Mental Health and Smoking During Pregnancy
Ellen J. Hahn, DNS, RN Professor University of Kentucky College of Nursing and College of Public Health
Adult Smoking in England compared to Kentucky and the U.S., 2003
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Total Men Women 26 23 33 28 25 24 21 35 31 England Kentucky U.S.
From the Womb to the Tomb
Significance
Only one-third of pregnant women who stop smoking during pregnancy remain smokefree one year after delivery. Infants born to women who smoke have a lower average birth weight.
Tobacco Use and Gender
Women ascribe different meaning to smoking than men. Girls who perceive themselves as heavy are more likely to smoke than boys who think they are heavy.
Women who quit gain more weight than their male counterparts.
Single, low income mothers are more likely to smoke than married women of higher SES
Greatest Barriers to Smoking Cessation Among Pregnant Women
Low education level Smoking by the partner Smoking in the home and elsewhere in the mother’s environment Degree of nicotine addiction Lack of use of interventions known to promote cessation
Background
Health care policy and the use of clinical practice guidelines significantly increase smoking cessation rates among low income pregnant women Pregnant smokers “should be offered extended or augmented psychosocial interventions that exceed minimal advice” Little research on the maternal conditions that influence smoking during and after pregnancy
Purpose
To tailor a previously tested group intervention for depression to a population of pregnant smokers. To test the effect of a cognitive-behavioral group and telephone intervention during pregnancy and the postpartum period on:
Smoking abstinence rates Nicotine dependence Secondhand smoke exposure Depressive symptoms Negative thoughts Chronic stress
Mental Health Issues in Pregnancy
Depressive Symptoms
Depressed pregnant smokers significantly less confident about quitting than the non-depressed Low depressive symptoms predictive of abstinence early in pregnancy
Chronic Stress
Pregnant smokers who report high levels of stress are less likely to quit smoking than those reporting low stress levels. Low stress predictive of abstinence early in pregnancy
Negative thinking is associated with depressive symptoms
Negative Thinking
Methods
Exploratory quasi-experimental, two-group design Intervention: cognitive behavioral group/phone intervention during and immediately after pregnancy
4-session, 90-minute group Conducted at Housing Authority Office
Treatment Group (n = 11 pregnant smokers) Control Group (n = 5 pregnant smokers) [nonrandom assignment] Recruited from WIC clinics (low income)
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant, no more than 25 weeks gestation (1st or 2nd trimester) 18 years of age or older Smoked any cigarettes (even just once in awhile) within the last 9 months Access to a telephone
Data Collection Plan
In-home interviews
Baseline and 1-month post-group intervention (Prenatal) 2- and 6-months postpartum
Telephone intervention calls (6) weekly with Treatment group
Weekly abstinence rates early postpartum
Open-ended in-home interviews at 6 months postpartum with abstinent participants in Treatment group (n = 3)
Measures
Smoking and quit history Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependence Scale Days exposed to secondhand smoke in home and car/truck CES-D Crandall’s Cognition Inventory (negative thinking) Everyday Stressors Inventory
Treatment vs. Controls
Treatment and Control groups did not differ on:
Abstinence rate Urine cotinine Self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day
Abstinence Rates (N = 16)
40 35 30 25
Percent
Treatment Control
20 15 10 5 0 Baseline Prenatal 1-3 wks Follow up PP 4-6 wks PP 2-3 mos PP
Note: Intent-to-treat analysis used
“What has been the MOST HELPFUL as you try not to smoke?”
Concern for the baby’s health
I just don’t want to smoke around her Thinking about my baby Better for my baby
“What has been the MOST DIFFICULT as you try not to smoke?”
Others smoking
Going out around other people who smoke Seeing people smoke
Husband goes outside to smoke
No urges (n = 3)
Nicotine Dependence
3.5 3 2.5
Percent
Treatment Control
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Stage of Change: Percent Reporting Preparation, Action, or Maintenance
80 70 60
Percent
Treatment Control
50 40 30 20 10 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Mean Days of Home Secondhand Smoke Exposure
8 7 6
Percent
Treatment Control
5 4 3 2 1 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Mean Days of Car/Truck Secondhand Smoke Exposure
7 6 5
Percent
Treatment Control
4 3 2 1 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Depressive Symptoms
35 30 25
Percent
Treatment Control
20 15 10 5 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Negative Thinking
3.5 3 2.5
Percent
Treatment Control
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Chronic Stress
35 30 25
Percent
Treatment Control
20 15 10 5 0 Baseline 1st Follow Up 2nd Follow Up
Follow up with Smoking Abstinent Mothers (n = 3)
Desired to protect their children from harm Viewed smoking cessation as a longterm/life-long decision Desired a smoke-free environment for their children Shift in maternal thought processes
All of the women viewed smoking as an unhealthy, nasty or disgusting habit
Limitations
Selection bias
Nonrandom assignment to group Treatment group more ready to quit at baseline
Small sample size Environmental influences not measured
Marketing Tobacco to Women
Prominent Themes
Independence “You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby” Find Your Voice Sexual Attractiveness Stress Relief Weight Control
40% of women think smoking controls weight
“…segment the female market on the basis of current values, age, lifestyles….target young adult female smokers” American Tobacco Company, 1983
Is there a Vaccine for Smoking?
What Works to Help Smokers Quit?
Price increases Smoke-free laws Mass media education Paid extended media campaigns Sporadic media interventions Cessation contests Health care delivery interventions Alternatives to school suspension
Smoke-free Laws
MOST People Are Exposed to Secondhand Smoke
An estimated 3,000 lung cancer and 35,000 heart disease deaths occur annually among adult nonsmokers in the U.S. from exposure to secondhand smoke Approximately 60% of people in the U.S. have biological evidence of exposure.
“I worked as a cocktail waitress in smoky restaurants and bars for 14 years. I have onset emphysema. My doctor says my constant exposure to tobacco smoke contributed significantly to my emphysema. No one should have to breathe tobacco smoke to hold a job.” Suzanne H
Public Health Benefits of Smoke-Free Laws
Nonsmokers protected Fewer children start to smoke Smokers consume fewer cigarettes More smokers quit
Toxic Poisons in Secondhand Tobacco Smoke
Mercury Lead Arsenic Toluene Cadmium Ammonia Butane Ethanol
Secondhand tobacco smoke contains more than 4,000 chemicals
5 regulated hazardous air pollutants 47 regulated hazardous wastes 60 known or suspected cancercausing agents More than 100 chemical poisons
Toxic Poisons in Secondhand Tobacco Smoke
Methanol Carbon Monoxide Hydrogen Cyanide Acetone Tar DDT Naphthalene Vinyl Chloride Formaldehyde Benzene
There is no safe level of exposure to firsthand tobacco smoke or secondhand tobacco smoke
Air Pollution Dropped 91% After Lexington’s Smoke-free Law
250
PM 2.5 microgram per cubic meter
200
B EFORE
150
100
50
A FTER
0
After Lexington’s Smoke-free Law, Hair Nicotine Dropped by 56%
3
Median hair nicotine level
2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Pre-law 3 months Post-law
The Average Decrease in Hair Nicotine Was Greater in Bar Workers
5
Geometric means for hair nicotine (ng/mg)
4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Pre-law
Bar Restaurant
3-months post-law
Figure 2. Geometric means by establishment type and time, adjusted for cigarettes per day
Lexington’s Public Support and Knowledge of Health Risks Before and After the Law
100 80 60 56.7 40 20 0 Public Support SHS as Health Risk 70.2 64.0 74.7 Pre-law Post-law
Public support for the law increased significantly
Economic Impact of Lexington’s Law on Fayette County Restaurants and Bars
3% increase in restaurant employment Bar employment remained stable No change in payroll withholding taxes in restaurants or bars No change in business openings or closures in alcohol-serving establishments or at nonalcohol serving establishments
Nothing Kills Like Tobacco “By 2025, 21 years from now, 500 million people worldwide will die of tobacco-related disease…that is 9/11 every two hours for 21 years,”
C. Everett Koop, March 2004
Building Collaborative Partnerships
Contact Us!
University of Kentucky Tobacco Policy Research Program
www.mc.uky.edu/tobaccopolicy ejhahn00@email.uky.edu 859-257-2358 www.kcsp.uky.edu kcsp00@lsv.uky.edu
Kentucky Center for Smoke-free Policy