ROMULUS, L.L.C. PAST PERFORMANCE CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START FINISH Contract No: N00164-05-P- 3/18/2005 9/30/2005 0576 Contract No:N00024-01- 12/2/2004 8/1/2005 D-7010; Purchase Order: 003231 N00140-D-00-0094 9/30/2004 6/20/2005 Purchase Order: 86269978 Purchase Order: 18280- 6/15/2004 11/20/2004 046-04 Purchase Order: 52407- 4/14/2004 8/31/2004 001-07 GS-23F-8006H; Project 1/9/2004 8/31/2005 Nr: 07680.004.751W.811; Purchase Order: S768033598 N00140-D-00-0094 9/30/2003 6/20/2005 Purchase Order: 86269978 N00164-03-D-0013; 9/30/2003 9/30/2004 Task Order: 083; Agreement NR: A150200440 N00140-D-00-0094; 9/9/2003 6/20/2005 Purchase Order: 86269982 N00140-D-00-0094 9/9/2003 8/31/2004 86269970 N00140-D-00-0094 7/31/2003 9/30/2003 Delivery Order: 0085 Purchase Order: 267514 ROMULUS, L.L.C. PAST PERFORMANCE CORE AREAS WORKED PRIME KTR ULTIMATE CUSTOMER TASKS 1. The contractor shall coordinate Fleet Forces Command (FFC) ROMULUS NSWC CRANE, Fleet Forces N43 inputs and comments in support of the TMA/TMI process. Command, NSWC Carderock 2. As requested by FFC N43, the contractor shall support the N43 Fleet Metrics Working Group. 3. The contractor shall review the N43 Fleet Metrics four phase TMA/TMI Problem Resolution process and the three tiered Common WC Readiness Assessment Process & Metrics proposed by the Warfare Center RM&A Working Group. Graphical descriptions of these processes are provided in Appendix A (SOW). The review shall assess the adequacy of each approach as an effective system and equipment problem identification and resolution process. Emphasis shall be placed on strengths and weaknesses of each system in performing their intended functions. A report shall be prepared outlining the results of the review, with recommendations for integration of the two processes into a single process. A briefing of the results of the study and report shall be prepared for FFC N43, the Warfare Center RM&A Metrics Working Group, and the Surfacecontractor shall Area Director. of the data available 4. The Warfare Product perform a study to support a ships systems and equipment problem and identification process. The study shall also include a review of the adequacy, timeliness in reporting and accuracy of the Navy Maintenance, Material Management (3M) data. The contractor shall prepare a report outlining the findings of the study, with recommendations on how better to use the existing data, and possible ways of making it more suitable to support a problem identification and resolution system. 5. The contractor shall assist the Warfare Center RM&A Metrics Working group develop a strategy for design of a system which integrates the Type Commanders Readiness Management System and the Warfare Center Problem Identification and Resolution system into a single Readiness 1. Commander Submarine Forces (COMSUBFOR): Using the methodology of Perot Systems Commander Submarine Michael Porter; provide Submarine Force Modernization, Depot Maintenance and Forces Interdeployment Readiness Cycle Maintenance process maps; identify the value chain primary and secondary activities in each, identify metrics associated with the primary activities that permit COMSUBFOR to monitor activities and take timely action to avoid cost and schedule overruns. 1. Recommend a Concept of Operations for the Engineering Department of the TITAN- Fleet Technical Support new Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center; Identify the primary Products and UNIDYNE Center Atlantic Services provided; recommend metrics to measure efficiency of product/service delivery and identification of savings to the Navy; recommend a hierarchical, "dashboard" arrangement that will "drill down" from Top-level to lowest workcenter. 1. Phase 1C Conceptual Design of the Royal Australian Navy Air Warfare ROMULUS Gibbs & Cox, Inc. Destroyer (RAN AWD): Provide response to the Integrated Logistics Support DID to include all plans and actions necessary through construction of the RAN AWD to provide for maintenance, training, shore infrastructure, provisioning and all remaining ILS elements. Provide the depot maintenance plan and schedule; manning and watch stations through all peacetime and wartime steaming conditions. 1. Provide training on how the Navy operates at the waterfront. ROMULUS Gibbs & Cox, Inc. 1. Shore Maintenance Manager Course Curriculum Director: Provide services to SAIC-AMSEC Commander, Naval Surface maintain a Curriculum that stays up-to-date with the Surface Navy latest Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet processes, procedures, policies and best practices for the Management of Ship Maintenance. The Course is designed for delivery to Maintenance Activity Commanding Officers and all managers who make maintenance or financial decisions. 2. Shore Maintenance Manager Course Instructor: Schedule and conduct courses Commander, Naval Surface in all east coast Regional Maintenance Centers. Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet 1. Waterfront Maintenance Technician: Commander Naval Surface Forces wishes Fleet Technical Support to continue deployment of a concept of attaching Fleet Technical Support Center Center Atlantic Field Service Engineers to Maintenance Teams. Using the results of the Pilot Program, refine the Concept of Operations for this new position, Identify additional Knowledge Skills and Abilities (KSA's) required, based on newly approved KSA's refine the Course Curriculum and Qualification Program developed under the Pilot Program; design, write and deliver the improved course of instruction to all Mid- Atlantic Regional Mainteance Center WMT's; update, write and deliver the Qualification Program and Qualification Card for Government use. 2. RMC Production Department Support: NAVSEA and the FLEET have agreed to Fleet Technical Support merge the Regional Maintenance Centers with the local Supervisors of Center Atlantic Shipbuilding, Fleet Technical Support Centers, Shore Intermediate Maintenacne Activities and parts of the NAVSEA Homeport Engineering Teams. Based on guidance from the SHIPMAIN Cross-Functional Teams, provide support to identify logical codes to be included in the Production Department and their respctive worcenter assignment, develop mission statements, functions and tasks for the new workcenters. Provide the history of the source codes to aid in understanding during the integration process. 1. LSD 49 Class 30 Ton Crane Control System: Develop a short-term and long- EG&G NSWC CRANE term strategy to maintain the electronic control system. The OEM has gone out of business. 2. NSWC Crane Fleet Maintenance Engineering Support Plan: Develop and NSWC CRANE maintain the NSWC CRANE strategy for interfacing directly with the Fleet at the Headquarters, Type Commander and waterfront maintenance activity levels. Identify NSWC CRANE Core Capabilities and products and services delievered directly to the Fleet. Identify areas where CRANE can improve operations. Provide training to Crane Managers on how the Fleet operates. 3. FTSCPAC support by NSWC Crane ISEA: Identify key personnel at both NSWC CRANE FTSCPAC and NSWC CRANE who are involved in Night Vision Devices and introduce the parties. 4. Crane Distance Support Center Support: As required provide support services to NSWC CRANE the NSWC CRANE Distance Support Center to include, but not limited to, the following: ship location and key personnel, ISEA identification, system identification, supply support, maintenance policy 5. Provide process maps for the maintenance of ships at the Organizational level, NSWC CRANE Intermediate level and Depot level. Include details of the process onboard ship for procurement of material and documentation of maintenance actions in 3M OARS. Provide decision maps used by shipboard leadership to approve, defer or disapprove requested maintenance actions. Provide process maps for off-ship supply infrastructure used to support O, I and D level maintenance. Identify worl- wide Supply stocking points both in NAVY and DOD. identify details of carcass turnaround, gold piles management and disposal. Interface with SIMULEX to provide process details to permit computer modeling the entire process. Identify a Battlegroup Commander Staff to test ideas, methodologies and conclusions. 6. ISEA Metrics Team: Provide support to summarize METRICS methodologies NSWC CRANE and analysis associated with: TRMS, TMA/TMI, MERIT, SUBMEPP RCM Analysis, AVCIM, DUCACA, MRDB, PIR2; make recommendations for actions to integrate Metrics efforts into a common process. 7. Product Area Director (PAD) Support: Surface Warfare Maintenance and NSWC CRANE Logistics PAD: Provide support services to include recommendations for Staff Organization; Mission, Functions and Tasks and initial Priorities, Projects and Contacts. 8. Commander Fleet Forces Command Metrics Support: Provide support services NSWC CRANE, Fleet Forces to NSWC CRANE and NAVSSES through On-Site presence at Fleet Forces Command, NSWC Carderock Command N43. Integrate the efforts of TMA/TMI with the Surface Warfare Logistics and Maintenance Product Area Director (SWLM PAD) RM&A Metrics efforts. 9. Knowledge Management Support: Provide high-level Fishbone Diagram NSWC CRANE overview of requirments and concepts associated with Navy-wide Knowledge Management (KM). Provide overview of efforts underway within Navy associated with KM. Make recommendations for a Navy-wide project to integrate all KM objectives and projects. 10. Shipboard Configuration Validity: Identify the Configuration Management NSWC CRANE process currently in use for Navy Ship Systems. Evaluate the effectiveness of the current system and make recommendations for improvement. 11. Afloat Readiness: Proide a high-level summary of policy and methods currently NSWC CRANE used to evaluate readiness at the CNO, FLEET, TYCOM, Battlegroup, Squadron and Unit Level. Identify Navy areas to be reengineered to support DOD's Sense and Respond Logistics concept. 12. E-Pilot Design Support: Integrating the efforts associated with Knowledge NSWC CRANE Management, Sense and Respond Logistics and Fleet Readiness, make recommendations for high-level concepts to drive an E-Business Architecture of the future. 13. Sea Basing Strategy: Using SEAPOWER 21 and Current Efforts of existing NSWC CRANE Sea Basing Working Groups, identify shortfalls in the areas of Ship, Vessel, Lighter , Marine Corps Ground Equipment, and Aviation Maintenance. Use the Sea Basing CONOPS as guide in this study. Identify all current efforts in progress in the R&D, OPNAV and Acquisition Communities. Identify shortfalls and additional efforts recommended: must include recommendations for funding levels and sponsorship. 1. Assessment and Troubleshooting Process: provide ongoing support for the TITAN- Commander, Naval Surface continuous improvement of processes previously developed. (Complete UNIDYNE Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet development of a concept for WMT Assessment and Troubleshooting processes that meet the requirments of the Engineering Barrier Removal Team. Provide documentation of processes for distribution by Handbook. Provide course of instruction.) 2. 2-Kilo Metrics & Process: provide ongoing support for the continuous Commander, Naval Surface improvement of processes previously developed.(Complete development of a Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet concept for WMT 2-KILO Metrics & Processes that meet the requirments of the Engineering Barrier Removal Team. Identify processes associated with 2-Kilos and identify enhancements that permit timekeeping, findings, root cause analysis and antry into the REMAIS System.Provide training.) 3. Common Assessment Team Process: provide ongoing support for the Commander, Naval Surface continuous improvement of processes previously developed. Expand previous Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet concepts to accomplish the goals of the Common Assessmsnt process mandated by the Fleet Maintenance Board of Directors. Previous concept as follows: (Assess the current status of implementation of the the SURFLANT requirements for HMERA II visits. Incorporate recent feedback from the Fleet on HMERA II performance and the concept of Project Management to improve the current process and meet SURFLANT requirments. Provide a course of instruction to FTSCLANT that teaches Project Management utilizing the integration of HM&E and C5 System Test requirments into a Microsoft Project resource loaded schedule.) 1. Ship Work Availability Assist Team (SWAAT): Identify policies, processes, TITAN- Commander, Naval Surface procedures and best practices associated with depot maintenance availabilties that UNIDYNE Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet result in the integration of all O, I and D-level work during a CNO Availability. Integrate these requirments into the ongoing SWAAT effort using the MAXIMO software and associated scheduling tools. Write a DRAFT Handbook for Shipboard Availability Coordinators that teaches all of the processes and procedures resulting from this integrated effort. 2. FTSCLANT HMERA II Test Plan Development: Assess the current status of Commander, Naval Surface implementation of the the SURFLANT requirements for HMERA II visits. Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet Incorporate recent feedback from the Fleet on HMERA II performance and the concept of Project Management to improve the current process and meet SURFLANT requirments. Provide a course of instruction to FTSCLANT that teaches Project Management utilizing the integration of HM&E and C5 System Test requirments into a Microsoft Project resource loaded schedule. 3. SHIPMAIN Maintenance Team Training, Assessment and Troubleshooting Commander, Naval Surface Process: Complete development of a concept for WMT Assessment and Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet Troubleshooting processes that meet the requirments of the Engineering Barrier Removal Team. Provide documentation of processes for distribution by Handbook. Provide course of instruction. 4. SHIPMAIN Maintenance Team Training, 2-KILO Metrics & distribution Process: Commander, Naval Surface Complete development of a concept for WMT 2-KILO Metrics & Processes that Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet meet the requirments of the Engineering Barrier Removal Team. Identify processes associated with 2-Kilos and identify enhancements that permit timekeeping, findings, root cause analysis and antry into the REMAIS System. Provide training. 5. SHIPMAIN Maintenance Team Training, MAI Maintenance Team Test Plan: Commander, Naval Surface Provide a methodology for the deployment of the Master Assessment Index Go- Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet Assess 2-Kilos at the compnent level. Provide a process for the use of the Port Engineer that permits identification of Assessment Tasks screened for individual accomplishment and those for Batch Accomplishment during HMERA and C5RA Visits. 6. SHIPMAIN Maintenance Team Training MAI FTSCLANT Test Teams: see 5 Commander, Naval Surface above Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet 1. Waterfront Maintenance Technician Pilot: Commander Naval Surface Forces TITAN- Fleet Technical Support wishes to deploy a concept of attaching Fleet Technical Support Center Field UNIDYNE Center Atlantic Service Engineers to Maintenance Teams. Using the SHIPMAIN Barrier Removal Team initial guidance, develop a Concept of Operations for this new position, Identify the Knowledge Skills and Abilities (KSA's) required, based on approved KSA's develop a Course Curriculum and Qualification Program; design, write and deliver the course of instruction to an initial Pilot Maintenance Team; design, write and deliver the Qualification Program and Qualification Card for Government use.
Pages to are hidden for
"Past Performance"Please download to view full document