Get documents about "Housing Choice Voucher Program FY 2006 Appropriations Implementation
Document Sample
Housing Choice Voucher Program
FY 2006 Appropriations
Implementation
Presented by:
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development --
Office of Housing Voucher
Programs
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 1
Housing Choice Voucher Program
FY 2006 Appropriations
Implementation
Public Law 109-115,
November 30,2005
Notice PIH 2006-05,
January 13, 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 2
Appropriated Renewal Funding
2005 2006
HAP Renewal Funding 13,462,989,000 14,089,755,725
Less Set-Aside for Baseline
Adjustments * 45,000,000
Less Congressionally-
Mandated Cut 107,047,242 140,447,557
Net Appropriation for
Renewals, exluding
Set-Aside 13,355,941,758 13,904,308,168
* Also subject to Congressional cut
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 3
Appropriated Renewal Funding
CY 2006 net amount available for
renewals, plus the set-aside, represents
a gross increase of $592,916,410, and
4.439%, over the FY 2005 amount.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 4
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
“…the Secretary for the calendar year 2006
funding cycle shall provide renewal funding for
each public housing agency based on each public
housing agency’s 2005 annual budget for
renewal funding as calculated by HUD, prior to
pro-rations, and by applying the 2006 Annual
Adjustment Factor as established by the
Secretary, and by making any necessary
adjustments for the costs associated with the
first-time renewal of tenant protection or HOPE
VI vouchers or vouchers that were not in use
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 5
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
during the 12-month period in order
to meet a commitment pursuant to
section 8(o)(13) of the Act…The
Secretary shall, to the extent
necessary to stay within the amount
provided under this paragraph, pro-
rate each public housing agency’s
allocation otherwise established.”
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 6
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
CY 2005 Baseline (per January 21, 2005
notifications)
Adjustments:
(1) Approved 2005 Funding Adjustments,
due to funding errors identified in the
quality assurance process following the
notifications
(2) Funds for vouchers initially awarded in
CY 2004 and renewed for a portion of CY
2005 in the 2005 baseline, ot bring baseline
to 12 months for
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 7
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
(3) Funds for vouchers initially awarded in CY
2005, to provide funding to 12/31/2006
(4) Baseline cost adjustments for transfers in or
out of PHA inventory during CY 2005
(5) Funds for the additional costs of enhanced
vouchers, based on PIC data, above funding
otherwise provided in the baseline
(6) Funds for additional costs of first-time
renewal of HOPE VI vouchers, based on PIC
data, above funding otherwise provided in the
baseline
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 8
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
All the above adjustments were made to the
2005 baseline, and then the 2006 AAF was
applied to establish the 2006 baseline.
Total baseline amounts for all PHAs were
totaled and compared to the available
appropriation to determine the pro-ration
factor
Pro-ration factor was applied to each PHA’s CY
2006 baseline to determine the projected
funding amount.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 9
Renewal Funding Calculations
– 2006 Act
2005 Baseline 27,550,400
Approved Adjustment 34,750
Partial Year Funding for 2004 New Vouchers 254,984
Partial Year Funding for 2005 New Vouchers 228,073
Transfers 47,627
Additional Costs of Enhanced Vouchers 2,457
Additional Costs for 1st Time Renewal of Hope VI 6,570
Total 28,124,861
AAF 1.002
2006 Baseline 28,181,111
Pro-ration Factor 0.94749
2006 Funding Amount 26,701,321
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 10
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Partial Year Funding for 2004 New Vouchers:
PHA received new increment with term of 8/1/2004 to
7/31/2005, for 93 units, due to 2004 approved PH
demolition under Section 18.
When 2005 base was calculated, renewal funds were
provided for the term of 8/1/2005 to 12/31/2005; that
amount carried forward in the 2005 base to 2006.
Calculations required to increase base for renewing the
months of the initial term that were in CY 2005:
1/1/2005 to 7/31/2005 (these are not already in 2005
base)
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 11
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Calculations: 2005 Funded PUC x
total units x months to fund =
$384.00 x 93 units x 7 months = $254,984
$254,984 is added to the base
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 12
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Partial Year Funding for 2005 New Vouchers:
PHA received new increment with term of 4/1/05
to 3/31/06, for 64 units under Multifamily Tenant
Protection
PHA is funded for these units through 3/31/06
Calculations are required to increase the base to
provide renewal funding for the months in CY
2006 beyond 3/31/06
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 13
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Calculations: 2005 Funded PUC x total units x
months to fund =
$384.00 x 64 units x 9 months = $221,184
$228,073 is added to the base
Note: Public Housing Relocation and Replacement
Vouchers are generally funded to December 31
of the initial year
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 14
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for 2005 Transfers:
PHA received 10 units via transfer from a divesting
PHA on 7/1/2005
Calculations are required to increase the base to
provide renewal funding for 12 months in 2006
Calculations: 2005 Funded PUC of Divesting HA x
total units x 12 months =
$396.89 x 10 units x 12 months = $47,627
$47,627 is added to the base of the receiving PHA
and deducted from the base of the divesting PHA
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 15
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for Enhanced Vouchers (EV):
PHA received Tenant Protection vouchers and has
reported 15 EVs in the current PIC database
Calculations are required to increase the base to
provide sufficient renewal funding for the 15
reported Enhanced Vouchers
Calculations: Average reported cost in PIC for
Enhanced Vouchers
Less: PHA’s 2005 Funded PUC
Times: Enhanced Vouchers x 12 months in CY 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 16
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for Enhanced Vouchers:
PHAs average reported cost in PIC for 15
Enhanced Vouchers:
$442.73
PHA’s CY 2005 Funded PUC: $429.08
Difference $ 13.65
$13.65 x 15 Enhanced Vouchers x
12 months = $2,457
$2,457 is added to the base
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 17
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for Enhanced Vouchers:
If PHA has reported more Enhanced
Vouchers in PIC than Tenant Protection
Vouchers it has received, calculations are
limited to the total TP Vouchers
If PHA base was increased in CY 2005 for
Enhanced Voucher cost, any additional
increase in CY 2006 is limited to the total
increase in the EV costs
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 18
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for 1st Time Renewal – HOPE VI Vouchers:
PHA received an award of Hope VI Vouchers, for the
term of 1/1/2005 to 12/31/2005, for 3 vouchers.
Calculations are required to increase the base for
the additional costs associated with the first time
renewal of these vouchers in CY 2006
Calculations: Reported average cost in PIC for
HOPE VI vouchers
Less: PHA’s Funded CY 2005 PUC
Times: HOPE VI vouchers in PIC x renewal
months in CY 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 19
Renewal Funding Calculations
- Example
Funding for 1st Time Renewal – HOPE VI Vouchers:
PHAs average reported cost in PIC for 3 HOPE VI
Vouchers: $703.17
PHA’s CY 2005 Funded PUC: $520.67
Difference $182.50
$13.65 x 3 Hope VI Vouchers x 12 months = $6,570
$6,570 is added to the base
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 20
Renewal Funding Calculations –
Process
Projected Funding Letter has been issued to
each PHA with an active voucher program
Attachment A details the calculation of the
PHA’s projected HAP funding for 2006
PHAs are asked to respond on two items if they
appear incorrect
No other response is needed or requested – do
not respond if there are no problems
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 21
Renewal Funding Calculations –
Process
PHA response to the projected funding letter must
be sent by overnight delivery and received at the
designated address by Tuesday, January 31
n do not use regular mail
n do not send your response to HUD HQ or the
field or the FMC
HUD will review all responses and make any
corrections to the data, as identified by PHAs and
by HUD
HUD will finalize CY 2006 funding calculations,
issue final letters to all PHAs, and establish
disbursements
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 22
Renewal Funding Calculations –
Process
PHAs are asked to request an adjustment
on these two items if they are incorrect
(1) Funding Increment / unit changes from 2005
--Determine if the new increments and
transferred vouchers are correct.
--If any are missing, provide documentation
--If any increments shown were not received,
provide that comment
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 23
Renewal Funding Calculations –
Process
(2) Fair Market Rent Area used to establish 2006
Annual Adjustment Factor
-- Respond if the newly assigned FMR area is not
consistent with PHA jurisdiction
Note: FMR areas were revised for 2006; some
have been combined and some eliminated; a
change in FMR area is not necessarily an error
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 24
Renewal Funding Calculations –
Process
Requests for adjustments of the
following items will not be considered:
(1) VMS or year-end data used to establish the
2005 Baseline
(2) PIC data used to calculate enhanced voucher
or additional HOPE VI voucher funding
(3) Annual Adjustment Factor established for a
Fair Market Rent area
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 25
Appropriated Admin Fee Funding
2005 2006
Administrative Fee Funding 1,210,107,000 1,250,000,000
Less Set-Aside for
Special Fees 25,000,000 10,000,000
Less Congressionally-Mandated
Cut 9,814,992 12,400,000
Net Appropriation for Renewal
Fees 1,175,292,008 1,227,600,000
FY 2006 net available for renewal fees represents an increase
of $52,307,992, and 4.45%, over FY 2005.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 26
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
2006 Act
“…$1,240,000,000 of the amount
provided in this paragraph shall be
allocated for the calendar year 2006
funding cycle on a pro-rata basis to
public housing agencies based on the
amount public housing agencies were
eligible to receive in calendar year
2005.”
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 27
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
2006 Act
CY 2005 Baseline
(per January 21, 2005 notifications)
Adjustments:
(1)Approved 2005 Funding Adjustments, due to
funding errors identified in the quality
assurance process following the January 21,
2005 notifications
(2)Fees required for vouchers initially awarded
in CY 2004 and renewed for a portion of CY
2005 in the 2005 baseline, to bring baseline
to12 months for 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 28
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
2006 Act
(3) Fees required for vouchers initially
awarded in CY 2005, to provide funding
to 12/31/2006
(4) Fee adjustments for transfers in or out
of PHA inventory during CY 2005
All the above adjustments were made to
the 2005 baseline to establish the 2006
baseline
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 29
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
2006 Act
Total baseline amounts for all PHAs
were totaled and compared to available
appropriation to determine the pro-
ration factor.
Pro-ration factor was applied to each
PHA’s 2006 baseline to determine the
funding amount
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 30
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
2006 Act
2005 Baseline 3,450,000
Approved Adjustment 2,400
Partial Year Fees for 2004 New Vouchers 28,156
Partial Year Fees for 2005 New Vouchers 24,912
Fees for Transfers 4,687
2006 Baseline 3,510,155
Pro-ration Factor
1.00797
2006 Funding Amount 3,538,130
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 31
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Example
Partial Year Fees for 2004 New
Vouchers
PHA received new increment with term of
8/1/2004 to 7/31/2005, for 93 units.
When 2005 base was calculated, renewal fees
were provided for the term of 8/1/3005 to
12/31/2005; that amount carried forward in the
2005 base to 2006.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 32
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Example
Calculations required to increase fee base for
renewing the months of the initial term that
were in CY 2005: 1/1/2005 to 7/31/2005 (these
are not already in 2005 base)
Calculations: per unit fee rate x total units x
months to fund =
$43.25 x 93 units x 7 months = $28,156
$28,156 is added to the base
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 33
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Example
Partial Year Fees for 2005 New Vouchers:
PHA received new increment with term of
4/1/05 to 3/31/06, for 64 units
PHA is funded for fees for these units
through 3/31/06
Calculations are required to increase the
fee base to provide renewal fees for the
months in CY 2006 beyond 3/31/06
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 34
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Example
Calculations: Per unit fee rate x total units
x months to fund
= $43.25 x 64 units x 9 months = $24,912
$24,912 is added to the base
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 35
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Example
PHA received 10 units via transfer from a
divesting PHA on 7/1/2005
Calculations are required to increase the fee
base to provide renewal fees for 12 months in
2006
Calculations: 2005 Fee Rate of Divesting HA
x total units x 12 months =
$39.06 x 10 units x 12 months = $4,687
$46.87 is added to the fee base of the
receiving PHA and deducted from the fee
base of the divesting PHA
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 36
Admin Fee Funding Calculations-
Process
Projected Funding Letter issued to each PHA
with active voucher programs
Attachment details the calculation of the
PHA’s projected administrative fee funding
for 2006
No response is needed or requested – if
problems with new increments or transfers
are reported using Attachment A, fee
calculations will be corrected and properly
reflected in the PHA’s final funding letter
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 37
Administrative Fee Set-Aside
The 2006 Appropriations Act provides for an admin fee
set-aside.
“…up to $10,000,000 (of the $1.25 billion fee
appropriation) shall be available to the Secretary to
allocate to public housing agencies that need
additional funds to administer their Section 8
programs.”
HUD has determined to apply these funds as follows:
$2,000,000 Homeownership Fees
$8,000,000 Tenant Protection Admin Fees
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 38
Administrative Fee Set-Aside
Homeownership Fees:
--$1,000 fee for each homeownership closing
during CY 2006 as reported in PIC
--Applies to families participating in the
homeownership voucher program,Section 8
Family Self-Sufficiency Program, or the Moving
to Work Program
--The one-time fee of $5,000 to a PHA for
implementing a homeownership program will
not be funded in CY 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 39
Administrative Fee Set-Aside
Tenant Protection Fees:
--Administrative fees will be provided only for
occupied units in the affected project at the time
of PHA application for voucher funding
--One-time special fee will be $100 per voucher
-- Administrative and special fees will be provided
until the funding is depleted
The $10,000,000 set-aside is subject to the
Congressionally-mandated 1 percent reduction
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 40
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
The 2006 Appropriations Act provides for a set-aside
from the renewal account:
“…up to $45,000,000 shall be available only: (1) to
adjust the allocations for public housing agencies,
after application for an adjustment by a public housing
agency and verification by HUD, whose allocations
under this heading for contract renewals for the
calendar year 2005 funding cycle were based on
verified VMS leasing and cost data averaged for the
months of May, June and July of 2004 and solely
because of temporarily low leasing levels during such
3-month period did not accurately reflect leasing levels
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 41
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
and costs for the 2004 fiscal year of the
agencies; and (2(for adjustments for public
housing agencies that experienced a
significant increase, as determined by the
Secretary, in renewal costs resulting from
unforeseen circumstances or from the
portability under section 8(r) of the United
States Housing Act of 1937 of tenant based
rental assistance.”
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 42
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
The $45,000,000 set-aside is subject to the
Congressionally-mandated 1 percent reduction
PHAs will be considered for these funds based
only on requests received by HUD no later than
Tuesday, January 31, 2006, per the instructions
of Notice PIH 2006-05.
HUD will process all requests under the first
proviso first; once eligible requests are funded,
HUD will process requests under the second
proviso
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 43
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
Proviso 1: Temporarily low leasing levels in the May to
July 2004 base period:
HUD will compare each HA’s validated VMS data for
May to July 2004 to the HA’s FY 2004 leasing data to
determine if leasing for the May to July 2004 period
was lower than the average for HA FY 2004
If the May to July 2004 leasing was lower than the FY
2004 average leasing, the HA’s baseline will be
increased for the additional units and the additional
funds will be provided from the set-aside.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 44
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
HUD will not accept revisions to the May
to July 2004 baseline VMS data nor to the
HA FY 2004 settlement data for purposes
of processing a request under this
proviso.
If eligible HA requests exceed the funds
available, HUD may pro-rate the available
funds.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 45
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
Proviso 1 Example:
PHA ACC units: 250
PHA average leasing, May to July 2004: 190
PHA leasing, FY 2004: 2448
Monthly average: 204
Adjustment: 14 units x 12 months x $384 PUC = $64,512
Adjustment funding will be calculated on the basis of the
CY 2006 funded per unit amount
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 46
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
Proviso 2: Significant increase in renewal costs
due to unforeseen circumstances or portability
To request a baseline increase due to
unforeseen circumstances, a PHA must
specify the circumstances and submit evidence
that its CY 2006 allocation will not suffice to
maintain its CY 2005 leasing levels.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 47
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
Proviso 2 Example (Unforeseen Circumstances)
A PHA had set its Payment Standards at 90% of FMR
in CY 2005 and maintained full lease-up at that level.
Due to a hurricane, rents increased due to demand for
housing in its jurisdiction, significantly and quickly,
causing the PHA to raise its Payment Standards to
110 % of FMR in order to maintain viability for its
program and participants.
The PHA should submit documentation of the
circumstances and calculations of the impact on its CY
2006 costs.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 48
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
Proviso 2 Example (Portability)
For requests for increases due to portability,
HUD will compare a PHA’s portability costs,
as reported in PIC, to the PHA’s baseline per
unit funding amount for CY 2006 to
determine if the PHA is incurring significant
cost increases due to portability
PHA should submit no documentation
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 49
Set-Aside for Baseline Adjustments
PHA CY 2006 Renewal Funding PUC: $550
Total portable households in PHA’s current
PIC data: 20
Average Total HAP and Utility Reimbursement
for portable households per current PIC
data $625
Baseline Adjustment for 2006: $18,000
(20 units x $75 x 12 months)
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 50
Moving to Work Program
PHAs in the MTW program received a separate letter
and attachment to set out the calculation of projected
CY 2006 renewal funding, for both MTW units and
regular vouchers
In addition to reviewing increments and FMR areas,
MTW PHAs are asked to review the program
designation of their units and advise HUD of any
request to move eligible units from the regular
voucher program to the MTW program as they are
renewed.
Regular voucher and MTW funding will be pro-rated in
2006 according to the same factor that is calculated
for all PHAs
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 51
Miscellaneous Provisions
The 2006 Appropriations Act prohibits the use of any
funds provided under the Act to support a greater
number of units than are authorized under a PHA’s
contract with HUD (ACC) – over-leasing
HUD will measure over-leasing on a calendar year
basis and will require and PHA that over-leases to
restore the funds to the unrestricted fund balance
If an HA is currently over-leased, it must support the
excess units only with administrative fee reserves
and other funds not appropriated for HAP costs in
FYs 2003 through 2006
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 52
Miscellaneous Provisions
HUD will continue to conduct Quality Assurance reviews at
PHAs to ensure the integrity of PHA-reported data for the
voucher program and compliance with program requirements
If a final QA report finds that a PHA mis-reported VMS
leasing and cost data for the May to July 2004 base period,
such that the PHA received excess renewal funding for CY
2005 and/or 2006, HUD will re-calculate the funding based
on accurate data and will recoup the excess amount from the
PHA.
HUD will monitor the over- and under-utilization of Budget
Authority by PHAs, to provide technical assistance where
warranted
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 53
Miscellaneous Provisions
The 2006 Appropriations Act states:
1. Incremental vouchers previously made available
for family unification shall, to the extent
practicable, continue to be provided for family
unification.
2. Incremental vouchers previously made available
(under the 1 Year Mainstream Program) for non-
elderly disabled families, and (under the 5 Year
Mainstream Program) for elderly and non-elderly
disabled, shall, to the extent practicable, continue
to be provided to non-elderly disabled families
upon turnover
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 54
Miscellaneous Provisions
Administrative Fees:
Administrative fees provided from the 2006
Appropriation may only be used for activities related to
the provision of Section 8 tenant-based assistance,
including related development activities
Any administrative fees from FY 2006, 2005 and 2004,
appropriations, that are subsequently moved into the
undesignated fund balance at the end of the year may
only be used for the same purposes as well.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 55
Miscellaneous Provisions
Administrative Fees
If a PHA has not adequately administered its voucher
program, HUD may prohibit the use of funds in the Net
Cumulative Administrative Fee Equity account and may
direct the PHA to use funds in that account to improve
administration of the program or to reimburse ineligible
expenses
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 56
Notice PIH 2006-03
Remaining ACC Reserve balances as of
12/31/2005 will be recaptured
PHAs will have access to their calculated
one-week reserve balance, where it was
available after the 2005 recapture
calculations, to support HAP costs through
12/31/2005 for ACC units
PHAs do not need to request these funds;
they will be calculated and disbursed based
on validated VMS data
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 57
Disaster Voucher Program
Dept of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006,
appropriated supplemental funding in the
amount of $390 M to HUD for temporary
rental voucher assistance for certain families
displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Unlike KDHAP funding, the DVP funding
under the Supplemental is specifically
authorized under section 8(o) of the United
States Housing Act of 1937
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 58
Disaster Voucher Program
The Supplemental provides that HUD may
waive the requirements for income eligibility
and tenant contribution for up to 18 months.
The Supplemental further provides the family
receiving assistance under the DVP shall be
eligible to reoccupy their previous assisted
housing, if and when it becomes available.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 59
Disaster Voucher Program
HUD consulted with the PHAs currently
assisting the greatest number of KDHAP
families to determine how best to administer
the DVP rental assistance provided under the
Supplemental.
The consensus of the PHAs was to retain the
KDHAP as the delivery model of choice to the
greatest extent possible permitted under the
law.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 60
Disaster Voucher Program
HUD will maintain the same operating
requirements of the KDHAP for the DVP
wherever possible. To this end, HUD has
exercised the statutory waiver authority and
waived all requirements related to income
eligibility and tenant contribution for families
participating under the DVP for the statutory
maximum term of 18 months or the end of
the DVP, whichever comes first.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 61
Disaster Voucher Program
Further, HUD has waived additional housing
choice voucher program regulatory
requirements to permit key variations from
regular voucher program rules in the DVP
operating requirements in order to retain the
KDHAP delivery model as much as possible.
The FEMA Mission Assignment with HUD
under which the KDHAP is funded ends
January 31, 2006 for most of the KDHAP
families
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 62
Disaster Voucher Program
PHAs will receive funding appropriated for
the new Disaster Voucher Program to cover
the February 2006 rental payments for most
KDHAP participants.
HUD will post operating requirements and
the necessary contracts on the HUD web in
the next day or so. HUD will also fax blast
this information to the PHAs administering a
KDHAP program
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 63
Disaster Voucher Program
KDHAP families and owners
will need to execute
addendums to the KDHAP
contracts to receive the
February housing assistance
payment
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 64
Questions?
Any questions arising after this broadcast should
be sent to HUD at the following e-mail address:
PIH_Financial_Management_Division
@hud.gov
HUD will post common questions and answers to
the Housing Choice Voucher Program web site.
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development 65
Related docs
