Facilities and Infrastructure

Click to download
Program: Facilities and Infrastructure Agency: Department of Energy Bureau: National Nuclear Security Administration 80 100 90 Rating: Moderately Effective Program Type: Capital Assets Program Summary: The purpose of the Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program (FIRP) is to restore the physical infrastructure of the nuclear weapons complex. The Department established the program in 2000 to address longstanding problems highlighted in numerous studies. Even though it is a young program, early indications are that NNSA manages it well. Findings from the PART assessment include the following: 1. The program has a specific purpose--to refurbish the aging nuclear weapons complex and reduce the backlog of maintenance that the Department deferred over the past decade. The Department has an adequate and detailed planning process that should enable it to achieve its goals of stabilizing (not increasing) the amount of deferred maintenance by 2005 and meeting the industry standard by 2009. 2. The program has a Ten-Year Comprehensive Site Plan that integrates and prioritizes projects across the weapons complex. Using the priority list, the backlog of maintenance work will be reduced to a level comparable to that found in industry by 2009. It will also lower overall maintenance requirements by reducing the amount of unused building space in the complex by approximately 3 million square feet. 3. The program appears to have strong program management at the headquarters level, with detailed involvement at the site level to ensure the proper allocation of funds. 4. Given that the program is new (its first year of funding was 2001), it does not yet have an extensive record of results. 5. Because the program is only two years old, and its results are not yet measurable, there may be some overlap between the FIRP program and other NNSA infrastructure related programs. For example, NNSA manages a separate budget line for facility readiness, and provides funding for new construction in its science campaigns budget lines. Both of these contribute to the overall condition of the weapons complex so it is an area that may require management attention in the future. The Administration plans to: 1. Review all infrastructure programs to ensure that there is no overlap between the FIRP and other NNSA programs; and 2. Monitor actual results and change the program accordingly. Purpose Planning Management Results / Accountability 67 0 Results Achieved Results Not Demonstrated 100 Measures Adequate New Measures Needed Key Performance Measures Long-term Measure: Amount of maintenance deferred from year to year that would otherwise be required to keep a facility in originally intended condition. Current NNSA data is under development. (Industry standard is to maintain the total cost of deferred maintenance at 5% or less of the total cost to replace the facility.) Long-term Measure: Amount of square feet of excess building space eliminated Year 2005 2009 Target Actual Stabilized Ind. Std. 2004 2009 435,000 3,000,000 Program Funding Level (in millions of dollars) 2002 Actual 197 2003 Estimate 243 2004 Estimate 265 88

Related docs
Other docs by b0b59b8a001752...
There s a Fountain Free
Views: 204  |  Downloads: 1
cr160
Views: 112  |  Downloads: 0
at135
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 0
Grade 8 Science Russian Glossary
Views: 964  |  Downloads: 13
ch135
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 0
Baldwin v Iowa State Traveling Mens Association
Views: 435  |  Downloads: 3
Helicopters Nacionales de Columbia v Hall
Views: 217  |  Downloads: 0
Persian Essay
Views: 1164  |  Downloads: 9
Future Possessory Interests
Views: 257  |  Downloads: 5
dv110k
Views: 109  |  Downloads: 0
Shout Hallelujah
Views: 514  |  Downloads: 9
English-Russian Legal Glossary
Views: 1056  |  Downloads: 54
Vogt Peterson Breifs
Views: 423  |  Downloads: 4
Acupuncture Fact Sheet
Views: 560  |  Downloads: 12
Idaho Public Policy Survey
Views: 761  |  Downloads: 3