September E i g h t e e n

September 13, 2003 1200 E i g h t e e n t h S t r e e t NL' S u i t e 200 'A'ashlngton, DC 20036 202-467-6 100 fax 202-467-6101 MWW Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary CAN-SPAM Act Post Office Box 1030 Merrifield, VA 22 1 16-1030 RE: CAN-SPAM Act Rulemaking, Project No. R411008 Dear Sir or Madam: INDEPENDENTSECTOR, national coalition of over 600 charitable nonprofit a organizations, philanthropic foundations, and corporate giving programs, welcomes this opportunity to comment on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with respect to the CAN-SPAM Act (Project No. R411008) published in the August 13, 2004 Federal Register. In comments filed in response to the Commission's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on this issue in April, 2004, INDEPENDENT SECTOR argued that email sent by a nonprofit organization primarily related to the organization's tax-exempt purposes should not be considered to be "commercial" messages and should therefore be exempt from regulation under the Act. We appreciate the Commission's statement in its current rulemaking: "On the issue of messages between a nonprofit and its members, it is possible - or even likely - that such messages are "transactional or relationship messages" under ยง7702(17)(A)(v), depending on the facts of a particular membership." 69 Fed. Reg. 50 100. We agree that most messages from nonprofit organizations will not meet the definition of commercial email given the criteria outlined in Project No. R4 1 1008, but there is still confusion over the definition of "transactional or relationship messages." We respecthllv request that the Commission provide further guidance on "transactional or relationship messages" that clearly states that email sent by a nonprofit organization to its members, donors and others who have indicated an interest in its work will not be considered to be commercial email. INDEPENDENTSECTOR advises all nonprofit organizations to observe responsible emailing practices, including honoring requests from any member of the public to remove his or her name and contact information from hture IndependentSector o r g info@ I n d e p e n d e n t s e c t o r o r g J o h n R Seffrln illwlr C a t y L Yaws Vrir i i i a l r C h r ~ s t u p h e rGates Srcrclnry D ~ a n aAviv Ptcsrdr~ira r ~ d CEO h a r d OJ D~rcctors Edward H Able, J r Angela C.lover Blackwell Kathleen W Buechel Hodd~ng Carter I l l Robcrt W Edgar Lewis h4 Feldstein Davld Ford B a l y Caherrnan Brian Callagher Marilda Candara Peter B. Coldberg Darell Harnrnond J B n a n Hehir I D Hokoyarna Kevin Klose Kathleen D McCarthy Cahr~ellaE Mot-rts Karen Narasakt Hilaty Pennlngton Mlchael R u b ~ n g r r M a v Beth Salerno Donald M Stewarr W'ill~am Truehearr Cass Wheeler he Honorable lohn W' Caldner ij912-2ooz 1 F,lrir)drng Cbalr 2001 Annual Conference, November 7-9, Chicago solicitations and other communications. We recognize, however, that limited staff resources and information systems capabilities of many nonprofit organizations will make it difficult to honor all opt-out requests within ten business days. We therefore respectfullv request that the Commission adopt a more-workable 30-day time frame to process opt-out requests. INDEPENDENT SECTOR further recognizes that despite the good-faith efforts of any organization, there can be inadvertent violations of the CAN-SPAM Act requirements regarding the subject line or content of an email message or failure to honor an opt-out request. We respectfullv request that the Commission create a safe harbor, as it did in the Do Not Call rule, for email senders that have committed such inadvertent violations which provides for warnings to be issued with an opportunity to comply before any enforcement action is taken. Communicating electronically with our members, supporters, and others who have shown an interest in our missions has proven to be an invaluable tool for nonprofits. Nonprofits senie the community in countless ways impacting millions of people and we want to ensure that our communications are not hampered by a law that was written to combat a completely different type of communication. Again, we thank you for this opportunity to offer comments. Patricia Read Senior Vice President, Public Policy and Government Relations INDEPENDENT SECTOR

Related docs
A G E N D A
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
b o r o u g h o f k e t t e r i n g
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
T H e e x T e n S I
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
T H E M E S S E N G E R
Views: 41  |  Downloads: 0
T H E I N T E R N
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
M A N N I N G T H E
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
S E R V I N G T H E
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
robert e
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
I G N I T E P E R
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
T H E L E G I S LAT
Views: 197  |  Downloads: 0
Other docs by Lauren Kurns
my bio
Views: 609  |  Downloads: 0
LoisLawcom Inc Ammendments and Bylaws
Views: 190  |  Downloads: 1
Lynuxworks Inc Ammendments and Bylaws
Views: 170  |  Downloads: 0
Legalopinioncom Ammendments and Bylaws
Views: 192  |  Downloads: 1
China Broadband Corp Ammendments and By laws
Views: 172  |  Downloads: 0
Application to Extend Time
Views: 178  |  Downloads: 0
Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification
Views: 517  |  Downloads: 9
Kraft Foods Inc Ammendments and Bylaws
Views: 183  |  Downloads: 1
Employee Attendance Record
Views: 585  |  Downloads: 42
brown-all
Views: 344  |  Downloads: 1
bassett-all
Views: 424  |  Downloads: 5
Credit Application
Views: 140  |  Downloads: 2