CCSSE 2007

Reviews
Shared by: Against Cavs
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/22/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
CCSSE 2007 Summary of Selected Results August 2007 4/22/2009 1 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Administered through University of TexasAustin  Survey administered directly to CC students during class in spring term  Assesses student experiences and engagement  Consistent sampling methodology – random sample, stratified by time of day  4/22/2009 2 CCSSE 2007 Cohort 525 colleges representing 48 states  260 institutions comprise the “small institution” group (< 4,500 students)  Iowa institutions – Hawkeye CC, Kirkwood CC, NIACC, Northeast Iowa CC, Northwest Iowa CC, Southeast Iowa CC, Western Iowa Tech, Mercy College of Health Sciences  4/22/2009 3 2007 ECC Survey Participants 231 usable surveys  49.7% male  94.3% full-time status  6.0% ELL/ESL  78.4% White, Non-Hispanic  83.4% aged 18 – 24  12.2% have dependent children at home  4/22/2009 4 2007 MCC Survey Participants 364 usable surveys  43.9% male  88.6% full-time status  13.9% ELL/ESL  76.1% White, Non-Hispanic  74.6% aged 18 – 24  26.5% have dependent children at home  4/22/2009 5 Educational Goals - ECC Educational Goals Certification program Associate degree Transfer to 4-yr. Primary goal 34.4% 57.4% 52.2% Secondary goal 21.1% 25.4% 22.1% Not a goal 44.4% 17.2% 25.7% Job-related skills Self-improvement 42.5% 39.3% 34.1% 34.5% 23.4% 26.2% Change careers 4/22/2009 21.5% 22.9% 55.6% 6 Educational Goals - MCC Educational Goals Certification program Associate degree Transfer to 4-yr. Job-related skills Primary goal 34.0% 63.3% 49.9% 38.7% Secondary Not a goal goal 18.6% 16.7% 17.6% 30.8% 47.4% 20.0% 32.5% 30.6% Self-improvement Change careers 4/22/2009 39.4% 38.0% 38.8% 15.4% 21.8% 46.5% 7 Benchmark Areas Active and collaborative learning  Student effort  Academic challenge  Student-faculty interaction  Support for learners  4/22/2009 8 Benchmark Scores Convert data into useful information  Compare CC performance to peers  Compare own performance across benchmarks  Identify areas in need of improvement  Track progress toward institutional goals  Mean score for each benchmark for “small colleges” comparison group is 50  4/22/2009 9 Active and Collaborative Learning ECC MCC       2004 48.8 49.9 2005 51.5 48.7 2006 54.7 47.7 2007 58.3 47.6 Asked questions in class Made a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class 10 4/22/2009 Student Effort 2004 ECC MCC  2005 47.7 46.1 2006 51.0 50.0 2007 53.1 48.6 49.8 48.7 Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in  Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources  Came to class without completing readings or assignments  Number of books read on your own for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment  Preparing for class  Frequency of use: peer or other tutoring, skill labs, computer lab 11 4/22/2009 Student-Faculty Interaction 2004 ECC MCC       2005 52.9 52.8 2006 54.4 49.6 2007 58.2 51.8 51.2 52.7 Used email to communicate with an instructor Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class Received prompt feedback from instructors on your performance Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 12 4/22/2009 Academic Challenge 2004 ECC MCC       2005 48.2 47.8 2006 46.6 49.2 2007 47.3 47.4 44.4 49.7 Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 13 4/22/2009 Academic Challenge Questions cont.     Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books or book-length packs of course readings Number of written papers or reports of any length Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying 14 4/22/2009 Support for Learners 2004 ECC MCC    2005 48.1 50.4 2006 52.9 51.9 2007 53.1 52.3 53.7 50.8    Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities Providing the support you need to thrive socially Providing the financial support you need to afford your education Frequency: academic advising/planning, career counseling 15 4/22/2009 Entering Student Experience Results Part-time Full-time All Students 62% 56% By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals. ECC - Yes MCC - Yes 20% 46% 65% 57% By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in. ECC – Yes MCC - Yes 4/22/2009 20% 58% 34% 51% 33% 51% 16 Entering Student Experience Results Part-time Full-time All Students 69% How satisfied were you with the quality of your college’s orientation course or program for new students? Very/Somewhat Satisfied 30% 71% Very/Somewhat Satisfied 63% 71% 70% Rate your overall satisfaction with this college’s processes for working with new students. Very/Somewhat Satisfied Very/Somewhat Satisfied 4/22/2009 80% 92% 89% 89% 87% 89% 17 ECC 84.1% of students surveyed would recommend ECC to a friend of family member  78.3% rated their experience at ECC as “Good” or “Excellent”  4/22/2009 18 MCC 91.0% of students surveyed would recommend MCC to a friend of family member  86.1% rated their experience at MCC as “Good” or “Excellent”  4/22/2009 19 Take the CCSSE Challenge       Ask me to present results in more detail at upcoming meeting or work session Visit www.ccsse.org to learn how others use results Write an op-ed piece for local paper Discuss ways to use survey results in your unit/division/area Use survey as a measurement tool for 2007-08 goals Other ideas…. 20 4/22/2009

Related docs
ccsse usa today initiative inv
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CCSSE 2005 Codebook
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CCSSE 2004 Documentation
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CCSSE Data Reports for 2006
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CCSSE 2006 Codebook
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
2004 Communications Tools for CCSSE Members
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
premium docs
Other docs by Against Cavs
Keating Owen Child Labor Act of 1916 info
Views: 1318  |  Downloads: 2
Operation of employment agency
Views: 177  |  Downloads: 4
Constitutional Law - Kmiec
Views: 301  |  Downloads: 12
National Industrial Recovery Act Info
Views: 275  |  Downloads: 3
Credit scoring
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 0
MORTGAGE DEED
Views: 439  |  Downloads: 8
Rent collection policies and procedures
Views: 557  |  Downloads: 14
Northwest Ordinance info
Views: 182  |  Downloads: 1
Bill of Sale for Business Assets
Views: 843  |  Downloads: 31
Removal of Contingency
Views: 221  |  Downloads: 3