VIEWS: 14 PAGES: 1 POSTED ON: 5/19/2009
Intermountain Section of American Water Works Association 2003 Annual Conference Water Savings of an Ultra-Low-Flush Toilet Replacement Program: Leaks, Flapperless, Dual-Flushers and More! Presenter: Paula Mohadjer, Conservation Programs Coordinator Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District 8215 S 1300 W, West Jordan, UT 84088 Phone: 565-4300, Fax: 801-565-4399, email: email@example.com Presenter’s Bio: Currently Conservation Coordinator for JWVCD. Conservation Horticulturist and Demonstration Garden Manager for JVWCD. Horticulturist at Red Butte Garden and Arboretum. Masters of Science in Horticulture from Oregon State University. Bachelors of Science in Horticulture from Utah State University. Brief Abstract: Replacing existing high-volume toilets with Ultra Low Flush Toilets (ULFTs) can save a substantial amount of water. In this study, 275 residential toilets were replaced with 3 models of ULFTs: Caroma Tasman 270, a dual flush toilet (a small volume flush of 0.8 g for liquids and a large volume flush for solids 1.6 g); Niagara Flapperless, a ULFT with a tipping bucket flushing mechanism instead of a flapper (flappers are the most common cause of toilet leaks), and a Gerber Aquasaver. A follow-up telephone survey was administered and water savings was measured in three ways: the water use per flush of every old toilet and every new ULFT was metered, 15% of the ULFTs were monitored with flush counting devices, and water use records the winter before and after installed were compared. On average, there were 3 people and 2.7 toilets per household. Over 85% of the participants said they would recommend the new ULFT (Caroma 96%, Niagara 92%, Gerber 69%). Almost 80% of the participants said the new ULFT clogged or required double flushing at a rate equal to or less than their old toilet. The old toilets averaged 4.16 gallons per flush (gpf), with a range of 2.1 to 6.7 gpf. The new ULFTs averaged 1.62 gpf, and the dual-flush toilet offered the greatest savings per flush because the small volume flush was used 60% of the time. Forty-two of the ULFTs were installed with flush counters for an average period of 50 days. The new ULFTs were flushed an average of 8.9 times a day, with an average savings of 22.7 gallons per toilet per day or 8,286 gallons per toilet per year. When comparing winter water use records of the participants with 10 of the 42 ULFTs fitted with flush counters, 69 gallons of water were saved per toilet per day, or 25,080 gallons per toilet per year. This suggests a good portion of the water savings achieved with the new ULFT installations are associated with leak repair, since the study shows an average water savings of 8,286 gallons per toilet per is due to flush volume reduction. By March of 2004, water use records for all 42 ULFTs will be available.
Pages to are hidden for
"Abstract submittal for the 2004 Utah Water Users Conference"Please download to view full document