San Francisco Employment Attorneys
Description
San Francisco Employment Attorneys document sample
Document Sample


Furlough Fights
Parties Court Filing Date
(1) PECG, CAPS v Schwarzenegger, others 12/22/2008
Sacramento Superior Court
(2) CASE v. Schwarzenegger, others Court
Sacramento Superior1/5/2009
Sacramento Superior1/7/2009
(3) SEIU Local 1000 v. Schwarzenegger, others Court
(4) CCPOA v. Schwarzenegger, others 1/15/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
(5) CAPT v. Schwarzenegger, others 1/23/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
(6) CDFF v. Schwarzenegger, others 1/23/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
(7) SEIU v. Schwarzenegger, others 1/27/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
(8) Schwarzenegger v Chiang, others Court
Sacramento Superior2/9/2009
(9) CASE v. Schwarzenegger, others 2/10/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(10) CCPOA v. Schwarzenegger, others Alameda Superior Court 3/16/2009
(11) CASE v. Schwarzenegger, others 5/22/2009
Alameda Superior Court
(12) SEIU v. Schwarzenegger, others 6/9/2009
Alameda Superior Court
(13) UAPD v. Schwarzenegger, others 6/9/2009
Alameda Superior Court
(14) SEIU v. Schwarzenegger, others 6/12/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(15) CASE v. Schwarzenegger, others 6/30/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(16) CAPS v. Schwarzenegger, others 7/24/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(17) DPA v. PECG 7/28/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
8/19/2009
(18) CalPERS v. Schwarzenegger, others San Francisco Superior Court
(19) CCPEA v. Schwarzenegger 8/28/2009
Sacramento Superior Court
(20) SEIU v. Schwarzenegger, others 8/28/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(21) IUOE v. Schwarzenegger, others 10/7/2009
Los Angeles Superior Court
(22) CMA v. Schwarzenegger, others 10/14/2009
San Francisco Superior Court
(23) CCSO v. CDCR, DPA, others Superior Court
Sacramento Country11/6/2009
(24) Acosta v. Henning and others 3/20/2008 (amended
San Francisco Superior Court 11/23/2009
Schwarzenegger, Northern California
12/16/2009
(25) Newton, McNeal, Beaton (CCPOA) v. US District Court, others
The unions / employee groups:
CAPS: California Associaton of Professional Scientists
CAPT: California Association of Psychiatric Technicians
CASE: California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment
CCPEA: California Professional Public Employees Association
CCPOA: California Correctional Peace Officers Association
CCSO: California Correctional Supervisors' Organization
CDFF: California Department of Forestry Firefighters
SEIU: Service Employees International Local 1000
PECG: Professional Engineers in California Government
SEIU: Service Employees International Local 1000
UAPD: Union of American Physicians & Dentists
IUOE: International Union of Operating Engineers, locals 3, 12, 39 and 501
Professional associations
CMA: California Medical Association
The government entities:
CalPERS: California Public Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration
CDCR: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
DPA: Department of Personnel Administration
Schwarzenegger: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Chiang: State Controller John Chiang
The courts:
1st District Court of Appeal (San Francisco)
3rd District Court of Appeal (Sacramento)
Alameda County Superior Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court (registration required, fee for service)
Sacramento Superior Court
San Francisco Superior Court
US District Court, Northern California
Updated 1/11/2010
Case number
34-2008-80000126-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000134-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000135-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000137-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000148-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-00032732-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000150-CU-WM-GDS
34-2009-80000158-CU-WM-GDS
CPF-09-509205
RG09-441544
RG09-453982
RG09-456750
RG09-456684
CPF-09-509580
CPF-09-509629
CPF-09-509695
34-2009-00054223-CU-MC-GDS
CPF-09-509754
34-2009-80000308-CU-WM-GDS
CPF-09-509782
BC 423409
CPF-09-509896
34-2009-00063209-CU-WM-GDS
CPF-08-508192
CV-09-5887
ng Officers in State Employment
of Administration
Argument
Order violates the California Constitution’s separation of powers.
The furlough order violates separation of powers.
The governor has no authority to furlough; employees not normally subject to overtime should get overtime pa
Salary adjustments must be approved by the Legislature.
The governor cannot reduce employee salaries. Governor seeks to combine several furlough lawsuits and bring
Furloughs are a de facto illegal pay cut.
Furloughs are an example of improper rule-making.
Employees of independent constitutional officers are subject to furloughs.
Furloughing of State Compensation Insurance Fund legal staff violates state law prohibiting staff cutbacks at th
Furloughs are a de facto illegal pay cut because understaffing forces union members to work full schedules but
Furloughing employees paid from money outside the general fund is wasteful and outside the government’s au
Furloughs are arbitrary and irrational for employees paid with money outside the general fund.
Furloughing employees paid from money outside the general fund is wasteful and an ideological statement aga
Furloughs at the State Compensation Insurance Fund violate state law prohibiting staff cutbacks at the fund.
Lawsuit sought to stop governor’s third furlough day order.
Furloughs are intended to save general fund money, so employees whose wages come from other sources shou
The union has improperly sought arbitration over whether furloughs violate its contract.
CalPERS’ needs staff at full strength to rebound from investment losses; staffing reductions violate members’ v
Independent employee group says that self-directed furloughs are illegal.
Governor’s third furlough day order undermined Legislature’s role in budget decisions.
Furloughs hinder vital work, make no sense for special fund departments and agencies and are unlawful.
Furloughs create licensure, investigative and enforcement delays
Correctional supervisors aren't being fully compensated for work performed
Furloughs hinder state from complying with federal UI mandates; violate state constitution and state UI law
Furloughs violate Federal Labor Standards Act - Class action suit backed by CCPOA
Next up
Union lost. On appeal in 3rd District Court, Case No. C061011. Unions hope for hearing in early 2010.
Union lost. On appeal in 3rd District Court, No. C061009, with (1) and (3).
Union lost. The case, No. C061020 was been consolidated with (1) and (2) in 3rd District Court.
The union lost. No appeal. CCPOA argued same issue and won in Alameda Superior Court (10).
Hearing date set for Jan. 15.
No action in this case since May. Case may not go forward, the union wouldn’t say.
No action in this case since June.
Constitutionals lost but their workers remain furlough free. Appealed to 3rd District Court. Case No. C061648.
CASE won. Governor plans to appeal to 1st District Court.
12/17/09 ruling in favor of CCPOA. Gov to appeal to 1st District Court.
12/31/09 ruling in favor of CASE. Gov to appeal to 1st District Court.
12/31/09 ruling in favor of SEIU Gov to appeal to 1st District Court.
12/31/09 ruling in favor of UAPD Gov to appeal to 1st District Court.
SEIU won. Governor plans to appeal in 1st District Court.
The union has dropped this case.
Set for Jan. 21 hearing at 9 a.m. Judge and department TBA.
No hearing date set.
Final ruling against CalPERS 12/18/09. CalPERS deciding whether to appeal.
No date set for hearing.
No date set for hearing.
Conference-case management hearing scheduled for 1/28/10
No date set for hearing.
No date set for hearing.
No date set for hearing.
No hearing date set.
n early 2010.
t. Case No. C061648. Opening brief filed Oct. 20.
Get documents about "