Excellent evidence based discussion of the use of IVIG

Document Sample

Shared by: sammyc2007
Categories
Stats
views:
484
posted:
4/24/2008
language:
English
pages:
50
Immune Globulin Therapies



Melvin Berger, M.D., Ph.D.,

Rainbow, Babies & Children’s Hospital

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH







• Consulting: AHIP (CDC), CSL-Behring, FFF, Grifols,

Pfizer, Talecris

• Speaker’s bureaus: CSL-Behring, Talecris

• Research support: Talecris, NIH

• Advisory Committees/Councils: IDF, CIS

• Off label: Dosages, Use of IGIV by sub-cu route

Objectives



• 1. Understand Indications for IgG Replacement Therapy



• 2. Learn Rationale for Selecting IgG Dosing Regimen



• 3. Discuss Advantages and Disadvantages of IV and

Sub-cu Routes of IgG Delivery



• 4. Learn How to Transition Patients From IV to

Sub-cu Therapy

Major Antibody Deficiency Syndromes:

 Bruton’s (X-linked) Agammaglobulinemia



 Transient Hypogam. of Infancy

(Delayed Maturation of Humoral Immunity)



 Common Variable Immune Deficiency



 Hyper IgM Syndromes (X-linked and others)



 SCID s/p HSCT



 IgA Deficiency

Criteria for Determining the Need for

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy

“It must be demonstrated that:

1. The patient has significant and clearly documented

infectious morbidity

2. Other disorders (allergy, anatomic defects) have

been sought and treated aggressively.

3. Other modes of therapy (antimicrobial, anti-

inflammatory) inadequate or poorly tolerated

4. There is a laboratory abnormality confirming

immunodeficiency ―

Practice Parameters of Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

Bonilla FA, et al. Ann Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2005;94:S1-S63.

What is Immune Globulin (Human) ?

• Made from Pooled Plasma From >10,000 Donors

• All use cold ethanol fractionation (Cohn)

• Content >95% IgG: IgA and other constituents

vary in different products

• Stabilizers, chemical treatments and forms vary

• All products use multiple safety steps beginning

with donor selection, screening, specific viral

inactivation/removal steps in manufacture

• Usual regimen: 300-800 mg/kg Q 21-28 days IV or

50-200 mg/kg/wk sub-cutaneously (SC)

Higher doses in pts with sinus, lung disease

• True anaphylaxis rare, even with IgA def. patients

Landmarks in the History of

Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy

Janeway and Gitlin prefer IM IVIG introduced and becomes Renewed interest

injections, and this becomes standard therapy due to in SCIG as alternative to

standard of care in US2 reduction of bacterial and IV therapy, especially for

non-bacterial infections4 home use5









1952 1953 1955 1980 1990s 2006







Bruton treats first patient diagnosed Berger introduces battery- First Sub-cu

with agammaglobulinemia with SC injections of powered pumps to slowly IgG

immune serum globulin (ISG)1 administer IM ISG by SC route3 Licensed in US









1. Bruton OC. Pediatrics. 1952;9:722-728.

2. Berger M. Clin Immunol. 2004;112:1-7.

3. Berger M. et al. Ann Intern Med. 1980;98:55-56.

4. Quartier P. et al. Jour Pediatrics. 1999;134:5:589-596.

5. Abrahamsen TG. Et al. Pediatrics. 1996;98:1127-1131.

Infection Frequency Is Reduced by

Immunoglobulin Replacement



90

80

70

60

Patients

(%) with at 50

least one 40

infection1 30

20

10

0

Before Diagnosis/Treatment Post IVIG Treatment





Busse PJ, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:1001-1004.

Skull S, Kemp A. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:527-530.

Increased Efficacy of 0.05 gr/kg/wk vs 0.025 gr/kg/wk ISG (im)

UK MRC Working Party on Hypogammaglobulinemia Study

c. 1957, published by HMSO 1970

____________________________________

Condition p

• Febrile Episodes 500 mg/dL on 600 mg/kg/mo



2. Infections: Major Minor

IgG 500 3 16



―….in patients with chronic sinopulmonary disease doses

of IVIG that give serum IgG>500 mg/dL provide better

protection against infection‖

Effects of Higher Doses and Higher Serum IgG Levels in

Gamunex® Licensing Trial

(Roifman et al , Int. Immunopharm 3: 1325- 1333, 2003)





Dose “Validated” Infections

IGIV-C IGIV-SD

400 mg/kg 10.5 23.8



Level

900 mg/dL 5.6 19.2

Efficacy of High vs. Standard doses

of IGIV in PIDD Patients

standard high p

(adults 300 mg/kg/mo) (600 mg/kg/mo)

(kids 400 mg/kg/mo) (800 mg/kg/mo)





Infections 3.5±2.6 2.5±2.4 0.004



Days Infected 33 21 0.015



n=41 2/3 adults

Eijkhout et al Ann Int Med 135: 165-174, 2002.

Infections in Recent IgG Licensing Trials



Author Product SBI CI Other Inf.



• Ochs Vivaglobin (SC) 2006 0.04 (99) 0-0,014 4.43



• Church Gammagard Liq 2006 0 (95) 0-0.06 3.5



• Berger Flebogam 5% 2004 0.06 (99) 0-0.18 2.99



• Ochs Octagam 5% 2004 0.1 ( 98) 0.03-0.28 3.41



• DeGracia Flebogam 5% 2004 0.05 (SD) 0.15 2.2



• Roifman Gamunex 10% 2003 0.16* NR



SBI= serious bacterial infections: pneumonia, meningitis, visceral abscess,

osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacteremia/sepsis

*= ―validated‖ sinusitis and pneumonia. SBIs not reported per se.

Adverse Effects of IVIG

• Related to Underlying Infection

• Rate Related

• Non-Rate Related

• Related to High Dose Rx

Adverse Effects of IgG



• True Anaphylaxis-very rare

• “Anaphylactoid” (Rate related)

• Febrile

• Excess Fluid Volume and/or Salt Load

• Headache-Migraine- Aseptic Meningitis

• Renal Complications

• Thrombotic Complications

• Local Site Reactions from SCIG

• Viral Transmission (potential)

Renal and Thrombotic Complications

• Renal failure most often related to sucrose in certain products,

usually transient

• Hyperviscosity may occur in patients with pre-disposing factors

receiving high doses of IVIG

• Activation of leukocytes and/or platelets may occur, resulting in

clots or TRALI





Headache, Migraine, Aseptic Menningitis

•? Different reactions or a spectrum- mild headaches common,

usually rate-related

•Onset of severe migraine or meningitis symptoms may be delayed?

•Severe headaches and/or aseptic meningitis more frequent with high

dose Rx and in neurologic diseases





Pierce and Jain: Transfusion Med Rev 17: 241 (2003)

Pharmacokinetics of IgG after IV Infusion

Serum IgG Levels in 34 year old Male with XLA

30 gr 5% IVIG (406 mg/kg) 12 gr 16% ISG Q 7 days =

1600

Q 3 weeks 36 gr in 3 weeks







1400







1200

Total IgG









1000







800







600







400

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 7 14 21

Days Days

Mean Serum IgG Levels Over Course of Two

Weeks During Steady-State on Treatment With

An Approved SCIG Therapy*









*non-IND 3002 EU

CSLBehring, Data on File.

Systemic Adverse Events During IM, IV,

and SC Immunoglobulin Infusions



Based on separate studies, not a head-to-head evaluation

50

45

40

35 IMIG (1893 injections)

30

25 IVIG (387 infusions)

20

SCIG (3232 infusions)

15

10

5

0

Percentage of Patients with Systemic Adverse

Reaction(s) *P<.001 vs SC infusion



Gardulf A, et al. Lancet. 1991; 338:162.

Reported Rates of Adverse Effects of

Subcutaneous IgG Infusionsa









Berger. Clin Immunol 2004;

Comparison of IV and SQ Dosing





• 70 kg patient receiving 500 mg/kg q 4 wks :



35 grams = 700 ml of 5% IV solution or

350 ml of 10% IV solution



= 220 ml of 16% sub-cu solution

= 55 ml/wk (2-3 sites- 2.5 hrs, 1 site-6-8 hrs)

= 20 ml every 3rd day (11/mo)

= 10 ml every weekday

Sub-cu needles then (1976) and now









27 gauge

9 mm

Sof-set

Syringe Driver Pumps









Graseby MS16A Crono







Freedom 60

SCIG Reactions in CE1200 Study

___________________________________________





• Local reactions occurred in most patients initially.

• Reactions clearly decreased with continued therapy

• Multiple studies report systemic reactions <1% in

patients on sub-cu. Severe rxns extremely rare.

• Local reactions mostly mild or moderate

• Only 3 subjects withdrew because of injection-site AEs









Ochs et al

SCIg: Mild Injection-Site reaction









Data on File. ZLB Behring.

SCIg: Moderate Injection-Site Reaction









Data on File. ZLB Behring.

SCIG Injection-Site Reactions by Gender



3001 NA Study 3002 EU non-IND Study









Subjects with Injection-site reactions (%)

Subjects with Injection-site reactions (%)









Infusion Infusion









CSL Behring. Data on File.

Side Effects to Expect

with SCIG Infusion



Site reactions

• Redness • Bruising

• Swelling — • Blanching of site

potential to last 1-3

days • Leaking at the site

• Discomfort • Warm to the touch

• Itchiness • Burning Sensation

• Rash — local or

generalized

Which Route to Use?

Advantages of SC and IV Administration

Subcutaneous Intravenous

No venous access Convenient and well tolerated

by most patients



Slow administration and gradual Ability to give large volumes

absorption reduces headaches and per infusion allows intermittent

other adverse events dosing (every 21-28 days)

Maintains more consistent IgG levels



Facilitates self or home infusion,

increasing patient autonomy – may

improve patient’s self-image and

sense of control

Convenient and well tolerated by

most patients



Berger M. Clin Immunol. 2004;112:1-7.

Which Route to Use?

Disadvantages of SC and IV Administration

Subcutaneous Intravenous

Relatively small volume per Requires venous access and

infusion requires frequent trained personnel in most

dosing – at least once a week in situations

most cases



Ability to self-infuse requires Large shift in IgG levels during

reliable and adherent patient dosing may cause adverse

effects at or just after peak, and

during low troughs



Infrequent dosing may result in

low troughs and could increase

the infection rate

Berger M. Clin Immunol. 2004;112:1-7.

SCIG Dose and IgG Trough Levels in North

American and (EU+Brazil) Clinical Trials





3001 NA 3002 EU (non-IND)

n=51 n=47



SCIG dose (% of IVIG) 136 SCIG dose (% of IVIG) 101



SCIG dose (mg/kg/wk) 158 SCIG dose (mg/kg/wk) 89

86

IgG increase during SCIG 255 IgG increase during SCIG

Therapy (mg/dL) therapy (mg/dL)



IgG level (mg/dL) on SCIg 1040 IgG level (mg/dL) on SCIG 922







CSL Behring, Data on File, Ochs et al, J Clin Immunol 26: 265 (2006)

SCIG Doses and Infections in North American and

(Europe+Brazil) Clinical Trials



3001 NA 3002 EU

n=51 n=47

Mean dose of SCIG Mean dose of SCIG

158 89

(mg/kg) (mg/kg)

Range SCIG dose Range SCIG dose

34–352 51–147

(mg/kg/week) (mg/kg/week)



Annual rate of serious Annualized rate of

bacterial infections 0.04 serious bacterial 0.04

per subject infections/subject

Annual rate of Annualized rate of

4.4 4.3

other infections other infections



CSL Behring, Data on File, Ochs et al, J Clin Immunol 26: 265 (2006)

Promoting Patient Autonomy

Home/Partner/Parent Administration of IVIG



Subcutaneous IgG:

self infusion possible

usually smaller doses given more frequently

may decrease adverse events by dampening

variations in serum IgG level



Careful selection of patients and appropriate

follow-up essential

Home-Based SCIG Therapy Improves

HRQoL

Mean Sum Score of Life Quality Index

105

100 95 94

95

Mean sum score









90

85 82 *

80

74*

75

70

65

60

55

50

Children (n=15) Adults (n=22)

Baseline After 10 months of home therapy with SCIG



*F-Test 10-months vs. baseline: P<.05

Gardulf A et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:936-942.

North America QoL Study









Nicolay U et al. J Clin Immunol 2006; 26: 65–72.

Patient Selection



• If Sub-cu is indicated to avoid complications or

adverse effects from IV, home therapy will often be

preferred because limitations on dose that can be

given per sub-cu infusion dictates frequent dosing



• If flexibility or home therapy is desired as primary

goal, (pt’s schedule, distance from infusion center),

sub-cu will be attractive because it is safer and

requires less technical skill (at starting IV )

Who: Patients in whom sub-cu might be

preferred

• Poor venous access

• Adverse effects: anaphylactoid reactions, post-

infusion migraines, risk of renal failure or

hyperviscosity, thromboses

• Patients who “run out of gas” at end of IV dosing

interval

• Patients who are remote from infusion facility

(college students)

• Patients who work, go to school, or have busy

schedule- convenience

• Patients who want to feel independent

Important Issues for the Doctor-

Patient Discussion

Medication-Related Process-Related

Dose (frequency, dose, and time) :

Insurance issues

IV vs SC, schedule

Leasing vs purchasing a

Adherence and follow-up pump- responsibility for

maintenance

Adverse reactions

Home care company ?



Patients can return to IV after

When to call your doctor

trying SC

Stepwise Approach : Plan

• Determine monthly IgG dose in grams

• Divide by unit dose of IgG (ex: 1.6 or 3.6 gr)

= number of 10 or 20 cc bottles/month

• Determine volume and number of sites per infusion.

• Guideline: 0.1 to 0.25 ml/kg/site/hr

(avg adult: approx. 10 ml/site/hr)

• Select pump

• Divide number of bottles by number per infusion to

get infusions per month

• Arrange schedule with patient

• Start SCIg 1 week after last IV infusion or load naïve

patient with 5-6 SC doses (opportunity to train pt).

Simplified Approach: Rule of 2’s



• Two bottles, two sites, two hours:

40 ml (6.4 grams) at 10 ml per site per hr in

teenager or adult: 25.6 gr/month



20 ml (3.2 grams) at 5 ml per site per hr in child:

12.9 grams per month



Give one or two extra doses per month or up to two

per week to achieve higher monthly dose.



Adjust sites and time as tolerated.

Training Patient

• Train a trainer &/or use home care company with

expertise

• Use video, checklist, ―buddy system‖.

• Have patient return to office to demonstrate their

procedure.

• Web resources: http://

cc.nih.gov/ccc/patient_education/pepubs/subq.pdf

Excellent source for selecting sites and techniques

for

sub-cu injections from NIH clinical center nurses

Guidelines for IgG Therapy

(Regardless of Route)



• Dose and Interval- Individualize

• Route- Location, Logistics, cost

• Treat the patient, not the numbers:

monitor and document outcome. Follow-up

determined by clinical status of pt.

• Use of IgG levels

• Adverse Effects: Rate related (IV), Non-rate

related. Replacement different than high dose

• Safety Monitoring: Liver & Renal Fxn, CBC

Conclusions

• Antibody Replacement is a mainstay of

treatment for PID

• IgG mainly is replaced

• IgG replacement should be individualized:

both IV and Sub-cu preparations available in

the US. Dose Requirements may vary

• Current Ig preparations are believed safe, but

we must always be cautious and monitor pts.

Courtesy of D. Sedlak, Duke U.

General refs on PIDD and IgG RX



• Bonilla FA, Bernstein IL, Khan DA, et.al. Practice

parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary

immunodeficiency.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 May; 94 (5 Suppl 1)

:S1-63.



• Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR, et al. Use of

intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease:

A review of evidence

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Apr;117(4 Suppl):S525-53.

Sub-cu IgG Refs



• Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Safety and efficacy of self-administered

subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency

diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2006 May;26(3):265-73.



• Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O,. Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement

therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary

immunodeficiencies--a prospective, multi-national study. J Clin Immunol. 2006

Mar;26(2):177-85



• Gardulf A, Nicolay U. Replacement IgG therapy and self-therapy at home

improve the health-related quality of life in patients with primary antibody

deficiencies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Dec;6(6):434-42.



• Nicolay U, Kiessling P, Berger M,. Health-related quality of life and treatment

satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunedeficiency

diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Clin Immunol.

2006 Jan;26(1):65-72.



• Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in primary

immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2004 Jul;112(1):1-7. Review.

Study Design of PK Substudy 3001 NA

Start weekly

SCIG at 120%

IVIG



Individualized SCIG Dose Adjustment







Serum

IgG

Level

IVIG Wash-in/ Efficacy 12

Equilibration 1 Wash-out Months

3 months month 3 months

PK Substudy





-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16

Months

IVIG Assessment of Final AUC

AUC Serum IgG Evaluation for

trough vs. non-inferiority

target levels

Kiessling P, et al. Data on File. ZLB Behring.

Fractionating Total Dose into More Frequent Small

Infusions Evens Out IgG Level Over Time


Share This Document



Related docs
Other docs by sammyc2007
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!