Docstoc

Free Iweb Templates - Excel - Excel

Document Sample
Free Iweb Templates - Excel - Excel Powered By Docstoc
					                                                                         Iweb                           Rsmart
 1   Cost issues
 2   Cost of Pilot                                                       $30 per account                Under 200 - $3000
     free to students (3 - 5 years) - post graduation ???                                               $15000-$50000 plus yearly
                                                                                                        $4000 Planning,
                                                                         No-$30 per account - can       Implementaion, Support-all one-
 3                                                                       buy multi year accounts        time costs
     mission critical hardware important-where is the data housed?
 4                                                                       No                             yes (pilot can be hosted here)
     tech support, training and monitoring                               No -needs to have a
 5                                                                       manager on campus              Yes
 6 new verision                                                          June 30th                      Mid-May
 7 Access issues
 8 accessible from anywhere                                              Yes                            Yes
 9 access determined by owner                                            Yes                            Yes
   outsiders possible--potential employers

10                                                                       Yes                            Yes
     levels of access (selectable by owner) - access determined at the   Not at artifact level unless
     artifact level                                                      build a "portfolio" with one
                                                                         artifact-there is a file       Not at artifact level unless build
                                                                         manager where you store        a "presentation" with one
                                                                         docs, links, etc-in new        artifact-management system
                                                                         version you can pull out       not clear because itwill be
11                                                                       items through tracdat          changing with new version
12
13 Integration issues
   integrated with other campus information and systems, e.g.            but maybe with new
14 PeopleSoft                                                            version?                       Yes-Per Ed Tola
   integrated with LMS (WebCT, Wolfware)
15                                                                       Yes-WebCT-Powerlink            Yes-Per Ed Tola
   ability to integrate any form of media/artifact - content
16 agnostic(ability to report from documents attached/artifacts)         No                             No
   should be progressive over time - needs a matrix -IUPUI has a
17 matrix                                                                No                             No

19
20   Higher-level issues:
     metacognitive space-reflection                                                                  Reflection built in for some
                                                                                                     elements but not others-you
                                                                      Reflection built in at every   can always add documents
21                                                                    level-every artifact           with reflections
     collaborative workspaces for courses and programs                yes/no-can give a group
                                                                      one account but then who
22                                                                    owns it?                       No
23   include co-curricular, extracurricular and experiential          Yes                            Yes
     accreditation purposes - representative assignments (program                                    Yes-separate portfolio for
     and institution)                                                                                assessment (also teacher
                                                                                                     certification, faculty
                                                                                                     development, and student
24                                                                    Yes-templates                  development)
     managing metadata-reporting across courses, programs, GER
25                                                                    Yes-limited                    Yes-will in next version
26
27   Software features issues:
     downloadable


28                                                                    Yes                            Yes
29   simple, intuitive use                                            Ok-some minor glitches         Ok-some minor glitches
     customizable (levels, "freestyle")                               Yes-ability for student to
30                                                                    build without a template       Yes
31 version control (number of drafts)                                 No                             No
   workflows - e.g. maybe some automated feedback processes,
   lockdown of assignments when submitted, division of tasks,
32 customizable etc.                                                  Customizable, lock-down,       Customizable
   ability to store any form of media/artifact - content agnostic
33                                                                    Yes                            Yes
     ability to sort data in multiple and customizable ways                                          Yes in version 2.0 March05-not
34                                                                    Yes-to some degree             able to test
     faculty portfolios integration and ability to access portfolio   Yes-if they have a user
     contents (RPT)                                                   account in addition to a       Yes-separate portfolio for
35                                                                    reviewer account               faculty
36   file Management System                                           Yes                            Yes
     feedback process                                                                                Yes-feedback process is a little
                                                                                                     less formal-"comments" from
18                                                                    Yes                            the user and reviewer
Keeptools                          LiveText                       IUPUI

Free-open source                                                  open source




Free-open source                                                  open source


Yes                                                               yes
Migration support is not part of
the scope of the project
No date set                                                       current version new

Yes                            Yes                                Yes
Yes                            Yes                                Yes
Yes but by cuting and pasting
the link from the preview page
into an email.                 Yes                                Yes




Not at artifact level unless       Not at artifact level unless
build a "Snapshot" with one        build a "Presentation" with    Only if build a presentation that
artifact-no file manager           one artifact                   includes specific artifacts




No                                                                Yes

No                                                                Yes

No                                                                Yes

No                                                                Yes
Relfection can be added but           Yes, reflection required as part of
not built in                          process of submitting for review


No                                    Yes, possible
Yes                                   Yes


Yes-templates for Course and          Yes, can be built up so that data can
blank ones for creating               automatically be transferred across
program "snapshots" or other          different matrices

No                                    Yes




Yes-do a "save as" while in
the preview of a snapshot             Yes
Yes-some minor glitches               Yes

Yes                                   Can add matrices
No                                    No


                                      Yes, formal feedback process
Customizable                          possible

Yes                                   Yes

No -maybe in next version             Yes

Yes if a user they can create         Yes, can create own portfolio once
there own.                            have an account
No                              Yes   Yes

No feedback -maybe in next
version                               Yes
   11/13/2010

Considerations for Electronic Porfolio Solutions
Cost issues
Cost of Pilot
free to students (3 - 5 years) - post graduation
mission critical hardware important-where is the data housed
tech support, training and monitoring
new verision
Access issues
accessible from anywhere
access determined by owner
outsiders possible--potential employers
levels of access (selectable by owner) - access determined at the artifact level

Integration issues
integrated with other campus information and systems, e.g. PeopleSoft
integrated with LMS (WebCT, Wolfware)
ability to integrate any form of media/artifact - content agnostic(ability to report from documents
attached/artifacts)
should be progressive over time - needs a matrix -IUPUI has a matrix
feedback process

Higher-level issues:
metacognitive space-reflection
collaborative workspaces for courses and programs
include co-curricular, extracurricular and experiential
accreditation purposes - representative assignments (program and institution)
managing metadata-reporting across courses, programs, GER

Software features issues:
downloadable
simple, intuitive use
customizable (levels, "freestyle")
version control (number of drafts)
workflows - e.g. maybe some automated feedback processes, lockdown of assignments when
submitted, division of tasks, customizable etc.
ability to store any form of media/artifact - content agnostic
ability to sort data in multiple and customizable ways
faculty portfolios integration and ability to access portfolio contents (RPT)
file Management System




                                            reviewportfolios.xls                               Page 7
11/13/2010




             reviewportfolios.xls   Page 8

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:100
posted:11/13/2010
language:English
pages:8
Description: Free Iweb Templates document sample