Sales Tax Pasco County Florida - PDF
W
Description
Sales Tax Pasco County Florida document sample
Document Sample


OF
B~ARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
ADDENDUM
To
AGENDA
November 4, 2003
~:30 p.m. West Pasco County Government Center, 7530 Lithe Road, New Port Richey, FL 34654
—
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ted Schrader, Chairman John J. Gallagher, County Administrator
PeterAitman, Vice-Chairman Robert D. Sumner, County Attorney
Pat Mulieri, BID. Jed Pittman, Clerk to the Board
Ann Hildebrand
Steve Simon
.....u...u.uu.u.....uumu.uu....uu.u.uu..u.uuuuuuep
Regular:
County Attorney
Local Government Infrastructure Surtax, ‘Penny for Pasco” -
Discussion and Vote on Baflot Language
Memorandum CAOO4-0409
*Note: This is on the outline as RIO (To Be Distributed)
PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Chairman and DATE: 10/28/03 FILE: CAOO4-0409
Members of the Board of
County Commissioners
SUBJECT: Local Government Infrastructure
Surtax, “Penny for Pasco”—
Discussion and Vote on Ballot
Language (BCC: 11/04/03, 1:30
p.m.; NPR)
I FROM: Robert D. Sumner REFERENCES: Intro: 10/07/03, 1:30 p.m.; DC
County Attorney
It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On October 21, 2003, this Board discussed two proposed versions of the ballot language for
the Infrastructure Sales Surtax Referendum (“Penny for Pasco”). The first of those two
versions (Version #1), drafted by Michael Nurrenbrock for the Board’s consideration,
reimburses the District School Board of Pasco County for the .5 millage reduction prior to the
distribution of the surtax proceeds to the parties, effectively reducing the total amount of
proceeds received by each party.
Upon the discussion by the Board on October 21, 2003, the County Attorney’s Office has
continued to work with the parties, a representative of the Florida Department of Revenue and
i has modified the proposed language (Version #2). A meeting was held with the City Clerks and
Managers to discuss the distribution of the surtax proceeds. At that time, the representatives of
the municipalities agreed to the distribution format that reimburses the School District prior to
the distribution to all the parties. Version #2 of the proposed referendum language contains the
agreed distribution format along with additional modifications for clarification purposes and to
comply with statutory requirements that the ballot language be an explanatory statement of the
chief purpose of the measure and contain a brief general description of the projects to be
funded while not exceeding 75 words in length.
Today, the County Attorney’s Office requests this Board to consider the two proposed versions
of the draft referendum language and make the determination as to which version shall appear
on the March 9, 2004, ballot.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
Board of County Commissioners is requested to consider the following alternatives:
1. Adopt the Penny for Pasco referendum ballot language Version #1 which is
the version considered by the Board at its last meeting.
2. Adopt the Penny for Pasco referendum ballot language Version #2 which
contains modifications made for clarity.
3. Direct the County Attorney’s Office as to other modifications to the ballot
language.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING:
The County Attorney’s Office recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt
alternative number 2 as this distribution format has been agreed to by the District School Board
and the Municipalities of Pasco County, and the Florida Department of Revenue considers the
language to be legally acceptable and the language meets the requirements of Florida Statutes.
Attachments: Ballot Language
Data~cau4\Publ,c1PENNYPASCOIO4-0409 BCC (11-4-03 BCC) doc~
\~Bccatty01\Cot~nty_
cc: John J. Gallagher, County Administrator (w/attachments)
Michael Nurrenbrock, Director, 0MB (w/attachments)
John Long, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools, District School Board of Pasco
(w/attachments)
Harold Sample, City Manager, City of Dade City (w/attachments)
Steve Spina, City Manager, City of Zephyrhills (w/attachments)
Vincent Lupo, City Manager, City of Port Richey (w/attachments)
Gerald Seeber, City Manager, City of New Port Richey (w/attachments)
Joan Rogers, Town Clerk, Town of St. Leo (w/attachments)
Barbara Sessa, City Clerk, City of San Antonio (w/attachments)
Mr. Allen Altman (w/attachments)
Datalcau4~Pub!ic\PENNY
~~BccattyO1\County_ PASCOIO4-0409 BCC (11-4-03 BCC) doc
(REDUCE PROCEEDS FROM SURTAX BY AMOUNT OF PROPERTY
TAX REDUCTION AND THEN ALLOCATE REMAINDER)
Version #1
PENNY FOR PASCO —10 YEAR
SALES SURTAX
ONE-CENT (1~)
HALF MILL PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION
SHALL THERE BE LEVIED A ONE-CENT SALES SURTAX: TO
REDUCE BY A HALF MILL THE CAPITAL OUTLAY SCHOOL
PROPERTY TAX MILLAGE FOR TEN YEARS AND THE REMAINDER
TO BE ALLOCATED 45% TO PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BUILD
NEW SCHOOLS, RENOVATE AND EXPAND EXISTING SCHOOLS TO
REDUCE OVERCROWDING; 45% TO PASCO COUNTY TO
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS, PURCHASING
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS, IMPROVING PUBLIC
SAFETY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES; 10% TO PASCO CITIES FOR
LOCAL PROJECTS AND FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
Data~cau4tPubIic’.PENNY
~Bccatty011County_ PASCOlvers,on I dcc
(REDUCE PROCEEDS FROM SURTAX BY AMOUNT OF PROPERTY
TAX REDUCTION AND THEN ALLOCATE REMAINDER WITH
MODIFICATIONS)
Version #2
PENNYFORPASCO-IOYEAR
ONE-CENT (1*) SALES SURTAX
HALF MILL PROPERTY TAX REDUCTION
SHALL THERE BE LEVIED FOR TEN YEARS A ONE-CENT SALES
SURTAX TO REDUCE SCHOOL PROPERTY TAXES BY 112 MILL AND
THEN DISTRiBUTE AS FOLLOWS: 45% TO PASCO SCHOOL
DISTRICT TO RENOVATE AND EXPAND SCHOOL FACILITIES,
IMPROVE EDUCATION, AND BUILD SCHOOLS TO REDUCE
OVERCROWDING; 45% TO PASCO COUNTY FOR
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC
CONGESTION AND SAFETY NEEDS, ACQUIRING
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LANDS, IMPROVING PUBLIC
SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE; 10% TO PASCO’S CITIES FOR
LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE?
PASCO\ Version 3 (USED AS #2) doc
flBccattyoltCounty_ Data~cau4~Pub1ic\PENNY
GROWTH IN SALES TAX AT 5% PER YEAR TAKING PROPERTY TAX OFF THE TOP
31,161,116 34,355,130
1.05
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
Growth 5.0% peryear 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTALS
9 months 3 months
25,766,347 36,072,886 37,876,531 39,770,357 41,758,875 43,846,819 46,039,160 48,341,118 50,758,174 53,296,083 13,990,222 4.37,516,572
Property tax reduction (7,696,981) (8,466,679) (9,313,347) (10,244,681) (11,269,149) (12,396,064) (13,635,671) (14,999,238) (16,499,162) (18,149,078) (122,670,050)
Cities Portion 10.000% 1,806,937 2,760,621 2,856,318 2,952,568 3,048,973 3,145,075 3,240,349 3,334,188 3,425,901 3,514,700 1,399,022 31,484,652
Dade City 16.764% 302,923 462,803 478,846 494,982 511,144 527,255 543,227 558,959 574,334 589,221 234,539 5,278,232
New Port Rictiey 42.417% 766,443 1,170,964 1,211,556 1,252,382 1,293,274 1,334,037 1,374,449 1,414,253 1,453,154 1,490,820 593,419 13,354,751
Port Richey 8.060% 145,640 222,507 230,220 237,978 245,748 253,494 261,173 268,737 276,129 283,286 112,762 2,537,675
Saint Leo 1.745% 31,523 48,160 49,830 51,509 53,191 54,867 56,530 58,167 59,767 61,316 24,407 549,266
San Antonio 1.865% 33,700 51,487 53,272 55,067 56,865 58,657 60,434 62,184 63,895 65,551 26,092 587,203
Zephyrhills 29.149% 526,708 804,699 832,594 860,650 888,751 916,764 944,536 971,889 998,623 1,024,507 407,804 9,177,526
1,806,937 2,760,621 2,856,318 2,952,568 3,048,973 3,145,075 3,240,349 3,334,188 3,425,901 3,514,700 1,399,022 31,484,653
School Portion 45.000% 8,131,215 12,422,793 12,853,433 13,286,554 13,720,377 14,152,840 14,581,570 15,003,846 15,416,555 15,816,152 6,295,600 141,680,935
County Portion 45.000% 8,131,215 12,422,793 12,853,433 13,286,554 13,720,377 14,152,840 14,581,570 15,003,846 15,416,555 15,816,152 6,295,600 141,680,935
Transportation 50% 4,065,608 6,211,397 6,426,716 6,643,277 6,860,188 7,076,420 7,290,785 7,501,923 7,708,278 7,908,076 3,147,800 70,840,468
Enviromental Lands 25% 2,032,804 3,105,698 3,213,358 3,321,639 3,430,094 3,538,210 3,645,393 3,750,961 3,854,139 3,954,038 1,573,900 35,420,234
Public Safety 20% 1,626,243 2,484,559 2,570,687 - 2,657,311 2,744,075 2,830,568 2,916,314 3,000,769 3,083,311 3,163,230 1,259,120 28,336,187
Public Facilities 5% 406,561 621,140 642,672 664,328 686,019 707,642 729,079 750,192 770,828 790,808 314,780 7,084,049
ORIGINAL
PROPERTY AVAILABLE FOR
GROSS TAX RELIEF NEW PROJECTS
CITIES 43,751,657 0 43,751,657
SCHOOL BOARD 196,882,457 61,335,025 135,547,433
COUNTY 196,882,457 61,335,025 135,547,433
437,516,572 314,846,522
TRANSFER 122,670,050
THE TOP
O~F
CITIES 31,484652
SCHOOL BOARD 141,680,935
COUNTY 141,680,935
437,516,572 122,670,050 314,846,522
CITIES DIFFERENCE 12,267,005
Dade City 6,400 16.76% 2,056,497
New Port Richey 16,193 42.42% 5,203,259
Port Richey 3,077 8.06% 988,725
Saint Leo 666 1.74% 214,004
San Antonio 712 1.87% 228,785
Zephyrhills 11,128 29.15% 3,575,734
38,176 100.00% 12,267,005
Related docs
Get documents about "