Commonwealth_realms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Commonwealth realm Commonwealth realm convenience for distinguishing this group of realms from other countries in the Commonwealth that do not share the same monarch. Current Commonwealth realms The Commonwealth realms, shown in pink. A Commonwealth realm is any one of 16 sovereign states within the Commonwealth of Nations that each have Elizabeth II as their respective monarch.[1][2] These countries have a combined area totalling 18.8 million km² (excluding Antarctic claims), and a combined population of 132 million;[3] all but about 2 million live in the six most populous states, namely the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand, and Jamaica. Fourteen of the current, and all former, realms were once British colonies that evolved into independent states, the exceptions being the United Kingdom (UK) itself and Papua New Guinea, which was formed in 1975 as a union of the former German New Guinea – which had been administered by Australia as an international trusteeship before independence – and the former British New Guinea – which had legally been the British possession of Papua, administered on the UK’s behalf by Australia since 1905. The first realms to emerge were colonies that had already previously attained the status of a self governing Dominion within the British Empire. For a time, the older term of Dominion was retained to refer to these non-British realms, even though their actual status had changed with the granting of full legislative independence. The word is still sometimes used today, though increasingly rarely, as the word realm was formally introduced with the proclamation of Elizabeth II in 1952,[1] and acquired legal status with the adoption of the modern royal styles and titles by the individual countries. The qualified term Commonwealth realm is not official, and has not been used in law; rather, it is a term of Country Antigua and Barbuda Monarchy Date[* Queen’s Title 1] Roy Sta Monarchy of Antigua and Barbuda 1981 Elizabeth the Non Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Antigua and Barbuda and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth. Australia Monarchy of Australia 1942[* Elizabeth the 2] Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth. 1973 The Bahamas Monarchy of the Bahamas Elizabeth the Non Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth. Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Barbados and of Her other Realms and Territories, Barbados Monarchy of Barbados 1966 1 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Head of the Commonwealth Belize Monarchy of Belize 1981 Elizabeth the None Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Belize and of Her Other Realms and Territories, New Head of the Zealand Commonwealth English: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Papua Queen, Head of New the Common- Guinea wealth, Defender of the Faith French: Elizabeth Deux, par la grâce de Dieu Reine du Royaume-Uni, Saint du Canada et Kitts and de ses autres Nevis royaumes et territoires, Chef du Commonwealth, Défenseur de la Foi[4] Elizabeth the None Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of the Saint United King- Lucia dom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Grenada and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth Saint Vincent Elizabeth the and the Second, by the Grenadines Commonwealth realm Grace of God, Queen of Jamaica and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth Monarchy of New Zealand 1947 Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Papua New Guinea and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Christopher and Nevis and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Lucia and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Canada Monarchy of Canada 1931 Monarchy of Papua New Guinea 1975 Non Monarchy of Saint Kitts and Nevis 1983 Non Grenada Monarchy 1974 of Grenada Monarchy of Saint Lucia 1979 Non Jamaica Monarchy of Jamaica 1962 Monarchy of Saint Vincent 1979 Non 2 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and the Grenadines Commonwealth realm state Vincent and the of the Cook Islands, but no act passed by Grenadines and the Parliament of New Zealand after 1981 of Her other applies in the Cook Islands.[5] For example, Realms and any change in the laws of succession to the Territories, New Zealand throne made by New Zealand Head of the would have no effect in the Cook Islands unless Commonwealth separately ratified there. As a result, the Cook Islands may be considered as a de facto Monarchy 1978 Elizabeth the None SoCommonwealth realm, though it is not formof the SoSecond, by the lomon ally considered to be one. lomon Grace of God, Islands Islands Queen of the Solomon Islands and of Her other Realms and The Commonwealth realms are sovereign Territories, states, united only in the voluntary and symHead of the metric sharing of the institution of the monCommonwealth archy,[6] the succession, and the Queen herself. Terms such as personal union, a form of Elizabeth the None Tuvalu Monarchy 1978 personal union,[† 1][8] and shared monarchy, of Tuvalu Second, by the amongst others,[† 2][11] have all been adGrace of God, Queen of Tu-vanced as definitions since the beginning of the valu and of Her Commonwealth itself, though there has been no agreement on which term is most acother Realms curate,[10][11] or even whether personal uniand Territories, Head of the on is applicable at all.[† 3] The United Kingdom Commonwealth no longer holds any legislative power over any country besides itself, although United Monarchy n/a[* 3] Elizabeth the some countries continue to use the Judicial of the UnSecond, by the Kingdom Committee of the British Privy Council as ited Grace of God, part of their own judiciary; usually as the Kingdom of the United highest court of appeal. Kingdom of Potential or actual conflicts of interest Great Britain have arisen from this relationship amongst and Northern independent states, ranging from minor dipIreland and of lomatic matters – such as the monarch exHer other pressing on the advice of one of her cabinets Realms and views that counter those of another of her Territories cabinets[† 4] – to more serious conflicts reQueen, Head of garding matters of war, wherein a the monthe Commonarch may be simultaneously at war and at wealth, Defendpeace with himself as head of two hostile naer of the Faith tions.[† 5] In such cases, viceroys have tended [1] Dates indicate the year of enactment of the Statute of Westminster to act in manners that avoid placing the sov(Canada), adoption by realm (Australia and New Zealand), or directly in the centre of the conflict, ereign grant of independence (all others except the UK); the monarch became head of governor-general may have to meaning that a state of the particular realm on this date as a result of one of these take controversial actions entirely on his or events. The monarch had previously been head of state over the same her own initiative through the exercise of the territory by virtue of being monarch of the United Kingdom, or, in the [† 6] reserve powers. Relationship of the realms case of Papua New Guinea, monarch of Australia. [2] Adoption of Statute of Westminster was declared retroactive to 1939. [3] A date is not applicable to the United Kingdom as it was the original Under the 1981 Cook Islands constitution, the Queen in Right of New Zealand is head of The Crown in the Comrealm from which other realms became independent. monwealth realms 3 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Commonwealth realm alternately, a realm may choose to end its participation in the shared monarchy. From a cultural standpoint, the shared nature of the Crown is less clear. In all realms, the sovereign’s name and image and other royal symbols are visible in the emblems and insignia of governmental institutions and militia. The Queen’s effigy, for example, appears on coins and banknotes in some countries, and an oath of allegiance to the Queen is usually required from politicians, judges, and new citizens. It is argued, however, that the Crown throughout the realms remains essentially British and primarily of the United Kingdom, despite the legal and cultural evolution of the Commonwealth since the 1930s, whereas others emphasise the Crown as a shared link between the Commonwealth realms, with the Crown in right of their own nation having unique domestic characteristics. Three portraits of Queen Elizabeth II illustrating her different positions as sovereign; from left to right: as Queen of New Zealand, as Queen of Canada, and as Queen of the United Kingdom.[† 7] Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, pose at Windsor Castle with the Queen’s fifteen viceroys in 2002.[† 8] The evolution of the Commonwealth realms has led to the scenario wherein the Crown has both a separate and a shared character; it is a singular institution with one sovereign, but also simultaneously operates separately within the jurisdiction of each country, with the Queen in right of a particular realm being a distinct legal person who acts only on the advice of the Cabinet of that state.[15] This means that in different contexts the term Crown may refer to the extra-national institution shared amongst all 16 countries, or to the Crown in each realm considered separately.[† 9] However, though the monarchy is therefore no longer an exclusively British institution,[15] for reasons historical, of convenience, or political it may in the media and legal fields often still be elaborated as the British Crown, regardless of the different, specific, and official national titles and terms that exist in each jurisdiction; for example, in Barbados the Queen is titled as Elizabeth II, Queen of Barbados, or simply the Queen of Barbados. To guarantee the continuity of this arrangement, the preamble of the 1931 Statute of Westminster stipulates that any alteration to the line of succession in any one country must be voluntarily approved by the parliaments of all the realms,[† 10][16] or, Monarch’s role in the realms The monarch is, in theory, the supreme governor of each of the Commonwealth realms, charged with issuing executive orders, commanding the military forces, and creating and administering laws. However, each country now operates under the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy and the concept of responsible government, meaning that the monarch only exercises her powers on the advice of her Crown ministers, who are usually drawn from, and thus responsible to, the elected lower house of the relevant parliament. While this remains the case for all the Commonwealth realms, their sovereign resides predominantly in her oldest realm, the United Kingdom, and thus carries out her duties there mostly in person. In the other realms, the Queen normally exercises only those powers related to the appointment of her viceroys (a governor-general in all cases, and a governor in each of the Australian states), usually on the advice of the prime minister of the country or state concerned, though this process may have additional requirements.[† 11] In certain other cases, the extent to which varies from realm to realm, specific additional powers are reserved exclusively for the monarch – such as the appointment of extra senators to the Canadian Senate, the creation of honours, or the issuance of letters patent – and on occasions of 4 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Commonwealth realm her dominions outside the UK, or acting on behalf of those realms abroad, approximately every other year. Religious role of the monarch The sovereign’s religious role differs from country to country. In all realms except Papua New Guinea, the Queen is sovereign "By the Grace of God", a phrase that forms a part of her official title within those states. In Canada, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand, "Defender of the Faith" (in Latin: fidei defensor) – the ancient phrase first granted in 1521 by Pope Leo X to King Henry VIII – is also included as a part of the royal title,[17] and the sovereign is anointed as such in the only coronation that takes place in any of the realms, a ceremony in the context of a church service imbued with theological and constitutional symbolism and meaning, held at Westminster Abbey in London, United Kingdom. However, as no realm other than the UK has an established church, it is only there that the Queen actually plays a direct role in organised religion, acting not only as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England – appointing for it bishops and archbishops who thereafter act as her Lords Spiritual – but also sitting as an ordinary member of the Church of Scotland, albeit one who swears an oath to uphold and protect the church and sends to meetings of the church’s General Assembly a Lord High Commissioner as her representative, when she is not personally in attendance.[18] Unusually for the Church of Scotland, Glasgow and Dunblane Cathedrals are both owned by the British Crown, though they are not alike to the Chapels Royal, which exist in both the United Kingdom and Canada and form a part of the Ecclesiastical Household in those two countries. In England and Scotland, these chapels are known as Royal Peculiars, and fall directly within the jurisdiction of the British monarch, as opposed to a diocese, as is the norm. To them, the Queen may also appoint her own chaplains from either the Church of England or of Scotland. Accompanied by her royal consort, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Queen Elizabeth II reads the Speech from the Throne at the opening of the third session of the 30th Canadian Parliament, on 18 October 1977. national importance, the Queen may be advised to perform in person her constitutional duties, such as granting Royal Assent or issuing a royal proclamation. Otherwise, all royal powers, including the Royal Prerogative, are carried out on behalf of the sovereign by the relevant viceroy, which, apart from those already mentioned, include a lieutenant governor in each province of Canada and the Queen’s Representative in the Cook Islands, though these are appointed by the Governor General of Canada and Governor-General of New Zealand, respectively. In the United Kingdom, the Queen appoints Counsellors of State to perform her constitutional duties in her absence. Similarly, the monarch will perform ceremonial duties in the Commonwealth realms to mark historically significant events. She will do so in the United Kingdom most frequently, and in the other countries during tours at least once every five or six years, meaning the Queen is present in a number of Royal family As with the sovereign, a single royal family is shared by the Commonwealth realms, similarly being most frequently referred to in a casual fashion as the British Royal Family, 5 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia sometimes causing conflict with official national titles, such as in Canada. Though there is no strict legal or formal definition of who is or is not a member of the Royal Family,[19] the group is loosely defined as the extended family of the monarch. These persons constitute the apex of a modern royal court, regularly performing public duties at hundreds of events throughout the 16 realms each year. For this work, the Royal Family members receive no salary from any state; instead, only the expenses incurred for each event (security, transportation, venue, etc.) are, due to the nature of the Crown in the realms, funded by the relevant state individually through the ordinary legislative budgeting process. These engagements are organised in order for the Crown to honour, encourage, and learn about the achievements or endeavours of individuals, institutions, and enterprises in a variety of areas of the lives of the Queen’s subjects. As representatives of the monarch, Royal Family members often also join the nation in commemorating historical events, holidays, and celebratory and tragic occurrences, as well as sponsoring or participating in numerous charitable, cultural, and social activities. Their work, which is all formally recorded in the Court Circular, draws public attention to amicable relations within and between the nations of the Commonwealth and beyond; the members of the Royal Family draw enormous media coverage in the form of photographic, written, and televised commentary on not only their activities and public roles, but also family relationships, rites of passage, personalities, attire, and behaviour. Commonwealth realm The Personal Flag of Queen Elizabeth II, used in a general capacity within the Commonwealth. latter flag on its own is used for realms that do not have a unique personal standard for the monarch, as well as for general use in representing the Queen as Head of the Commonwealth. The monarch previously held royal standards for Sierra Leone, Mauritius, Malta, and Trinidad and Tobago, but these banners became obsolete when the countries became republics. The Governors-General throughout the Commonwealth realms also each use a personal flag, which, like that of the sovereign, passes to each successive occupant of the office. All feature a lion passant atop a St. Edward’s royal crown with the name of the country across a scroll underneath, all on a blue background. The two exceptions are those of Canada (bearing on a blue background the crest of the Royal Coat of Arms of Canada) and New Zealand (a St. Edward’s Crown above the shield of the Coat of Arms of New Zealand). The lieutenant governors of the Canadian provinces each have their own personal standards, as do the governors of the Australian states. Flags The Queen employs various royal standards to mark her presence, the particular one used depending on which realm she is in or acting on behalf of at the time. There are presently unique flags for Australia, Barbados, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand, and two variations for the United Kingdom – one for Scotland and another for the rest of the country. All are heraldic banners displaying the shield of the sovereign’s coat of arms for that state, and each, save for those of the UK, are defaced in the centre with the Queen’s Personal Flag, a crowned E for Elizabeth surrounded by a garland of roses representing the countries of the Commonwealth. This Historical development Dominions emerge The possibility that a colony within the British Empire might become a new kingdom was first mooted in the 1860s, when it was 6 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia proposed that the British North American territories of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and the Province of Canada unite as a confederation that might be known as the Kingdom of Canada.[20][21][22] In light of geopolitical circumstances at the time, however, the name was abandoned in favour of the Dominion of Canada.[† 12] As more British colonies followed Canada in gaining legislative independence from the United Kingdom, Prime Minister of Canada Wilfrid Laurier was led to insist at the 1907 Imperial Conference that a formula be created to differentiate between the Crown and the self-governing colonies. For the latter the Canadian precedent was followed, and the term Dominion was extended to apply to Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, and the colonies of the Cape, Natal, and Transvaal, before and after they merged in 1910 with the Orange River Colony to form the Union of South Africa. These countries were joined in 1921 by the Irish Free State. Commonwealth realm King George V with his prime ministers at the Imperial Conference of 1926.[† 13] monarch-in-Council reigning over these territories as a single imperial domain. This unitary model began to erode, however, when the Dominions gained more international prominence as a result of their participation and sacrifice in the First World War, in 1919 prompting Canadian Prime Minister Robert Borden and South African Minister of Defence Jan Smuts to demand that the Dominions be given at the Versailles Conference full recognition as "autonomous nations of an Imperial Commonwealth." The immediate result was their being separate signatories to the Treaty of Versailles, as well as, together with India, founding members of the League of Nations, but the pace of independence thereafter increased, with Canada exchanging envoys with the United States the following year, and in 1923 concluding in its own right the Halibut Fisheries Treaty, and by 1925 the Dominions felt confident enough to refuse to be bound by Britain’s adherence to the Treaty of Locarno. All of this appeared to put to rest previous assertions that the Crown could never be divided amongst the Dominions.[† 14] A compiled portrait of the main delegates to the signing of the Treaty of Versailles; Prime Minister of Canada Robert Borden sits 4th from left. Although the Dominions were capable of governing themselves internally, they technically remained – especially in regards to foreign policy and defence – subject to British authority, wherein the Governor-General of each Dominion represented the British Between the wars Another catalyst for change came in 1926, when then Governor General of Canada The Baron Byng of Vimy refused the advice of his prime minister (William Lyon Mackenzie King) in what came to be known colloquially as the King-Byng Affair.[24] Mackenzie King, after being dismissed and then reappointed as prime minister some months later, pushed at the Imperial Conference of 1926 for a reorganisation of the way the Dominions 7 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia related to the British government, resulting in the Balfour Declaration, which declared formally the practical reality that had existed for some years, namely that the Dominions were fully autonomous and equal in status to the United Kingdom.[25] It thus followed that the Dominion governments gained a separate and direct relationship with the monarch, without the British Cabinet acting as an intermediary, and the governors-general now acted solely as a personal representative of the sovereign in right of that Dominion.[† 15] Though no formal mechanism for tendering advice to the monarch had yet been established – former Prime Minister of Australia William Hughes theorised that the Dominion cabinets would provide informal direction and the British Cabinet would offer formal advice[27] – the concepts were first put into legal practice with the passage in 1927 of the Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act, which implicitly recognised the Irish Free State as separate from the UK, and the King as king of each Dominion uniquely, rather than as the British king in each Dominion. Then, in 1930 George V’s Australian ministers employed a practice adopted by resolution at that year’s Imperial Conference,[28] directly advising the King to appoint Isaac Isaacs as his Australian Governor-General, against the preferences of the British government. These new developments were explicitly codified in 1931 with the passage of the Statute of Westminster, through which Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State all immediately obtained formal legislative independence from the UK, while in the other Dominions’ adoption of the statute was subject to ratification by the Dominion’s parliament. Australia and New Zealand did so in 1942 and 1947, respectively, with the former’s ratification back-dated to 1939, and, though originally covered by it, Newfoundland never ratified the bill. What resulted was the inability for the parliament at Westminster to legislate for any Dominion unless requested to do so. Further, the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council was left available as the last court of appeal for some Dominions.[29] This was all met with only minor trepidation either before or at the time,[† 16] and the government of Ireland was confident that the relationship of these independent countries under the Crown would function as a personal union,[8] akin to that which had earlier existed between the United Commonwealth realm Kingdom and Hanover (1801 to 1837), or between England and Scotland (1603 to 1707). The first prominent example of this arrangement working in practice came with the abdication of King Edward VIII in 1936,[28] for which it was necessary to gain the approval of all the Dominions of the Commonwealth before the resignation could take place;[31] Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State even passed unique legislation to solidify the changes in succession within their jurisdictions.[† 17] Following the accession of Edward’s brother, George VI, to the throne, the United Kingdom created legislation that would provide for a regency in the event of the incapacitation of the monarch. Though input was sought from the Dominions on this matter, all declined to make themselves bound by the British legislation, feeling instead that the governors-general could carry out royal functions in place of a debilitated sovereign.[33] During his tenure as Governor General of Canada, The Baron Tweedsmuir urged the organisation of a royal tour of the country by King George VI, so that he might not only appear in person before his people, but also personally perform constitutional duties and pay a state visit to the United States as King of Canada.[34] While the idea was embraced in Canada as a way to "translate the Statute of Westminster into the actualities of a tour," throughout the planning of the trip that took place in 1939, the British authorities resisted at numerous points the idea that the King be attended by his Canadian ministers instead of his British ones.[35] The Canadian Prime Minister (still Mackenzie King) was ultimately successful, however, in being the minister in attendance, and the King did in public throughout the trip ultimately act solely in his capacity as King of Canada. Yet, the international status of the Crown was also illustrated by George VI simultaneously bolstering from both Canada and the United States support for the UK in the looming war with Nazi Germany.[34] When this threat became reality, there was some uncertainty in the Dominions about the ramifications of Britain’s declaration of war against Adolf Hitler. Australia and New Zealand had not yet ratified the Statute of Westminster; the Australian Prime Minister, Robert Menzies, considered the government bound by the British declaration of 8 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia war,[36][37] while New Zealand coordinated a declaration of war to be made simultaneously with Britain’s.[38] Canada and South Africa made separate proclamations of war against Germany a few days after the UK’s. Commonwealth realm that different royal houses and republics be allowed in the Commonwealth so long as they recognised as the international organisation’s symbolic head the shared sovereign of the UK and the Dominions.[39] At approximately the same time, the tabling in 1946 of the Canadian parliament’s Canadian Citizenship Act brought into question the the homogeneity of the King’s subjects, which, prior to that year, was uniformly defined in terms of allegiance to the sovereign, without regard to the individual’s country of residence. Following negotiations, it was decided in 1947 that each Commonwealth member was free to pass its own citizenship legislation, so that its citizens owed allegiance only to the monarch in right of that country. As these constitutional developments were taking place, the Dominion and British governments became increasingly concerned with how to represent the more commonly accepted notion that there was no distinction between the sovereign’s role in the UK and his or her position in any of the Dominions, as summed up in Patrick Gordon Walker’s statement in the British House of Commons: "We in this country have to abandon... any sense of property in the Crown. The Queen, now, clearly, explicitly and according to title, belongs equally to all her realms and to the Commonwealth as a whole". Thus, at the 1948 Prime Ministers’ Conference the term Dominion was avoided in favour of Commonwealth country, in order to avoid the subordination implied by the older designation. Then, with the British proclamation of Elizabeth II’s accession to the throne in 1952, the phrases Commonwealth realm and Head of the Commonwealth became established, deriving from the words that declared the monarch as "of this Realm, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth." The Commonwealth realms prime ministers thereafter discussed the matter of the new monarch’s title, with St. Laurent stating at the 1953 Commonwealth Conference that it was important to agree on a format that would "emphasise the fact that the Queen is Queen of Canada, regardless of her sovereignty over other Commonwealth countries."[40] The result was a new Royal Style and Titles Act being passed in each of the seven realms then existing (excluding Pakistan), which all identically gave formal recognition to the separateness and equality of the countries involved, and replaced the Post-war evolution Governor General and Viceroy of India The Earl Mountbatten overseeing the transfer of power that created India as a Commonwealth realm, 15 August 1947. Jawaharlal Nehru signing the Constitution of India, ending the country’s status as a Commonwealth realm. Once the Second World War was over, India, Pakistan, and Ceylon became independent Dominions of the Commonwealth, though it was made clear at the time that India would soon move to a republican form of government. Unlike Ireland and Burma at the time of their becoming republics, however, there was no desire on the part of India to give up its membership in the British Commonwealth, prompting a Commonwealth Conference and the issuance of the London Declaration in 1949, which entrenched the idea of Canadian Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent 9 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia phrase "British Dominions Beyond the Seas" with "Her Other Realms and Territories", the latter using the medieval French word realm (from royaume) in place of dominion. Further, at her coronation, Elizabeth II’s oath contained a provision requiring her to promise to govern according to the rules and customs of the realms, naming each one separately. The principle of fully separate and equal realms was followed in all future grants of independence, including those that came through the winds of change that swept through Africa in the 1960s, the collapse of the Federation of the West Indies in 1961, and at later dates. In post-colonial Africa, within a few years of their founding the realms drafted new constitutions in order to come under a different royal house or become republics within the Commonwealth; South Africa was the only exception, having been a Dominion and then a realm for 54 years before becoming a republic in 1961. The white minority government of Rhodesia in 1965 issued its unilateral Declaration of Independence, and its members affirmed their loyalty to Elizabeth II as Queen of Rhodesia, a title to which she had not consented, did not accept, and was not recognised internationally. Her representative in the colony, Sir Humphrey Gibbs, immediately dismissed his prime minister, Ian Smith, but this action was ignored by Smith and he appointed, without the Queen’s consent, an Officer Administrating the Government to perform the Governor’s constitutional duties until 1970, when Smith’s government declared Rhodesia a republic. When Papua New Guinea became independent of Australia in 1975, this was the first (and so far the last) time a Commonwealth realm was created from a territory that had never been made up of British colonies in its entirety. The country to most recently become a Commonwealth realm was Saint Kitts and Nevis, achieving the status in 1983. There are currently movements in some Commonwealth realms to end their respective country’s involvement in the shared monarchy, most advocating a republican government in place of the present constitutional monarchy; they are countered by monarchist leagues that support the existing system and celebrate the historical and modern connections the shared monarchy provides. Commonwealth realm Former Commonwealth realms Country[‡ 1] Ceylon[‡ 2] Dates Original system Method R S 1948 – Parliamentary New 1972 republic constitution 1970 – Parliamentary Military coup 1987 republic 1965 – Presidential 1970 republic 1957 – Presidential 1960 republic Referendum Referendum N Fiji Gambia Ghana Guyana India[‡ 3] Ireland Kenya Malawi Malta 1966 – Parliamentary Constitutional 1970 republic amendment 1947 – Parliamentary New 1950 republic constitution 1931 – Parliamentary Act of parlia1949 republic ment[‡ 4] 1963 – Presidential 1964 republic 1964 – Single-party 1966 republic New constitution New constitution N 1964 – Parliamentary Constitutional 1974 republic amendment 1968 – Parliamentary Constitutional 1992 republic amendment 1960 – Parliamentary Constitutional 1963 republic amendment 1947 – Parliamentary New 1956 republic constitution 1961 – Presidential 1971 republic New constitution Mauritius Nigeria Pakistan Sierra Leone South Africa Tanganyika[‡ 5] Trinidad and Tobago Uganda N 1931 – Parliamentary Referendum 1961 republic 1961 – Presidential 1962 republic New constitution 1962 – Parliamentary New 1976 republic constitution 1962 – Parliamentary Constitutional 1963 republic amendment [1] The flags shown are those in use at the time the country was a Rhodesian flag in 1968. Commonwealth realm; the Ceylonese flag changed in 1951, an [2] Now called Sri Lanka. [3] The term Dominion was still used to describe a Commonwealth this time. [4] See also: Irish head of state from 1936-1949. [5] Now a part of Tanzania. 10 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Commonwealth realm credentials of the German consul to Ireland, which remained neutral throughout the war. A more extreme example was the IndoPakistani War of 1947, in which George VI, as head of state of both warring nations, was, in a legal sense, at war with himself. Similarly, in 1983 Queen Elizabeth II was monarch of Grenada when her governor-general there requested the invasion of the country by a number of other Caribbean states, including some that were also realms of the Queen; an undertaking that was opposed by a number of Elizabeth’s other governments, such as those of the United Kingdom, Canada, and Belize. [6] In the example of the 1983 invasion of Grenada, the Governor-General, Sir Paul Scoon, invited the intervention of foreign troops deliberately without ever having informed the Queen. Also, when Sir John Kerr dismissed the Australian government in 1975, he did not inform the Queen of his intent to do so. [7] To illustrate the distinction, the Queen in each portrait is wearing the sovereign’s insignia of honours unique to each state: for New Zealand, the Order of New Zealand, the Queen’s Service Order, and the sash and the star of the New Zealand Order of Merit; for Canada, the Order of Canada and the Order of Military Merit; and for the United Kingdom, the Order of the Garter and the Royal Family Orders of King George V and King George VI. [8] The figures in the image are, from left to right, back row: Ivy Dumont, GovernorGeneral of the Bahamas; Silvia Cartwright, Governor-General of New Zealand; unknown; Pearlette Louisy, Governor-General of Saint Lucia; unknown; unknown; Adrienne Clarkson, Governor General of Canada; Peter Hollingworth, Governor-General of Australia; Filoimea Telito, GovernorGeneral of Tuvalu; front row: unknown; Colville Young, Governor-General of Belize; Paulias Matane, GovernorGeneral of Papua New Guinea; Queen Elizabeth II; The Duke of Edinburgh; Frederick Ballantyne, Governor-General of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; unknown; and Clifford Husbands, Governor-General of Barbados. See also • • • • States headed by Elizabeth II Self-governing colony British overseas territories Monarchy Notes [1] F.R. Scott stated: "The common kinship within the British group today establishes a form of personal union, the members of which are legally capable of following different international policies even in time of war."[7] [2] W.Y Elliott stated: If a personal union be chosen, the Crown will be forced to act on the king’s own discretion [and] since personal discretion is a modern monarch is unthinkable, the only alternative would be a league of states with a common but symbolic crown",[9] and Alexander N. Sack stated: "Whatever the future development of the British Commonwealth may be [it] can be described as a that of associations or unions of States, as distinguished from ’personal’ unions, on the one hand, and federal States, on the other.[10] [3] J. D. B. Miller stated:[T]he survey concludes with an attempt to classify the Commonwealth. It is no longer a federation, nor a military alliance, nor a personal union.[12] [4] During a British state visit to Jordan in 1984, Queen Elizabeth II made a speech expressing opinions of her British Cabinet that countered the views of her Australian Cabinet,[13] though the Queen was evidently not representing Australia at that time. Similarly, Elizabeth II undertook a visit to Latin America to promote British goods at the same time a Canadian ministerial trip was underway in the same region in order to promote Canadian products.[14] [5] In 1939, the Union of South Africa and Canada, under the articles of the Statute of Westminster, declared war on Nazi Germany some days after the United Kingdom had done so, meaning that King George VI, as king of all three countries, was both at war and at peace with Germany. Similarly, as he was still technically monarch of Ireland, it was George VI’s duty to validate the 11 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [9] One Canadian constitutional scholar, Dr. Richard Toporoski, stated on this: "I am perfectly prepared to concede, even happily affirm, that the British Crown no longer exists in Canada, but that is because legal reality indicates to me that in one sense, the British Crown no longer exists in Britain: the Crown transcends Britain just as much as it does Canada. One can therefore speak of ’the British Crown’ or ’the Canadian Crown’ or indeed the ’Barbadian’ or ’Tuvaluan’ Crown, but what one will mean by the term is the Crown acting or expressing itself within the context of that particular jurisdiction".[15] [10] Monarchist League of New Zealand Chairman Professor Noel Cox stated: "Any alteration by the United Kingdom Parliament in the law touching the succession to the throne would, except perhaps in the case of Papua New Guinea, be ineffective to alter the succession to the throne in respect of, and in accordance with the law of, any other independent member of the Commonwealth which was within the Queen’s realms at the time of such alteration. Therefore it is more than mere constitutional convention that requires that the assent of the Parliament of each member of the Commonwealth within the Queen’s realms be obtained in respect of any such alteration in the law." [11] In the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, the Prime Minister must consult the legislature in confidence; in Papua New Guinea the Governor-General is nominated to the Queen by a parliamentary vote. [12] The Colonial Office in London opposed this potentially "premature" and "pretentious" reference for a new country, and were also also wary of antagonizing the United States, which had emerged from its Civil War as a formidable military power with unsettled grievances because of British support for the Confederate cause. See also: Name of Canada > Adoption of Dominion. [13] The figures in the photo are, back row, left to right: Walter Stanley Monroe, Prime Minister of Newfoundland; Gordon Coates, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Stanley Bruce, Prime Minister of Commonwealth realm Australia; James Hertzog, Prime Minister of South Africa, and W.T. Cosgrave, President of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State; front row, left to right: Stanley Baldwin, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; the King; and William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada. [14] A.H. Lefroy wrote in 1918: "The Crown is to be considered as one and indivisible throughout the Empire; and cannot be severed into as many kingships as there are Dominions, and self-governing colonies."[23] [15] The ministers in attendance at the Imperial Conference agreed that: "In our opinion it is an essential consequence of the equality of status existing among the members of the British Commonwealth of Nations that the Governor General of a Dominion is the representative of the Crown, holding in all essential respects the same position in relation to the administration of public affairs in the Dominion as is held by His Majesty the King in great Britain, and that he is not the representative or agent of His Majesty’s Government in Great Britain or of any Department of that Government.[26] [16] P.E. Corbett in 1940 questioned whether there were any existing terms that could be used to describe any or all of the "possessions of the British Crown,"[11] while Scottish constitutional lawyer Arthur Berriedale Keith warned before 1930 that "the suggestion that the King can act directly on the advice of Dominion Ministers is a constitutional monstrosity, which would be fatal to the security of the position of the Crown."[30] [17] The Oireachtas of the Irish Free State passed the External Relation Act on 12 December 1936,[32] the parliament of the Union of South Africa passed an act declaring that the abdication had taken place on 10 December, and the parliament of Canada passed the Succession to the Throne Act in 1937.[28] References [1] ^ "Official Website of the British Monarchy > What is a Realm?". Queen’s Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/ Home.aspx. Retrieved on 2 May 2009. 12 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Commonwealth realm [2] "Mailbox". Royal Insight (London: doi:10.2307/824318. Buckingham Palace) (August 2005). http://links.jstor.org/ August 2005. http://www.royal.gov.uk/ sici?sici=0042-0220%281940%293%3A2%3C348%3A output/Page4422.asp. Retrieved on [12] Miller, J.D.B (October 1959). "The 2008-10-25. (dead link) Commonwealth in the World". The [3] Figures totalled from 2007 CIA World American Historical Review Fact Book (Washington, DC: American Historical [4] Elizabeth II (1985), Loi sur les titres Association) Volume 65 (Number 1). royaux, Ottawa: Queen’s Printer for [13] Cohen, Zelman (1995) (Lecture). Further Canada, R.S., 1985, c. R-12, Reflections on an Australian Republic. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/fr/showdoc/cs/ Sir Robert Menzies Lecture Trust. R-12/se:1::se:2/20090503/fr?page=1, http://www.menzieslecture.org/ retrieved on 3 May 2009 1995.html. Retrieved on 3 May 2009. [5] Elizabeth II (1965), Constitution of the [14] Sharp, Mitchell (1994). Which Reminds Cook Islands, Westminster: Queen’s Me..., A Memoir. Toronto: University of Printer, http://www.paclii.org/ck/legis/ Toronto Press. p. 223. ISBN num_act/cotci327/, retrieved on 2 May 978-0802005458. 2009 [15] ^ Toporoski, Richard. "The Invisible [6] Trepanier, Peter (2004). "Some Visual Crown". Monarchy Canada. Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition". http://www.monarchist.ca/mc/ Canadian Parliamentary Review (Ottawa: invisibl.htm. Retrieved on 2008-04-20. Commonwealth Parliamentary [16] George V (11 December 1931), Statute Association) 27 (2). of Westminster, 1931, Westminster: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/ Queen’s Printer, c. 4 (U.K.), Infoparl/english/ http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/ issue.asp?param=160&art=287. Canada/English/ Retrieved on 2 May 2009. StatuteofWestminster.html, retrieved on [7] Scott, F. R. (January 1944). "The End of 2 May 2009 Dominion Status". The American Journal [17] "World Who’s Who > Reigning Royal Families > United Kingdom". Routledge of International Law 38 (1): 34–49. Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.2307/2192530. http://www.worldwhoswho.com/public/ http://links.jstor.org/ views/ sici?sici=0002-9300%28194401%2938%3A1%3C34%3ATEODS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B. royal_families.html?country=UNITED_KINGDOM. [8] ^ "Murdoch University Electronic Retrieved on 3 May 2009. Journal of Law". Black v Chrétien: Suing [18] "The Monarchy Today > Queen and State a Minister of the Crown for Abuse of > Queen and Church > Queen and Power, Misfeasance in Public Office and Church of Scotland". Queen’s Printer. Negligence. September 2002. http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/ http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/ Page4709.asp. Retrieved on 25 October v9n3/cox93.html. Retrieved on 2 October 2008. 2008. [19] >"Heraldica > Heraldry and Royalty [9] Elliott, W.Y (November 1930). "The FAQs > FAQ on British royalty". François Sovereignty of the British Dominions: R. Velde. http://www.heraldica.org/faqs/ Law Overtakes Practice". The American britfaq.html#p2-2. Retrieved on 3 May Political Science Review 24 (4): 971–989. 2009. doi:10.2307/1946754. [20] Farthing, John (1985). Freedom Wears a [10] ^ Sack, Alexander N. (March 1940). Crown. Toronto: Veritas Paperback. "Treaty Relations of the British ISBN 978-0949667038. Commonwealth of Nations". University of [21] Pope, Joseph (2009). Confederation: Pennsylvania Law Review and American Being a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Law Register 88 (5): 637–640. Documents Bearing on the British North doi:10.2307/3308937. America Act. Whitefish: Kessinger [11] ^ Corbett, P. E. (1940). "The Status of Publishing. p. 177. ISBN the British Commonwealth in 978-1104086541. International Law". The University of Toronto Law Journal 3 (2): 348–359. 13 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [22] Hubbard, R.H. (1977). Rideau Hall. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen’s University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0773503106. [23] Lefroy, A. H. (1918). A Short Treatise on Canadian Constitutional Law. Toronto: Carswell. pp. 59-60. [24] Williams, Jeffery (1983). Byng of Vimy: General and Governor General. Barnsley, S. Yorkshire: Leo Cooper in association with Secker & Warburg. pp. 314-317. [25] Marshall, Peter (September 2001). "The Balfour Formula and the Evolution of the Commonwealth". The Round Table 90 (361): 541–53. doi:10.1080/ 00358530120082823. [26] Balfour, Arthur (November 1926). "Imperial Conference 1926". Balfour Declaration, London: King’s Printer. E (I.R./26) Series. Retrieved on 6 May 2009. [27] Jenks, Edward (1927). "Imperial Conference and the Constitution". Cambridge Law Journal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Law Society) 3 (13): 21. ISSN 0008-1973. [28] ^ Heard, Andrew (1990), Canadian Independence, Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/ 324/Independence.html, retrieved on 6 May 2009 [29] Baker, Philip Noel (1929). The Present Juridical Status of the British Dominions in International Law. London: Longmans. p. 231. [30] Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1928). Responsible Government in the Dominions. 1 (2 ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. xviii. [31] Williams, Susan (2003). The People’s King: The True Story of the Abdication. London: Penguin Books Ltd.. p. 130. ISBN 0-71399-573-4. [32] Edward VIII (12 December 1936), Executive Authority (External Relations) Act, 1936, Dublin: King’s Printer for the Irish Free State, 3.2, http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1936/en/ act/pub/0058/ sec0003.html#zza58y1936s3, retrieved on 6 May 2009 [33] Mallory, J. R. (1984). The Structure and Function of Canadian Government (2 ed.). Toronto: Gage. pp. 36-37. [34] ^ Library and Archives Canada. "Biography and People > A Real Commonwealth realm Companion and Friend > Behind the Diary > Politics, Themes, and Events from King’s Life > The Royal Tour of 1939". Queen’s Printer for Canada. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/king/ 023011-1070.06-e.html. Retrieved on 6 May 2009. [35] Galbraith, William (1989). "Fiftieth Anniversary of the 1939 Royal Visit". Canadian Parliamentary Review (Ottawa: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association) 12 (3). http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/ Infoparl/english/ issue.asp?param=130&art=820. Retrieved on 6 May 2009. [36] Hasluck, Paul (1952). The Government and the People, 1939-1941. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. pp. 149-151. [37] Menzies’ announcement of the declaration of war [38] Monckton-Arundell, George (1949), "Documents Relating to New Zealand’s Participation in the Second World War 1939-45 > 9 - The Governor-General of New Zealand to the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs", in Historical Publications Branch, The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945, 1, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 4 September 1939, http://www.nzetc.org/tm/scholarly/ tei-WH2-1Doc-c1-9.html, retrieved on 6 May 2009 [39] de Smith, S. A. (1949). "The London Declaration of the Commonwealth Prime Ministers, April 28, 1949". The Modern Law Review 12 (3): 351–354. http://links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=0026-7961%28194907%2912%3A3%3C351 Retrieved on 22 July 2007. [40] High Commissioner in United Kingdom (6 December 1952), "Royal Style and Titles", Documents on Canadian External Relations 15 (3), DEA/50121-B-40, http://www.international.gc.ca/ department/history-histoire/dcer/detailsen.asp?intRefid=3499 Bibliography • Bogdanor, V.; The Monarchy and the Constitution; Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995 • Cox, Noel; "The Theory of Sovereignty and the Importance of the Crown in the 14 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Realms of The Queen"; Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal; Vol. 2, No. 2; 2002 • Forsey, Eugene; Royal Power of Dissolution on Parliament in the British Commonwealth; Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1968 [1943] Commonwealth realm • Maitland, F; "The Crown as a Corporation"; Law Quarterly Review; Vol. 17, No. 131; 1901 • McIntyre; P.; "The Strange Death of Dominion Status", Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History; Vol. 27, No. 2; 1999; 193-212 Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_realm" Categories: Commonwealth realms, British Empire, British monarchy, Monarchy in Canada, Monarchy in Australia, Monarchy in New Zealand This page was last modified on 11 May 2009, at 14:27 (UTC). All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) taxdeductible nonprofit charity. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers 15