Strong trap

Document Sample
Strong trap Powered By Docstoc
					Strong trap
Blogger ago Reporter: social stratification, with the elite, Advantage
family; world divided, a well-developed, strong and the like. May be
in order to achieve harmony, the stronger party always shown a
charity, the pursuit of justice faces. Of course, some true and some
have good human nature, but also sinister intention of the human
Human nature, rich people can help the poor get rich, but will not
make the poor become rich like him, they need a deep divide between
the obvious and even insurmountable, otherwise how could he love and
be recognized by society, to make up self-missing opportunities? The
muddy water between countries that may be even more unpredictable.
I am not a hatred of the rich, I am not denying the social charity. I
just told a number of vulnerable groups, whether groups or
organizations: the strong side of superstition, not
"recommendations" and "recommend" their "good
intentions" may not give them good education, enrichment and
development of the real path, during or exaggerated or hidden, or to
join the social ethical and legal factors, or ulterior motives - the
path of development according to their specified, is a strong
willingness to maximize the interests of one party.
To participation in social policy or international rule-making,
implementation and monitoring, not just as a play-off, so that the
process of playing to play and gain playing with profit, so the other
can not be controlled.
V. above, a humble opinion, only nonsense, let us also look at the
"rich trap - why the developed countries kicked the ladder,"
the book review it!
??????????????????????????"Kicked the ladder" is to not let
you go beyond
???????????Study: Pan Qiwen, contained in the "Chinese Academy of
Social Sciences report," 26 May 2009.
In today's world, we see some no shortage of "kind" of
developed countries. To help developing countries that they had
"the good life", described as "busy before the busy
post-" to make plans, "sell" various policy proposals.
However, Zhang University of Cambridge, Department of Political
Economy Summer Associate (Ha-loon Chang), Dr. is in the "rich
Trap: Why do developed countries, kicked the ladder?" In the
developed countries are recommended to developing countries, the
so-called "good policy "and" good system "is to
guide development than for
In the country's "wealth ladder," while today's developed
countries are trying to kick this "ladder" - it would
undoubtedly be kicked out of developing countries among the developed
countries of the "ladder" and its fundamental purpose is to
maintain two different levels of development among countries and for
"a lifetime meal ticket."
Here, the "good policy" often refers to those so-called
"Washington Consensus" unanimously approved the policy,
including restrictive macroeconomic policies, international trade and
investment liberalization, privatization and deregulation. "Good
system" referred to must be those developed countries, especially
Britain and other countries were used in the system, including:
democracy, "good" bureaucracy, independent judiciary, the
private property rights (including intellectual property rights) in
strong protection, transparent and market-oriented corporate
governance system and the financial system (including the central bank
with independent political status), etc.. According to today's
standards, immediately recommended that all developed countries to
developing countries "good policy" and "good
system" in its early history is highly "imperfect",
even if these "imperfect" policy and system, the developed
countries themselves are not well used, or simply not used.
Developed countries have climbed different "ladder", then
why they should "kick" catch up strategy climb the
"ladder"? It is because they attempt to use its strength in
the world economy, making economies of developing countries level of
development never reach their level. They usually take measures that,
in formulating the international economic system of Guize Shang
"Qian Kun Tai diversion": Yifang Mian, Ta Men orally on
Yaoqiu developing Caiyongnaxie Tamen has never Fa Zhan Er Shi Yong
over the so-called "good policy" and " a good system
": On the other hand, when the developing countries in a way they
set up a" wealth ladder "to climb, especially when the level
of economic development in developing countries will be near or at the
level of their development before they will create all kinds of
excuses, "kicked the ladder." (including the re-development
and changes do not help the economic development of developing
countries in international economic rules and standards), the level of
economic development in developing countries will never get what they
are now up height. Intellectual property system, for example, the
major countries in Europe and the United States until the late 19th
century, intellectual property system still very chaotic, governments
refuse patent protection for chemical products, acquiescence imported
technology patented in China and the neglect of foreign patents, etc.
and so on. The United States more than 100 years after the founding of
beginning to recognize foreign copyrights, starting from the first
introduction of intellectual property law to the initial sound,
Western countries took more than 100 years. However, they are asking
developing countries to rapidly implement intellectual property
regimes, especially in April 2007, the Sino-US intellectual property
rights issues "conflict" sudden escalation - when the U.S.
government announced to the world trade organization of trade action
against China, the two were accused of copyright enforcement in China
and restrictions on American movies, music, books, products into the
Chinese market and developing countries ... ... the current year
compared to developed countries, development, upgrading the system
does has "advanced" a lot, which makes short-term reform of
space within the system and the role of constantly narrowing. The IP
determines a country's position in the international division of labor
in developing countries in the process of "jump" or
"leapfrog" development, made by developed countries to
temporarily can not accept or not accept, so they "trying"
the "ladder" aside.
At the same time, the developed countries maintain the "global
standard" of the intellectual property system and the common
control system will also require developing countries to training
(Even worse, from the foreign employment) a large number of
world-class legal experts and accountants, The developing countries
most need is engineers and craftsmen. Therefore we can say whether in
the policy areas, or areas in the system, the developed countries
today are in the "kick the ladder." Some systems that
benefit the majority of developing countries, but its specific form
could still be a controversial topic. Such as the central bank's
control of systemic risk is necessary, but disputed whether it should
be required, as orthodox theory not subject to political influence and
only focus on controlling inflation? As the authors put it:
"reform, in particular, is to consider the really good policy and
good system integration can bring great potential when Fa Zhan, should
be bold to try. But this does not mean forcing all countries should be
one kind of fixed the Anglo-American Deng Fa Zhan mode, Yebingbushi
Yaoqiu developing countries to upgrade their system too fast level.
Both developed and "Kick the ladder," the hidden purpose
behind what we have reason to ask the question: the developed
countries to developing countries recommended the so-called "good
policy" and "good system" when, if they are
deliberately conceal their "success secrets" mean? book
brings together various viewpoints with the orthodox history of
capitalism's historical information, the developed countries in the
course of their development policies and institutions adopted a
comprehensive yet concise description of and discussed. In other
words, this book raised the question: "How true that the rich
countries become rich?" On the short answer is: not through the
use of the developed countries to developing countries that their
policies and the system recommended by Today's position. Most of them
have frequently used the "bad" measures and policies such as
protection of infant industry policies and export subsidies. These
measures and policies today are not in favor of the World Trade
Organization, even firmly resisted. Before they become well-developed
(ie, until the late 19th century and early 20th century), they were
now only a small number of developing countries as essential systems,
including central banks, limited liability companies and other
"basic" system. Therefore a matter of policy, the author
sensibly pointed out: "The developing countries should be allowed
to present the current stage of development in their countries through
the effective use of the 'bad policy'."
Looking at the book, not difficult to find countries "Kick the
ladder," the danger is that it will further lead to new
imbalances in the world economy, expansion of the world economy the
gap between rich and poor countries: it will make it on the
international economic organizations (including the WTO, WB, IMlz)
developed a fair international economic rules and authority cast doubt
on the intensification of the developing and developed countries in
the economic development of contradictions and conflicts.
To correct the developed countries "Kick the ladder" type of
selfish way to approach the current reform of international economic
organizations, so that it not only represents the interests of
developed countries, but also to fully reflect and represent the
interests of developing countries. "Wealth ladder" needs of
developing countries and developed countries to establish, once the
"wealth ladder" to reach a consensus, it does not allow any
State or States free to "kick."

Shared By: