Does The Shadow lurk The Shadow

Document Sample
scope of work template
							VOLUME 4 NO.1                         debate
                   REFLECTING ON ORGANISATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
                                                                                  FEBRUARY 1997




     Does T h e S h a d o w lurk
          The Shadow
       in your organisation?




     WARNING SIGNS: if you recognise any of these symptoms, turn to page 3.


   Also in this issue:   q Donors: should their concern go beyond giving money? – page 5
                         q The view from outside: A critical look at South African
                           development approaches – page 8
                         q Under the spotlight: Olive’s annual review – page 10
                         q ODelia on NGOs and the new LRA – page 14
                         q Civil society in Cambodia – page 16
                                                          editorial


            ive                   subscription                        structures and systems.
 O R G A N I S AT I O N
  DEVELOPMENT                         service                    • the environment in which the organisation works.
    &TRAINING                                                      Here we will look at the social, economic and
                                                                   political context in which we operate and their
                                                                   effect on organisations.
                                                                 • theory, which is an integral part to understanding

Editorial                                                          the environment as well as the organisations in
                                                                   which (or with which) we work. We will take a
                                                                   closer look at development, organisational and
Welcome to the new Olive Subscription                              change theory.
Service
We trust that you have had a refreshing break and are
                                                                 Letters
geared for the challenges that any new year brings. Olive        This year, we will actively revive correspondence with
has spent the end of last year and the first few days of the     yourselves as this is often the place where debate
new year finalising various aspects of the “new look” for        begins. We ask you, as a reader of OD debate, to take
the Subscription Service. Welcome.                               this seriously and take issue with an article - even if
                                                                 you just write two or three paragraphs. We would love
Ideas for a Change                                               to hear your views on controversial issues (of which
This is a new aspect to our Subscription Service which           there are a fair number in this issue).
has been conceptualised as a response to the high
demand for practical ideas to initiate and manage
                                                                 This edition
change. This publication will cover methods, techniques          This first edition of the year, we see as our “phasing
and approaches that will be useful in this regard. It will       in” issue. You will find that a number of the 1996
reach you twice a year (in June and November) and each           “regulars” no longer feature. These have either been
pack will include a range of ideas, exercises or “tools” to      incorporated into the other part of our Subscription
guide various aspects of organisational change.                  Service (Ideas for a Change) or are covered in other
                                                                 publications. However, we felt that we couldn’t give
Who are we targeting with ODdebate?                              our readers a total “shock treatment” and decided to
ALL organisations that are working for (or with)                 phase in some of the new ideas (and phase out some
development and change. We are targeting people that             of the old features) over two editions!
are instrumentally involved in change processes. We                  Over the December break, Odelia completed her
are moving beyond providing facts and information to             studies and is now an expert on legal matters! She will
reflecting on issues of interest to such people. It is           be providing legal advice on issues that affect NGOs
through reflection, that other people are able to learn          and welcomes any queries from you. In this issue she
from experiences. Because of this slight change in               looks at the relevance of the new Labour Relations Act
focus, you will find that some of the articles will              (LRA) for NGOs.
become longer. Also, editions will vary in size from 12          Enjoy the read.
to 20 pages.

What will ODdebate cover?                                         OD debate is published six times a year
OD debate will reflect on organisations and on
change. Articles will deal with issues concerning
                                                                  by Olive Subscription Service,                    ive
                                                                  21 Sycamore Road, Glenwood, 4001.           ORGANISATION
                                                                                                              DEVELOPMENT
• the practitioner - those people who facilitate                                                               &TRAINING

  change in (their own or other) organisations.                   Telephone: 031-258059 or 253947
  Developing oneself and knowing oneself is central               Fax: 031-252114
  to enabling change in others.                                   ISSN Number 1025-1073
• the intervention - the relationship between the                 E-mail: oliveodt@iafrica.com
  practitioner and the organisation. We will be
                                                                  Website: http://www.epages.net/olive
  featuring reflections on interventions - what
  worked, what didn’t work.
                                                                  Editors: Davine Thaw
• the process of the intervention. This aspect can be                      Andra Hellberg-Phillips
  linked closely to the other part of our subscription
                                                                  Correspondence is very welcome and should be sent to
  service, namely the Ideas for a Change.
                                                                  the Editors at the above addresses.
• the organisation and various aspects of
  organisational change, including those relating to              Designed and produced by         ARTWORKS
  the people, the purpose and the issues of power,

                                       February 97       OD debate      Page Two
                                                          shadows



               What does OD practice
              have to do with shadows?
          An OD Event hosted by the Community Development Resource Association (CDRA) in November 1996
        addressed the theme: Shadows - exploring the boundaries of our practice. The workshop was facilitated
           by Mario van Boeschoten, an English consultant with some 30 years’ experience. STEPHEN HEYNS,
       a freelance writer, editor and researcher, asked him about the relevance of the ‘shadow’ for OD practice.


What is the shadow?                                                        with huge insecurities find the greatest guidance
                                                                             from working with their core values. These arise
When we relate the shadow to the self, it is that                              from working with light and shadow. The
part of ourselves that is unseen. It is living in                               shadow lies between light and dark, it is the
us, but is not penetrated by consciousness. It                                   colour in the situation.
influences our orientation, our behaviour
and how we feel about ourselves. Carl Jung,                                       What do you mean by “working
whose strong personal experience of the
shadow is described in his biography, did
                                                                                  with light and shadow”?
not just put an emphasis on the darkness of                                           An example of this is when people become
the shadow, on the bad things, the things we                                         aware that destructive power battles are
are frightened of, things we feel guilty about,                                      being played out in an organisation and they
things about which we feel shame. This is one                                       resist rattling the skeletons in the cupboard
part. But there is more: our dreams live in the                                    because it makes them feel frightened and
shadow. They are a rich source for telling us                                    uncomfortable. Power struggles can be about
what is really going on.                                                       fundamental values that have not been faced -
                                                                             this is the dark side. The light side has to do with
What is the relevance for OD                                                            the fact that people do engage in battles
                                                       Mario van Boeschoten
practitioners?                                                                          over fundamental values. Recognising this
                                                                                        can become a great source of making
As was said at the OD Event, the shadow is not the                  these values emerge. The shadow is what you as a
problem – ignoring or not working with the shadow is the            consultant can see the organisation is not facing up to. This
problem. If we don’t work with it we are missing the                may need real confronting, backed up by love. Your
opportunity to get in touch with ourselves and our feelings.        approach here is crucial. Make sure you do not get mixed
As OD practitioners our main tool is ourselves. We have to          up in what is going on. Remain aware that the people are
take our own development seriously, continuously working            real behind the mask of the shadow that grew in the
with it and being in touch with ourselves so that unseen            organisational situation.
things do not interfere with our ability to see things as they
really are. The better the relationship we establish with our       How do you know if you are getting mixed up
own shadow, the less likely we are to project parts of
ourselves onto the organisations we work with. It is for this
                                                                    in what is going on in an organisation?
reason that therapists are obliged to go into therapy               If you are aware that something is going on but you can’t
themselves. The need to work on our own development                 quite put your finger on it, ask yourself to what extent
must be our top priority.                                           this is you and how much of it is them. When you do a
                                                                    diagnosis and all you see is what is “out there”, you are
Is the shadow a tool which can be used in                           either ignoring your own limitations or are entering into
practice?                                                           territory where you have particular hang ups. If your
                                                                    client is violating things which are dear to you, check
Work with the shadow is not a tool, it is an approach to            whether your own shadow may be distorting the picture
life. It is also not just about self-knowledge. Organisations       you see for your own comfort. Any consultant should
and groups of people also have their own shadow, their              have a regular speaking partner, as a mentor or as a
secret life, the part that is not talked about but which            colleague, to discuss doubts, worries, stitches which may
nevertheless plays a big part in the organisation’s health.         have been dropped and any uncomfortable feelings about
Greater self-knowledge increases the area of creative               things to really get to the bottom of things.
freedom available to us. The more the “baggage” we carry
has been penetrated by consciousness, the less of a                 What are signs of the shadow in an
negative effect it has on us. The shadow is also a treasure         organisation?
box - our strongest imagination and deepest source of
inspiration lives there. It is the same with organisations.         Some of the signs are:
When they look away from their secret lives they miss              •   a strong denial of certain problems
working with that part of them that develops new faculties         •   people not talking to each other
and capacities. The central principle is that there is always      •   people being very happy at work while the
a light behind the shadow - there are ideals and sources of            organisation is going down the plughole
inspiration behind even the biggest organisational shadow          •   people carrying on with what they are doing although
when you really work with what is there. Organisations                 they have lost sight of why they are doing it

                                        February 97       OD debate       Page Three
                                                            shadows


•    a short-term approach to things                                       consultants have with coping with any
•    organisational issues which are talked                                form of rejection - something we all have
     about informally but are not dealt with                               to face. If you have not learnt why you are
     through formal channels.                                              so vulnerable to this hurt, this really is a
                                                                           shadow; and as long as you do not
Which skills are required to work                                          understand it there is nothing you can do
with the organisational shadow?                                            about it. Consultants must be careful not
                                                                           to allow the intimate discussions they have
Objective        observation        is one.   A consultant exercises in their work lead to other, inappropriate
Characterisation is another - not just
looking at the picture, but identifying the    a lot of secret power       intimacies. Consultants also like to deny
                                                                           the existence of any competitiveness when
striking features of the situation. This is   and is very influential. they are working with others, but this is an
not the same as analysing, which is
looking at the bits and adding them up, it Ask yourself what need
                                                                           illusion. As is the case with any helping
                                                                           profession, consultants must acknowledge
looks at how the bits fit and the nature of    in you this serves so       they are satisfying personal needs when
the totality. Once you have done the
characterisation, take it back to your            that you have no         helping and assisting a client. You must be
                                                                           aware of your own needs for engaging with
speaking partner or to your client. Their      illusions about what        a client. A consultant exercises a lot of
feedback can help you pick up your biases
and what you may be avoiding.
                                               you are doing or why.       secret power and is very influential. Ask
                                                                           yourself what need in you this serves so
Characterisation should have the
                                                                          that you have no illusions about what you
character of a loving mirror, not a cold one.
                                                             are doing or why.
It should be truthful, without denial, but with the
intention of showing real interest and sensitivity. It
should never, ever be flattering. Any consultant who
                                                             Further reading
flatters a client has no integrity.                          Zweig, Connie and Abrams, Jeremiah (editors). 1995.
                                                                  Meeting the shadow: the hidden power of the dark side of
What are the shadows of consultancy?                              human nature. New York: Putnam (65 essays written by
Consultants are a bit like actors, they can be very               Robert Bly, Edward Whitmont, Marie-Louise von Franz, Adolf
narcissistic. When they talk to each other they like to           Guggenbuhl-Craig, George Fuerstein, Carl Jung, Scott Peck,
blame their failures on their clients. The idea that              Sam Keene, Nathaniel Brandon and others)
consultants have of themselves as “bearers of the light”          For a good introduction to the concept:
who “transform society” carries with it the implicit idea         Johnson, Robert. 1993. Owning your own shadow: under-
that others are living in greater darkness. Along with            standing the dark side of the psyche. San Francisco: Harper
being bearers of light comes the great difficulty that


                                                      ngo legislation



                         New legislation for the
                          not-for-profit sector
The process for the drafting of legislation regarding the not-for-profit sector, under the leadership of the Department
           of Welfare, is currently underway. Here the DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE provides a brief update.


    he process will be consultative, aiming at presenting         further discussion will be discussed by means of focus
T draft legislation to Parliament by the middle of June           group discussions.
1997. The extensive debates and work done by the sector               Approximately 20 000 to 50 000 organisations will be
over more than three years will be taken into account as          affected by this legislation and it will aim at minimum
work proceeds.                                                    government control, but with the necessary checks and
    A Technical Reference Team (TRT) has been                     balances in place to ensure accountability.
appointed. The names of its members were made public                  The policy will strive towards creating an enabling
at a Press Conference held by the Minister of Welfare,            environment within which the sector can function
Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi on 15 January 1997. It must be          through legislation which is user-friendly and in line with
stressed that these members do not represent                      the new Constitution.
constituencies, but were chosen for their expertise and               Inputs are welcome and may be forwarded to:
skills regarding the issues.                                          Directorate Non-Governmental Organisations
    The task of the TRT will be mainly to consider burning            Department of Welfare
issues, e.g. whether registration is necessary, minimum               P/Bag X901, Pretoria 0001
requirements for registration, accountability, tax and                Tel: 012 3220826
other benefits, sanctions, self-regulation. Issues that need          Fax: 012 3203854

                                        February 97         OD debate   Page Four
                                                                    funding




                  Adding Value:
          What role for Northern NGOs?                                                                                      1



                                   JAMES TAYLOR from CDRA2 recently spent time with
                         INTRAC (International NGO Training and Research Centre), based in the UK.
        During this time he was engaged in trying to understand more about the realities of the European donor NGO.


    was surprised to find that the general and                                      more value) to the transfer of money from

I   sometimes strong sense of insecurity
    common amongst Southern NGOS
(related to an inability to clearly and
                                                                                         the North to the South and which no
                                                                                           government could achieve?” Donors
                                                                                              seem to be asking what else they can
succinctly measure and prove their                                                              do other than funding.
‘value added’ to others), was also                                                                All too often I heard members of
evident amongst their Northern                                                                      donor organisations saying,
counterparts. It interests me                                                                        with great feeling, that “we
greatly that Northern NGOs,                                                                           don’t just want to be funders,
like NGOs in the South, are                                                                             or conduits of money”. I did
feeling the pressure to prove                                                                           not understand them to be
that they are ‘adding value’.                                                                            saying that they felt they
Northern NGOs (NNGOs)                                                                                     were already disbursing
seemed to feel threatened                                                                                 funds as professionally and
by the European govern-                                                                                   developmentally as
ments’ demands (indepen-                                                                                  possible and now needed to
dently and collectively) to                                                                               diversify into other
know what value, as                                                                                       supplementary services.
intermediary donor NGOs,                                                                                 Their response and the
they were adding to the                                                                                  emotion behind it reminded
funding process. Why should                                                                             me more of a common, and
the bi-laterals not bypass them                                                                        understandable, NGO sector
and instead engage directly in                                                                       aversion to anything that is too
funding relationships with                                                                          closely related to capitalism.
recipients in the South? Such                                                                     Their ultimate fear is to be seen
pressure is being brought to bear                                                                as the bankers of the development
for a number of reasons to do with                                                             sector, the implication being that it
the politics and history of different                                                       is not through the transfer of money
regions and the changing roles                                                                        that development really takes
                                         Although it can be likened to the “lifeblood” of an
of donors, NGOs and                                                                                   place, but through other
                                       organisation, funding alone cannot sustain it - it is a
development aid. However,                                                                             “capacity building” processes.
what specifically interests me                  question of how the money is given.                   This undervaluing of the role
is the NGOs’ response to it.                                                                          of appropriately and
     “You’re absolutely right, we are not adding sufficient          developmentally disbursed funds in the development
value, we need to look for and engage in additional                  process - by the very agencies whose primary role it is -
activities which add more value…” This characterises very            undermines the very existence of NNGOs involved in
crudely a common NNGO response. The question that                    funding.
underlies much of the search for “adding more value” is                  To disburse funds developmentally attention must be
articulated as “how do we contribute towards building the            focused on how (and how much) money is given and also a
capacity of our partner organisations?” The answer to the            concern for the capacity of the recipient organisation. If
question incorporates a wide array of responses from in-             donor NGOs do not understand and appreciate this
depth explorations of the meaning and concept of                     relationship, it is correct that they should feel threatened.
partnership, to the provision of training courses and                From the work of the CDRA over the years we have seen the
consultancy services by donor agencies. What I found                 dramatic positive impact that committed developmental
alarming is that all the good and critical thinking that has         donors can have, and the opposite effect of those who see
resulted from the perceived threat seems to be leading               themselves simply as conduits of funds. What hope is there
away from the core purpose of donor organisations - which            if donors don’t sufficiently appreciate the vital role that
I understand to be funding. No one seems to be asking                funding plays in the development of recipient organisations.
“what is it in the way we fund that adds value (or could add         I have often likened funding to the “life blood” of an


1
    This article was first published in on trac (the newsletter of INTRAC) No. 5 in October 1996.
2
    CDRA (Community Development Resource Association) is a Cape Town-based OD organisation. This month (February 1997) CDRA is running
    a course “Capacity Building through Donor Practice” for donor leadership and field officers operating in Southern Africa.

                                             February 97          OD debate         Page Five
                                                                      funding


organisation. Alone it cannot sustain the life of an                          directly to the development and capacity of organisations.
organisation, but without it survival is not possible.                            The ability to accurately diagnose funding needs
Healthy organisations depend on the effective and                             developmentally, and the ability and flexibility to respond
efficient functioning of many “organs”, but too much or                       to them appropriately is not easily come by, and not often
too little blood in the system is life threatening, as is blood               encountered. It demands both an understanding of how
of the wrong “type”.                                                          organisations develop, which requires study and
    Whilst there is clearly a need for many different                         experience, diagnosis skills and an ability to build trusting
services in order to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness                  relationships. Even if the diagnostic ability exists, the
of recipient NGOs, it is funding that has the ability to                      policies and procedures of funders and those who fund
destroy recipient organisations with such ease, or provide                    them often make differentiation of the way in which funds
the basis from which they grow and develop. Donors                            are disbursed almost impossible. Unless donors take
should first ensure that their core activity of funding                       seriously their ability to fund developmentally, and
builds capacity, before they diversify and move into other                    develop confidence in its value, they will always remain
activities.                                                                   vulnerable and insecure of their specific role. Government
    In order to achieve this there are two fundamental                        agencies might have a chance of becoming reasonable
abilities that donors need to have incorporated as part of                    conduits of funds, but are fundamentally unsuited to
their essential practice. The first is the knowledge and                      being able to provide differentiated and developmental
ability to understand the phases of organisational                            funding.
development, to diagnose the particular needs that                                For me it is clear; donors can best impact on the
organisations have at any point in their development, and                     capacity of their recipient organisations not through being
how those needs change over time. The second is the ability                   all things to all recipients but by taking seriously their
of donors to differentiate their funding response in order to                 core responsibility of providing funds developmentally.
meet the specific developmental needs of their recipients as                  There is no other means I can imagine by which they can
they evolve and change. In this way they will be contributing                 contribute more to the building of capacity.


                                                    SUBSCRIPTION FORM



                               debate
   REFLECTING ON ORGANISATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
                                                                                 & Ideas for a Change
               Annual subscription to the complete Olive Subscription Service package entitles you to
               ❍ 6 bi-monthly issues of OD debate
               ❍ 2 issues of Ideas for a Change
               Ideas for a Change
   OPTION A:




               There has been a high demand for practical ideas to initiate and manage change. We have expanded the previous “middle
               page” section of OD debate (Methodology, Technique, Approach) into a publication in its own right.
               This publication will reach you twice a year (June and November). Each will include a range of ideas, exercises or “tools” to
               guide various aspects of organisational change.
               ❍ up to 4 working papers which tackle issues of importance to NGOs in a more in-depth way
               Prices
               ❍ R200 (within South Africa)        ❍ R320 (other African countries)           ❍ R390 (Europe and USA)
               Annual subscription to OD debate on its own entitles you to
   OPTION B:




               ❍ 6 bi-monthly issues of OD debate
               Prices
               ❍ R95 (within South Africa)         ❍ R125 (other African countries)           ❍ R185 (Europe and USA)
  Please note: we have not increased the basic price from the last three years, but because of the postage costs to other countries
  we have had to increase those prices to cover our mailing costs.


                                                            Your details
Name of your organisation: –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Contact person: ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Postal address: –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Tel: ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Fax: ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
I enclose a cheque/postal order to the value of R –––––––––––––––
                                                 Please send your completed form to Olive (OD and T):
                             21 Sycamore Road, Glenwood, Durban, South Africa; Fax: 031-252114; e-mail: oliveodt@iafrica.com

                                                February 97         OD debate         Page Six
                                                  draft document




              The South African National NGO Coalition presented a draft document
                 for discussion in its newsletter NGO Matters. It will be discussed
           at the Coalition’s Assembly from 16-18 April 1997. These are some excerpts:



     Covenant on South African
           Development
“...[The Coalition recognises] that development             5.     South African NGOs have the right to
is a comprehensive economic, social, cultural                      assert immunity and neutrality from
and political process, which aims at the                           operations and encounters of warring
attainment of a better quality of life for the                     factions.
people and the protection and conservation of
                                                            6.     South African NGOs have the right to
the environment that is based on the active,
                                                                   unhampered operations in delivering
free and meaningful participation of the people
                                                                   relief goods and services to communities
in development and on the fair distribution of
                                                                   affected by natural disasters [and those
the benefits resulting from there...
                                                                   caused by humans] including armed
   “We, South African Non-governmental                             conflict situations.
Organisations (NGOs) therefore, proclaim this
                                                            7.     South African NGOs have the right to
covenant on South African Development to
                                                                   free and unhampered access to
unite us in a common effort to promote, protect
                                                                   information.
and assert the right to development of the
people. We do so fully aware of the compelling
need for the South African government to                    We, the undersigned South African
guarantee the free and unobstructed exercise                NGOs, bind ourselves to the following
by NGOs of their right to undertake                         responsibilities and obligations
development work...”
                                                            1.     Protect and enhance the integrity,
                                                                   autonomy and independence of People’s
Rights, responsibilities and obligations                           Organisations (POs).
of development NGOs
                                                            2.     Respect and enhance the culture and
We believe that South African NGOs should be allowed
                                                                   traditions of the community and
to exercise the following rights in the pursuit of their
                                                                   creatively build up indigenous structures.
work:
                                                            3.     Provide access to all forms of
1.     South African NGOs have the right to
                                                                   information.
       assert their legitimate role as equal
       partners in development.                             4.     Help create democratic and participative
                                                                   leadership in the community.
2.     South African NGOs have the right to
       propose and implement alternative                    5.     Institute the necessary mechanisms such
       development strategies and                                  that we share our own perspective
       programmes.                                                 without the danger of imposition or
                                                                   manipulation.
3.     South African NGOs have the right to
       remain autonomous from the government                6.     Respect the dynamics of communities
       and from any other organisation, political                  and enhance local initiatives.
       or otherwise.
                                                            7.     Enhance community empowerment by
4.     South African NGOs have the right to                        encouraging greater self-reliance in
       equal access to funding and other                           terms of resourcing, organisational and
       resources, both local and foreign,                          programme management and by
       without compromising their principles or                    facilitating linkages and co-operation
       their autonomy.                                             among POs and communities.




                                  February 97         OD debate   Page Seven
                                                         development


             JOCHEN LOHMEIER, an “outsider”, reflects on the South African development arena and asks,



                “What development
               approaches are being
           used by South African NGOs?”
Jochen is a German/European, 47 years old, a geographer, an economist. He earns his living as a manager, a facilitator
and a consultant. He has worked and lived in (and out of) Africa - and parts of Asia - for the past 20 years; six of these
                in Tanzania. Since 1994 he has conducted courses in four provinces of South Africa on:
                                     ❐ objectives oriented project planning,
                                     ❐ communication and facilitation,
                                     ❐ regional rural development,
                                     ❐ comprehensive project management techniques, and
                                     ❐ design of development interventions.
Here, he has worked with some 350 participants, ranging from NGO managers and staff to funders to government officials.

Training is in                                                   whether such has happened or not, I came across two
                                                                 interesting responses: First resistance, and then
   n South Africa, with the history of deprivation for the

I  majority and international isolation for the country as
   a whole, training is in high demand. Especially
international experts meet a sponge-like receptiveness for
                                                                 helplessness. Figures, numbers and statistics are fairly
                                                                 alien to development players outside of the university
                                                                 environment. My sense is that there is a real need for
                                                                 development players to grapple with the nasty, difficult
education, training and new ideas. For a person such as          business of figures, formulae and calculations. In Asia, my
myself this is motivating, astounding and worryingly             experience has been that similar groups would work
uncritical at the same time. I want to feed back this            through a thousand items of data with ease and familiarity.
polarity to you through the following:                           This has not been my experience in South Africa.
Politics                                                         Obsession with organisation
In South Africa, unlike many other countries, you do not         Development practice has (regrettably) always had
have to stress that development has a political component.       fashions. A recent fashion in South Africa has been OD. If
With the history of struggle for power, calls for solidarity     there is a problem to be solved, there must be an
and the legitimacy of rebellion, South African development       organisation to do it. A forum is proposed as the solution
actors are not only familiar with the politics, they often       to all problems of participation. In too many cases,
interpret the development process politically. My experience     building capacity means “organisations” need to be
in other countries has been that it takes great effort to        developed. In my view this is fallacious. People have
convince funtionaries that development is not merely a           always organised themselves for survival, but for their
technical issue. It has been inspiring to experience the         own chosen improvements. They know how to do this.
dedication of the South African development actors, to           What makes OD so fashionable?
learn about their strategies and to recognise the charisma of        Forums, organisations, NGOs and government
individual personalities in the new development arena.           agencies are charged with alleviating pressing problems,
However, people have come to our courses because they            yet complaints of non-delivery and failed development
need new capabilities, which relate to professional              prevail. Support agencies are under pressure and
management, to negotiating power arrangements and to             implementation is in demand. For me there are two
functioning effectively in bureaucracies. The old qualities of   issues here: the problem and the solution. Organisations
activism and these new demands create a useful tension.          need a common purpose, vision and values. It is not
                                                                 enough for an organisation to have a problem to tackle.
Figure phobia                                                        It is one thing to identify the problem that needs to be
South Africa has its own political jargon. In addition,          tackled. It is another to identify an innovative, locally
development actors are faced with the international              adjusted, economically viable, ecologically sustainable,
development jargon, which was not always part of their           organisationally implementable solution. It seems to me
past vocabulary. However, it is picked up with alacrity:         that little effort goes into “scouting” for solutions that take
“sustainability, PRA, participation, poverty-orientation,        account of specific groups’ needs, that mediate different
capacity building, empowerment,…” There is no question           interests and that are realistic and achievable. I think it is
that the principles and theoretical positions that lie           helpful to free up energy to focus on opportunities rather
behind these terms are of substantial importance.                than only problems. It allows one to unlock existing
However, in asking participants on our courses to make           potential rather than parrot partial or foreign models
these practical, to attempt to quantify them, to declare         which need not be inappropriate to South Africa.
their assumptions, to be specific about how one assesses             OD is not about building a strong organisation that

                                        February 97       OD debate    Page Eight
                                                        development


tackles problems - perhaps OD is about creating                 “law and order”? It has been interesting to observe how
organisational forms with people who respond creatively         strong a desire there is for structure and order. Is the
and energetically to such problems and identify solutions       internalised segregation and suppression from the old
that truly do make a difference to people’s lives.              South Africa surviving in a new form?
                                                                     I am deeply aware of the danger of instruments and
“Culture” challenges                                            tools which suggest logical rigidity and strictness, and
Although familiar with the racial and gender divides in         conjure up unfounded clarity. This is even more worrying
South Africa’s history, the concept of a rainbow nation has     if facilitators who lead participants through the
yet to be seen in day to day reality. At a recent training      application of such tools are unaware of such a danger.
programme around gender sensitivity, we suggested a role
play which included men and women in a pub comfortably          The professional…
enjoying themselves, but with the gender roles reversed.        Professionals are needed to develop and accompany the
This proposal met with extraordinary resistance from the        process. Development is about power too. It is not enough
men and disappointment from the women. The suggestion           for professionals only to be politically aware. A facilitator
was rejected, indicating that the boundaries were still very    in development needs to be an advocate, a “scout” with an
fixed. A challenge to professional facilitators is to explore   own stance to power questions. This requires the self-
processes to enable people to venture across these              confidence to acknowledge the complexity of the terrain;
boundaries.                                                     and to bring to it the creativity and stamina to work out
                                                                solutions with the people affected and all parties
A “tool” has more than one use                                  concerned. Hence, training…
Our courses work with various development tools or
instruments which aim to distinguish which specific             NGOs and training
responses particular target groups might benefit from. We       Again, training is in high demand in South Africa.
speak of these as “self-targeting measures” which are           Demand creates offers of courses, but not necessarily
designed to empower, not all (which is a South African          quality. There seems to be a tendency, particularly
obsession), but specific groups (e.g. rural women,              amongst NGOs, to hurry from undergoing a course this
unemployed youth, retrenched workers, disabled                  month to directly offering training in the same thing next
children), as they all have different needs. Therefore, by      month without applying the learning and building one’s
the development arena response needs to be quite                own experience effectively. Is this shying away from the
specific to these needs. A hammer is not bad because you        responsibility of really doing it rather than the safer
can bang it on someone’s head. I am interested in what I        option of training others to do it?
experience to be a block to these kinds of instruments. I
think it is underpinned by a resistance to division and         Conclusion
segregation, which has an historical background.                According to process (however this may be understood), I
However, to distinguish difference in order to ensure                                         chose to be descriptive
inclusivity, I believe, is an important concept, but                                             only. The figure that
apparently new to many South Africans.                                                             emerges from this just
                                                                                                    provokes me to say
Applying a method                                                                                    to myself, “Isn’t it
The logical framework (or ZOPP) approach is                                                          interesting.”
becoming increasingly well-known in South
Africa. It can be a healthy debate in
both academic and development circles
around the ZOPP approach. It can be
viewed as a strict, rigid way of planning
ina situation where one needs
something more open and discursive
to deal with the complexities of
particular       communities.
However, my view is that the
application of ZOPP can be
very open, innovative and even
playful. It has been interesting
to see how, in South Africa,
many people choose its
more orderly appli-
cation. Is this also a
consequence of
the apartheid
h i s t o r y
loaded
with




                                        February 97       OD debate   Page Nine
                                                                 review




                                       Olive’s Review -
OD challenges to an OD organisation
                        In November and December 1996, Olive underwent its third annual review -
                 after another year of hard work, growth and development. For the first time, the review
          was conducted by a team of two people - David Harding1 and Edgar Pieterse2. This article summarises
    the key points that emerged from the review that might be of interest to Olive’s clients and other organisations.


    he feedback is set within an overall fairly positive               Strengths
T   assessment of Olive, its effectiveness and presence. The
    review team endorsed that an organisation such as
Olive (an OD organisation that works on issues within
                                                                       During the process, Olive received consistently high and
                                                                       positive marks from all the people interviewed. This is a
                                                                       summary of Olive’s strengths:
other NGOs) has to be able to look hard at its own
practice. It has to set a particularly high standard in its            •   Olive is a highly professional organisation to work
own organisational life. The review team expressed                         with. It delivers on what it says it will do, within the
confidence that Olive would constructively respond to a                    time frame agreed upon.
straightforward exposition of issues.                                  •   The quality of Olive’s delivery work is high, compared
                                                                           to experiences with other support organisations and
                                                                           individuals that clients have used.
                                                                       •   Olive is very sensitive to the needs and processes of
The brief to the reviewers:                                                clients, which allows them to adapt and change
❐ to assess the role Olive has played and its possible                     interventions as required.
  future role over the next 3 years.                                   •   Olive is good at explaining to clients the limitations of
                                                                           a particular intervention and communicating the
❐ to consider the views of funders, clients and collegial                  importance of a holistic approach to OD work.
  organisations to assess Olive’s services in terms of                 •   Olive has been very good at developing certain
  relevance, quality and availability.                                     methods beyond their limited and/or inappropriate
                                                                           framework to ‘fit’ better the needs of the South African
❐ to consider staff, Board and user views to assess Olive’s
                                                                           NGO context (in particular ZOPP).
  levels of competence, effectiveness and efficiency in                •   Olive is a ‘thinking’ and imaginative organisation and
  conducting its work.                                                     offers a whole range of opportunities to other NGOs to
❐ to assess the extent to which the suggestions from the                   learn and share new ideas and initiatives.
                                                                       •   Olive is a friendly organisation to work with, sensitive
  1995 review have been taken up or not and reasons for
                                                                           and sympathetic to clients and their needs.
  this.                                                                •   Olive produces unique and high quality publications,
❐ to comment on Olive’s sustainability strategies.                         filling a gap that no-one else is meeting.
                                                                       •   Olive’s internal administrative and resource systems
❐ to recommend any changes or shifts to improve Olive’s                    are well designed and show signs of a systematic drive
  positioning, its work and its impact.                                    to improve and innovate.
                                                                       •   The administrative team provide good support and

1
    David Harding is a UK-based consultant with some 23-years experience in the areas of OD and management skills development for the
    non-profit sector, socio-economic policy and programme, and local economic and community development - all within a range of national
    contexts. He may be contacted at: 3 West End Lane, Merton Nr, Bicester, Oxon Ox6 ONG, UK; e-mail: HARDINGDC@aol.com
2
    Edgar Pieterse works from Cape Town as an independent development consultant. He is attached to The School for Public & Development
    Management (Wits) in a part-time capacity and has research interest themes such as “Globalisation and Cities”; “Race and the City” and
    “Urban Governance, Culture and Development”. Contact details: Tel: 021-4184173; e-mail: mirged@global.co.za

                                                  Meet the Olive staff




      Davine Thaw               Shireen Ragunan               Essa Al-Seppe             Desré Wright                 Simanga Sithebe
      OD & T Team                Finance Team                 OD & T Team            Communications Team               OD & T Team

                                           February 97        OD debate        Page Ten
                                                              review


     service to both other staff and to external clients.
                                                                                                                                                                }
                                                                                           }
     External clients find Olive a good organisation to deal
                                                                                                                                                                       Internal
     with at this level.                                                                                                                    Internal                aspects, that
•    Olive is financially healthy. Its financial side is well                                                   Financial                                            support the
                                                                                                               management                organisational
     managed - there is good ‘financial discipline’ - and                                                                                                              external
                                                                                                                                          management                   delivery
     financial reporting is good quality, regular and          Olive’s
     respected by donor bodies.                               4-person

But of course there are always challenges…
The challenges can be contextualised with two
statements:
                                                              management
                                                                 team
                                                                                                               Management
                                                                                                                of learning
                                                                                                                    and
                                                                                                                                         Management
                                                                                                                                         of the delivery
                                                                                                                                             of Olive
                                                                                                                                         services and
                                                                                                                                                                }  Development
                                                                                                                                                                   and delivery
                                                                                                                                                                       side
1. Olive is moving from its ‘pioneering’ (informal or
                                                                                                               development                in strategic
   initial) phase into a more formal phase. Factors of
                                                                                                                                            direction
   size, complexity and a broadening of the professional




                                                                                             publications
                                                                                             distribution of
                                                                                             Development &




                                                                                                                      OD practitioners
                                                                                                                      Development of:




                                                                                                                                             related services
                                                                                                                                             Olive’s OD and
   base of Olive may now be placing in question the
   effectiveness of the combination of a strongly
   informal system and a strong personal leadership.
   This has implications for a number of areas:
a. management and leadership structures (formal and
   informal) within Olive.
   The review team’s view is that Olive will need to
   explicitly review its management systems and
   procedures to develop more awareness of how it                                     b. policies and systems.
   operates at present and to look openly at options                                     Closely linked with formalising the management
   available. A more dispersed management function                                       structure within Olive is the need to clarify and formalise
   should be looked at and a sharing of leadership                                       certain systems and policies, such as payment policies,
   functions. This could be done by tightening the role of                               internal management and HR systems.
   the board and increasing the responsibilities of other
   functions in the organisation.                                                     c. the board’s role.
                                                                                         The reviewers felt that the board needs to be more
                                                                                         engaged and active in policy level discussions. There is
                                                          Spreading responsiblities




                                                      }
                      BOARD                                                              a continuous need to strengthen the board, but the
                                                                                         review team suggested a more adventurous policy in
                                                                                         recruiting new members by accepting the need to
                                                                                         develop members from a less experienced base.
                    DIRECTOR                                                             Up to the present, the Board has expressed their
                                                                                         confidence in both the director and staff to manage the
                                                                                         organisation effectively. It has been a fairly “hands off”
                                                                                         way of working.
                                                                                         The reviewers felt that in the future, Olive will need the
      OTHER           STAFF         FUNCTIONS
                                                                                         full and active support of the board in policy issues
                                                                                         around future direction, re-thinking management
As a learning organisation, Olive staff have already started                             styles and structures and deepening capacity around
working with this point in particular. The“management                                    key work areas. They should also provide a sounding
model” that we are thinking around is depicted in the                                    board, and be a source of experience in strategic level
diagram (top right).                                                                     thinking.
   It will involve a four-person management team, which
means, although we retain the position of director                                    2. After three years of hard and, we believe, creative
(delivery, strategic issues), much of the responsibility is                              and exploratory work, it is time to reflect upon and
moved to other team members. An interesting aspect is                                    consolidate what we know and can do. This has
that the changes are happening according to Olive’s                                      implications for:
specific needs - not according to any text book model. For                            a. organisational culture.
example, Olive places great emphasis on personal and                                     Any organisation is marked by a distinctive culture
organisational learning and development, thus this                                       that is continuously shaped and moulded by the people
position is given management prominence.                                                 who make up the organisation, external and internal




      Cathy van de Ruit      Kenneth Msomi             Printha Pillay                                          Michael Randel                            Nonkosi Mangxangaza
    Communications Team     Maintenance Team           Finance Team                                            OD & T Team                                   Admin Team

                                        February 97      OD debate                          Page Eleven
                                                                review


   events and the organisation’s structures and systems.             2. Olive will deepen its focus on the organisational
   Olive needs to increase its awareness of what the                    aspects, rather than the programme side of
   dominant culture in the organisation is. This can be                 organisations.
   addressed if the organisation grows increasingly                  3. Olive will give serious consideration to issues of
   reflective, self conscious and open about its own                    consolidating and strengthening what it has done in
   identity.                                                            the past 3 years and guarding against growth that is
b. Olive’s practitioners                                                too rapid.
   Issues of diversity and difference are frequently
   encountered within organisations. This means that the             Focus for the next three years:
   delivery team in Olive has to be totally comfortable and          1. to increase the quality of our delivery. This we see as a
   skilled in dealing with these issues in the field.                   constant aim.
c. Olive’s own practice.                                             2. to focus on developing an OD course for leaders in
    In its internal learning work Olive needs to give more              organisations to bring more people into the field.
    time and space to work on issues arising from its own            3. to ensure that OD debate reflects more of Olive’s
    practice. This should provide a stronger and sharper                practice and experience.
    basis for building experience, reflective capacity and           4. to deepen and consolidate the development programme
    good practice.                                                      and to ensure that we develop quality practitioners.
d. our theoretical approach and framework.
   Olive needs to deepen its understanding of issues in
   development and broaden its understanding of                      Having been through our third review process,
   approaches to development in order to be able to                  what have we learnt?
   continue to respond to the complexity and specificity of
   the development realities it will have to engage with.            a. Reviews are necessary - they are not just an interesting
                                                                        option.
e. projecting our image clearly.                                     b. External eyes on busy organisations are invaluable. Two
   Olive needs to develop clear information to give clients,            pairs of eyes are even better.
   potential clients and associates a good picture of what it        c. It is hard to be challenged, but it is good to be reminded
   has to offer and who works in the organisation around
                                                                        of the importance of setting time aside for reflection so
   key issues.
                                                                        that we can learn from our history and experience.
   Clients often don’t get a clear sense of the whole range
                                                                     d. Reflection is about learning what to let go of and what
   of work that is done by Olive, or know who else to talk
   to if “their” contact is not in the office.                          to retain.
                                                                     e. If staff found that the opportunity to talk to a reviewer
   In other words, Olive will soon be producing a brochure              for an hour was useful, does this confirm the importance
   on who we are and what we do - see press for details! But            of a talking partner or mentor?
   to start the ball rolling, we have included photos of staff to    f. It is important to involve the entire organisation in the
   attach faces to the Olive name.                                      process.
Future direction:
1. Olive will continue to target mainly NGOs in its                  On the basis of our review, we have learnt a great deal for our
   ‘delivery’ work, although our publications are targeted           own future practice. See the April edition of OD debate for
   at all organisations that deal with organisational                our reflection on and understanding of what makes for a
   change and development.                                           good review and what doesn’t.




    Loretta van Schalkwyk               Nomvula Mdunge                       Pearl Redman                Andra Hellberg-Phillips
         OD & T Team               Admin & Maintenance Teams                  Admin Team                 Communications Team
          Jean works                                                                                         Carol-Ann
                 on a                                                                                        will be
             contract                                                                                        leaving Olive
               basis.                                                                                        soon but will
                                                                                                             probably be
                                                                                                             back within
                                                                                                             a year.


                   Jean Westmore-Suesse                  Warren Banks                    Carol-Ann Foulis
                        OD &T Team               Admin & Communications Teams             OD & T Team


                                          February 97        OD debate     Page Twelve
                                                        coalition list



 List of NGO Coalitions in Eastern and Southern Africa
1. MWENGO (Mwelekeo wa NGO) -                       (postal)   P.O.Box 11224                               Exec. Director)
Reflection and Development Centre for                          Kampala, Uganda         Address (physical): 16 Samora Machel
NGOs in East and Southern Africa           Telephone No: +256-(0)41-530575 or                    (postal): P.O.Box CY 250
Contact Person:      Ezra Mbongori                             531150                                      Causeway
                     (Exec. Director)      Fax No: +256-(0)41-531236                                       Harare, Zimbabwe
Address (postal):    P.O.Box HG817         e-mail: deniva@infoma.com                   Telephone No: +263-(0)4-708761
                     Highlands                                                         Fax No: +263-(0)4-794973
                                           4. KENYA
                     Harare, Zimbabwe
                                           The National Council of NGOs                8. MOZAMBIQUE
Telephone No: +263-(0)4-721469
                                           Contact Person:     Murtaza Jaffer          LINK NGO Forum (an Association of
Fax No: +263-(0)4-738310
                                                               (Chief Exec. Officer)   NGOs in Mozambique)
e-mail: mwengo@mango.zw
                                           Address (physical): House No 3,             Contact Person:     Guy Mullin
2. LESOTHO                                                     Chania Avenue                               (Co-ordinator)
Lesotho Council for NGOs                            (postal):  P.O.Box 48278           Address (physical): Rua Mariano
Contact Person:     Mathulo Mokati                             Nairobi, Kenya                              Machado 56,
                    (Human Resource        Telephone No: +254-(0)2-560877 or                               B.Central
                    Dev.Officer)                               562312 or 562323                  (postal): C.P. 2187, Maputo,
Address (physical): 544 Hoohlo Ext.,       Fax No: +254-(0)2-568445                                        Mozambique
                    along Kingsway                                                     Telephone No: +258-(0)1-424100
                                           5. BOTSWANA
         (postal):  Private Bag A445                                                   Fax No: +258-(0)1-423377
                                           Botswana Council of NGOs
                    Maseru 100,                                                        e-mail: forum@link.uem.mz
                                           Contact Person:     Vivian Mazunga
                    Lesotho
                                                               (Admin Assistant)       9. SOUTH AFRICA (Country code: +27)
Telephone No: +266-317205
                                           Address (physical): Plot 508, Ext. 4        a. South African National NGO
Fax No: +266-310412
                                                               Gaborone,               Coalition
2. SWAZILAND                                                   Botswana                Contact Person:     Kumi Naidoo
Co-ordinating Assembly of NGOs                      (postal):  Private Bag 00418                           (Executive
(CANGO)                                                        Gaborone,                                   Director)
Contact Person:     Dumisile Shabangu                          Botswana                Address (physical): 4 Melridge
                    (Director)             Telephone No: +267-311319                                       56 Stiemens Street
Address (physical): Mandlenkosi            Fax No: +267-311319                                             Braamfontein,
                    Ecumenical Centre                                                                      2017, South Africa
                    142 Esser Street       6. NAMIBIA
                                                                                                (postal):  P.O.Box 31471
         (postal):  P.O.Box 3084           Namibian Non-governmental
                                                                                                           Braamfontein,
                    Manzini, Swaziland     Organisation Forum (NANGOF)
                                                                                                           2017, South Africa
Telephone No: +268-52511 or 53587          Contact Person:     Naftali Uirab
                                                                                       Telephone No: 011-4037746
Fax No: +268-53587                                             (Chairperson)
                                                                                       Fax No: 011-4038703
                                           Address (physical): Axali Doeseb Street
3. UGANDA                                                                              e-mail: ngocoal@sn.apc.org
                                                               18 Windhoek West
Development Network of Indigenous                   (postal):  P.O.Box 7043            b. Private Agencies Collaborating
Voluntary Associations (DENIVA)                                Khomasdal,              Together (PACT)
Contact Person:     Prof. Jassy B.                             Namibia                 Contact Person:     Yvette Henley (Co-
                    Kwesinga               Telephone No: +264-(0)61-239469                                 ordinator)
                    (Exec. Secretary)      Fax No: +264-(0)61-239471                   Address (postal):   P.O.Box 32286
Address (physical): 490 off Mkerere Rd                                                                     Braamfontein,
                    Kagugube Zone          7. ZIMBABWE                                                     2017, South Africa
                    Block 9 (near Law      National Association of NGOs (NANGO)        Telephone No: 011-4033010/1/2
                    Dev. Center)           Contact Person: Jonah Mudewhe (Acting       Fax No: 011-4031104


                  International NGO Coalitions/Councils
1. International Council of Voluntary                           Switzerland            4. United Nations Association in
Agencies (ICVA)                            Telephone No: +41-(0)22-7988400             Canada - Vancouver Branch
Contact Person:     Rudolph Von            Fax No: +41-(0)22-7887366                   Address (physical): 101-1956 Broadway
                    Bernuth (Executive     e-mail: ngls@unctad.org                                          Vancouver, BC
                    Director)                                                                   (postal):   VEJ 1Z2
                                           3. Co-ordinating Committee for
Address (physical): 13 rue Gautier                                                                          Vancouver, Canada
                                           International Voluntary Service
                    1201 Geneva                                                        Telephone No: +1 (0)604 732-0448
                                           (CCIVS)
         (postal):  C.P. 216                                                           Fax No: +1 (0)604 736- 8963
                                           Contact Person:       Nigel Watt
                    1211 Geneva 21
                                                                 (Director)            5. International Organisation
                    Switzerland
                                           Address (physical): Maison de I’Unesco      Development Association (IODA)
Telephone No: +41-(0)22-908 0770
                                                                 1 rue Miollis         Contact Person:      Sherrie Wood
Fax No: +41-(0)22-738-9904
                                                                 75015 Paris, France                        (Secretary)
2. United Nations Non-governmental                   (postal):   75732 Paris,          Address (postal):    P O Box 40323
Liaison Service (NGLS)                                           Cedex 15,                                  Providence, RI
Contact Person:    Tony Hill                                     France                                     02940, USA
                   (Co-ordinator)          Telephone No: +3- (0)1-45682731/2           Telephone No: +1 (0)401 351-6931
Address (postal):  Palais des Nations      Fax No: +33-(0)1-42730521                   Fax No: as above
                   CH-1211 Geneva 10       e-mail: ccivs@zcc.net                       e-mail: IODA212016@AOL.com

                                         February 97     OD debate       Page Thirteen
                                                                 odelia


                                                                          defensible reasons for stating that (in terms of ageism
    Dear Odelia                                                           or gender charges).
    We are a small NGO with 22                                        •   Selecting people to attend the interview. Because the
    people working for the                                                new Act does not define applicants, this term may
    organisation - 6 staff members                                        include anyone who has sent in an application for a job.
    are on a fixed 2 year contract                                        Even at this very early stage, it is therefore crucial that
                                                                          one does not unfairly discriminate. Selection criteria for
    and the rest are regarded as
                                                                          choosing the first round of applicants should ideally be
    “permanent” (if people in NGOs                                        determined prior to the receipt of any applications if one
    can ever regard themselves as                                         wants to prove non-discrimination.
    “permanent”!). We heard that                                      •   Conducting the selection interviews. You need to be
    the new Labour Relations Act was passed in November                   careful about the kinds of questions you ask during the
    last year and were wondering if this will affect us in any            interview. Asking a woman how many children she has
    way. Surely NGOs don’t need to worry about such things?               and who will look after them, is a big “no-no”! In
    If we are wrong, what is it that we need to know so that              gathering information from job applicants, the employer
    we don’t get into trouble?                                            should continually check “why do I need to know this?”
                                                                      •   Reference checking. As with selection interviews, the
    Curiously yours                                                       questions posed in reference checks need to be
    N.O. Rules                                                            carefully considered. Asking for a referee’s opinion is
                                                                          of little use unless they can provide some verification
                                                                          for what they say.
Dear N.O. Rules
                                                                      ❷ The second important area for NGOs is the area of
I’m afraid there are a couple of things about the new                 unfair dismissals. In terms of the new LRA, a dismissal
Labour Relations Act (LRA) that you do need to know. For              would automatically be regarded as unfair, if the reason
one, if you look at who is covered by the new Act, you will           for the dismissal:
find that it includes all employees and people seeking                • is based on discrimination against the staff member
employment, including domestic workers, farm workers,                     on grounds of race, gender, sex, age, marital status,
teachers and lecturers, public sector workers and the                     family responsibility, political opinion, etc.
South African Police Services.                                        • is participation in a strike.
    These inclusions differ from the previous Act and                 • is because a staff member is pregnant or intends
eliminate confusion that previously reigned about who was,                falling pregnant.
or was not, covered by the Act. In particular, the fact that          • is because a staff member takes action against the
persons seeking employment are also covered by the law has                employer or exercises any right conferred by the Act.
a number of significant implications for NGOs (but more of            • is because the staff member refuses to do the work of
that later). The only people who are excluded from the Act                striking staff.
are members of the South African National Defence Force,
                                                                          Furthermore, a dismissal is unfair if the employer fails
South African Secret Service and the National Intelligence
                                                                      to provide a fair reason for the dismissal (substantive
Agency. So, unless Defence, Secret Service and Intelligence
                                                                      fairness) or if a fair procedure is not followed (procedural
have found their way into the independent sector, in all
                                                                      fairness) during the disciplinary inquiry.
likelihood your staff members fall within the group of
                                                                          There are some guidelines which you might want to
people covered by the Act. For this reason, you need to
                                                                      keep in mind to ensure that you fulfil the requirements of
concern yourself with understanding some of its key
                                                                      procedural fairness:
elements. It is also worthwhile to note that much of what is
contained in the Constitution and Bill of Rights is repeated          1. The accused staff member is entitled to representation or
or expanded upon in the new LRA. All these documents are                 assistance from a fellow staff member or shop steward.
closely linked.                                                       2. The staff member must be informed of the charge or
                                                                         allegation which is being laid against him/her.
❶ Firstly, let’s return to the definition of “employee”. The
                                                                      3. The staff member must be given notice of the inquiry in
new LRA includes potential job applicants in the
                                                                         order to prepare a response to the charges.
definition of employee, so organisations need to be very
                                                                      4. The staff member is required to be present at the
careful about how they go about recruiting new staff
                                                                         disciplinary inquiry.
members. If any of the recruitment procedure is deemed
                                                                      5. The “accused” has the right to call witnesses.
to be discriminatory, job applicants can institute legal
                                                                      6. An impartial chair must head up the inquiry.
action against the organisation.
                                                                      7. The staff member has the right to challenge the evidence.
    Consideration needs to be given to the following issues:
                                                                      8. The staff member has the right to appeal through the
•     Advertising the vacancy. Positions need to be                      statutory or organisational dispute procedure.
      advertised widely within the organisation as well as
                                                                         So, next time you are conducting a disciplinary inquiry,
      outside. The medium that is chosen to communicate
                                                                      make sure you follow these guidelines to prevent your
      the vacancy should not unfairly disadvantage one
                                                                      organisation from being charged with unfair dismissal.
      group over another, e.g. consideration should be given
      to the readership of the newspaper that is used for             ❸ Thirdly, a new component of the Labour Relations Act is
      advertising purposes. “Word-of-mouth” is not regarded           the formation of workplace forums. While it is unlikely that
      as fair practice for advertising a position.                    any NGOs will be legally required to set up a workplace
•     Wording of the advertisement. Only specifications               forum (it only applies to organisations which employ more
      which are based on the inherent requirements of the             than 100 staff), the principles underpinning these forums
      job should be included in the advert, e.g. if the advert        ensure participation and transparency in the workplace.
      specifies that you require a man under 30 years of                  In putting in place a structure like this, a distinction is
      age, you need to ensure that you have valid and                 made between those areas where staff should be involved

                                          February 97       OD debate       Page Fourteen
                                                             odelia


in decision-making and those areas which only require
consultation with staff. Issues for joint decision-making                        Purpose of the new
include:
•   disciplinary codes and procedures,                                          Labour Relations Act
•   affirmative action (AA) plans, and                            The purpose of the Act is to advance economic
•   rules relating to conduct of staff members.
                                                                  development, social justice, labour peace and the
   These differ from those areas where the employer is
                                                                  democratisation of the workplace; to reform the law
required to consult with staff, e.g.
                                                                  governing labour relations and, for that purpose;
•   the introduction of new technology
•   changing the organisation of work                             ❐        to give effect to section 27 of the Constitution1;
•   education and training
•   retrenchments                                                 ❐        to regulate the organisational rights of trade unions;
•   job-grading.
                                                                  ❐        to promote and facilitate collective bargaining at the
    In these areas, leadership of organisations would have
the final say on decisions that need to be made. These
                                                                           workplace and at sectoral level;
examples raise some interesting questions for NGOs about          ❐        to regulate the right to strike and the recourse to
issues of participation in decision-making.
                                                                           lock-out in conformity with the Constitution;
❹ The last issue of relevance to NGOs which I want to
discuss is about alternative dispute resolution procedures        ❐        to promote employee participation in decision-
and the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and                         making through the establishment of workplace
Arbitration (CCMA).                                                        forums;
    A new system of dispute resolution has been
introduced by the Act which includes the introduction of a        ❐        to provide simple procedures for the resolution of
Labour Court to replace the old Industrial Court and                       labour disputes through statutory conciliation,
conciliation boards. It is possible that disputes might
                                                                           mediation and arbitration (for which purpose the
arise in NGOs around issues such as dismissals,
grievances, retrenchments, etc. For this reason, it is                     Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and
important for NGOs to be aware of the new system that is                   Arbitration has been established), and through
in place which they can make use of.                                       independent alternative dispute resolution services
    In particular, it is important to know about the CCMA.                 accredited for that purpose;
This is an independent statutory body (funded by the
state) which has the function of providing advice on              ❐        to establish the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court
dispute procedures, assisting with unresolved disputes, as                 as superior courts, with exclusive jurisdiction to decide
well as providing advice and training in a number of other                 on matters arising from the Act;
areas such as AA programmes or dismissal procedures.
They have a national office in Johannesburg and can be            ❐        to provide for a simplified procedure for the
contacted on 011-3776650. Offices are also located in the                  registration of trade unions and employer’s
main centres of each province.                                             organisations, and to provide for their regulation to
    In looking at those issues in the LRA which are
                                                                           ensure democratic practices and proper financial
relevant for NGOs, I feel a little like a child who has stolen
the last cookie out of the cookie jar. Last time I didn’t get              control;
wrapped over the knuckles, but who knows what will                ❐        to give effect to the public international law
happen this time?
                                                                           obligations of the Republic relating to labour relations;
    By this I mean that for a long time NGOs have “got
away” with a fairly slack or lax attitude towards                 ❐        to amend and repeal certain laws relating to labour
employment standards and labour relations. With an                         relations; and
increasing awareness, all round, of one’s rights and
responsibilities it is unlikely that this situation will be       ❐        to provide for incidental matters.
tolerated in the future. It is also rather sad and surprising
that a sector which concerns itself with the fair treatment
of others, sometimes falls short on the home-front.               1
                                                                        Section 27, which is in the Chapter on Fundamental Rights in
    But your interest is heartening! The new LRA makes                  the Constitution entrenches the following rights:
for relatively easy reading and I would strongly suggest
                                                                  a. Every person shall have the right to fair labour practices.
that you get a copy of it and spend some time familiarising
yourself with its contents and those issues which are of          b. Workers shall have the right to form and join trade unions, and
particular relevance to NGOs.                                        employers shall have the right to form and join employers’
                                                                     organisations.
References
                                                                  c. Workers and employers shall have the right to organise and
Focus on Nedlac. December 1996. A user’s guide to the                bargain collectively.
new LRA. South African Labour Bulletin. Vol. 20 Number 6
pp40-45. Umanyano Publications: Johannesburg.                     d. Workers shall have the right to strike for the purpose of
                                                                     collective bargaining.
Milne, E. March 1996. Tuning-in to the new LRA. People
Dynamics, pp25-30. Institute of Personnel Management:             e. Employers= recourse to the lock-out for the purpose of
Johannesburg.                                                        collective bargaining shall not be impaired, subject to
Labour Relations Bill , RSA.                                         subsection 33(1).

                                        February 97         OD debate     Page Fifteen
                                                              civil society
      VIETNAM



                    Trying to explain the
                   enormity of Cambodia
           LAO
              S




THAILAND



     CAMBODIA CHRIS DAMMERS is a freelance development consultant 1in social and economic development
     Phnom Penh    and human rights issues. In 1996 he worked on a study commissioned by the NGO Forum
                    on Cambodia which sought to examine and compare different approaches and strategies
               towards development assistance used in Cambodia. These are some of his reflections on Cambodia.


      ow do I explain the enormity of Cambodia in a few                 process of development. Many foreign agencies stress the

H     short paragraphs? How do I link the experience of
      Cambodia to South Africa? And what are common
issues in debates over development?
                                                                        transience of their own presence, and of the need to ‘do
                                                                        themselves out of a job’. Yet few have a focused strategy
                                                                        for doing this, and many underestimate the time needed
    The appalling ravages of the Pol Pot regime which                   for Cambodian institutions to develop, and misunderstand
ruled Cambodia from 1976 to 1979 are well known. Under                  strategies for promoting such a process. Many assume that
Pol Pot about a million Cambodians, one in eight of the                 training automatically translates into capacity building. It
population, died from warfare, starvation, disease,                     doesn’t. Few ask hard enough questions about whether the
overwork and executions, in the name of a programme of                  outcomes of their interventions are really sustainable. And
social transformation more extreme than anything seen                   far too many international agencies still run their
this century.                                                           programmes in comparative isolation from Cambodian
    The subsequent Vietnamese-backed government (1979-                  institutions, and have limited understanding of the society
1993) faced international isolation from all but a few Soviet-          they are trying to help.
bloc countries. After an initial period when relief and                     Pol Pot famously wanted Cambodia to return to ‘year
rehabilitation programmes were mounted, United Nations                  zero’, to start from scratch, or at least return to an
(UN) and Western bilateral agencies withdrew from the                   imaginary utopian peasant past. In doing so he came close
country, though several international NGOs remained. The                to destroying his country. After his fall, Cambodia’s
new government extended state and party control over the                poverty was compounded by its isolation. It is sobering to
country. Wider development of civil society was not on the              see how capacity has stagnated - particularly by
agenda, and Cambodian NGOs and CBOs did not exist.                      comparison with neighbouring countries in south-east
    Political deadlock between the Vietnamese-backed                    Asia. The building of government capacity, and of civil
government and the exiled Khmer Rouge and its Royalist                  society, is a lengthy process.
allies continued until the Paris Peace Agreements of 1991                   So there are after all some similarities between
which led to UN-sponsored elections in 1993. The elections              Cambodia and South Africa. Both countries:
were won by the Royalist party, FUNCINPEC, which then
                                                                        •    are trying to escape from the legacy of governments
entered into an uneasy coalition with the Cambodian
                                                                            with a pernicious, unworkable ideology, though from
People’s Party (CPP), the party of the ousted regime which
                                                                            opposite ends of the political spectrum.
retained de facto control of much of the country. (The
                                                                        •   are finding that a political settlement based on
Khmer Rouge boycotted the election and continued a
                                                                            democratic elections does not banish the past.
destabilising presence on the Thai border). Cambodia
                                                                        •   underwent international isolation, including to a
embarked on a rapid transition from socialism to capitalism.
                                                                            degree from the ‘development debate’ as conducted by
    From 1992 Cambodia was subjected to an
                                                                            its mainstream proponents - a debate which anyway
international presence of great intensity. An enormous UN
                                                                            only appears on the agenda in conditions of
military and civilian apparatus was supplemented by
                                                                            comparative stability.
international agencies of all kinds - relief agencies,
                                                                        •   are finding that their recent readmission to the
development agencies, missionary societies; multilateral,
                                                                            ‘international community’ can sometimes be a mixed
bilateral, non-governmental.
                                                                            blessing, even a new source of disempowerment.
    Cambodia was isolated, impoverished and unprepared.
Foreigners were setting most of the agendas, particularly                   Of course the differences are even more striking.
in aid and development, and development agencies have                   Visiting South Africa in 1995 I found myself disagreeing
remained even though the UN troops and most of the                      with development NGOs and CBOs who believed that their
international observers have gone.                                      days were numbered, that the government did not want
    Cambodian NGOs started to develop only from 1992 -                  them, and that their donors would abandon them all at
initially mainly in the human rights field, then increasingly           any minute. Of course NGOs faced changes and challenges
in development. The sector is still weak, especially for                but I thought they underestimated the strength of their
CBOs. In some ways the international NGOs are in an                     situation, both in relation to the politics of the New South
analogous situation to service NGOs in South Africa,                    Africa, and to wider international developments.
aspiring to support Cambodian NGOs and CBOs. Only a                     Apartheid was an almost uniquely unpleasant political
handful of Cambodian NGOs are performing a similar role.                system, but it did not or could not destroy civil society, nor
    Most of these international NGOs, are happy to                      all the organisations of those who opposed it. South Africa
acknowledge the centrality of Cambodian institutions,                   has a civil society which has a good deal of potential - and
whether governmental or non-governmental, in any                        not only by comparison with countries like Cambodia.
1
    This study was undertaken by INTRAC (International NGO Training and Research Centre).
    Contact INTRAC for a copy of the study report: PO Box 563, Oxford OX2 6RZ; UK. e-mail: intrac@gn.apc.org

                                           February 97        OD debate        Page Sixteen

						
Related docs