NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results Master List by Park Alpha
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 128418 African Burial Ground NM 133664 Arches NP 108248 Badlands NP, South Unit 109246 Big Thicket Npres 67236 69023 73198 Bryce Canyon NP Buffalo NR Cape Hatteras NS GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Revision GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP CMP GMP GMP NE IM MW IM IM MW IM SE NE IM IM IM IM PW MW PW SE IM PW IM MW MW MW IM MW IM IM IM MW MW IM PW PW PW SE MW IM IM MW PW IM 1000 350 200 550 350 400 175 350 700 400 350 50 50 150 175 500 80 300 50 50 0 20 175 300 175 750 175 600 350 200 50 175 350 800 200 0 175 350 550 400 350 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 200 450 350 450 250 450 150 450 200 450 200 50 250 350 400 400 250 400 50 300 0 50 150 225 300 650 400 450 650 250 150 450 500 700 300 150 500 500 650 650 500 VISITOR USE 775 400 200 350 250 225 0 350 575 425 200 50 375 175 150 375 50 100 0 100 50 150 100 175 150 475 150 550 150 200 150 200 475 525 200 0 50 600 100 200 200 PARK OPERATIONS 500 50 50 200 150 0 0 300 200 300 175 50 175 0 0 200 0 100 75 125 175 125 50 225 0 200 200 100 0 250 0 75 25 350 50 0 0 100 200 225 100 OTHER ADVANTAGES 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ADVANTAGES 2475 1250 850 1550 1000 1075 325 1450 1675 1575 925 200 850 675 725 1475 380 900 175 575 225 345 475 925 625 2075 925 1700 1150 900 350 900 1350 2375 750 150 725 1550 1500 1475 1150 ADV/ RATIO 61.88 17.86 13.08 19.38 14.81 17.92 8.13 14.50 41.88 17.50 23.13 5.33 28.33 16.88 7.63 31.72 10.86 25.71 5.00 16.43 22.50 8.63 11.18 20.56 15.63 17.29 26.43 8.61 16.43 30.00 5.83 24.00 15.88 43.18 11.54 5.45 16.11 19.38 25.00 30.73 13.53 2007 ESTIMATED COST 400,000 700,000 650,000 800,000 675,000 600,000 400,000 1,000,000 400,000 900,000 400,000 375,000 300,000 400,000 950,000 465,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 100,000 400,000 425,000 450,000 400,000 1,200,000 350,000 1,975,000 700,000 300,000 600,000 375,000 850,000 550,000 650,000 275,000 450,000 800,000 600,000 480,000 850,000
IMPORTANCE OF COST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
5/3/2007
AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE
134926 Casa Grande Ruins NM 135731 John Smith Chesapeake NHT 108796 Canyonlands NP 109036 Cedar Breaks NM 111373 Chamizal Nmem 105165 Chaco Culture NHP 99106 71477 96199 66960 City of Rocks Nres Cuyahoga Valley NP DeSoto Nmem El Morro NM
118032 Devils Postpile NM
132561 Eugene O'Neill NHS 133393 Fossil Butte NM 96945 70534 71663 67302 67303 Fort Larned NHS Fort Smith NHS Fort Union Trading Post NHS Golden Spike NHS Grand Teton NP 120047 Fort Scott NHS 130417 Fort Union NM 108866 Glen Canyon NRA
123243 Hot Springs NP 106449 Ice Age NST Interpretive Site 123839 Jewel Cave NM 132557 John Muir NHS 132072 Joshua Tree NP 118981 Kalaupapa NHP 49138 70930 71698 Kennesaw Mountain NBP Keewenaw NBP Knife River Indian Villages NHS
104097 Lake Meredith NRA / Alibates Flint Quarries NM GMP 114271 Lewis & Clark NHT 113836 Lewis & Clark NHP 86398 Mesa Verde NP
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 1
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results Master List by Park Alpha
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 119361 Mount Rushmore Nmem 69642 Natchez Trace Parkway 123233 Nicodemus NHS 108819 Organ Pipe Cactus NM 108795 Pipe Spring NM 76034 Potomac Heritage NST 113607 Puuhonua O Honaunau NHP 128375 Redwood NP 99103 95070 Ross Lake NRA Russell Cave NM GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP MW SE MW IM MW IM NC PW PW PW SE IM PW SE IM SE IM IM SE PW IM MW MW IM 150 200 0 150 50 150 300 400 300 550 150 500 175 200 600 550 200 400 200 175 375 150 125 800 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 50 400 200 700 50 600 100 650 500 450 250 100 400 125 850 650 100 400 300 400 700 250 0 450 VISITOR USE 100 200 50 350 150 50 100 325 350 400 100 50 150 250 300 350 150 275 200 150 325 125 100 500 PARK OPERATIONS 0 100 0 150 0 100 0 150 100 125 0 0 125 100 100 50 0 200 50 50 100 50 0 150 OTHER ADVANTAGES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ADVANTAGES 300 900 250 1350 250 900 500 1525 1250 1575 500 650 850 675 1850 1600 450 1275 750 775 1500 575 225 1900 ADV/ RATIO 5.00 9.09 6.79 20.77 8.33 25.71 10.00 30.50 63.78 28.64 14.29 16.25 13.08 11.25 28.46 30.48 7.50 31.88 11.54 11.48 27.27 8.85 5.63 9.50 2007 ESTIMATED COST 600,000 990,000 368,000 650,000 300,000 350,000 500,000 500,000 196,000 550,000 350,000 400,000 650,000 600,000 650,000 525,000 600,000 400,000 650,000 675,000 550,000 650,000 400,000 2,000,000 $ 37,699,000
IMPORTANCE OF COST
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
120680 Perry's Victory and International Peace Mem GMP
108622 Santa Fe NHT 111785 San Francisco Maritime NHP 87670 71837 Shiloh NMP Theodore Roosevelt NP
113580 Timucuan Ecological & Historic Pres GMP 108626 Trail of Tears NHT 108614 Tumacacori NM 113004 Vicksburg NMP 121455 War in the Pacific NHP 108652 White Sands NM 70802 67339 Wind Cave NP Yellowstone NP 133818 William Howard Taft NHS
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 2
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results Master List by Park Alpha
Running Total of Net Cost 400,000 1,100,000 1,750,000 2,550,000 3,225,000 3,825,000 4,225,000 5,225,000 5,625,000 6,525,000 6,925,000 7,300,000 7,600,000 8,000,000 8,950,000 9,415,000 9,765,000 10,115,000 10,465,000 10,815,000 10,915,000 11,315,000 11,740,000 12,190,000 12,590,000 13,790,000 14,140,000 16,115,000 16,815,000 17,115,000 17,715,000 18,090,000 18,940,000 19,490,000 20,140,000 20,415,000 20,865,000 21,665,000 22,265,000 22,745,000 23,595,000
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 3
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results Master List by Park Alpha
Running Total of Net Cost 24,195,000 25,185,000 25,553,000 26,203,000 26,503,000 26,853,000 27,353,000 27,853,000 28,049,000 28,599,000 28,949,000 29,349,000 29,999,000 30,599,000 31,249,000 31,774,000 32,374,000 32,774,000 33,424,000 34,099,000 34,649,000 35,299,000 35,699,000 37,699,000
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 4
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results in Total Importance of Advantages Order
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 128418 African Burial Ground NM 118981 Kalaupapa NHP 108866 Glen Canyon NRA 67339 71837 67303 Yellowstone NP Theodore Roosevelt NP Grand Teton NP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment NE PW IM IM IM IM NE SE IM PW IM IM PW MW IM PW PW SE PW IM IM IM PW MW IM MW IM IM IM IM IM MW PW SE IM MW IM 1000 800 750 800 600 600 700 550 400 550 550 350 400 550 375 500 400 350 350 150 400 350 300 350 350 400 350 350 300 175 300 200 175 200 150 200 50 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 200 700 650 450 850 450 200 650 450 450 450 500 650 650 700 400 650 450 500 700 400 450 500 650 500 450 250 200 225 400 400 250 450 400 600 350 250 VISITOR USE 775 525 475 500 300 550 575 350 425 400 350 600 325 100 325 375 200 350 475 350 275 400 350 150 200 225 250 200 175 150 100 200 200 200 50 200 375 PARK OPERATIONS 500 350 200 150 100 100 200 50 300 125 200 100 150 200 100 200 225 300 25 150 200 50 100 0 100 0 150 175 225 200 100 250 75 100 100 50 175 OTHER ADVANTAGES TOTAL IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGES 2475 2375 2075 1900 1850 1700 1675 1600 1575 1575 1550 1550 1525 1500 1500 1475 1475 1450 1350 1350 1275 1250 1250 1150 1150 1075 1000 925 925 925 900 900 900 900 900 850 850 2005 ESTIMATED COST 400,000 550,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 650,000 1,975,000 400,000 525,000 900,000 550,000 800,000 800,000 500,000 600,000 550,000 465,000 480,000 1,000,000 850,000 650,000 400,000 700,000 196,000 700,000 850,000 600,000 675,000 400,000 450,000 350,000 350,000 300,000 375,000 990,000 350,000 650,000 300,000
AFBG KALA GLCA YELL THRO GRTE CAJO TIMU CANY ROLA BITH LAMR PUHO LECL WHSA DEPO LEWI CAHA JOTR ORPI TUMA ARCH REDW HOSP MEVE BUFF BRCA CEBR FOUN GOSP ELMO IATR JOMU NATR PISP BADL CHCU
135731 John Smith Chesapeake NHT 113580 Timucuan Ecological & Historic Pres 108796 Canyonlands NP 99103 Ross Lake NRA 109246 Big Thicket Npres 113607 Puuhonua O Honaunau NHP 114271 Lewis & Clark NHT 108652 White Sands NM 118032 Devils Postpile NM 113836 Lewis & Clark NHP 73198 Cape Hatteras NS 132072 Joshua Tree NP 108819 Organ Pipe Cactus NM 108614 Tumacacori NM 133664 Arches NP 128375 Redwood NP 123243 Hot Springs NP 86398 69023 67236 Mesa Verde NP Buffalo NR Bryce Canyon NP
104097 Lake Meredith NRA / Alibates Flint Quarries NM GMP
109036 Cedar Breaks NM 130417 Fort Union NM 67302 66960 Golden Spike NHS El Morro NM
106449 Ice Age NST Interpretive Site 132557 John Muir NHS 69642 Natchez Trace Parkway 108795 Pipe Spring NM 108248 Badlands NP, South Unit 105165 Chaco Culture NHP
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 5
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results in Total Importance of Advantages Order
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 111785 San Francisco Maritime NHP 121455 War in the Pacific NHP 49138 71477 71698 99106 87670 71663 70802 76034 95070 70534 96199 Kennesaw Mountain NBP Cuyahoga Valley NP Knife River Indian Villages NHS City of Rocks Nres Shiloh NMP Fort Union Trading Post NHS Wind Cave NP Potomac Heritage NST Russell Cave NM Fort Smith NHS DeSoto Nmem 113004 Vicksburg NMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP Revision GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP Amendment PW PW SE SE MW IM PW SE IM MW IM MW NC SE MW IM SE IM MW IM MW MW MW MW MW IM PW MW 175 175 200 200 175 175 150 200 500 175 50 150 300 150 175 200 80 50 20 175 150 0 50 0 125 50 50 0 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 400 400 300 300 400 500 350 125 100 300 300 250 100 250 150 100 250 150 50 150 50 200 50 0 0 50 50 150 VISITOR USE 150 150 200 200 150 50 175 250 50 150 100 125 100 100 100 150 50 150 150 0 100 50 150 50 100 50 0 0 PARK OPERATIONS 125 50 50 50 0 0 0 100 0 0 125 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 175 0 50 75 0 OTHER ADVANTAGES TOTAL IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGES 850 775 750 750 725 725 675 675 650 625 575 575 500 500 475 450 380 350 345 325 300 250 250 225 225 200 175 150 2005 ESTIMATED COST 650,000 675,000 650,000 650,000 950,000 450,000 400,000 600,000 400,000 400,000 350,000 650,000 500,000 350,000 425,000 600,000 350,000 600,000 400,000 400,000 600,000 368,000 300,000 100,000 400,000 375,000 350,000 275,000
SAFR WAPA KEMO VICK CUVA KNRI CIRO SHIL SAFE FOUS FOBU WICA POHE RUCA FOSM TRTE DESO JECA FOSC CAGR MORU NICO PEVI FOLS WIHO CHAM EUON KEWE
108622 Santa Fe NHT 133393 Fossil Butte NM
108626 Trail of Tears NHT 123839 Jewel Cave NM 120047 Fort Scott NHS 134926 Casa Grande Ruins NM 119361 Mount Rushmore Nmem 123233 Nicodemus NHS 96945 Fort Larned NHS
120680 Perry's Victory and International Peace MemMP G 133818 William Howard Taft NHS 111373 Chamizal Nmem 132561 Eugene O'Neill NHS 70930 Keewenaw NBP
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40,675 64,100
63%
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 6
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results in Advantage-Cost Ratio Order
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 128375 Redwood NP 128418 African Burial Ground NM 118981 Kalaupapa NHP 135731 John Smith Chesapeake NHT 108614 Tumacacori NM 118032 Devils Postpile NM 113836 Lewis & Clark NHP 113607 Puuhonua O Honaunau NHP 106449 Ice Age NST Interpretive Site 99103 71837 Ross Lake NRA Theodore Roosevelt NP GMP Amendment GMP GMP CMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP Revision GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP PW NE PW NE IM PW PW PW SE MW PW IM IM IM IM IM IM MW PW IM MW IM IM IM IM MW IM IM IM PW IM MW IM IM PW MW IM SE SE 300 1000 800 700 400 500 400 400 550 200 550 600 50 375 175 300 150 550 175 350 0 150 300 350 550 400 350 400 750 150 50 350 500 175 350 175 350 350 150 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 500 200 700 200 400 400 650 650 650 250 450 850 250 700 400 400 600 650 450 200 0 700 225 500 450 450 450 450 650 350 300 650 100 500 500 300 250 450 250 VISITOR USE 350 775 525 575 275 375 200 325 350 200 400 300 375 325 150 100 50 100 200 200 50 350 175 600 350 225 400 425 475 175 100 150 50 50 475 150 250 350 100 PARK OPERATIONS 100 500 350 200 200 200 225 150 50 250 125 100 175 100 200 100 100 200 75 175 175 150 225 100 200 0 50 300 200 0 125 0 0 0 25 0 150 300 0 OTHER ADVANTAGES TOTAL IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGES 1250 2475 2375 1675 1275 1475 1475 1525 1600 900 1575 1850 850 1500 925 900 900 1500 900 925 225 1350 925 1550 1550 1075 1250 1575 2075 675 575 1150 650 725 1350 625 1000 1450 500 ADV/ COST RATIO 63.78 61.88 43.18 41.88 31.88 31.72 30.73 30.50 30.48 30.00 28.64 28.46 28.33 27.27 26.43 25.71 25.71 25.00 24.00 23.13 22.50 20.77 20.56 19.38 19.38 17.92 17.86 17.50 17.29 16.88 16.43 16.43 16.25 16.11 15.88 15.63 14.81 14.50 14.29 2007 ESTIMATED COST 196,000 400,000 550,000 400,000 400,000 465,000 480,000 500,000 525,000 300,000 550,000 650,000 300,000 550,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 600,000 375,000 400,000 100,000 650,000 450,000 800,000 800,000 600,000 700,000 900,000 1,200,000 400,000 350,000 700,000 400,000 450,000 850,000 400,000 675,000 1,000,000 350,000 Page 7
REDW AFBG KALA CAJO TUMA DEPO LEWI PUHO TIMU IATR ROLA THRO CHCU WHSA GOSP ELMO PISP LECL JOMU CEBR FOLS ORPI FOUN LAMR BITH BUFF ARCH CANY GLCA CIRO FOBU HOSP SAFE KNRI JOTR FOUS BRCA CAHA RUCA 5/3/2007
113580 Timucuan Ecological & Historic Pres GMP
105165 Chaco Culture NHP 108652 White Sands NM 67302 66960 Golden Spike NHS El Morro NM
108795 Pipe Spring NM 114271 Lewis & Clark NHT 132557 John Muir NHS 109036 Cedar Breaks NM 96945 Fort Larned NHS 108819 Organ Pipe Cactus NM 130417 Fort Union NM 109246 Big Thicket Npres 69023 Buffalo NR 133664 Arches NP 108796 Canyonlands NP 108866 Glen Canyon NRA 99106 City of Rocks Nres 133393 Fossil Butte NM 123243 Hot Springs NP 108622 Santa Fe NHT 71698 71663 67236 73198 95070 Knife River Indian Villages NHS Fort Union Trading Post NHS Bryce Canyon NP Cape Hatteras NS Russell Cave NM 132072 Joshua Tree NP
104097 Lake Meredith NRA / Alibates Flint Quarries NM GMP
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Final Results in Advantage-Cost Ratio Order
IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGE SCORES BY FACTOR PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT REGION NEED FOR DIRECTION 86398 Mesa Verde NP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP Amendment GMP GMP IM MW PW SE SE PW SE MW SE NC IM SE MW MW IM MW IM MW IM MW IM MW MW IM PW MW 350 200 175 200 200 175 200 175 80 300 800 200 150 20 600 50 175 175 200 0 50 125 0 50 50 150 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 500 350 400 300 300 400 125 150 250 100 450 400 250 50 450 50 150 400 100 200 150 0 150 50 50 50 VISITOR USE 200 200 150 200 200 150 250 100 50 100 500 200 125 150 550 150 0 150 150 50 150 100 0 50 0 100 PARK OPERATIONS 100 50 125 50 50 50 100 50 0 0 150 100 50 125 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 75 0 OTHER ADVANTAGES TOTAL IMPORTANCE OF ADVANTAGES 1150 850 850 750 750 775 675 475 380 500 1900 900 575 345 1700 250 325 725 450 250 350 225 150 200 175 300 ADV/ COST RATIO 13.53 13.08 13.08 11.54 11.54 11.48 11.25 11.18 10.86 10.00 9.50 9.09 8.85 8.63 8.61 8.33 8.13 7.63 7.50 6.79 5.83 5.63 5.45 5.33 5.00 5.00 2007 ESTIMATED COST 850,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 675,000 600,000 425,000 350,000 500,000 2,000,000 990,000 650,000 400,000 1,975,000 300,000 400,000 950,000 600,000 368,000 600,000 400,000 275,000 375,000 350,000 600,000
MEVE BADL SAFR VICK KEMO WAPA SHIL FOSM DESO POHE YELL NATR WICA FOSC GRTE PEVI CAGR CUVA TRTE NICO JECA WIHO KEWE CHAM EUON MORU
108248 Badlands NP, South Unit 111785 San Francisco Maritime NHP 113004 Vicksburg NMP 49138 87670 70534 96199 76034 67339 69642 70802 67303 Kennesaw Mountain NBP Shiloh NMP Fort Smith NHS DeSoto Nmem Potomac Heritage NST Yellowstone NP Natchez Trace Parkway Wind Cave NP Grand Teton NP 121455 War in the Pacific NHP
120047 Fort Scott NHS
120680 Perry's Victory and International Peace Mem GMP 134926 Casa Grande Ruins NM 71477 Cuyahoga Valley NP 108626 Trail of Tears NHT 123233 Nicodemus NHS 123839 Jewel Cave NM 133818 William Howard Taft NHS 70930 Keewenaw NBP 111373 Chamizal Nmem 132561 Eugene O'Neill NHS 119361 Mount Rushmore Nmem
0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
46,175 64,100
17.00
$ 37,699,000
72%
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 8
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Banding by 2007 Estimated Cost
TOTAL PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT ADVANTAGES ADV/ RATIO 2007 ESTIMATED COST Running Total of Net Cost
REGION IMPORTANCE OF COST
SMALL PROJECT BAND (< $525,000) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
REDW AFBG CAJO TUMA DEPO LEWI PUHO TIMU IATR CHCU GOSP ELMO PISP JOMU CEBR FOLS FOUN CIRO FOBU SAFE KNRI FOUS RUCA FOSM DESO POHE FOSC PEVI CAGR NICO WIHO KEWE CHAM EUON 128375 Redwood NP 128418 African Burial Ground NM 135731 John Smith Chesapeake NHT 108614 Tumacacori NM 118032 Devils Postpile NM 113836 Lewis & Clark NHP 113607 Puuhonua O Honaunau NHP 106449 Ice Age NST Interpretive Site 105165 Chaco Culture NHP 67302 66960 Golden Spike NHS El Morro NM GMP Amendment GMP CMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP Revision GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP Amendment GMP GMP Amendment GMP Amendment GMP PW NE NE IM PW PW PW SE MW IM IM IM IM PW IM MW IM PW IM IM IM MW SE MW SE NC MW MW IM MW MW MW IM PW 1250 2475 1675 1275 1475 1475 1525 1600 900 850 925 900 900 900 925 225 925 675 575 650 725 625 500 475 380 500 345 250 325 250 225 150 200 175 63.78 61.88 41.88 31.88 31.72 30.73 30.50 30.48 30.00 28.33 26.43 25.71 25.71 24.00 23.13 22.50 20.56 16.88 16.43 16.25 16.11 15.63 14.29 11.18 10.86 10.00 8.63 8.33 8.13 6.79 5.63 5.45 5.33 5.00 196,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 465,000 480,000 500,000 525,000 300,000 300,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 375,000 400,000 100,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 425,000 350,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 400,000 368,000 400,000 275,000 375,000 350,000 196,000 596,000 996,000 1,396,000 1,861,000 2,341,000 2,841,000 3,366,000 3,666,000 3,966,000 4,316,000 4,666,000 5,016,000 5,391,000 5,791,000 5,891,000 6,341,000 6,741,000 7,091,000 7,491,000 7,941,000 8,341,000 8,691,000 9,116,000 9,466,000 9,966,000 10,366,000 10,666,000 11,066,000 11,434,000 11,834,000 12,109,000 12,484,000 12,834,000
113580 Timucuan Ecological & Historic Pres GMP
108795 Pipe Spring NM 132557 John Muir NHS 109036 Cedar Breaks NM 96945 99106 Fort Larned NHS City of Rocks Nres 130417 Fort Union NM 133393 Fossil Butte NM 108622 Santa Fe NHT 71698 71663 95070 70534 96199 76034 Knife River Indian Villages NHS Fort Union Trading Post NHS Russell Cave NM Fort Smith NHS DeSoto Nmem Potomac Heritage NST
120047 Fort Scott NHS 134926 Casa Grande Ruins NM 123233 Nicodemus NHS 133818 William Howard Taft NHS 70930 Keewenaw NBP 111373 Chamizal Nmem 132561 Eugene O'Neill NHS
120680 Perry's Victory and International Peace Mem GMP
20,875
/
PW PW IM IM MW IM MW IM MW IM MW PW SE SE PW SE MW IM IM MW
27,225
2375 1575 1850 1500 1500 1350 1075 1250 1150 1000 850 850 750 750 775 675 575 450 350 300
77% $
43.18 28.64 28.46 27.27 25.00 20.77 17.92 17.86 16.43 14.81 13.08 13.08 11.54 11.54 11.48 11.25 8.85 7.50 5.83 5.00
12,834,000
550,000 550,000 650,000 550,000 600,000 650,000 600,000 700,000 700,000 675,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 675,000 600,000 650,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 13,384,000 13,934,000 14,584,000 15,134,000 15,734,000 16,384,000 16,984,000 17,684,000 18,384,000 19,059,000 19,709,000 20,359,000 21,009,000 21,659,000 22,334,000 22,934,000 23,584,000 24,184,000 24,784,000 25,384,000
MEDIUM PROJECT BAND ($525,000 - $750,000) 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
KALA ROLA THRO WHSA LECL ORPI BUFF ARCH HOSP BRCA BADL SAFR KEMO VICK WAPA SHIL WICA TRTE JECA MORU 118981 Kalaupapa NHP 99103 71837 Ross Lake NRA Theodore Roosevelt NP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP CMP GMP GMP
108652 White Sands NM 114271 Lewis & Clark NHT 108819 Organ Pipe Cactus NM 69023 Buffalo NR 133664 Arches NP 123243 Hot Springs NP 67236 Bryce Canyon NP 108248 Badlands NP, South Unit 111785 San Francisco Maritime NHP 49138 Kennesaw Mountain NBP 113004 Vicksburg NMP 121455 War in the Pacific NHP 87670 70802 Shiloh NMP Wind Cave NP
108626 Trail of Tears NHT 123839 Jewel Cave NM 119361 Mount Rushmore Nmem
14,625
5/3/2007
/
20,950
70% $
12,550,000
Page 9
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLANNING 2007 GMP Priority Panel -- Banding by 2007 Estimated Cost
TOTAL PARK CODE PMIS # PARK NAME PROJECT ADVANTAGES ADV/ RATIO 2007 ESTIMATED COST Running Total of Net Cost
REGION IMPORTANCE OF COST
LARGE PROJECT BAND ($750,000 >) 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
BITH LAMR CANY GLCA JOTR CAHA MEVE YELL NATR GRTE CUVA 109246 Big Thicket Npres 108796 Canyonlands NP 108866 Glen Canyon NRA 132072 Joshua Tree NP 73198 86398 67339 69642 67303 71477 Cape Hatteras NS Mesa Verde NP Yellowstone NP Natchez Trace Parkway Grand Teton NP Cuyahoga Valley NP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP GMP IM IM IM IM PW SE IM IM SE IM MW 1550 1550 1575 2075 1350 1450 1150 1900 900 1700 725 19.38 19.38 17.50 17.29 15.88 14.50 13.53 9.50 9.09 8.61 7.63 800,000 800,000 900,000 1,200,000 850,000 1,000,000 850,000 2,000,000 990,000 1,975,000 950,000 26,184,000 26,984,000 27,884,000 29,084,000 29,934,000 30,934,000 31,784,000 33,784,000 34,774,000 36,749,000 37,699,000 104097 Lake Meredith NRA / Alibates Flint Quarries NM GMP
10,700
/
15,925
67% $
12,315,000
46,200
/
64,100
72% $ 37,699,000
5/3/2007
Park Planning and Special Studies Division
Page 10
GROUP "1" SCORING SHEET
NEED FOR DIRECTION AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE
PARK
COMMENTS
1000 350 200 550 350 400 175 350 700 400 350 50 50 150 175 500 80 300 50 50 0 20 175 300 175 750 175 600 350 200 50 175 350 800 200 0 175 350 550 400 350 150 200 0 150 50 150 300
Page 11
GROUP "1" SCORING SHEET
NEED FOR DIRECTION PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
400 300 550 150 500 175 200 600 550 200 400 200 175 375 150 125 800
Page 12
GROUP "1" SCORING SHEET
NEED FOR DIRECTION AFBG KALA YELL GLCA CAJO GRTE THRO BITH LECL ROLA TIMU DEPO SAFE BUFF CANY LEWI PUHO TUMA WHSA ARCH BRCA CAHA CEBR HOSP JOTR LAMR MEVE ELMO FOUN POHE REDW BADL IATR KEMO NATR SHIL TRTE VICK CAGR CUVA FOSM FOUS GOSP JOMU KNRI SAFR WAPA CIRO
PARK
COMMENTS
1000 800 800 750 700 600 600 550 550 550 550 500 500 400 400 400 400 400 375 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 300 300 300 300 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 150
Major change in direction coming Crown jewel park w/o comprehensive direction
Betwn CAJO & TIMU; Adjustment in direction due to internal & external changes Betwn CAJO & TIMU; Adjustment in direction due to internal & external changes Comp to TIMU w/ complex external issues & new lands No existing mgt direction; complex authorities; opp for proactive NPS mgt Comp to TIMU w/ complex external issues & new lands No GMP; Centennial in 2011; need WMP; comp to TIMU No existing mgt direction; complex authorities; opp for proactive NPS mgt Comp to SHIL & BITH Comp to ARCH + larger scale & more external issues Comp to TUMA Comp to TUMA Comp to TUMA; includes wild study 1989 GMP, update to an existing GMP Comp to ARCH Comp to ARCH Comp to ARCH Comp to ARCH (Factor 2 should be substantial) Comp to ARCH (Factor 2 should be substantial) Comp to CAHA 1979 GMP; comp 350 No GMP; Comp to ARCH but fewer issues Comp to ELMO No GMP; framework for trail mgt needed 2000 GMP; additional land but similar resources & mgt direction comp to SHIL in terms of changes + addition of complex tribal issues Comp to SHIL Comp to SHIL; Small addition + external pressures Comp to SHIL Comp to SHIL; 1992 CMP; complex authorities; potential for futrue doubling but not yet Comp to SHIL Comp to SHIL Comp to SHIL Comp to CAGR Comp to CAGR Comp to CAGR Comp to CAGR Comp to CAGR Comp to CAGR; some complications in mgt but not major change in direction Comp to SHIL Comp to CAGR; some complications in mgt but not major change in direction
Page 13
GROUP "1" SCORING SHEET
NEED FOR DIRECTION MORU ORPI PISP RUCA WICA WIHO DESO CHAM CHCU EUON FOBU JECA PEVI FOSC FOLS KEWE NICO
PARK
COMMENTS
150 150 150 150 150 125 80 50 50 50 50 50 50 20 0 0 0
Comp to CAGR; some complications in mgt but not major change in direction 1997 GMP; major threats but not change in mgt direction No GMP; some adjustments in mgt direction needed Comp to CIRO; some complications in mgt but not major change in direction Comp to SHIL - but no additional lands/resources Comp to SHIL - DCP level decisions Comp to CHAM but no GMP Appears issues could be resolved by foundation and IP PMIS as written is not sufficient to determine fundamental direction No demonstrated need in change of direction from 1991 GMP Appears issues could be resolved by foundation No demonstrated need in change of direction from 1994 GMP No demonstrated need in change of direction PMIS states no change in direction needed; need to better integrate mgt Proposed move to joint VC not a GMP issues(space was in prior GMP) No demonstrated need in change of direction from 1998 GMP No demonstrated need in change of direction from 2003 GMP
Page 14
GROUP "2" SCORING SHEET
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE
PARK
COMMENTS
200 450 350 450 250 450 150 450 200 450 200 50 250 350 400 400 250 400 50 300 0 50 150 225 300 650 400 450 650 250 150 450 500 700 300 150 500 500 650 650 500 50 400 200 700 50 600 100
Page 15
GROUP "2" SCORING SHEET
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
650 500 450 250 100 400 125 850 650 100 400 300 400 700 250 0 450
Page 16
GROUP "2" SCORING SHEET
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 17
GROUP "2" SCORING SHEET
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES THRO KALA ORPI WHSA GLCA LECL LEWI PUHO TIMU HOSP PISP JOTR KNRI LAMR MEVE REDW ARCH BITH BUFF CAHA CANY GRTE JOMU ROLA YELL CUVA DEPO ELMO GOSP NATR SAFR TUMA WAPA BADL CIRO FOBU FOUS KEMO VICK BRCA CHCU DESO IATR RUCA WICA FOUN AFBG CAJO
PARK
COMMENTS
850 700 700 700 650 650 650 650 650 650 600 500 500 500 500 500 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 350 350 300 300 300 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 225 200 200
Compareble to GRTE Similar to GRTE Like JOTR Orv's, T&E species Compareble to GRTE Like GRTE
No GMP, needs res.guidance are slightly less than GRTE City controls the water flow that threatens the inscriptions
Information support found in basic description complexity is slightly less than GRTE Need DCs because of external threats
Potential for a irreplaceble loss, not articulated well Park needs desired conditions to cooperate with county,
Resource protected, but collections need to be addressed Pollution, est. a framework for resource conditions
Page 18
GROUP "2" SCORING SHEET
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES CEBR NICO CAGR FOSM JECA KEWE SHIL POHE SAFE TRTE CHAM EUON FOSC MORU PEVI FOLS WIHO
PARK
COMMENTS
200 200 150 150 150 150 125 100 100 100 50 50 50 50 50 0 0
Resource issues to be addressed by GMP, after inventory Urbanization along the boundaries
Minimum resources articulated, mainly operational
Page 19
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE
PARK
COMMENTS
775 400 200 350 250 225 0 350 575 425 200 50 375 175 150 375 50 100 0 100 50 150 100 175 150 475 150 550 150 200 150 200 475 525 200 0 50 600 100 200 200 100 200 50 350 150 50 100
Page 20
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
325 350 400 100 50 150 250 300 350 150 275 200 150 325 125 100 500
Page 21
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 22
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES AFBG LAMR CAJO GRTE KALA YELL GLCA JOTR CANY ARCH ROLA CHCU DEPO BITH CAHA ORPI REDW TIMU PUHO WHSA THRO TUMA BRCA SHIL BUFF BADL CEBR IATR JOMU KEMO LEWI MEVE NATR VICK CIRO FOUN CUVA FOSC FOUS GOSP HOSP JECA PEVI SAFR TRTE WAPA WICA ELMO
PARK
775 600 575 550 525 500 475 475 425 400 400 375 375 350 350 350 350 350 325 325 300 275 250 250 225 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 175 175 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 125 100
Page 23
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES FOBU FOSM LECL MORU POHE RUCA WIHO CHAM DESO FOLS KNRI NICO PISP SAFE CAGR EUON KEWE
PARK
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 0 0 0
Page 24
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
VISITOR USE ISSUES
PARK
Page 25
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
COMMENTS
anchor fluctuating lake, new land-base recreation, need flexible strategy preference preference like a new area when patients gone increasing visitation, failing infrastructure, big old park cc of lake, backcountry, adapt to fluctuating lake levles changing uses, intense regional pressure similar to ARCH, a little more need to address visitor issues regional recreation pressures, regional coordination of use, more and different types of use traffic, backcountry roads similar to GRTE but less complex potentially profound change to visitor experience from potential newly paved road preference increasing visitation and regional pressure increasing use and visitor conflicts affect 65% of park closures requiring re-thinking visitor use new GMP, new 25,000 ac addition, cc and public pressure for recreational use hunting, beach, house (new resources/activities) old GMP, new lands, access, interp., cc, etc.. regional recreation pressure, changing visitor use, diverse visitors, military closures need zoning; equestrian trail overuse issues preference crowding, carrying capacity, and social trail; long-term transportation Access issues, visitor experience in dispersed sites, new site coming on line more visitors and different types of use consider camping, access, VC, wildness, need CIP and to work with tribes adjacent resort development/second homes, more winter use, snowmobiles main purpose of site is interpretation need visitor center, use of house space bisected by roads, tour route issues, alternative transportation cooperation with state, new visitor infrastructure access to backcountry, more trails, ADA need strategy for many communities proposing visitor centers local recreational pressure, capacity issues camping, trails, equestrian etc. need evaluation significant drop in visitation, new scholarship, along Santa Fe Trail alternative transportation, heritage corridor significant decline in visitation significant drop in visitation, need to bring in tribes population growth, need CIP, VC issues experience free flowing springs; define future of bathhouse experience visitor use of more cave passages? carrying capacity New visitor access from transit CMP - inapporpriate activities new VC, special events visitor capacity, camping, rockfall hazard, basic guidance
Page 26
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
COMMENTS
general need to identify visitor experiences need themes (do a CIP), buffer noise CMP for trail, need CIP crowding, but just built lots of facilities opportunities for partner coordination need general visitor planning CIP, changing visitor use patterns relatively small needs need to provide sense of place evaluate alternative to GMP proposal for VC in park have new VC and staff, need CIP re-evaluate visitor use in 2003 GMP CIP could do this CMP - want to make people more aware of trail anticipating expansion only operational issues identified only issue is ID boundaries
Page 27
GROUP "3" SCORING SHEET
COMMENTS
Page 28
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE
PARK
COMMENTS
500 50 50 200 150 0 0 300 200 300 175 50 175 0 0 200 0 100 75 125 175 125 50 225 0 200 200 100 0 250 0 75 25 350 50 0 0 100 200 225 100 0 100 0 150 0 100 0
Page 29
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
150 100 125 0 0 125 100 100 50 0 200 50 50 100 50 0 150
Page 30
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 31
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES AFBG KALA CAHA CANY IATR FOUN LEWI BITH CAJO DEPO GLCA GOSP LECL TUMA CEBR CHCU FOLS BRCA ORPI PUHO YELL FOBU FOSC ROLA SAFR ELMO GRTE LAMR MEVE NATR PISP REDW SHIL THRO WHSA EUON JOMU ARCH BADL CHAM FOSM KEMO TIMU VICK WAPA WICA JOTR BUFF
PARK
COMMENTS
500 350 300 300 250 225 225 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 175 175 175 150 150 150 150 125 125 125 125 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 75 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 25 0
Page 32
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES CAGR CIRO CUVA DESO FOUS HOSP JECA KEWE KNRI MORU NICO PEVI POHE RUCA SAFE TRTE WIHO
PARK
COMMENTS
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 33
GROUP "4" SCORING SHEET
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS ISSUES
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 34
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS AFBG ARCH BADL BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP POHE
PARK
COMMENTS
0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
increased tribal management role
Page 35
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS PUHO REDW ROLA RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
transboundary management w/Canada
Page 36
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 37
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS BADL ROLA AFBG ARCH BITH BRCA BUFF CAGR CAHA CAJO CANY CEBR CHAM CHCU CIRO CUVA DEPO DESO ELMO EUON FOBU FOLS FOSC FOSM FOUN FOUS GLCA GOSP GRTE HOSP IATR JECA JOMU JOTR KALA KEMO KEWE KNRI LAMR LECL LEWI MEVE MORU NATR NICO ORPI PEVI PISP
PARK
COMMENTS
50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
increased tribal management role transboundary management w/Canada
Page 38
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS POHE PUHO REDW RUCA SAFE SAFR SHIL THRO TIMU TRTE TUMA VICK WAPA WHSA WICA WIHO YELL
PARK
COMMENTS
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 39
GROUP "5" SCORING SHEET
OTHER ADVANTAGES TO NPS
PARK
COMMENTS
Page 40