Driving Value – the NIMM, the EA, the CUI,

Shared by: wgv13363
-
Stats
views:
10
posted:
9/27/2010
language:
English
pages:
34
Document Sample
scope of work template
							Driving Value – the NIMM, the EA,
the CUI, CASE & the TR
Dr Mark Ferrar, NHS Connecting for Health
26-FEB-2008

                                            1
And in the next
  40 mins...




• NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model (the NIMM)

• Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (the EA)

• Common User Interface Programme (the CUI)
The NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model
             (the NIMM)
We Can Only Influence Change
NHS infrastructure numbers game
We need to raise
 the bar...

• “Patchy” IT infrastructure maturity and performance

• 2005 “Infrastructure Themes” still valid today (in fact
  there’s evidence best/worst gap is widening)

• NHS not getting to lowest (or even competitive) TCO

• A consistent, well-managed desktop is key to supporting
  Local NPfIT programmes (NLOP)

• Overall value eroded by premature use of high value
  technology
Infrastructure
  Challenges...

• Expensive - according to analysts, 70% of typical IT spend goes on IT
  Infrastructure! (run the organisation) – (70% of £2.2bn = £1.54bn)
• NHS IM&T Managers should not just rely on gut feel when setting
  investment priorities
• Inconsistent terminology makes it difficult to benchmark (TCO)
• Organisational changes in the NHS means that many IT infrastructures
  are in silos and not optimally managed
• Some suppliers don’t create infrastructure solutions that NHS Trusts
  request, actually need or are ready for
• Many NHS Trusts need help to build coordinated infrastructure
  improvement plans
• Some key tasks often get overlooked because their impact on
  infrastructure is not obvious
Infrastructure Challenges


    • Expensive - according to analysts, 70% of typical IT spend goes on
      IT Infrastructure! (run the organisation)
    • NHS IM&T Managers should not just rely on gut feel when setting
      investment priorities
    • Inconsistent terminology makes it difficult to benchmark
    • Organisational changes in the NHS means that many IT
      infrastructures are in silos and badly managed
    • Some suppliers don’t create infrastructure solutions that NHS
      Trusts request, actually need or are ready for
    • Many NHS Trusts need help to build coordinated infrastructure
      improvement plans
    • Some key tasks often get overlooked because their impact on
      infrastructure is not obvious
The NIMM can
  help...

• NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model provides guidance and
  helps trusts objectively benchmark for themselves their “as-is”
  infrastructure capabilities, then:

• Use it to build a plan for coordinated capability improvement
  in a systematic way

• Use it to set investment priorities and create a benefits plan to
  understand desired outcomes

• Use it to collaborate with NHS suppliers so they create
  infrastructure solutions that NHS needs (and is ready for)
Common Themes – Integrated Projects




       Re-use
                                         Responsiveness

                            CASE
   Agility
                                                   Innovation

                  CUI
Manage Risk
                                                      Competency
                                  NIMM
 ROI/Business
   Value
                                                     Efficiency
              Consistency
                            Standards
Maturity Model Delivery Approach


     • Iterative & collaborative approach will regularly release new and
       updated features based upon feedback and requests from users

     • Develop the NIMM body of knowledge first then create tools to
       help users automate assessments and provide a management
       scorecard

     • Delivered online via PSPG (infrastructure best practice site)

     • Capability Maturity Documents developed for specific
       infrastructure capabilities

     • Virtual group of NIMM Champions from the NHS and key suppliers
       will feed into a feature wish list of maturity guidance that needs to
       be developed

     • ROI modeling tool being developed to help NHS Trusts create their
       own business case for improving maturity
NIMM & Microsoft EA



     • We only have a limited number of Enterprise CAL Licenses (eCAL)
        • This will ramp up every year for the next 3 years
     • Enterprise Collaboration Technology needs eCAL
        • Not straightforward, check with you LAR
     • We want to get the most value from these licensees
     • We need to report our licensing position against eCAL
     • There are 2 capabilities that we want to use to gauge readiness
        • Software Asset Management
        • Collaboration Technology
     • We have developed Capability Maturity Documents for these that
        • Describe what we mean by these capabilities
        • Describe each Maturity Level including KPIs for each level
        • Recommend a level to aim for
        • Suggest resources to help achieve this
NIMM Example - SAM Maturity KPIs (Level 4)

              KPI Description                              Metric
       Availability of electronic       Asset Management system used
       records on software              Records for >80% of software purchases
       purchased or no longer used


       Policy for software purchase     Policy exists and enforceable for >80% of
       exists and enforceable           purchases


       Accountability for maintaining   Formal central IT accountability exists,
       records                          performance of this role measured every six
                                        months
       On-going - Technology and        Coverage                 Accuracy
       process in place to track        Greater than 80%         Greater than 80%
       software installed               of PC estate


       Ad-hoc - Technology and          Greater than 80%         Greater than 80%
       process to perform audit of      of PC estate
       software licensing position
NIMM Example - Gap Analysis for SAM

      Capability Description         Target Maturity                Current Maturity                         Needs Gap
  Availability of electronic     Records for >80% of   Records for approximately 50%            Need to deploy an asset management
  records on software            software purchases    of purchases exist. Absence of an        system.
  purchased or no longer                               asset management system
                                                                                                Need to improve record keeping by
  used                                                 makes it difficult to track this
                                                                                                30%
                                                       capability.
  Policy for software purchase Policy exists and       A policy exists but is not regularly     Need to create communications
  exists and enforceable       enforceable for >80% of communicated.                            channels for IT policies.
                               purchases
                                                                                                Need to incorporate IT policies in HR,
                                                                                                and training processes.

  Accountability for             Formal central IT        Accountability for this is informal   Accountability is informal and
  maintaining records            accountability exists,   and shared between purchasing         responsibility is unclear.
                                 performance of this role and the service desk
                                 measured every six
                                 months

  Technology in place to track >80% Accuracy               Unknown Accuracy                     Need technology with processes that
  software installed                                                                            can measure accuracy in tracking
                                                                                                deployed licenses

  Technology in place to track >80% of PC estate           <50% of PC estate covered            Need to increase coverage by 30%
  software installed           covered
  Technology to perform ad-      >80% Accuracy             Unknown Accuracy                     Need technology with processes that
  hoc audit of software                                                                         can measure accuracy in auditing
  licensing position                                                                            deployed licenses

  Technology to perform ad-      >80% of PC estate         <50% of PC estate covered            Need to increase coverage by 30%
  hoc audit of software          covered
  licensing position
Management “Scope” of the NIMM
Technology “Scope” of the NIMM
NIMM Summary
Gartner Model Mapping to NIMM




                                                                                         Service-       Policy/Value-
                                                                                          Based            Based
                                                                       Virtualized                         Dynamic
                                                    Rationalized                          Services      optimization to
                                  Standardized                        Infrastructure     managed         meet SLAs
                                                     Consolidate to     resources        holistically
                    Basic            Standard           fewer             pooled
                 Uncoordinated      resources,
                 infrastructure    configurations                                      Service-         Business
                                                    Economies         Flexibility,     level            agility
                                  Reduce                              reduce costs
   Objective                                        of scale                           delivery
                 React            complexity
    Ability to   Months to                          Weeks to          Weeks to                          Minutes to
                                  Weeks                                                Minutes
    Change       weeks                              days              minutes                           seconds
                                                                                                        Variable
     Pricing                                        Reduced,          Fixed shared     Variable
    Scheme
                 None, ad hoc     Fixed costs                                                           business
                                                    fixed costs       costs            usage costs
                                                                                                        costs
   Business                       Class-of-         Class-of-                          End-to-end       Business
                 No SLAs                                              Flexible SLAs
   Interface                      service SLAs      service SLAs                       SLAs             SLAs
  Resource                                                                             Service-         Policy-based
                 Unknown          Known             Rationalized      Shared pools
  Utilization                                                                          based pools      sharing
                                                                      Pooled           Service-         Business-
Organization     None             Central control Consolidated
                                                                      ownership        oriented         oriented
         IT
                 Chaotic –        Reactive -        Proactive         Proactive        Service          Value
Management Reactive               Proactive         Mature            Prediction,      End-to-end       Policy
  Processes Ad hoc                Life cycle        problem mgmt      dynamic          service          management
                                  management                          capacity         management
Microsoft IO Model Mapping to NIMM




         Basic                  Standardized                    Rationalized                       Dynamic

                                  Identity & Access Management
                       Directory services, User provisioning, Directory-based authentication

                         Desktop, Server, and Device Management
                     Software distribution, Patch management, Mobility, Imaging, Virtualization

                                       Security and Networking
                  Policy, Anti-malware, Firewall, Access control, Network protection, Quarantine

                                   Data Protection and Recovery
                                      Backup, Restore, Storage management

                                      IT and Security Process
           Best practice guidance on cost-effective solution design, development, operation, and support
How should you use
  the NIMM?


• Perform a self assessment using the NIMM

• Prioritise and invest to improve lowest scoring areas

• Aim for a balanced score, rather than excellence in isolation

• Higher value MS EA technologies only available to those with
  CAPABILITY to exploit them

• Leverage capabilities of Core EA products that are licensed for
  all and don’t default to Enterprise products that aren’t –
  especially if your organisation isn’t ready to exploit them
The Microsoft NHS Enterprise Agreement
               (the EA)
EA Framework


 • Remaining 6 years of the 9 year EA
 • Orders placed for years 4, 5 & 6
 • Software Assurance on all products
 • Deploy up to 800,000 seats over 6 years (850K inc. “flex”)
 • Core CAL & Enterprise CAL Suites
 • Growth in “Knowledge Worker” tools
 • 340,000 SQL Client Access Licences
 EA offers...
Windows Vista Business Edition                    Office 2007 Professional Plus Edition
•  Upgraded to Windows Vista Enterprise Edition   • Access
    •   Four Virtual Operating Systems            • PowerPoint
    •   Windows Bit Locker Drive Encryption       • Word
    •   Multi Lingual User Interface
                                                  • Excel
                                                  • Outlook
Desktop Optimisation Pack
                                                  • Publisher
•  Softgrid
                                                  • Communicator
Core CAL                                          • Integrated Enterprise Content
•  Windows Server CAL                                 Management
•  Office Exchange Server Standard CAL            • Integrated Electronic Forms
•  Office SharePoint Server Standard CAL          • Information Rights & Policy
•  Systems Management Server CAL                  Enterprise Edition also includes
Enterprise CAL also includes                      • OneNote
•  Office Communications Server Standard CAL      • Groove
•  Office Communications Server Enterprise CAL
•  Windows Rights Management CAL                  SQL CAL
•  Office SharePoint Enterprise CAL
•  Office Exchange Enterprise CAL
•  Operations Manager Client OML
•  Forefront Security Suite (Anti Virus)
And also...


• Windows Update Services Server(s) within N3
• Access to Digital Learning Academies & Digital Literacy
  Programme
• Home User Programme and EPP
• Training Vouchers & E-Learning Tools
• Desktop Deployment Planning Services
New Stuff...


• SharePoint CAL for all desktops
• Groove growth at 50,000 per year
• Anti-Virus (Forefront)
   -   223,000 in Year 4 allowing existing AV deals to “unwind”
• Vista Enterprise
   -   Only pay for Vista Business
• SoftGrid
   -   Application virtualisation fixes “Java Hell”
New LAR deal


 Enrolment                     Number of
                   LAR                     Allocation
   Areas                       Desktops
  NWWM             Bytes        160,900      25%
   South           Bytes        138,350      21%
   London          Bytes        111,200      17%
  NE & DH       Trustmarque     116,150      18%
 EM & ALBs     Computacenter    123,400      19%
                  TOTAL         650,000      100%
Value



• Most Favoured Customer.
• Lower cost per desktop than initial 3 years
• Improved collaboration and security.
• 50% increase in CUI funding
• Contributes to OGC discounting
The Common User Interface Programme
            (the CUI)
CUI Phase 2

• 3rd October 2007 - Development Agreement
  signed for 4 Projects delivery in Phase 2:

  (“Classic”)
  • Clinical Applications and Patient Safety (CAPS)
  • Information Management and Technology
    (IM&T) Tools
  • Knowledge Worker Tools (KWT)

  (“New”)
  • NHSmail Technology Refresh (TR)
CUI Phase 2 - Management

• 3 discrete governance controls across the Classic
  and New projects.
• Phase 2 of CUI “Classic” Projects governance
  changes:
  • Prof Michael Thick (CFH CCO) joining the programme at
    Steering Board level
  • Formal cross Projects Board, including:
     -   National Clinical Leads
     -   SHA CIOs
     -   ISB
     -   Service Implementation
CUI Phase 2 - Controls

• Distribution of the Products brought in-house to
  NHS CFH (via existing cui.nhs.uk and PSPG)
• Development of CUI integrated communications
  plan across the Tech Office
• Utility of new and emerging engagement channels
• Tie in with CFH initiatives
  • NIMM framework and taxonomy
  • Collaboration Architecture & Solution Enablers (CASE)
• Smarter internal use of EA technologies (e.g.
  SharePoint) to manage stakeholders
CAPS - Delivery

• Design guidance has begun to influence NHS
  systems development
  • Extensive guidance published to the Clinical and Supplier
    community
  • 12 Requirement DSCNs approved and issued by the ISB
  • CUI documents undergoing incorporation into the NHS
    CFH Technical Baseline where possible
  • 6 UK suppliers actively adopting CUI guidance
  • UK and Worldwide interest in using CUI guidance in
    requirements and contracts
KWT - Delivery

• Guidance, research and products covering:
  • Enablers to support NHS Entities migration through
    fundamentals of attaining NIMM levels 1-3
  • Abbreviation Manager
  • NHS Office Client Installer
  • User Task Analysis
  • Office Version Migration Guides
  • Document Collaboration and Compliance
  • Medical Research Services
IM&T Tools - Delivery
• Documents, tools and templates have been created and
  made easily accessible to NHS Trusts via the interactive
  Planning and Deployment Guide (see slide 21)
• 36 NHS Entities using guidance as Early Adopters
• 72 people from 51 NHS Trusts attending 14 dedicated
  Special Interest Group meetings shaped the guidance
• 19,080 NHS PCs are already live and benefiting from NHS
  CUI D&I guidance and when remaining pilots Live, at least
  75,000 PCs benefiting from the NHS CUI D&I guidance
• 9 of the 10 Infrastructure Optimisation assessed trusts
  moved from Basic to Standardised maturity level following
  Systems Management Server pilots

						
Related docs