Ryan & Maniskas, LLP Announces Class Action
Lawsuit Against SearchMedia Holdings Limited
September 16, 2010 07:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time
WAYNE, Pa.--(EON: Enhanced Online News)--Ryan & Maniskas, LLP (www.rmclasslaw.com/cases/idi)
announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California (the "Court") on behalf of purchasers of SearchMedia Holdings Limited, formerly Ideation Acquisition
Corp. ("SearchMedia" or "Ideation" or the "Company") (AMEX: IDI), common stock during the period between
April 1, 2009 and August 20, 2010 (the “Class Period”).
For more information regarding this class action suit, please contact Ryan & Maniskas, LLP (Richard A. Maniskas,
Esquire) toll-free at (877) 316-3218 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org or visit:
Ideation was a blank-check company formed for the purpose of acquiring one or more businesses through a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, or other similar business combination. On October 30, 2009, Ideation
completed the acquisition of SearchMedia International Limited ("SMIL") (a purported nationwide multi-platform
media company in China) and changed its name to SearchMedia (the "Merger").
The complaint charges SearchMedia and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company issued material misstatements and/or
omissions in the joint proxy statement and prospectus dated October 5, 2009, and other public statements during the
class period related to the Merger and SMIL. According to the complaint, the Company made false and/or
misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) SMIL was improperly recognizing revenue; (ii) certain of
SMIL's accounts receivable related to sales generated primarily in the in-elevator business were uncollectible and, as
a result, SMIL's financial results were overstated; (iii) SMIL's financial results were not prepared in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; and (iv) SMIL lacked adequate internal and financial controls.
On August 20, 2010, the Company announced that the historical financial statements of SMIL for the 2007 and
2008 fiscal years would have to be restated and that the financial statements from these periods should no longer be
relied upon. The Company also stated that it estimated that revenue in 2007 and 2008 had been overstated by
approximately $6 million and $25 million, respectively. Upon this news, the Company's stock fell nearly 23%, to
close on August 20, 2010, at $2.62 per share.
If you are a member of the class, you may, no later than November 15, 2010, request that the Court appoint you as
lead plaintiff of the class. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in
directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim
is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under
certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any
recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Ryan &
Maniskas, LLP or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action.
For more information about the case or to participate online, please visit: www.rmclasslaw.com/cases/idi, or contact
Richard A. Maniskas, Esquire toll-free at (877) 316-3218, or by e-mail at email@example.com. For more
information about class action cases in general or to learn more about Ryan & Maniskas, LLP, please visit our
Ryan & Maniskas, LLP
Richard A. Maniskas, Esquire