49818 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 157 / Monday, August 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
corresponding EASA regulations thus paragraph 4(j) and involves no List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
reducing the cost of joint certification. extraordinary circumstances. Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
Unfunded Mandates Assessment Regulations That Significantly Affect and recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use Transportation.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) The FAA has analyzed this final rule The Amendment
requires each Federal agency to prepare under Executive Order 13211, Actions ■ In consideration of the foregoing, the
a written statement assessing the effects Concerning Regulations that Federal Aviation Administration
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or Significantly Affect Energy Supply, amends Chapter I of Title 14, Code of
final agency rule that may result in an Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We Federal Regulations part 25, as follows:
expenditure of $100 million or more (in have determined that it is not a
1995 dollars) in any one year by State, ‘‘significant energy action’’ under the PART 25—AIRWORTHINESS
local, and tribal governments, in the executive order, and it is unlikely to STANDARDS: TRANSPORT
aggregate, or by the private sector; such have a significant adverse effect on the CATEGORY AIRPLANES
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant supply, distribution, or use of energy.
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently ■ 1. The authority citation for part 25
uses an inflation-adjusted value of Availability of Rulemaking Documents continues to read as follows:
$143.1 million. You can get an electronic copy of Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
This final rule does not contain such rulemaking documents using the 44702, and 44704.
a mandate. The requirements of Title II Internet by— ■ 2. Amend § 25.1583 by revising
do not apply. 1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Executive Order 13132, Federalism Portal (http://www.regulations.gov); § 25.1583 Operating limitations.
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and (a) * * *
The FAA has analyzed this final rule Policies web page at http://
under the principles and criteria of (3) The maneuvering speed
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or established under § 25.1507 and
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We
determined that this action would not 3. Accessing the Government Printing statements, as applicable to the
have a substantial direct effect on the Office’s web page at http:// particular design, explaining that:
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. (i) Full application of pitch, roll, or
States, on the relationship between the
You can also get a copy by sending a yaw controls should be confined to
Federal Government and the States, or
request to the Federal Aviation speeds below the maneuvering speed;
on the distribution of power and
Administration, Office of Rulemaking, and
responsibilities among the various
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue, (ii) Rapid and large alternating control
levels of government, and, therefore,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by inputs, especially in combination with
would not have federalism implications.
calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to large changes in pitch, roll, or yaw, and
Regulations Affecting Intrastate identify the docket number or full control inputs in more than one axis
Aviation in Alaska amendment number of this rulemaking. at the same time, should be avoided as
they may result in structural failures at
Section 1205 of the FAA Anyone is able to search the
any speed, including below the
Reauthorization Act of 1996 (110 Stat. electronic form of all comments
3213) requires the Administrator, when received into any of our dockets by the
modifying regulations in Title 14 of the name of the individual submitting the * * * * *
CFR in a manner affecting intrastate comment (or signing the comment, if Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8,
aviation in Alaska, to consider the submitted on behalf of an association, 2010.
extent to which Alaska is not served by business, labor union, etc.). You may J. Randolph Babbitt,
transportation modes other than review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Administrator.
aviation, and to establish appropriate statement in the Federal Register [FR Doc. 2010–20195 Filed 8–13–10; 8:45 am]
regulatory distinctions. In the NPRM, published on April 11, 2000 (Volume BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
we requested comments on whether the 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
proposed rule should apply differently may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
to intrastate operations in Alaska. We Small Business Regulatory Enforcement FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
did not receive any comments, and we Fairness Act
have determined, based on the 16 CFR Part 305
administrative record of this The Small Business Regulatory
rulemaking, there is no need to make [RIN 3084-AB03]
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
any regulatory distinctions applicable to 1996 requires FAA to comply with APPLIANCE LABELING RULE
intrastate aviation in Alaska. small entity requests for information or
advice about compliance with statutes AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
and regulations within its jurisdiction. If ACTION: Final rule; correction.
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA you are a small entity and you have a
actions that are categorically excluded question regarding this document, you SUMMARY: The Federal Trade
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
from preparation of an environmental may contact your local FAA official, or Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is issuing a
assessment or environmental impact the person listed under the FOR FURTHER technical correction to a final rule
statement under the National INFORMATION CONTACT heading at the published on July 19, 2010 (75 FR
Environmental Policy Act in the beginning of the preamble. You can find 41696). In particular, the Commission is
absence of extraordinary circumstances. out more about SBREFA on the Internet correcting text in Sample Label 13 in
The FAA has determined this at http://www.faa.gov/ Appendix L published on page 41724 of
rulemaking action qualifies for the regulations_policies/rulemaking/ that document.
categorical exclusion identified in sbre_act/. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 157 / Monday, August 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 49819
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: in that sample label which reads ‘‘Costo Monday, July 19, 2010, the following
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Division ´
Estimado Anual de Energıa’’ instead of correction is made:
of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer ‘‘Costo Anual Estimado;’’ ‘‘de la tarifa’’
Protection, Federal Trade Commission, ´
instead of ‘‘del indice;’’ ‘‘calida’’ and Appendix L, Sample Label 13
Washington, D.C. 20580 (202-326-2889). ´ ´
‘‘frıa’’ instead of ‘‘calido’’ and ‘‘frio;’’ and [Corrected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ‘‘desecho seguro’’ instead of
Notice contains a technical correction to ´
■ On page 41724, the label image
Sample Label 13 in Appendix L in 16 Correction of Publication ‘‘Sample Label 13’’ is revised to read:
CFR Part 305 published on July 19, 2010
BILLING CODE 6750–01–S
(75 FR 41696). In particular, this Notice In FR Doc. 2010-16895 appearing on
contains revised Spanish language text page 41696 in the Federal Register of
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:14 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1
49820 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 157 / Monday, August 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
SAMPLE LABEL 13 Commission deems relevant or material 15 U.S.C. 78w(a)(2), requires the
LIGHTING FACTS LABEL FOR to the inquiry.’’ Section 21(b) of the Commission, in adopting rules under
GENERAL SERVICE LAMP Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 that Act, to consider the anticompetitive
CONTAINING MERCURY (BILINGUAL U.S.C. 78u(b). See also Section 19(c) of effects of any rules it adopts. Because
the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. the amendment imposes no new
77(c); Section 42(b) of the Investment burdens on parties in investigations, the
By direction of the Commission. Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a– Commission does not believe it will
Donald S. Clark,
41(b); and Section 209(b) of the have any impact on competition.
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 Finally, this amendment does not
U.S.C. 80b–9(b). The Commission issues contain any collection of information
[FR Doc. 2010–20322 Filed 8–13–10; 10:36 am]
formal orders of investigation that
BILLING CODE 6750–01–C requirements as defined by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as
enforcement staff to exercise the
Commission’s statutory power to amended. Accordingly, the amendment
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE subpoena witnesses and take the other is effective August 16, 2010.
COMMISSION actions authorized by the relevant cited List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200
provisions. The Commission delegated
17 CFR Part 200 authority to issue formal orders of Administrative practice and
investigation to the Director of the procedure, Authority delegations
[Release No. 34–62690]
Division of Enforcement on August 11, (Government agencies).
Delegation of Authority to the Director 2009. ‘‘Delegation of Authority to
Director of Division of Enforcement,’’ Text of Amendment
of Its Division of Enforcement
74 FR 40068 (Aug. 11, 2009). The
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange delegation was made effective for a one- ■ For the reasons set out in the
Commission. year period, ending on August 11, 2010, preamble, Title 17, Chapter II of the
ACTION: Final rule. to allow Commission review of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
Division’s exercise of formal order as follows:
SUMMARY: The Commission is amending authority.
its rules to remove a sunset provision The Commission has determined that PART 200—ORGANIZATION;
from the delegation of authority to the it is appropriate to extend the Division’s CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND
Director of the Division of Enforcement authority to issue formal orders of INFORMATION AND REQUESTS
to issue formal orders of investigation. investigation. In making this
Formal orders designate the determination, the Commission ■ 1. The authority citation for part 200,
enforcement staff authorized to issue considered the increased efficiency in subpart A, continues to read in part as
subpoenas in connection with the Division’s conduct of its follows:
investigations under the Federal investigations permitted by the Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77o, 77s, 77sss, 78d,
securities laws. On August 5, 2009, the delegation, and the Division’s continued 78d–1, 78d–2, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 80a–37,
Commission issued a release effective communication and 80b–11, and 7202, unless otherwise noted.
authorizing the Division Director to coordination in addressing pertinent
issue such orders for a one-year period legal and policy issues with other * * * * *
beginning on August 11, 2009 and Commission Divisions and Offices when ■ 2. Section 200.30–4 is amended by
ending on August 11, 2010. The sunset formal order authority is invoked. revising paragraph (a)(13) to read as
provision was included to permit the Administrative Law Matters follows:
Commission to evaluate the Division’s
use of the delegation and to consider The Commission finds, in accordance § 200.30–4 Delegation of authority to
whether extension of the delegation was with the Administrative Procedure Act Director of Division of Enforcement.
appropriate. (‘‘APA’’) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A)), that this * * * * *
amendment relates solely to agency
DATES: Effective Date: August 16, 2010. (a) * * *
organization, procedure, or practice and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: does not relate to a substantive rule. (13) To order the making of private
Kenneth H. Hall, Assistant Chief Accordingly, the provisions of the APA investigations pursuant to section 19(c)
Counsel, 202–551–4936, Office of Chief regarding notice of the proposed of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C.
Counsel, Division of Enforcement, rulemaking, opportunities for public 77s(c)), section 21(b) of the Securities
Securities and Exchange Commission, participation, and publication of the Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u(b)),
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC amendment prior to its effective date, 5 section 42(b) of the Investment
20549–6553. U.S.C. 553, are not applicable. For the Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The same reason, and because this 41(b) and section 209(b) of the
Commission is authorized to conduct amendment does not substantively Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15
investigations of possible violations of affect the rights or obligations of non- U.S.C. 80b–9(b)).
the Federal securities laws, which agency parties, the provisions of the
* * * * *
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
provide that ‘‘any member of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Commission or any officer designated Fairness Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C), are not Dated: August 11, 2010.
by it is empowered to administer oaths applicable. Additionally, the provisions By the Commission.
and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, which Elizabeth M. Murphy,
compel their attendance, take evidence, apply only when notice and comment
and require the production of any are required by the APA or other law,
[FR Doc. 2010–20197 Filed 8–13–10; 8:45 am]
books, papers, correspondence, 5 U.S.C. 603, are not applicable. Section
memoranda, or other records which the 23(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act, BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:14 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1