TITLE
The Use and Misuse of Pesticides in New York City: Early Reports from an Urban Pesticide Tracking System
THEME
Disseminate Credible Information to Guide Policy, Practice and Other Actions to Improve the Nation’s Health
KEYWORDS
pesticides, hazard, exposure, urban, housing, HANES
BACKGROUND
Data from pesticide-use registries and recent epidemiological evidence pointing to health risks from urban residential pesticide use make a strong case for better understanding the sale, application and use of pesticides in cities. In 2003, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) began the development of a robust pesticide hazard, exposure and health outcome tracking system to help elucidate why pesticides are used, the potential risks to varied populations and the health consequences of their use.
OBJECTIVE(S)
Attendees of this presentation will learn about: 1) New York City’s efforts to fill hazard, exposure and outcome data gaps in pesticide tracking through primary data gathering; 2) geographic patterns of pesticide use and pest infestation and their determinants; 3) New York City’s analytic, reporting, and intervention plans around urban pesticide use; and 4) the implications of the NYC efforts for local, state and national tracking programs.
METHOD(S)
DOHMH has created a robust data model and warehouse of hazard and contextual data sources to evaluate the use of commercial and off-the-shelf pesticide use in NYC. A variety of sources were linked and analyzed to create neighborhood level profiles of pesticide use and some of its determinants. NYC’s EPHT program also joined efforts with the city’s Housing Preservation Department and DOHMH’s Division of Epidemiology to survey population samples of NYC residents on pesticide use, infestations and the use of professional pest control services. Exposure to pyrethroid and organophosphate pesticides was gathered as part of the population-based 2004 NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES). Health outcome data include pesticide-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits and calls to the Poison Control Center. Data describing asthma prevalence and exacerbations, hypothesized to be indirectly associated with pesticide exposures through infestations, are also included in the system.
Page 1 of 2
RESULT(S)
The presentation will describe initial results of analyses of NYC’s pesticide-related tracking data. Spatial, ethnic and income stratified pesticide applications and infestation data demonstrate markedly different hazard and potential exposure profiles among communities in NYC. In general, infestations and the personal use of off-the-shelf pesticides are inversely proportional to personal and neighborhood measures of wealth and education. The presentation will contrast the use of various types of pesticides among these geographic and demographically diverse communities.
DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION(S)
The work completed thus far in developing this urban pesticide tracking system—secondary data collection, conducting population surveys, developing a constituency for tracking, and reporting early analytic results—has important implications for the work of local health departments. Notably, pursuing and publicizing a deeper understanding of the relationships among pesticide use, infestation, housing quality and population characteristics implies a willingness and ability to respond to newly recognized hazards and risks. State and local governments should embark on tracking mindful of the importance of agency commitment to addressing hazards, exposures and inequities exposed by tracking’s findings.
AUTHOR(S)
Daniel Kass, M.S.P.H. Director NYC Environmental Public Health Tracking New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene 253 Broadway, CN-34C New York, NY 10007 212-442-2638 dkass@health.nyc.gov Jessica Leighton, Ph.D.: jleighto@health.nyc.gov Wendy McKelvey, Ph.D.: wmckelve@health.nyc.gov James Bryan Jacobson, M.P.H.: jjacobso@health.nyc.gov Audrey Thier, M.S.: athier@verizon.net
Page 2 of 2
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
365 |
9 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
121 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/5/2008 |
117 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
160 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
135 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
110 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/5/2008 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/5/2008 |
76 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
108 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/5/2008 |
86 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
95 |
1 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
115 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/6/2008 |
79 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
169 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
213 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
115 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
136 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
106 |
2 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
165 |
2 |
1 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
93 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
118 |
0 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
99 |
1 |
0 |
legal
CDCdocs 5/8/2008 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
legal