E-rate A Review for 2009 -Session starts at 1pm-

Reviews
Shared by: Lisa Turtle
Stats
views:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/10/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
December 5, 2008 E-rate: A Review for 2009 -Session starts at 1pm- Bob Bocher 608-266-2127 cell 608-212-2773 robert.bocher@dpi.wi.gov Steve Sanders 608-266-3856 stephen.sanders@dpi.wi.gov Agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. Overview of the E-rate program Eligibility and discounts Technology plans Review of forms and application process Video and PowerPoint: http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/erate.html 2 Overview   Created by 1996 Telecom Act $2.25 billion annually from interstate phone revenue   Can use rollover funds WI averages $25 million annually   FCC has regulatory and legal oversight SLD does program administration  SLD division of USAC K-12 public and private schools, CESAs, Head Starts Public libraries, library systems The Telecom Act created a program to enable “access to advanced telecommunications and information services for all elementary and secondary schools and public libraries.” 3  Eligible applicants   Status of 2008 WI Funding Requests (2452 FRNs) Pending, 820, 33% Funded, 1 494, 61 % Not funded, 1 6% 38, Check your application status at http://www.sl.universalservice.org/FY3_form471/471StatusCheck.asp 4 What Are The Eligible Services?  Priority 1   Telecommunications services (telco’s only) Local/long distance, wireline and wireless, voice, video, data   Internet access Basic access  Priority 2    Internal connections Basic maintenance of IC Very few WI applicants get P2 Demand exceeds funds available. Priority 1: Funded first. Priority 2: Funded starting at highest discounts (90%, 89%, 88%, etc.). P2 seldom funded <80%. 5 2009 Eligible Services List (ESL)  Official ESL released November 21  471 window open now, closes: 10:59 p.m. CST Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 2009 list same as 2008 list Filtering, expanding ―basic‖ telecom to include data circuits, dist. learning scheduling   FCC refused action on eligibility of:   DPI filed comments supporting the above 6 2009 Eligible Services List (ESL)  If it’s not in the ESL, assume it’s not eligible  E.g., email storage vs. archiving    Must be used in an eligible location for eligible purposes See SLD site ―Determine Eligible Services‖ Ineligible components/services must be removed  Full funding may be provided as Ancillary Use  Funding requests must be cost effective USAC will not approve funding requests that have unreasonable costs compared to the marketplace. -FCC’s 2003 Ysleta Order How Much Discount Can I Get?  Discounts range from 20% to 90%   Based on free/reduced lunch eligible Enrollment and lunch data entered on ISES by Nov 6   Part of NCLB mandates About 15 districts still have outstanding issues  DPI does not verify schools using their own data  ―Alternate‖ options Sends file to SLD  DPI plans to post Excel file third week of Dec.  8 Discounts  Calculating Discount Methods   Primary measure: NSLP (via ISES) Alternative discount mechanisms  Shared Discounts  School districts use the weighted average of the discounts of individual schools in the school district Libraries use the simple average discount of the school district in which they are located   Consortia use the simple average of the consortium members 9 Discount Matrix Percent of Eligible Students Less than 1% 1% - 19% 20% - 34% 35% - 49% 50% -74% 75% -100% Urban 20% 40% 50% 60% 80% 90% Rural 25% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% State average is 53% 10 Technology Plans  Technology plans must be ―developed‖ before the Form 470 is filed. (1st step in process) Plans must support requested services on Form 470 Plans must be approved before service begins, usually July 1, 2009    Technology plans must cover the entire funding year for which a service is being sought. (Can’t expire before June 30, 2010) 11 Technology Plans Timelines for Information and Technology Plans Developed prior to 470 Filing ** Dec 2008 Plan to DPI by: May 1, 2009 Plan Approved by: July 1, 2009 Plan Expires June 30, 2009 ** E-Rate Note: A change in the E-Rate technology plan requirements occurred in August 2004. Technology plans must be “developed”, but not approved, before Form 470 is submitted. 12 CIPA/NCIPA Compliance (Children's Internet Protection Act)    Compliance with CIPA required for: o Internet access o Internal connections o But not telecommunications CIPA requires filtering and having an Internet Safety Plan New law will require Internet safety policy to include educating minors about appropriate online behavior, including interacting with other individuals on social networking websites and in chat rooms and cyberbullying awareness and response. See DPI’s CIPA FAQ at: http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/cipafaq.html 13 E-Rate Flowchart (Part 1) Tech Plan before 470 Oct - Dec Form 470 posted Wait 28 Days Pick vendor, sign contract RNL Select vendor, cost main factor. If no bids, applicant selects provider. Dec – Feb ? Submit 471 RAL Retain all documentation for at least five years!! 15 E-Rate Flowchart (Part 2) PIA Review FCDL - Decision July – Oct ? Applicant can appeal a denial of funding to the SLD within 60 days of date on FCDL. SLD mails applicant and service provider a 486 approval letter. SLD mails applicant and service provider a BEAR approval letter. Form 486 – Service Start Discount on bills BEAR (472) Form 500 (optional) Online filing/certification available for most forms 16 Forms and Deadlines Form or Event Funding Year   Deadline or Dates July 1 through the following June 30; Current year is 2008. Applying for 2009. Starts request for services. Must be posted at least 28 days before the filing Form 471. Keep in mind (1) the timeframe for all bids (2) the Form 471 filing closing date. Will receive Receipt Acknowledgement Letter – RAL. 470 deadline will be late Dec. or Early Jan. Tells SLD what services you want to receive, the provider, costs, schools getting services, discount %, contract or MTM, etc. Will probably be due early February 2009. Will receive Receipt Notification Letter – RNL. SLD’s Program Integrity Assurance (PIA) staff review all applications, which can take over 8 months. PIA will contact you with questions. Starting late April, Funding Commitment Decision Letters sent to applicants. This continues for months. Confirms start of service. Must be received/postmarked within 120 days after FCDL date or 120 days after the Service Start Date, whichever is later. Get discounts on bills (#474) or reimbursements (#472). Received or postmarked no later than 120 days after the date of the Form 486 Notification Letter or 120 days after the last date to receive service, whichever is later. Must be received within 60 days of date on the FCDL. DPI can help you with any appeals. 17 Form 470 Form 471 PIA review FCDL sent Form 486 Form 472 / Form 474 Appeals       Form 470 18 Form 470  470 begins bidding process, must be filed for 2009  If you have no contract for the requested services  Often tariffed or monthly telco or Internet service  If a contract expires on June 30, 2009  File 470 once for length of multi-year contracts or contracts with voluntary extensions  470 and RFP must indicate this  Check 7a and b and both options under b  In future years on the 471, site the original 470  Be sure to file for correct category of service 19 Form 470  Can file the 470 now for 2009 services  Be certain to have draft Tech Plan 143 WI applicants have already filed 374 form 470s.  File one 470 for all services, or file separate forms for each service 470 must be posted on SLD Website for at least 28 days before you select a provider or sign a contract   See ―Form 470‖ area of the News Briefs Form 470 drop dead filing date is January 15. But do not wait until then! 20 Form 470 and Competitive Bidding  Must have a fair and open bidding process    Bid document (RFP) helpful, but not required All bidders are treated the same All bidders have equal access to information Cost must be primary factor  Must choose most cost-effective bid    Non-eligible products/services not part of cost effectiveness Fully document your bid review process and any decision(s)  Record dates of any decisions 21 Common Bidding Violations    Cost was not primary factor Provider involved with 470 and/or RFP Applicant’s consultant associated with service provider  Consultant used with no Letter of Agency (LOA)   Contract signed before RFP due date or before 28 days Failure to provide bidding documentation when requested by PIA  Keep all information received from all providers  Document if you received no responses 22 Online Forms Training Site (http://usactrain.solixinc.com) See Oct 3 News Brief for training site information. 470 options 23 Checking all to keep all options open. 24 25 Check these boxes 26 Block 4 information 27 Check all certifications, enter authorized person (bottom) 28 Use Print Preview to check all data, then Submit and certify online or via paper 29 Form 471 30 E-rate Form 471  Provides specific information on services, service providers selected, and contracts and/or agreements, costs, etc.   Provides discount calculation information Must be filed each funding year    Applicant certifies compliance with all program rules Must be postmarked or filed online by ??? Form 470 certifications must also be filed online or postmarked before the close of the 471 filing window 2009 Form 471 drop dead date: Likely Early-Mid Feb, 2009, 10:59PM CST 31 Form 471 Online Interview You can use the interview form if you meet the following conditions: 1. You are one of the following: • An individual school • A school district • An individual library • A library system. 2. You have National School Lunch Program student counts - or equivalent data using an alternative discount mechanism - for each school (individual schools and school districts) or for all school districts in which your outlets/branches are located (individual libraries and library systems). You are strongly encouraged to print a copy of the Form 471 Interview Filing Guide to use for reference. 32 33 Block 1: Basic contact information 34 RECORD YOUR SECURTIY CODE!!!! 35 Block 4: Calculate Discount. Adding entities (schools) 36 Block 4: Calculate Discount. Adding entities (schools) 37 Block 4: Calculate Discount. Adding entities (schools) NCES Codes: http://nces.ed.gov/globallocator/ 38 Block 5: One for each funding request. Adding entities (schools) Spin search tool http://www.sl.universalservice.org/Forms/SPIN_Contact_Search.asp But VERIFY with service provider! 39 Block 5: Type of service. 470 Number Contract or Month-tomonth 40 Block 5: Service start and end dates OR Contract award and expiration date 41 Block 5: Item 21 Attachment 42 Block 5 — Item 21 Attachment ‖You MUST attach a description of the service, including a breakdown of components, costs, manufacturer name, make and model number….‖  Examples are provided in the document ―Item 21 Attachments for Form 471‖  http://www.sl.universalservice.org/reference/ Form471item21Attachments.asp 43 43 Block 5: •Enter Amounts. •Add another block 5? 44 Block 6: Certifications Have necessary resources 45 Block 6: Certifications: Have Technology Plan 46 Block 6: Certifications: Send Signed Certifications or PIN 47 Block 6: 48 Tips on Filing Form 471  File separate Forms 471 for Priority 1 and Priority 2 services  Remove ineligible costs and document or estimate eligible costs carefully (30% Rule) online speeds processing and reduces errors  Filing  Examine, correct, and save Receipt Acknowledgement Letter (RAL)  Paper forms and instructions: http://usac.org/sl/tools/required-forms.aspx 49 Receipt Acknowledgement Letter  Form 471 Receipt Acknowledgment Letter (RAL)   Cover page of important reminders Provides confirmation of certain information entered from Form 471  Data entry errors may be corrected within three weeks by using the RAL (including Block 4 worksheets) Applicants can request funding reductions but not funding increases  50 50 Funding Commitment Decision Letter (FCDL)  FCDL reports status of individual funding requests: funded  Funded  Not  As yet unfunded (internal connections)  Canceled  May  Use receive more than one FCDL info on FCDL to prepare Form 486 51 E-rate Form 486  Notification that services have started and that SLD can pay invoices Certifies that Tech Plan (if required) has been approved and covers the entire funding year. Form 486 deadline is 120 days after service starts –OR– 120 days after date of Funding Commitment Decision Letter date, whichever is later  Late    October deadline for FCDL before July 1 52  Online version continues to have issues E-rate Form 472/474 (Invoices)  Invoices — Form 472 or Form 474  BEAR (Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement) Form 472 filed by applicant and certified by service provider after receipt and payment for services  Form often due late October, 120 days after last day of services on June 30 or 120 days after date of Form 486 Notification Letter  -OR SPI (Service Provider Invoice) Form 474 filed by service provider after providing services and billing applicant for its non-discount share 53 Issues of Waste, Fraud, Abuse  W/F/A still problem in program   90% discount and complex program rules Vendors have been debarred, people are in prison More certifications U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte sentenced Andre Hornsby, Mitchellville, Maryland, today to six years in prison in connection with his conviction by a federal jury of wire fraud, witness and evidence tampering arising from a scheme to cause the Prince George's County Public Schools to award lucrative contracts to benefit associates and himself. 54  W/F/A drives many FCC decisions    More PIA requests for information More audits leading to more COMADs  FCC can recoup funds going back 5 years  See SLD Fall 2008 slides on audits Rule Violations That Can Warrant Recovery of Funds  Insufficient documentation  Competitive bidding, discount rate, contracts     Funding approved for ineligible services Receipt of duplicative services Lack of necessary local resources Technology plan issues (e.g., no approved plan) The auditors estimated the improper payment rate at 12.9%. There was noncompliance in several areas, such as recordkeeping; eligible services; and entering into a contract too early in the application process. —FCC Notice of Inquiry, 9-08 The E-rate has become so complex that it is almost impossible for schools or libraries to be 100% accurate in their execution of the application or invoicing process. However, there is a fundamental difference between intentional fraud and inadvertent errors due to program complexity. —ALA Response to FCC NOI Telecom provider issue 470/471 service 3% mismatch Other 4% 6% Service provider involvement 4% Tech plan issues 4% Budget issues 5% 471 filing issues 9% No 470 posted 9% Common Reasons for Denial of Funding Contract issues 24% Insufficient documentation 17% 30% rule 15% http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/eratedenials.html 56 Contract Issues     FCC/SLD E-rate contract rules trump local policies Telecom and Internet may/may not be contracted services As noted, on the 470, always check #7, options a and b You must sign and date contract before filing Form 471   Verbal agreements are not acceptable Quotes are not acceptable   Always try and have contract timed to E-rate cycle State Master Contracts 57 State Master Contracts  DOA cell contract    Applicant files 471 for cell service using their own or DOA 470 Still working on some SPIN issues U.S. Cellular has many dead SPINs Gary McFall, DOA cell contract contact (608-266-1032 gary.mcfall@wisconsin.gov,)  DOA STS, Centrex, VoIP contract  DOA did not file 470; you must file both Form 470 and 471  471, #18, Contract Award Date (CAD) is date you selected SMC as winning bid Still cannot use TEACH circuits; issue ―under review‖ Mark Rappe, DOA VoIP contract contact (608-264-9406; mark.rappe@wisconsin.gov)  VoIP and DOA/TEACH circuit issue  58 Program Integrity Assurance (PIA) Application Review  PIA reviews all applications    To ensure that funds are used for eligible services/products To ensure that funds go for eligible uses by eligible entities To annoy you by asking for same documents multiple times Need more information on requested services Competitive bidding process and contracts Discount calculation Establishing Form 470 ―Please provide the Form 470 that established the bidding for the contract extension.‖ 59 59  Common PIA requests to applicants     Program Integrity Assurance (PIA) Application Review  Respond within 15 days to PIA requests     Work with service provider if needed Respond completely to PIA questions, but no more Ask for more time or for clarification if needed; contact DPI 17% of all WI denials: No response or insufficient info 10% of FRNs move to ―Selective Review”  PIA initial review   Check 471 status at 471 Application Status Tool 60 Appeals  Funding denials can be appealed   Generally, appeal first to the SLD Then appeal to FCC if SLD denies appeal   Must be postmarked within 60 days of denial on FCDL FCC has been granting many appeals  But can be a year or more No appeal form  Contact DPI for appeal advice and template   See Appeals Procedure on SLD Website 61 Where to Go For Help  On the Web: www.usac.org/sl/    Fall training slides Reference: http://www.usac.org/sl/tools/reference-area.aspx News Briefs: http://www.usac.org/sl/tools/news-briefs/Default.aspx Enter your BEN and get info on your application  E-rate Central, WI site     Client Service Bureau: 888-203-8100 Email: question@slcfund.org Fax: 888-276-8736 62 DPI Help  DPI’s E-rate Web site:  dpi.wi.gov/pld/erate.html dpi.wi.gov/pld/wieratelist.html  DPI’s WIERATE email list:   DPI Staff: Bob Bocher 608-266-2127; fax 608-266-2529 robert.bocher@dpi.state.wi.us Steve Sanders 608-266-3856; fax 608-266-2529 stephen.sanders@dpi.state.wi.us 63 December 2008 E-rate for 2009 ? Questions ? Bob Bocher 608-266-2127 fax 608-266-2529 robert.bocher@dpi.state.wi.us Steve Sanders 608-266-3856 fax 608-266-2529 stephen.sanders@dpi.state.wi.us History of Demand* * From E-Rate Management Professionals Association Return

Related docs
E-rate Basics Overview for 2009
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate 2009-2010
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 2
E-rate Basics Overview for 2008
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate Support Services Agreement
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate and Head Start_1_
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate Technology Planning Webinar
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate FCC Form 470.pptx
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
E Rate Central News for the Week of September
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
E-Rate Draft Technology Plan Template
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
FUNDING MECHANISMS OF THE E RATE PROGRAM
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
premium docs
Other docs by Lisa Turtle
Board Resolution Declaring a Regular Dividend
Views: 214  |  Downloads: 4
Stock Ledger and Capitalization Summary
Views: 1197  |  Downloads: 87
ALLEGATION OF JURISDICTION
Views: 175  |  Downloads: 0
Little Essays of Love and Virtue
Views: 331  |  Downloads: 8
Board Resolution Authorizing Litigation
Views: 153  |  Downloads: 3
Bill of Sale of Assets in Exchange For Stock
Views: 216  |  Downloads: 1
Telecommuting Checklist and Agreement
Views: 404  |  Downloads: 13
BULK SALES AGREEMENT
Views: 235  |  Downloads: 4
Information release authorization
Views: 309  |  Downloads: 7
3dfx Interactive Ammendments and By laws
Views: 162  |  Downloads: 1
Employee Arbitration Agreement NOT DONE
Views: 196  |  Downloads: 0