LAB UPDATE
Feb. 15, 2006
Dr. Beverly Dickson
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
An antibody mediated adverse effect of heparin that is important because of its strong association with venous and arterial thrombosis.
Heparin exposure may be any preparation (LMWH) by any route (flushes), and with any dose.
HEPARIN INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA Clinicopathological Syndrome Clinical:
Serologic:
Thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis
High titer platelet activating HIT antibodies by sensitive antigen and/or activation assays
Clinical Features of HIT
Timing of thrombocytopenia Typical onset: between days 5 and 10 after starting heparin Rapid onset: < 1 day following resumption of heparin (usually in a patient recently exposed to heparin, who therefore has residual circulating HIT antibodies) Severity of thrombocytopenia Platelet count nadir: < 20,000/µL in 10% of patients; < 150,000/µL in 85% of patients Thrombosis is common > 50% develop new thrombosis Venous thrombosis: deep venous thrombosis > pulmonary embolism > warfarininduced venous limb gangrene > adrenal hemorrhagic necrosis* > cerebral sinus thrombosis Arterial thrombosis: limb artery thrombosis > stroke syndrome > myocardial infarction > mesenteric artery thrombosis Absence of petechiae (even with platelets < 20,000/µL) Skin lesions at heparin injection sites Severity ranges from erythematous plaques to skin necrosis Acute systemic reactions following intravenous bolus heparin Acute inflammatory or cardiorespiratory signs and symptoms associated with abrupt platelet count fall Consultative Hemostasis and Thrombosis, 2002, pg358.
Consultative Hemostasis and Thrombosis 2002, pg 359
DRUG INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA MECHANISMS
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Frequency Onset after beginning treatment Platelet count Sequelae
Approx. 1/100 5-14 days
Quinine- or Sulfainduced Thrombocytopenia
Approx. 1/10,000 ≥ 7 days
20 - 150x109/L* Thrombosis
< 20x109/L Bleeding Drug-dependent increase in platelet-associated IgG
Laboratory testing Heparin-dependent platelet activation; Immunoassay using patient (heparin/PF4 antigen) serum
*Some patients have a fall in platelet count but platelet count remains > 150x10 9/L
Simposio Internacional CLAHT PERU 2004
HIT ASSAYS Two Major Classes
Functional activation assays (Serotonin Release Assay): Infer presence of HIT antibodies based on heparin-dependent, platelet activating properties (washed platelets) Antigen Assays (Heparin-PF4 ELISA): Detect HIT antibodies based upon their reactivity with platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexed to heparin or other polyanions (ELISA)
Specificity, %
HIT Diagnostic Assay
Sensitivity, %
Early Platelet Fall
Late Platelet Fall
Platelet SRA
90-98 *
>95
80-97 ‡
Heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay Platelet aggregation test using citrated platelet-rich plasma PF4/heparin EIA
Combination of sensitive platelet activation and PF4-dependent antigen assay
90-98 *
>95 ‡
80-97 ‡
35-85 >90 *
100 *
90◊ >95
>95
82◊ 50-93
80-97
”Early” refers to a fall in the platelet count that begins within the first 4 d of starting heparin; “late” refers to a fall that begins on day 5 or later. The specificity varies because late thrombocytopenia due to a reason other than HIT may nevertheless show a false-positive HIT antibody result because of subclinical HIT antibody seroconversion. *Sensitivity defined in relation to those patients in prospective studies who had a positive test result when the platelet count fell by ≥50% after ≥5 days of heparin therapy, and in whom the available clinical information (particularly, evidence for alternative explanations for thrombocytopenia and the effect of stopping or continuing heparin) supported the diagnosis of HIT. However, about 30-40% of samples (app. 2% overall) give a repeated “indeterminate” result, and the activation assay is nondiagnostic. ‡ Assumes that the heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay test and SRA have similar sensitivity and specificity profiles; other platelet activation end points that may also give acceptable results using washed platelets include detection of platelet-derived micro particles by flow cytometry. ◊ Assumes that a 90% specificity in early thrombocytopenia attributable to non-HIT disorders (eg, nonspecific platelet activation related to acute inflammatory proteins) declines to an 82% specificity in late thrombocytopenia that may be attributable to subclinical HIT antibody seroconversion. Clinicopathologic definition assumes that at least one sensitive test result must be positive for diagnosis of HIT; specificity of the activation assay is indicated.
Localization of thromboembolic complications associated with HIT
Thromb Haemost 2005:94:132-5.
Type of TEC
Arterial Limb artery Thrombotic stroke
Number of TECs (%)
126 (29.2%) 71 (16.4%) 26 (6.0%)
Aortic Thrombosis Myocardial infarction
Other Venous Proximal DVT
16 (3.7%) 10 (2.3%)
3 (0.7%) 306 (70.8%) 114 (26.4%)
Pulmonary embolism Distal DVT
Cerebral vein (sinus) thrombosis Other
103 (23.8%) 78 (18.1%)
7 (1.6%) 4 (0.9%)
Simposio Internacional CLAHT PERU 2004
Clinical Assessment: Inclusion Criteria
History of heparin exposure Thrombocytopenia during and after heparin exposure (<150,000)
Drop in platelet count (<50%) rather than absolute thrombocytopenia
Smaller drop in platelets (especially skin necrosis) Early-onset of thrombocytopenia with heparin re-exposure caused by circulating antibodies Platelet count may rarely be normal when patient presents with thrombosis (delayed-onset HIT)
Thrombocytopenia recovers after heparin withdrawal
Median time to platelet count recovery after heparin withdrawal is 4 days
Platelet Monitoring for HIT ACCP Consensus Conference, 2004
HIT risk >0.1% - platelet count monitoring Patients recently treated with heparin starting UFH
Platelet count baseline within 24 hours
Acute systemic reaction post UFH bolus
Immediate platelet count
Patients receiving therapeutic dose UFH
Every other day platelet count until day 14 or UFH stopped, whichever is first
Postoperative patients, UFH prophylaxis
(HIT risk >1%) Every other day platelet count until 14 days or UFH stopped.
HIT Patient Risk Groups 1-5% risk (highest)
Post-op vascular, ortho, cardiac patients receiving UFH for 1-2 weeks
0.1-1% risk (rare to infrequent HIT)
Medical and obstetric patients receiving prophylactic doses of UFH Post-op patients receiving LMWH Post-op/critical care patients with UFH flushes Medical patients receiving LMWH after one or several preceding doses of UFH
HIT
A negative laboratory test for HIT antibodies should never be used as the sole criterion for restarting heparin therapy.
HIT CONCLUSIONS Routine platelet monitoring rather than HIT Antibody studies is most useful to identify patients who are at risk for thrombosis Although functional and antigen assays are sensitive in detecting HIT antibodies, neither is completely specific for HIT syndrome The diagnostic interpretation of these laboratory tests must be made in the context of clinical pretest probability of HIT
Clindamycin Disk Inductive Test for Staphylococcus spp. “D Test” • Routinely performed on Staphylococcus that test resistant to erythromycin but are susceptible to clindamycin • Many MRSA that cause community acquired infections have msrA gene
D Test
Resistance to macrolides (e.g. erythromycin) can occur by two different mechanisms with the resulting phenotypes noted below: Mechanism Determinant (gene) msrA Erythromycin Clindamycin
Efflux
R
S
Ribosome alteration
erm erm
R R
S* R (constitutive)
msrA=macrolide streptogramin (type B) resistance Erm=erythromycin ribosome methylase; encodes enzymes that confer inducible (MLS Bi) or constitutive (MLSBc) resistance to MLS agents via methylation of the 23S rRNA *requires induction to demonstrate resistance MLS=macrolide lincosamide (e.g. clindamycin) streptogramin (type B)
Inducible Clindamycin Resistance (erm-mediated)
Helicobacter pylori Tests at PHD
CLO-Test HpSA Rapid urease Stool antigen test
Sensitivity Specificity
Invasive Non-invasive
FDA Detects active approved test infection for cure
CLO HpSA
80-98%
93-100%
Yes
Yes
92-97% 80-95%
90-95% 80-95%
Yes No
Yes No
Serology
Helicobacter pylori
AGG/AGA Graded Recommendations 2005
For patients ≤ 55 years without alarm features, the clinician may use either “test and treat” for H. pylori or acid suppression therapy. (A)
Point of Care
PT
Blood Gas (TIS) 6+
I-STAT
ACT
i calcium
creatinine
Additional POC instruments: Hemocue, Accu-Chek, Clinitek, DCA 2000 (A1c)
Point of Care
Limitations
Method dependent Technique dependent
Interferences: known and unknown
Drugs Metabolic Other
Chemical Pathology
Are your hands clean enough for point-of-care electrolyte analysis? Hugh S. Lam*, Michael H.M. Chan, Pak C. Ng*, William Wong*, Robert C.K.Cheung, Alan K.W. So*, Tai F. Fok* and Christopher W.K. Lam
Departments of *Paediatrics and Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong ______________________________________________________________________
Pathology (August 2005) 37(4) pp.299-304
Case #1 POC/INR
The patient is a 75 year old female with history of frequent TIA, recently placed on coumadin Upon ambulatory clinic visit her I-STAT INR was > 8.0 but Core Lab INR was 4.1
What might cause this discrepancy? → technique → interference → reagents → instrument malfunction
POC/INR Interferences
Lupus anticoagulant/anticardiolipin Ab LMWH Direct thrombin inhibitors Daptomycin
Case #2 ED/I-STAT +6
I-STAT Core Lab
A middle aged male presented to the ED post grand mal seizure. Patient had a history of hyponatremic episodes secondary to anti-convulsant drug therapy.
Na
132
140
K Cl BUN AG
Glu
3.7 103 13 N/A
159
4.0 100 10 31
158
Hgb
17
14
Accu-Chek Inform Meter Accu-Chek Comfort Curve Strip
A whole blood glucose test strip that delivers plasma-like test results.
Case #3 ICU/Accu-Chek Inform Meter
The patient is a 75 year old male who was transferred from Lake Pointe in septic shock s/p hernia repair. The patient developed renal failure, liver failure with coagulopathy and respiratory failure. Multiple POC glucoses performed, multiple results discrepant with laboratory.
Date Jan 9 Time* 0754 Core Lab 109 AccuChek 140
Jan 9
Jan 8
0550
1415
88
63
129
99
Jan 8 Jan 8
Jan 8
1055 0630
0350
59 36
38
100 75
74
* Results charted within minutes of each other
Case #3
Metabolic Status Alk Phos ALT 374 U/L 407 U/L
AST Total Bili
Lipase CK
2697 U/L 5.4 mg/dL
2347 U/L 863 U/L
Creatinine TnI
Calcium i Calcium Anion gap
4.7 mg/dL 0.5 ng/mL
5.5 mg/dL 0.71 mmol/L 24
PT INR
Lactic Acid
32.8 sec 3.0
10.7 mmol/L
Accu-Chek Comfort Curve Strip Known Interferences
Galactose Maltose Xylose Bilirubin (> 20 mg/dL) Lipemia (> 5000 mg/dL) Acetaminophen (> 8 mg/dL) Uric acid Low Hct (< 20%) High Hct > 65% @ ≤ 200 mg/dL > 55% @ > 200 mg/dL Mannitol Icodextrin
60 mg/dL glucose concentration
500 mg/dL glucose concentration
Clinica Chimica Acta 356 (2005) 178-183.
CAPILLARY BLOOD GLUCOMETER VS REFERENCE STANDARD
Crit Care Med 2005 Vol 33, no.12.
ARTERIAL BLOOD GLUCOMETER AND REFERENCE STANDARD
Crit Care Med 2005 Vol 33, No 12
POC Glucose
meters originally designed to test glucose in diabetics with normal hematocrit ICU patients may suffer from multiple metabolic +/or hematologic derangements ICU patients may be treated with multiple drugs
Results which do not seem realistic in view of the clinical assessment should be repeated in the Core Laboratory.
Urine Drug Screen
Immunoassay
Does it detect oxycodone?
Basic urine drug immunoassay testing for opiates tests primarily for morphine (heroin and codeine metabolized to morphine). These tests do not generally detect low to moderate oxycodone use.
STAT Quantitative Serum Toxicology Assays Required to Support the ED
acetaminophen lithium salicylate theophylline valproic acid co-oximetry digoxin phenobarbital iron transferrin ETOH MEOH ethylene glycol
Oxycodone
To detect compliance, abuse or toxicity
best detected by specific assay detection levels < 100ug/L necessary
Urine Drug Screen
Immunoassay
Drug PCP Opiates
Amphetamines
X-reaction
Dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, sertraline Quinolone antibiotics
Detects all types of sympathomimetic amines (including those in OTC diet suppressants and cold medications)
sammyc2007 4/27/2008 |
71 |
1 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/24/2008 |
135 |
5 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/23/2008 |
169 |
5 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/24/2008 |
475 |
36 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/24/2008 |
363 |
38 |
0 |
educational
NIHhealth 7/9/2008 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 3/24/2008 |
207 |
16 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/28/2008 |
178 |
11 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/17/2008 |
41 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/23/2008 |
92 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/24/2008 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/25/2008 |
40 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
307 |
4 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
269 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
328 |
4 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
283 |
3 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
541 |
2 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
449 |
1 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
264 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
241 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
367 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
332 |
0 |
0 |
legal