-1CITY OF PRINEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Commission Members:
Paul Cuddy, Chairman Marty Bailiey, Vice-Chairman James Haynie, Don Wee, Jim McMillin, Reese Moody, Seth Crawford
Website: www.cityofprineville.com
Meeting Tuesday, March 21, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Prineville City Hall, 387 NE Third Street, Prineville, OR 97754 AGENDA NOTE: The Prineville Planning Commission welcomes, appreciates, and encourages participation in the Meetings. The Planning Commission reserves the right to reasonably limit the total time for public comment on any particular noticed agenda item as it may deem necessary. 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the audience may comment on matters that are not included on the agenda. Each person will be allowed three (3) minutes or less if a large number of requests are received on a particular item. No action may be taken on a matter raised under “public comment” until the matter has been specifically included on an agenda as an action item. 3. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: The Planning Commission will review the proposed request, receive public input and consider action for the following Items: NONE SCHEDULED 4. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: NONE SCHEDULED 5. NEW BUSINESS ITEMS: The Planning Commission will review the proposed request and consider action for the following Items: A. B. Review Comprehensive Plan Review Water and Waste-Water Master Plan
6. NEW BUSINESS ITEMS: The Planning Commission will review the proposed request and consider action for the following Items: 7. PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT: This item is reserved for the Planning Director to comments or report on items not on the agenda. No action will be taken. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION MATTERS: This item is reserved for the Planning Commission to make comments on items not on the agenda, and to request information from staff. 9. ADJOURNMENT:
Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006
-2-
GENERAL RULES FOR HEARINGS. (1) Hearings on land use matters are conducted in a quasi-judicial manner; there shall not be any audience demonstrations or other conduct, which, would disrupt the hearing. (2) Persons may only speak after being recognized by the presiding officer of the hearing, and must state their full name and address for the record. (3) A record of attendance for the hearing shall be provided; parties not signing the attendance record may be precluded from testifying, or testimony may not be entered as a part of the hearing record. (4) The hearing body shall only consider testimony and information that is relevant to the issue of the hearing, and the presiding officer may prohibit immaterial and/or repetitious testimony. (B) Burden and criteria. In the initial application stage, the proponent of an application or permit has the burden of proof for the justification of approval thereof; the more drastic the request, or the greater the impact of the application or permit, the greater is the burden of proof on the proponent. In any review or appeal of a decision, the party appealing has the burden of proof relative to declarations of errors in the decision being appealed. (C) Order of procedures for hearings. The following procedures shall be followed in the conduct of hearings, except as otherwise modified or set forth by the hearing authority in the case of a hearing regarding a review or appeal, or as otherwise necessary in the consideration of time or to maintain order. Relative thereto the hearing authority may limit individual testimony times, may request that identified groups designate a specified number of representatives, may limit or prohibit repetitive testimony and stipulate other hearing procedures that are deemed necessary to facilitate an orderly hearing process. (1) The presiding officer shall request declarations of potential conflicts of interest and/or ex parte contacts by members of the hearing body. Participation may be subject to objections from the public with final determination of such participation by the hearing body. (2) Presentation of input or advice from the City Attorney regarding procedures or other matters of concern relative to the subject matter of the hearing. (3) Presentation of the City Planning Staff Report. (4) Presentation of any other public or semi-public agency or organization with design recommendations; does not include proponent and/or opponent testimony from such agencies or organizations. (5) Presentation by the applicant. (6) Cross-examination of the applicant by the hearing body. (7) Other proponents' testimony. (8) Cross-examination of proponents by the hearing body. (9) Opponent's testimony. (10) Cross-examination of opponents by the hearing body. (11) Rebuttal: proponents'; then opponents'. (12) Final summation by applicant. (13) Hearing closed. (14) Deliberation by the hearing body; upon closing the hearing, the hearing body will deliberate the question and reach a decision, or continue the matter for further study or decision to an announced time and place. (15) The Planning Commission or the City Council may recess or continue a hearing in order to obtain additional information or to serve further notice upon
Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006
-3other property owners or persons it decides may be interested in and/or affected by the proposal being considered. Upon recessing or continuance, the time and date when the hearing is to be resumed shall be announced. NOTICE REGARDING APPEALS Pursuant to §153.253 of the Zoning Code, appeals of a final action by the Planning Commission must be filed with the City Planning Department no later than ten (10) calendar days after the day on which the final action was taken, along with the appropriate fee. ADA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Assistant Planner Cindy MacDonald at (541) 447-8326. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006