in acquiring knowledge and skills
      in standards?

 •    Representative of the content and rigor students are expected to master

     QUESTION: What are you doing between the benchmarks to
        adjust/change plans and deliver instruction based on
                   evidence of student progress?

                                                                             45
Examples of Formative
Benchmark Assessments

 • Performance Tasks embedded within units
 • Unit Culminating Performance Assessments
 • System “benchmark” assessments
 • School-scheduled benchmarks by grade level
   and subject/course
 • Teacher-created assessments
 • Commercial assessments, if aligned to
   identified standards

                                                46
Formative Benchmark Assessments

  How do you use the information from your
  on-going, formative assessments to modify
  or adapt teaching strategies, materials and
  approaches to improve student learning?

  “It’s not about giving the assessments; it’s
  about doing something about the results.”
                                Doug Reeves

                                                 47
Formative Benchmark
Assessments and
Student Performance Templates:
Examples of Questions

       • How did you use the assessment results
         to adjust and deliver instruction for
         whole groups, small groups, sub-
         groups, and individuals?

       • Explain what you learned about a
         selected student’s instructional needs
         from the results of the assessments and
         how you addressed his/her needs.

                                               48
Non-CRCT Specialty
    Groups…


   Special Education, EIP,
       ESOL, Gifted



                             49
   Specialty Groups with
   subgroups

• EIP:
   - Augmented (Kindergarten and First Grade)
   - Other (Pull-Out, Reading Recovery, Self-Contained and
      Reduced Class Size)

• ESOL:
   - Self-Contained, Pull-Out

• Gifted:
   - Resource K-12, Clustering, Advanced Content

• Special Education:
   - Collaboration, Co-Teaching, Alternative Placement

NOTE: Some teachers in specialty groups may be able to apply using
  either CRCT or non-CRCT format. Please call Master Teacher staff   50
  if you have questions.
Specialty Groups

     Choose the appropriate level (elementary,
     middle or high school)

     Select appropriate grade level, delivery model or
     setting:
        Example: EIP Kindergarten/Augmented
        Example: ESOL Grades 2-5/Core Curricular
        Example: Gifted Resource K-12

     Complete the required forms and templates



                                                         51
Instructional Coach
     Application



                      52
Instructional Coach
Application

 Two premises:
 • Improving the professional practices of teachers can
   positively impact student achievement.
 • Coaching is a professional learning strategy and its impact
   on student learning can be assessed.

 Application requirements include:
 • analyzing student performance data to determine the
   desired professional practices of teachers needed to
   improve performance
 • coaching teachers to develop the targeted practices
 • monitoring improvement in the implementation of the
   professional practices
 • evaluating the impact of coaching on student learning
                                                            53
Review of Non-CRCT
and Instructional Coach
Applications:
State Review Team
  • All Monitoring Student Progress (non-CRCT and
    Instructional Coach applications are reviewed
    and evaluated by at least three members of a
    State Review Team.

  • State Review Team members are trained in the
    application process and requirements.


                                                   54
School System Information




                            55
School System:
Access to Resources
  Go to www.gamasterteachers.org

  Click on School Systems to access Local System Management Plan
  which includes:

      – Local System Coordinator Checklist for Accepting Submissions
        from Applicants
      – Local System Review Team Guidelines
      – Document Submission Guidelines and Checklist
      – System Operator - Electronic Data Submission Process

  • Professional Responsibilities Evidence Guide

  • Application Verification form

  • Support Tools (Critical Vocabulary, Redelivery PowerPoint, Letters,
    etc.)
                                                                       56
Local System
Management Plan
 1. Superintendent appoints a Local System Coordinator (LSC)
 2. LSC establishes a local system management plan and oversees the
       plan:
     –    Appoints a system review team to assist in the development and
          oversight of the plan
     –    Establishes due dates for each level of application/applicant
          screening
     –    Identifies a system operator to coordinate the electronic
          submission of application
 3. Leadership and teachers are informed of the application criteria and
       process:
     –    Leadership orientation
     –    Teacher orientation
     –    Distribution of printed information
 4. Review process is in place:
     –    Local school review verifies that data submitted are accurate and
          that the professional practices can be supported with
          documentation.
     –    System level review verifies the local school recommendation to57
          submit or not submit the application to PSC.
Local System Management
Plan….continued
• ALL APPLICATIONS MUST HAVE THE SIGNATURES OF THE
  SUPERINTENDENT, APPLICANT’S PRINCIPAL, AND TWO OTHER
  REVIEWERS
   – Superintendent (or designee) must sign the verification document
   – Applicant’s Principal must sign the verification document
   – In addition to the Superintendent and the Principal, two other
     reviewers could be:
       • Other Review Committee Members
       • District Level Directors from Human Resources, Professional
         Learning, Curriculum and Instruction, etc.
       • Applicant’s Assistant Principal
       • School’s Lead Teachers or Department Heads
       • Any other personnel who would be able to verify the applicant’s
         teaching practices, professional responsibilities practices,
         teaching credentials, and complete and accurate application
       • Note: If application is a Special Education category, the Special
          Education Supervisor or Director must be one of the signatories.

                                                                             58
Application Verification Form
Place a check (  ) in the appropriate column – each item must be “Yes” or “N/A” to
be submitted. All four signatures must be included. PSC is no longer able to
contact Local Systems regarding missing signatures or checks.



 Applicant’s Name:
 I certify that I have reviewed the attached application and it meets the requirements outlined in the Georgia          Yes   No   N/A
          Master Teacher Certification application and that the following are true and valid statements:

 1.   Applicant is a full time teacher and has at least three full years of successful Georgia public school teaching
        experience on a Georgia clear renewable teaching certificate.
                                                                                                                                         Application
 2. Assessment data provided meets all guidelines stated in the application and guidance for CRCT Assessment
        Rosters:
                                                                                                                                         Verification
       The 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 rosters contain all students taught by the applicant for all classes taught
        during the two school years.                                                                                                     Page 1
       The student 10-digit GTIDs are correct for the school and school year listed.



       Applicant submitting student roster for CRCT data is the teacher of record.



 3. Assessment data provided meets all guidelines stated in the application and guidance for Non-State
        Assessment Rosters and Supporting Evidence:
       The rosters contain a list of all students taught by the applicant for all classes taught during the 1½
        school years: 2008-2009 and first semester of 2009-2010 as described in the application process. Grades
        9-12 applicants submit for one preparation only. The submitted preparation/grade level reflects common
        practice for all classes taught.

       The rosters contain teacher-created codes with all other student-identifying information omitted.



       Applicant has followed the requirements for submitting required documents. (See Document
        Submissions Guidelines and Checklist)


 4.   Professional Responsibilities in the Evidence of Professional Responsibilities form are practiced by the
        teacher and evidence is available for review.


 5. For Instructional Coach: Each school assignment is represented and verified with principal signature on the                                  59
        Coaching Practices Verification Form.
Application Verification
Page 2


         School Principal             School System Superintendent




         Printed name                 Printed name


         Email address                Email address


         Signature and date           Signature and date
         Other Reviewer of Evidence   Other Reviewer of Evidence


         Position title               Position title


         Printed name                 Printed name


         Email address                Email address


         Signature and date           Signature and date

                                                                     60
Possible Problems in the
Application Process

 • Incorrect information (school, year, and/or grade) was entered
 • Incorrect ID numbers - must submit 10-digit Georgia Test Identification
   (GTID) number
 • Missing student ID #s for some students listed
 • Applicant does not sort roster by subject and grade
 • Scanned or faxed student rosters
 • Applicant’s name and the name for submitted documents do not match
   (Applicant’s data submitted under wrong name)
 • Application is submitted under wrong category (CRCT, non-CRCT, or
   Instructional Coach)
 • File names are incorrect
 • Files are uploaded by operator to wrong section
 • Directions are misread or not followed

                                                                        61
Critical Dates for
2010 Master Teacher Application

OPENS

• September 21, 2009

CLOSES (System Deadlines for Submission)

• December 15, 2009 for CRCT

• January 31, 2010 for Non-CRCT and Instructional Coach


                                                     62
Local Timelines
  [School Systems complete as needed]


  • CRCT applications due_____

  • Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT)
    and Instructional Coach applications
    due_______


                                         63
Validity of Certificate

Six (6) years:
• 2006 Master Teachers will renew in 2011-12 school year
• 2007 Master Teachers will renew in 2012-2013 school year
• 2008 Master Teachers will renew in 2013-2014 school year
• 2009 Master Teachers will renew in 2014-2015 school year

• Renewal will be based on continued evidence of a positive
  impact on student achievement



                                                          64
      Electronic Data
    Submission Process
for Local System Operators




                             65
Electronic Submission
Process
•    APPLICATION: All supporting documents are submitted
     electronically by the Local School System Operator.
     Faxed applications and documents are NOT
     ACCEPTED.

•    STUDENT ROSTER(S): Submitted electronically on the
     template provided (scanned and faxed rosters are NOT
     ACCEPTED)

•    SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS - some can be scanned
     and saved to a file: Access the Document Submission
     Guidelines and Checklist 2010 for:
       - Complete list of documents to be submitted
       - File names for each document submitted         66
 Designate a System Operator

• System operators will use the Master Teacher Data Manager
  (MTDM) on the PSC’s portal, www.gapsc.org

• Most systems already have someone authorized to use
  MTDM

• Register new operators by sending email to:
  support@gapsc.com and provide the following information
  about the operator:
   –   Full name
   –   School system
   –   Email address
   –   Phone number                                         67
Get Ready…


Obtain and prepare application materials before accessing www.gapsc.org

• Gather paper and electronic documents from applicants.
• Applicants have provided you with a list of documents that are to be
  included with the limitations placed on the number of pages per document
  as appropriate.
• Access www.gamasterteachers.org/SchoolSystem - a complete list of file
  names for all application categories can be found in Document
  Submission Guidelines and Checklist.
• Expect to have many electronic documents from each applicant
• Be sure paper documents are complete – check for all required
  signatures!
• Scan paper documents to generate electronic documents in PDF or TIF format.
  You should have one electronic document per paper document.



                                                                            68
Log in…


System operator logs onto www.gapsc.org and clicks
the MTDM button




                                                69
Master Teacher Data
Manager (MTDM)

                      •   Record lookup
                      •   History
                      •   Status
                      •   Application
                          creation and
                          editing




                                          70
Record Lookup:
Find a Teacher




   • Enter SSN or Certification ID
   • Click the “Search” button


                                     71
Update Personal Information
                              • Check the
                                applicant's
                                address and
                                update it!
                              • Add the
                                applicant’s
                                email address
                                located on the
                                applicant’s
                                Personal
                                Information
                                form
                              • Click “Save
                                changes”

                                                 72
Application Questions




  • Provide the requested data from the applicant’s application
  • Click the “Continue” button to proceed
  • Click “Quit” to stop and resume later


                                                                  73
74
75
76
                           #1: Click to browse your drives and
                           find the file to upload
#2: After selecting
your file, click here to
upload




                                                             77
                             #1: Click to your drives
                             and find the file to upload


#2: After selecting your
file, click here to upload
                             #3: After uploading file, check to be sure that
                             the filename submitted is uploaded, then
                             click on continue




                                                                       78
79
Summary Screen
  CHECK FOR
  ACCURACY

The SUBMIT
button on the
MTDM portal for
the following
teacher must be
clicked in order to
finish submitting.
The application
will go forward to
the PSC as soon
as that operation
is completed. 80
Electronic Upload Errors


•    SUBMISSION ERRORS: Application with submission
     errors will be placed in the category “CANNOT
     PROCESS”. PSC staff will no longer be able to contact
     systems/teachers to correct information. Errors include
     wrong rosters, incorrect student ID numbers, and
     scanned documents that should have been transmitted
     in the provided format through the portal, etc.

•    TO AVOID ERRORS, BE SURE TO CHECK THAT:
      • Supporting documents submitted are uploaded to the correct
        applicant’s file and to the correct section
      • Data submitted match the school, grade, and school year
      • Student identification number (the GTID 10-digit number used for
        GA DOE reporting) is provided for the correct school, grade, and
        school year of data (CRCT format only)
                                                                    81
Closing Remarks

• Recognition for Georgia’s public school teachers

• Collaborative effort by:
   – PSC
   – DOE
   – Governor’s Office of Student Achievement
   – Governor’s Office
   – Legislature
   – The Public

• Thank you for your interest and your comments!!!


                                                     82
Information Access


     Website: www.gamasterteachers.org
     Email: masterteachers@gapsc.com




                                         83
Contact Information


  For questions and information:

    ginny.elliott@gapsc.com 404-232-2601
    winifred.nweke@gapsc.com 404-232-2602
    tom.higgins@gapsc.com 404-232-2603




                                            84

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: Sample Kindergarten Teacher Resume document sample