The Interface Between Human and Veterinary Public Health
Emerging Zoonotic Disease Summit Gainesville, Florida August 23, 2005
Lonnie J. King Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation, CDC Dean, CVM, Michigan State University
Historical Epidemiological Transitions
Paleolithic Age
Hunters and gatherers Nomadic Small populations Parasitic infections
Historical Epidemiologic Transitions – 1st Transition
10,000 years ago New social order due to agriculture Zoonoses through animal domestication Increases in infectious diseases Epidemics in non-immune populations
Deadly Gifts
Human Diseases
Measles TB Smallpox Influenza Pertussis Malaria
Animal Origin
Rinderpest of cattle
M. bovis of cattle
Cowpox Pigs and Ducks Pigs and Dogs Birds
Guns, Germs and Steel J. Diamond
Historical Epidemiologic Transitions – 2nd Transition
Coincided with mid-19th century Industrial Revolution Decreases in infectious disease mortality Increasing life expectancy Improved nutrition Antibiotics “Diseases of Civilization” – cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases Environmental problems Chronic diseases
Historical Epidemiologic Transitions – 3rd Transition
Last 25 years Emerging infectious diseases globally New diseases and increases in mortality; first since 19th century Re-emergence Antimicrobial resistance 75 percent of diseases are zoonotic Anthropogenic factors of emergence; the microbial “perfect storm”
“The Perfect Storm” Sebastian Junger
an ocean tempest due to a rare combination of factors and circumstances that might occur every century
MICROBIAL THREATS TO HEALTH
EMERGENCE, DETECTION, AND RESPONSE
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES National Academy Press Washington, DC 2003
The “Microbial” Perfect Storm
Due to special combinations and circumstances Relatively common occurrence Doesn’t dissipate, but may perpetuate or accelerate Convergence model
WHO Map on World – Emerging Diseases
Convergence Model
Genetic and Biological Factors Physical Environmental Factors
Microbe
Human
Social, Political and Economic Factors
Ecological Factors
Convergence Model (Microbial Threats to Health – IOM/NAS, 2003)
Factors in Emergence
Microbial adaptation and change Host susceptibility to infection Climate and weather Changing ecosystems Economic development and land use Human demographics and behavior Technology and industry
Factors in Emergence
continued
International travel and commerce Breakdown of public health measures Poverty and social inequality War and famine Lack of political will Intent to harm
Multihost Pathogens
60% of all human pathogens are zoonotic 80% of animal pathogens Ecological generalists
New Dynamic
Emerging diseases – 70% zoonotic New zoonoses Food safety Antimicrobial resistance Agents of bio- and agro-terrorism – 80% zoonotic Global trade and movements
Rapidly Increasing Human Population
•
6.1 Billion people in 2000 ~9.4 to 11.2 Billion in 2050
•
Source: United Nations, World Population Prospects, The 1998 Revision; and estimates by the Population Reference Bureau.
Rapidly Increasing Urbanization
•
2000
-
47% world population living in urban areas 60% world population living in urban areas
•
2030
-
The Divided World of 2025 – 8.4 Billion People
World 1 World 2 World 3
Advanced nations (Advances in medicine and food) Middle class (Livestock Revolution) People in destitution and poverty (Sources of traditional pathogens)
El Nino
Leptospirosis Hantavirus Rift Valley fever
Vectors of Disease
Global Warming
Shifting and enlarging the incidence and distribution of disease Malaria zone 45% of population to 60% Habitat change and disruption via weather changes
Global Warming Effects on Malaria
Ecosystem
Waterborne Zoonoses
Animals Humans
Waterborne Disease
Microbial Pathogens
Water Environment
Waterborne Zoonoses – Global Threat
4 billion cases of diarrhea per year 2-3 million deaths Poorly reported Zoonotic portion is significant Endemic and epidemic 1.1 billion people with unreliable water supply
Waterborne Zoonoses Pathogens
Cryptosporidium Giardia E. Coli 0157:H7 Salmonella Leptospiria Toxoplasma Campylobacter Entamoeba Ascarsis Viruses and Prions? SARS?
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs)
Their Impact on Food Safety and Healthy Environments
Foodborne Infections
•
Worldwide
> 2 million people die from diarrhea caused by contaminated food and water each year
•
U.S.
~ 76 million persons experience foodborne illnesses (1 in 4 people)
-
~325,000 hospitalizations ~5,000 deaths
-
Most Common Foodborne Pathogens
Campylobacter Salmonella E. coli 0157:H7 Yersinia Listeria Cryptosporidium Cyclospora Norwalk-like viruses
Livestock 2020 – The Next Food Revolution
Global increase and demand for protein and food of animal origin Shift from poverty of 1-2 billion people to middle class “Westernization” of Asia and Latin America Concerns with sustainability Increases in emerging zoonoses through the concentration of people and animals
By 2020, There will be 1 Billion People Over the Age of 60
30% of US population are baby boomers Immuno-compromised population
Movement and Interactions of People and Commerce
Distance and speed of travel increased 1000 fold since 1800 1.4 billion air travelers/year 50 million foreign visitors, to US year through, 102 sites Antibiotic resistance Global trade of food, animals and plants
The Coming Plague
Today’s mingling of people, animals and microbes in new environments has no historical precedent. -”We await the coming plague”
- Laurie Garrett
Remote Sites
Pathogen Pollution
Human and domestic animal populations Free-living wild animals Example: global decline in amphibian populations due to chytridiomycosis Concern with adverse effects on biodiversity
Chytridiomycosis
Virus Carriers
Fruit bats
Flying Foxes
Nipah Virus
Malaysian Pig Farms
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Encroachment Introduction “Spill over” & “Spill back”
Translocation
Wildlife EID
Human encroachment Ex situ contact Ecological manipulation
Agricultural Intensification
Domestic Animal EID
Human EID
Global travel Urbanization Biomedical manipulation
Dasazak P. et.al. Science 2000 287:443
Technology and Industry
Spill Over and Spill Back
What’s Next?
Human Monkeypox Cases
Marshfield Clinic and MCW
Matt Kuehnert
Exotic Pets
SARS
Maintenance Host
SARS Airport Screening
The Lessons of SARS
The need for multinational collaboration Public alarm can lead to huge economic impact $80 billion Weaknesses in public health infrastructures Consequences of poor reporting –disincentives A true zoonosis: more to come Constant threat due to Emerging Infectious Diseases in less developed countries
H5N1 Avian Influenza
Pandemic Influenza
The Next Influenza Pandemic
Not if, but when 1918-1919 Experience: 20 million deaths 150 – 450% increase in patient and hospital visits In 2001 (Asia only), 160 million workdays lost, and for a pandemic, 6 billion workdays lost worldwide
Bioterrorism Biodefense Agroterrorism
Agents of Bioterrorism
Bacteria, Rickettisia, Category Toxins Anthrax; Botulism; Plague; Tularemia Brucellosis; Epsilon toxin of C. perfringens; Glanders; Staphylococcus, enterotoxin B; Q Fever Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Total (% Zoonotic) 6 (83%)
Viruses Smallpox Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
A
5 (80%)
B
C
Hantaviruses; Nipah 4 (80%) virus; Tickborne encephalitis viruses; Yellow Fever
CDC’s Most Significant Global Epidemics Over the Last Decade
1993 – Hanta virus 1994 – Plague (India) Ebola virus (Zaire) 1996 – New Variant of CJD (UK) H5N1 influenza (Hong Kong)
1998 – Nipah virus (Malaysia) 1999 – West Nile 2000 – Rift Valley Fever 2001 – Anthrax 2002 – Norwalk-like viruses 2003 - SARS
Implications of Emerging Diseases
Political Social Economic Psychological Environmental
Animal-borne Epidemics Out of Control: Threatening the Nation’s Health – 2003
A report from the Trust
for America’s Health
Findings from the Report
U.S. lacks a national program to prevent and control diseases that impact humans, animals and our food There is no coordinated effort or single agency with a “command and control” responsibility There is a lack of effective communications with the public about these diseases and their impact Disease surveillance systems are not linked
Findings from the Report
(continued)
Funding for bioterrorism has not adequately supported efforts to counter zoonotic disease threats, especially from the animal health perspective and infrastructure There is a fragmentation of jurisdictions, authorities, statutes and research; e.g. 200 different government offices and programs responding to 5 zoonotic diseases Animal and public health are separated by culture and organization
Microbial Threats to Health Conclusions & Recommendations
1. Enhancing the global response capability 2. Improving global infectious disease surveillance 3. Rebuilding domestic public health capacity 4. Improving domestic surveillance through better disease reporting (this includes both human health and veterinary health) 5. Exploring innovative systems of surveillance 6. Developing and using diagnostics
Microbial Threats to Health Conclusions & Recommendations
(continued)
7. Educating and training the microbial threat workforce 8. Developing and producing vaccines 9. Developing and producing antimicrobial drugs 10. Controlling the use of antimicrobials 11. Controlling vectorborne and zoonotic diseases 12. Establishing a comprehensive infectious disease research 13. Creating interdisciplinary infectious disease centers
Preventing Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Strategy for the 21st Century – CDC
Goal 1: Goal 2: Goal 3: Goal 4: Surveillance and Response Applied Research Prevention and Control Infrastructure and Training
Public Health at the Crossroad
New, inclusive vision of public health Shift to focusing on causes of population health Ensuring that population health is a central concern of policymakers Globalization of causes and issues Socioeconomic disparities Emerging threats due to interdependence New team – expanded, integrated and transdisciplinary
Population health is a shift from an emphasis on individual health to understanding the multiple determinants of health.
Health is an outcome shaped by a wide range of social, economic, natural, built, and political environments that form a complex and everchanging dynamic. Because of this broad perspective, public health teams themselves also need to reflect this reality.