CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Good Review Practices (GRPs) in the United States CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authorities October 1, 2007
Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
FDA CDER Office of New Drugs
Objectives For This Lecture
• Describe the philosophies underlying Good Review Practices as developed by CDER/OND for their drug product review staff. • Recognize examples of CDER GRP documents including review templates, MAPPs and Guidances for Review Staff and Industry.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
1
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Philosophy
• Developing Good Review Practices is an attempt to identify, collect, enhance, implement, and adopt internal best product review practices as documented and standardized approaches that can be shared among all review divisions.
GRPs are developed:
• Based on reviewer experiences • As a response to changing regulatory environments (e.g., the Prescription Drug User Fee Act) • To formulate an overall quality systems approach to product review
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
2
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
CDER Quality Systems Approach
Improve it Say what you do
Prove it
Do what you say
Quality Systems Approach to GRPs
Evaluate or reevaluate
Develop GRP
Mentor and Train Staff
Implement
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
3
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
CDERs GRPs are…
• Documented best practices that discuss any aspect related to the process, format, content, and/or management of a product review. • Developed over time as superior practices based on CDER’s collective experience. • Intended to provide consistency to the overall review process of new drugs.
CDERs GRP Fundamental Values • • • • • Quality Efficiency Clarity Transparency Consistency
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
4
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Quality
• Consistent implementation of GRPs by review staff will enhance the quality of reviews, the review process, and the resultant regulatory action.
Efficiency
• GRPs will improve the efficiency of the review process through standardization.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
5
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Clarity
• GRPs support clarity throughout the review process, including critical review and decision making prior to a regulatory action.
Transparency
• Developing and documenting GRPs ensures that CDERs review processes are readily available for review by both sponsors and the public.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
6
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Consistency
• By offering a consistent approach and only deviating from it when appropriate, GRPs help reviewers achieve consistency with their reviews and standardize review processes across divisions.
Reviews before GRPs-Problems
• Format and content of product reviews at the discretion of each individual reviewer without a standard outline or table of contents. • Every review posted on the web looked different and it was difficult to find particular sections of the review. • Sometimes reviewers inadvertently omitted critical information and analyses.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
7
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Solution- Standard review templates and template MAPPs
– Provide a framework and structure for writing a review – Act as a checklist to insure completeness – Give a consistent location for information
• Section 6 is the Efficacy Review • Section 7 is the Safety Review
– Train reviewers in how to perform their reviews
Reviews after GRPs-Improved
• Reviews contained predictable headings and were consistently organized. • Reviews contained critical analyses previously omitted. • Review staff learned what was expected for their reviews.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
8
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
CDER GRP Web Site
• All CDER Good Review Practices are now located on an FDA/CDER website.
http://www.fda.gov/cder/other/grp.html
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
9
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Good Review Practices (MAPP)
• Instructs review staff on what GRPs are. • Provides general policies, roles and responsibilities for all future GRPs
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
10
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Good Review Management Principles and Practices for PDUFA Products (Guidance)
• Gives an ideal timeline for a first cycle NDA/BLA review • Reflects expectations both FDA and sponsors as negotiated through PDUFA
Conducting a Clinical Safety Review of a New Product Application and Preparing a Report on the Review (Guidance)
• Very detailed instructions on how reviewers should perform a safety review • Offers philosophy of how to prioritize safety issues • Concentrates on evaluating pooled safety data from the Integrated Summary of Safety (ISS), an FDA specific regulatory requirement.
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
11
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
Clinical Review Template (MAPP)
• An annotated standard outline for preparing and documenting the primary clinical review of original NDA/BLA applications, NDA/BLA amendments in response to action letters and efficacy supplements. • Currently under review for revisions.
Labeling for Human Prescription Drugs-Determining Established Pharmacologic Class for Use in the Highlights of Prescribing Information (Guidance)
• Reflects final rule regulations for content and format of labeling for drugs. • Focuses on the Indications and Usage section of Highlights
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
12
CDER Forum for International Drug Regulatory Authoritie
In Summary, GRPs…
• Provide a more consistent approach to the review and approval of new products • Specify our process, format and content of a review • Standardize reviews and review management • Train staff • Inform industry of our internal review best practices
howard.chazin@fda.hhs.gov
October 1, 2007 – Howard D. Chazin, MD MBA
13
GovernmentDocs 5/4/2008 |
291 |
2 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
legal
GovernmentDocs 5/4/2008 |
111 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
74 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/5/2008 |
146 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
186 |
3 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
164 |
2 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/8/2008 |
91 |
1 |
0 |
legal
GovernmentDocs 5/4/2008 |
112 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/5/2008 |
74 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/8/2008 |
202 |
3 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
98 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/9/2008 |
61 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
119 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
246 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
131 |
1 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
138 |
2 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
90 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
95 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
167 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
161 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
230 |
0 |
0 |
legal
FDADocs 5/12/2008 |
96 |
0 |
0 |
legal