Why Develop a Taxonomy of HIV Be
Document Sample


Why Develop a Taxonomy
of HIV Behavioural Prevention Activities,
and Why Specify Quality, Intensity and
Coverage?
Barbara O. de Zalduondo, Anindya Chatterjee,
Richard Delate and Terhi Aaltonen and the
Prevention Reference Group Content Team
Department of Policy Evidence and Partnerships
UNAIDS
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Overview
• The challenge: why are we calling a UNAIDS Prevention Reference
Group meeting on this topic? What do we hope to achieve together?
• Why are we calling a meeting on this now?
• Why did we propose to focus on the 5 activities/interventions, as
opposed to many others?
• Some definitions of our own – please see flip chart page
“activity, “intervention,” “measure” or “programme”
Critical element
Quality
Standards
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Why is UNAIDS calling this Reference
Group meeting on HIV prevention?
• 4.3 million new infections in 2006 (3.6-6.6 million)**
Coverage of prevention measures is incredibly low; must be
scaled up
e.g. In 2005, only 20% of the people most at risk and most in need of
HIV prevention services, world wide, were getting them.*
e.g., 9% of men who have sex with men worldwide received HIV
prevention services (from 4% in Eastern Europe to 24% in Latin
America).*
Results of prevention activities have often been inadequate
e.g Botswana - only about one in three young people aged 15–24 both
correctly identified ways of preventing the sexual transmission of HIV and
rejected major misconceptions about HIV transmission.**
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
To improve prevention impact
(decreased HIV incidence) countries
could require:
• More effort/investment in prevention
(Eye-dropper problem)
• Better planned and allocated prevention activities
• Better implementation
• All of the above
How to tell?
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
to Do Better – advising countries that are
spending prevention effort in ways unlikely
to impact new infections
Figure 1 Mismatch between funding and HIV epidemiology
observed in a west African country
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Sex workers General population
HIV rate Share of infections involving Share of funding
12
UNAIDS Source: Courtesy of World Bank MAP, (2005)
November 7, 2010
Programme evaluation and comparison should
complement prevention research.
Can we compare:
Reduced
New Infections
Design/Mix of
Prev. Actions Reduced risk
to meet
+ behaviour
current needs Changed KABP and
more enabling
environment
Adapted to
local settings
+ Implemented
Correctly
(“faithfully”) and to Scale Effective
Prevention
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
“Comprehensive prevention” – from UNAIDS
policy position paper to operational definitions
e.g. UNAIDS Resource Needs Model –
19 “types” in 2005 • Prevention programmes for people
living with HIV
• Mass media
• Special populations
• Community mobilization
• Condom social marketing
• Voluntary counseling and testing
• Public and commercial sector
• Youth in school condom provision
• Youth out of school • Improving STI management
• Programmes focused on sex workers • Prevention of mother-to-child
and their clients transmission
• Programmes focused on MSM • Blood safety
• Harm reduction programmes for IDUs • Post-exposure prophylaxis
• Workplace interventions • Safe medical injections
• Universal precautions
And now, Male circumcision
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
To build prevention knowledge, and to offer
guidance on prevention planning we need:
1) Clear terminology for each prevention activity – at operational level
What exactly do we mean by “focus on young people” – or - “school-based
education?” What are the critical ingredients?
When we analyze the outcomes of several “school-based education” activities,
how do we know we are comparing the same things?
2) Information on scaling each one: how much? how much will/should it cost?
The answers depend on definitions of quality, intensity and coverage
3) Information about the most effective mix of programmatic and policy actions.
cf. UNAIDS policy position paper: Intensifying HIV prevention
(7 principles, 10 programmatic actions, and 11 policy actions)
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Quality – a value in every health and
development field. Definitions vary in
specificity and generality
Quality management methods, continuous quality improvement etc. are
widely available. They all entail:
• building technical consensus on the terms and definitions (Mike Sweat’s
presentation=
establishing consensus on critical elements
• establishing agreement on the criteria or dimensions of quality (Nancy
Padian’s presentation)
• specific methodology – what content, goal, method, intensity, etc. –
which can be costed.
Specifications of quality, intensity and coverage need to be gathered, made
explicit, and cited, for behavioural interventions, just as they are for
clinical services. We will be discussing a framework for guiding this.
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Testing the framework against SELECTED
prevention actions:
We are developing a model/framework to assist countries and expert
organizations
We do not expect to arrive at the answers – only to establish the need, and
to define the processes that will follow this meeting
We selected a few prevention actions because in this initial meeting, time is
short.
The choice was made in order:
• to illustrate the diverse kinds of prevention interventions
• to focus on areas where international guidelines have not been
established or widely publicized
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Why raise these issues now?
• 4.3 million new infections....
• Global Resource Needs estimation process
Using best available “legacy categories,” definitions and cost data
UNAIDS and World Bank are training people to gather cost and
expenditure data
Laying the groundwork to provide more and better data for the 2009
estimates
• The need for behavioural prevention will go on for the next generation –
so it is time to strengthen the foundation of prevention science.
Because of the urgency of responding to HIV, we have been in too
much of a hurry .... for 25 years
As a result, we are still working with legacy categories and ad hoc
definitions that make it difficult to build knowledge.
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Challenges of terminology
Quality (discussed earlier)
Activity/Measure/Intervention
An input, activity, or component of an HIV prevention programme that is
designed and managed as a unit to achieve a specific outcome or result.
Critical components/core elements
Elements, steps or features that are necessary to the effectiveness of an HIV
prevention activity/intervention/measure
Standards
“something established by authority, custom, or general consent as a model or
example”*
“something set up and established by authority as a rule for the measure of
quantity, weight, extent, value, or quality*
UNAIDS * Source: Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary
November 7, 2010
In Sum: UNAIDS seeks your advice and
recommendations for a 2 year plan to clarify
building blocks of prevention science:
First 12 months:
an agreed taxonomy (“list,” with definitions) of HIV
prevention activities/interventions that are used and
combined in successful national HIV programmes
an approach to defining minimum standards for each
prevention activity, including the behavioural ones, to
permit realistic costing and budgeting for HIV prevention
Longer term (now through 2008?):
a process, or series of activities, to engage key
stakeholders to translate the agreed terminology and
standards into practice, at country and global levels
UNAIDS
November 7, 2010
Related docs
Other docs by pengtt
Introduction to IPv6 IPv6 deployment IPv6 Forum IPv6 Transition support IPv6 IPv4 and
Views: 5 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "