Identification of Amino Acids Using Paper Chromatography

Document Sample
Identification of Amino Acids Using Paper Chromatography
Description

This is a biochemistry report on the identification of amino acids using paper chromatography.

Experiment number:5



Title: I. Paper Chromatography – Amino Acids Identification



Objectives:

1. To learn how to use the paper chromatography technique.

2. To identify and calculate the Rf of each amino acid.

3. To compare the Rf values and determine the two unknown amino acid.



Materials and Methods:

- Refer to UESB 2142 laboratory manual, page 12 and 13.



Results:



Table 1: The colour, distance migrated and the Rf of the amino acids samples



Amino acid Paper chromatography 1 Paper chromatography 2 Rf values

Colour Distance Rf Colour Distance Rf (average)

of migrated values of migrated values

amino by amino by

acid amino acid amino

acid acid

(cm) (cm)

Glutamic Purple 3.40 0.2982 Purple 3.85 0.3156 0.3069

acid

Lysine Purple 1.80 0.1580 Purple 2.10 0.1721 0.1651

Methionine Purple 6.10 0.5351 Purple 6.00 0.4918 0.5135

Threonine Purple 3.60 0.3158 Purple 3.70 0.3033 0.3096

Unknown 1 Purple 3.70 0.3246 Purple 3.60 0.2951 0.3099

Unknown 2 Purple 6.20 0.5439 Purple 6.20 0.5082 0.5261



 Solvent front for paper chromatography 1 was recorded as 11.4cm.

 Solvent front for paper chromatography 2 was recorded as 12.2cm.



Calculation:

The relationship of the distance moved by an amino acid to the distance moved by the

solvent front is calculated as below:



Distance moved by amino acid (cm)

Rf =

Distance from amino acid origin to solvent front (cm)

Paper chromatography 1:

For Glutamic acid: For Lysine:



Rf = 3.4 cm / 11.4 cm Rf = 1.8 cm / 11.4 cm

= 0.2982 = 0.1580





For Methionine: For Threonine:



Rf = 6.1 cm / 11.4 cm Rf = 3.6 cm / 11.4 cm

= 0.5351 = 0.3158





For Unknown 1: For Unknown 2:



Rf = 3.7 cm / 11.4 cm Rf = 6.2 cm / 11.4 cm

= 0.3246 = 0.5439







Paper chromatography 2:

For Glutamic acid: For Lysine:



Rf = 3.85 cm / 12.2 cm Rf = 2.1 cm / 12.2 cm

= 0.3156 = 0.1721





For Methionine: For Threonine:



Rf = 6.0 cm / 12.2 cm Rf = 3.7 cm / 12.2 cm

= 0.4918 = 0.3033





For Unknown 1: For Unknown 2:



Rf = 3.6 cm / 12.2 cm Rf = 6.2 cm / 12.2 cm

= 0.2951 = 0.5082

Observation:









Length of

Solvent front is

4.7 cm









Yellowish and

Purple Color reddish

(Movement of (Contamination)

amino acids)









Length of

Solvent front is

5.3 cm

L-M : L-Methionine G : L-Glutamic acid

L-P : L-Phenylalanine U1 : Unknown 1

U2 : Unknown 2 L : L-Lysine



Observation:

There are present of purple color, and yellowish or reddish colors on the

chromatography paper.





There were presence of purple, yellowish and reddish colours on the chromatography

paper.



Discussions:



In order to identify the different types of amino acids in this practical, a series of

procedures was followed. A chromatography paper was obtained by wearing gloves and a

line was drawn 2 cm from the bottom of the paper. Six marks were made at 1.5 cm

intervals along the line. Each amino acid sample was taken and lightly dotted on each

pencil mark by using a micropipette. The paper was dried with hair-dryer. These

processes should then be repeated at least 8 times, applying the same amount of amino

acid to the same pencil mark, to build up a concentration. This step was necessary for the

chromatogram results to be clear and distinct. Next, the BAW solvent was poured into the

chromatography tank and the chromatography paper was stand in the tank where its

bottom edge was in the solvent but the remaining paper did not touch the tank (including

the sample spots). The paper was left in the tank for about 2.5 to 3 hours for the solvent

movement. The damp chromatography paper was removed before the solvent front

reached the top of the paper. Position of the solvent front was marked with a pencil and

the paper was dried in the fume cupboard. Then, the paper was sprayed with ninhydrin.

The ninhydrin should have the effect of bringing the amino acid dots to visibility. The

paper was dried again and the position of each spot that developed was marked. Finally,

the colour present for the amino acids could be observed, and the Rf values for each

amino acid could be calculated. The amino acid composition of the unknown samples,

unknown 1 and unknown 2 could then be determined.



As the amino acids have no colour, all the procedures were carried out “blind” in

this experiment and the results would only be seen after spraying the revealing agent

(ninhydrin) onto the chromatogram. Ninhydrin is also known as Triketohydrindane

hydrate, a chemical used to detect ammonia or primary amines. When the ninhydrin

reacts with the free amines, a deep blue or purple colour is evolved. Hence, it is

commonly used to detect fingerprints, monitor deprotection in solid phase peptide

synthesis and used in amino acid analysis of proteins. Simultaneously, the solvent

solution used is a mixture of Butan-1-ol : Acetic acid : Water ,in the ratio of 60 : 15 : 25.

To obtain better result, the solvent used must be freshly prepared. Our experimental

results for the different amino acids might not be that accurate since the separation time is

short. Hence, the solvent front was not run to the top of the paper and the amino acids

sample might not be finished separating as we stopped and took out the paper from the

tank. In actual, the solvent front was supposed to be run in the undisturbed tank for about

2.5 to 3 hours. However, as a result of time consuming (as our practical class had only

two hours time), the solvent front was run for only 2 hours. Hence, the results obtained

might not be so accurate. The Rf value for each of the amino acids obtained from the

experiment was compared with the expected result (standard Rf values). The comparison

was recorded the table below:





Amino acid sample Rf values obtained Expected Rf values

Glutamic acid 0.3069 0.3000

Lysine 0.1651 0.1400

Methionine 0.5135 0.5500

Threonine 0.3096 0.3500



From the table above, it could be seen that the results obtained from this

experiment were different from the expected results (standard Rf values) . However, by

observing and comparing the sequences of these sets of data carefully, there were

similarities. Both sets of data shown that Methionine has the highest Rf value, followed

by Threonine and Glutamic acid. Lysine has the lowest Rf value.



From the observations, the presence of purple, reddish and yellowish colours on

the chromatography paper could be observed. The purple colour indicated the presence of

the amino acids sample while the presence of reddish and yellowish colours might due to

contamination.The contamination might due to our fingerprints as we might accidentally

take out a chromatography paper without wearing gloves at the beginning of the

experiment or during the drying process after spraying the ninhydrin solution onto the

paper as we hold the paper on hand. After recording the distance migrated by the solvent

front and the amino acids samples, the Rf values of each sample were calculated. By

comparing the Rf values, Methionine had the highest Rf (0.5135) .Conversely, Lysine had

the lowest Rf value (0.1651). This meant that Lysine was very attracted to the

chromatography paper but not too much to the BAW solvent so it did not move much as

the solvent moved up the paper and gave a low Rf value. In contrast, Methionine was

very attracted to the BAW solvent so it moved along with the solvent front and gave a

higer Rf value compared to that of Lysine. Next, the two unknown amino acids were

being compared by using the Rf values obtained. It was predicted that the Unknown 1

(0.3099) was Threonine as it had a very close Rf value with Threonine, which was

0.3096. The Unknown 2 was predicted as to be Methionine (0.5261) as it had a very close

Rf value with that of Methionine, which was 0.5135.



There were some precaution steps that should be taken into consideration when

handling this experiment in order to improve the quality of observations and obtain

accurate results. First, gloves should be worn when handling the chromatography paper

to avoid the depositing of amino acids from our fingers. Apart from this, nitrile gloves

should be worn rather than latex gloves as latex is soluble in many of the reagents but

nitrile is resistant to chemicals. Futhermore, the spray of ninhydrin should be done in the

fume cupboard to avoid inhalation and injury as the ninhydrin is carcinogenic. Besides

that, lead pencil should be used to make marks on the chromatography paper instead of

using the ink ball-pen. This is to get a better and more accurate result as the solvent front

might solubilize with the ball-pen ink as moving up to the top of the paper.









Conclusions:



1. The Rf value obtained for Glutamic acid was 0.3069, Lysine was 0.1651,

Methionine was 0.5135, Threonine was 0.3096, unknown 1 was 0.3099 and

unknown 2 was 0.5261.

2. By comparing the obtained Rf values, the unknown 1 was predicted to be

Threonine and the unknown 2 was predicted to be Methionine.

3. The presence of purple colour on the chromatography paper indicated the

separation of the amino acids but the presence of the reddish and the yellowish

colours might be due to the contamination of our fingerprints.

4. The obtained Rf values were not so accurate as the time for the movement of

solvent front was only 2 hours due to time consuming of our practical class.


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by I-Ping Khoo
Religion Conflicts
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 1
An Anti-cancer Medicinal Plant
Views: 313  |  Downloads: 1
Thesis Abstract Sample
Views: 351  |  Downloads: 0
Fermentation Sample Thesis
Views: 72  |  Downloads: 0
Genomics and Bioinformatics Tutorial
Views: 68  |  Downloads: 0
Research on Kojic Acid
Views: 220  |  Downloads: 0
Medical Lab Technologist Training Report
Views: 192  |  Downloads: 0
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!