Some Concepts to Help the Development of a Strategic Planning
April 2008 Mário Luís Tavares Ferreira
Strategic Planning
Goals / Objectives
SWOT Analysis
Strategy
Implementation
Measurement and Evaluation
SWOT
Internal Environment Strengths Weaknesses World class product Technical support Financial resources Internal processes Know-how Channels network External Environment Opportunities Threats Water & Energy crises Competitors market share Environment awareness Euro X Dollar Productivity improvement Technology development
TOWS matrix
Strengths Opportunitie S-O strategies s Threats S-T strategies Weaknesses W-O strategies W-T strategies
S-O strategies pursue opportunities that are a good fit to the companies strengths. W-O strategies overcome weaknesses to pursue opportunities. S-T strategies identify ways that the firm can use its strengths to reduce its vulnerability to external threats. W-T strategies establish a defensive plan to prevent the firm's weaknesses from making it highly susceptible to external threats.
PEST analysis
A scan of the external macro-environment in which the company wants to operate (or operates) and can be expressed in terms of the following factors:
Political Economic Social Technological
Ninety ways to measure demand (6 x 5 x 3)
Geographical Level
World Region Country
Territory
Client Total sales Sector sales
Product Level
Company’s sales Product lines
Product config
Product items Short term Medium term Long term
Timing Level
Porter 5 Forces
Value Chain
Innovation Process Identification of client’s necessities Operation Process Post Sales Process Satisfaction of Client’s necessities
Market products / Delivery identification products / services products and services creation services definition
Services to the clients
Life cycle
Sales & profit Sales
Profit Invest & expenses
Product development
growth
maturity
Boston matrix – Product life cycle
Directional policy matrix or GE-McKinsey matrix
The diameter of each pie is proportional to the Volume or Revenue accruing to each Segment, and the solid slice of each ‘pie’ represents the share of the market enjoyed by the Company.
S curve
Management
Management, control and evaluation
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Deployment - Plan Completing Success Failure
>Assign roles and responsibilities >Establish priorities >No accountability for deployment >Too many goals, strategies, or objectives - no apparent priority >Plan in a vacuum-functional focus
>Involve mid-level management as active participants >Think it through - decide how to manage implementation >Charge mid-level management with aligning lower-level plans >Make careful choices about the contents of the plan and form it will take
>No overall strategy to implement
>Make no attempt to link with day-to-day operations >Not being thorough-glossing over the details
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Deployment - Communicating
Success
Assign roles and responsibilities
Failure
No accountability
Communicate the plan constantly and consistently
Recognize the change process
Never talk about the plan
Ignore the emotional impact of change
Help people through the change process
Focus only on task accomplishment
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Implementing - I
Success
Assign roles and responsibilities Involve senior leaders
Failure
No accountability Disengagement from process
Define an infrastructure
Link goal groups
Unmanaged activity
Fragmented accomplishment of objectives leads to sub-optimization Force people to choose between implementation and daily work; too many teams No alignment of strategies
Phase integration of implementation actions with workload Involve everyone within the organization
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Implementing - II Success
Allocate resources for implementation
Failure
Focus only on short term need for resources Ignore or avoid change No measurement system Hide mistakes/lay blame; limited/no communication
Manage the change process Evaluate results Share lessons learned; acknowledge successes through open and frequent communication
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Strategic Measurement - I Success Failure
Assign roles and responsibilities Use measurement to understand the organization Use measurement to provide a consistent viewpoint from which to gauge performance Use measurement to provide an integrated, focused view of the future No accountability Sub-optimization: focus only on efficiencies Use measures that provide no real information on performance; use too many measures Use measurement to focus on the bottom-line only
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Strategic Measurement - II Success
Use measurement to communicate policy (new strategic direction) Update the measurement system Use measurement to provide quality feedback to the strategic management process
Failure
Use measurement to control
Never review measures Fail to use measurement to make strategic, fact-based decisions; use only for control
Keys of Success - Facts of Failure
Evaluation
Success
Assign roles and responsibilities Recognize when to update the plan
Failure
No accountability Poor timing and not recognizing external forces Rigid application of strategic planning process; ignore lessons learned from previous efforts Ignore impact of new leaders
Modify strategic planning process to accommodate the more mature organization
Incorporate new leaders into the strategic planning process
Integrate measurement with strategic planning
Use experienced strategic planning facilitators
Don't use measurement information
Shortcut the process
Measurement and evaluation – BSC
Measurement and evaluation – BSC
Measurement and evaluation – BSC
Measurement and evaluation - BSC
Five disciplines – Peter Senge
Personal Mastery:
Aspiration involves formulating a coherent picture of the results people most desire to gain as individuals, alongside a realistic assessment of the current state of their lives today. Learning to cultivate the tension between vision and reality can expand people's capacity to make better choices, and to achieve more of the results that they have chosen.
Mental Models:
Reflection and inquiry skills is focused around developing awareness of the attitudes and perceptions that influence thought and interaction. By continually reflecting upon, talking about, and reconsidering these internal pictures of the world, people can gain more capability in governing their actions and decisions.
Five disciplines – Peter Senge
Shared Vision:
Establishes a focus on mutual purpose. People learn to nourish a sense of commitment in a group or organization by developing shared images of the future they seek to create, and the principles and guiding practices by which they hope to get there.
Team Learning:
Group interaction. Through techniques like dialogue and skillful discussion, teams transform their collective thinking, learning to mobilize their energies and actions to achieve common goals, and drawing forth an intelligence and ability greater than the sum of individual members' talents.
Five disciplines – Peter Senge
Systems Thinking:
People learn to better understand interdependency and change, and thereby to deal more effectively with the forces that shape the consequences of our actions. Systems thinking is based upon a growing body of theory about the behavior of feedback and complexity - the innate tendencies of a system that lead to growth or stability over time. To help people see how to change systems more effectively and how to act more in tune with the larger processes of the natural and economic world.
Project management - processes
Project management – a process
Project management – Process chain
Project management – risk analysis