Statement by William McChesney Martin Jr Chairman of the by birdmandaddy

VIEWS: 0 PAGES: 15

									Statement by William McChesney Martin, Jr.,
    Chairman of the Board of Governors
       of the Federal Reserve System
                before the
   House Banking and Currency Committee

              May 10, 1951
Mr. Chairman and Members of t h i s Committee -

            I appreciate t h i s opportunity t o present t o you the views of the

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System with r e s p e c t t o the r e -

s p o n s i b i l i t i e s placed upon or delegated to "the Federal Reserve System

under the Defense Production Act of 1950.              The Board is strongly of the

opinion t h a t these provisions of the Act should be continued.

            As has been repeatedly emphasized before t h i s and other committees

of the Congress primary r e l i a n c e must be placed on f i s c a l , c r e d i t , and

monetary measures in combating i n f l a t i o n a r y forces i n e v i t a b l y generated

by the expanding defense         effort.     I t is hardly necessary t o emphasize that

the forces creating upward pressures on p r i c e s are l i k e l y t o continue

dominant in the economy even though these pressures may appear temporarily

to have been moderated. Nor is i t necessary t o recount again the many

circumstances and f a c t o r s which have combined to produce grave i n f l a t i o n a r y

dangers, or the preventive and precautionary steps already taken to

safeguard the economy.        On behalf of the Board I therefore s h a l l address

myself p a r t i c u l a r l y to those provisions of the Act with which we have been

directly    concerned.    These provisions deal with c e r t a i n supplementary

r a t h e r than primary c r e d i t r e s t r i c t i o n s as well as with the so-called V-loan

program to aid the defense         effort.

            I t i s important to emphasize that the marked advances in p r i c e s and

the exceptionally large increase in bank and other c r e d i t that have taken

place up to the present time r e f l e c t mainly expansion in p r i v a t e        expenditures.

The f u l l effects of expansion of defense a c t i v i t i e s are s t i l l to be f e l t .

While expenditures for defense purposes have doubled since l a s t summer as y e t
                                    - 2 -


they account for only about ten per cent of total output.   Moreover, they

have thus far been met out of growing Government revenues and no new Federal

borrowing has been needed.   However, Federal expenditures for defense and

related activities are scheduled to rise sharply and may account for as

much as 20 per cent of total output within a year. This is the overriding

consideration for national stabilization policy.   If inflationary trends

are to be held in check, public policy will need to limit private spending,

especially such spending as is financed by borrowing or by the use of

past savings.   This is a time for saving, not spending.

Role of Credit Restraint

          Credit expansion has financed a substantial share of the increased

consumer and business spending since June 1950. Without the restraints pro-

vided by the Defense Production Act the expansion in credit and upward price

pressures undoubtedly would have been even greater.   From the end of June

1950 to the end of March outstanding loans and holdings of corporate and

municipal securities by all banks increased by over 12 billion dollars. This

increase was almost as much as occurred in the two years 1947 and 1948 together

and these were both years of rapid credit expansion and inflationary trends.

Credit extended by other lenders to businesses, municipalities, and consumers

also was in unprecedented volume.

          Such credit was supplemented by drawing on liquid asset holdings.

-Between the end of June 1950 and the end of March of this year, redemptions

of savings bonds exceeded cash purchases by over a billion dollars, and

savings accounts were reduced by close to three-quarters of a billion dollars.
                                      -3 -
Reflecting the demand for and use of ready cash, demand deposits of busi-

nesses and individuals increased by over 7 billion dollars in the last half

of 1950 and showed only a moderate seasonal decline in the first quarter of

1951.    The turnover or rate of use of these deposit balances rose sharply.

             It has become increasingly evident during recent weeks that this

acceleration of inflationary tendencies has been checked, temporarily at

least.     The prospects for getting inflation under control are now better than

at any time since Korea, To succeed, however, will require full and contin-

ued use of all of the credit measures now up tor renewal in the Defense

Production Act. It would be extremely unfortunate if any of the means we

have been using to stem the inflationary tide should be allowed to lapse

at this critical moment when they are achieving a considerable measure of

success.

             There are tangible, evidences that the availability of bank reserves

has been reduced, that banks have become more restrictive in their lending

policies, and that the over-all expansion of bank credit has definitely

slackened despite acceleration of lending to finance defense production.

Further evidences of the effects of the various measures of monetary and

credit restraint may be seen in the markets for consumer credit, mortgages,

and new capital issues. Consumer instalment credit has ceased to grow.

New commitments by insurance companies and savings banks to purchase mort-

gages have been reduced. Plans for issuance of some new securities have

been withdrawn or postponed and others have had to be revised, although the

total volume of new issues has continued very large*

             The record of the past year has clearly demonstrated that selective

measures of credit restraint are an effective and necessary supplement to

general credit measures and at the same time are an important line of defense

for the Government securities market.
                                     -4-
Continuing Authority to Regulate Consumer Credit

          Regulation of consumer credit, reinstated last fall under

authority of the Defense Production Act, has played an important part

and as defense spending continues to expand should play an even more

important part in the program to control inflationary forces. While

consumer credit regulation alone cannot solve the problem of inflation,

nevertheless, Regulation W, by establishing minimum downpayment require-

ments and maximum periods for repayment of consumer instalment debt, has

effectively limited the expansion of consumer purchasing power in the

form of credit dollars and is an essential part of any continuing compre-

hensive anti-inflationary program,

         The terms initially established in September l950, after extensive

consultation with trade groups were only slightly more restrictive than

the average terms prevailing in consumer markets in the period just preceding

the regulation. In announcing them the Board indicated that further

tightening might be in order as the magnitude of the defense program and

resulting inflationary pressures become more evident. Some weeks later,

after careful consideration of current and prospective developments not

only in the consumer durable goods field but in the economy as a whole,

the Board announced, effective October 16, a more restrictive set of terms

which has remained in effect since that time.

         The regulation now provides that in buying an automobile on in-

stalment a buyer must pay one-third down and repay the balance of his contract

in not more than 1$ months; for other durables such as washing machines and
                                     -5 -
television sets, the minimum downpayment requirement is 25 per cent, and

the maximum term allowed is also 15 months. More liberal terms are permitted

for furniture and home repairs and improvements.

                                                I
          The present provisions of Regulation V are more lenient in some

respects than those in effect during most of World War II. The regulation is

also substantially less restrictive than the terms of similar regulations

now in force in Canada, where the regulation of consumer credit is also

included in the arsenal of anti-inflation weapons.

          Under the present terms of Regulation W, the highly inflationary

expansion of outstanding instalment credit has been stopped. In the six-

month period October 1950 through March 1951, instalment credit outstanding

declined by 364 million dollars. This decline contrasts sharply with the

increase of 2.3 billion dollars in the preceding six months, and with the

rise of 1.2 billion dollars in the period October 1949 to March 1950-

          Recently there has been some reduction in demand for consumer

durable goods from the exceptionally large volume of December and January,

although sales of most continue close to the high levels reached a year ago.

Conditions in these markets are being watched closely and frequent

consultations are being held with representatives of the industries and

trades which have been affected.   Even though inflationary pressures may

temporarily be checked, a highly volatile demand situation is to be expected

as long as the defense program and international developments play such a

•dominant role in the economy. Let me assure you that the Board is prepared

either to tighten or to relax credit terms whenever such action would be

consistent with the objectives of the Defense Production Act.
                                      - 6 -


Regulation of Real Estate Credit

             In the field of real estate credit, several important steps have

been taken    t o check inflationary developments and conserve materials and

other   resources.   Last July, prior to the passage of the Defense Production

Act, the Federal Housing Administration and the Veterans Administration

tightened the terms under which they would insure or guarantee mortgage loans,

both on new and on existing properties. Since the passage of that Act,

further action has been taken to regulate real estate construction credit.

The f i r s t step was the issuance, effective October 12, of Regulation X by

the Board and companion regulations by FHA and VA covering credit extended

in connection with purchases of 1- to 2-family houses. The next was amendment

of these regulations as of January 12, 1951, to cover new multi-family units.

Finally, another amendment to Regulation X , effective February 15, covered

loans in connection with certain     nonresidential construction.   At every

stage in developing the regulations valuable advice and assistance has been

sought and obtained from lenders, builders, and other private groups, as well

as from public officials.

                                                            H
             Under the terms of Regulation X and companion F A regulations,

mortgage loans on houses are limited to various percentages from 90 per cent

for houses valued at 5,000 dollars or less to 50 per cent for houses valued

at over 24,250 dollars. With respect to loans guaranteed by the Veterans

Administration, loan ratios 5 to 10 percentage points higher were authorized

by the Housing    Administrator to preserve the relative credit preference

granted to veterans.    At the time of their announcement the terms were widely

regarded as being s t r i c t and likely to lead to sharp curtailment in the

volume of residential building.
                                    - 7 -
          The effectiveness of the regulation was considerably limited at the

outset by the large volume of building then under way and by the large volume

of financing commitments outstanding.   Thus, while construction activity

and extensions of mortgage credit have continued at very high levels, the

restrictions imposed have been important in helping to reduce the number of

new units being started.   During the winter months housing starts were equal

to those a year earlier but were down more than seasonally from the extra-

ordinary high level of last spring and summer.    In March and April starts ap-

pear to have been about one-fifth below a year ago.

          It now appears likely that under present regulations the effective

demand for new houses will be less than in 1950 when a record total of

1,400,000 units were started.   At the same time, with about 360,000 or

370,000 units started in the first four months of l95l, the total for the

year will probably exceed the 800,000 to 850,000 units set as a target

last October when the terms were first announced.     Prospects for a smaller

volume of construction this year together with recent high levels of

production of most building materials have resulted in a leveling off of

building material prices since the first of the year. Even so, these prices

average about 20 per cent higher than in the spring of 1950 and shortages

of some metal items are rather widely reported.

          To make restrictions of mortgage credit adequately effective, the

authority over such credit needs to be extended to cover loans made on existing

properties.   Since passage of the Defense Production Act prices of old as

well as new houses have increased significantly, thereby raising the loan

values of old properties and adding to the potential volume of credit based

on this type of asset. Price    increases for old properties in turn tend to
                                     -8 -

support increases in prices of, and the amount of credit extended on,

new houses. Thus, restriction of credit extended on existing properties

would help to make the restraint of new construction credit more effective

as well as to limit inflationary mortgage credit expansion generally.

          The amount of mortgage credit extended on old houses during 1950

was the largest on record, almost 9 billion dollars or about three-fifths

of all the credit   extended on all 1- to 4-family properties.   In the first

quarter of 1951 lending on old houses was maintained at a very high rate and

continued to account for a large share of the total volume of mortgage credit

extension.

          The President as well as the Council of Economic Advisers and the.

Joint Committee on the Economic Report have recommended that authority be

granted to control credit on purchases of existing houses.   The Board joins

in this recommendation and urges that the authority be granted in the form

provided in the bill presently under consideration.

         Total mortgage debt outstanding on 1- to 4-family houses, new and

old combined, is 2-l/4 times what itwasat the end of World War II. Continuation

of such rapid expansion of mortgage debt would not only threaten the stability

of real estate markets but also have a serious inflationary impact on the

whole economy.

Voluntary Credit Restraint Program

         The recently inaugurated Voluntary Credit Restraint Program, to

which I referred earlier, is designed to encourage financing institutions to

conduct their credit operations in such a way as to contribute to meeting

defense and other essential needs and at the same time to help limit the use
of credit for other purposes. This program has been established as a result

of the President's delegation to the Board of the authority contained in

the Defense Production Act to encourage the making of voluntary agreements

in the field of financing. It has been developed after consultation with

and approval by the Attorney General and also after consultation with the

Federal Trade Commission.

          The Program is entirely voluntary on the part of participating

financing institutions and its success is wholly dependent on the coopera-

tion of such institutions. The Board and the Reserve Banks participate in

it to the extent required under the terms of the program in order to be of

assistance to the voluntary committees appointed under the Program. Governor

Powell has been designated by the Board to be Chairman of the National

Voluntary Credit Restraint Committee. This Committee originally consisted

of four representatives each of banks, insurance companies, and investment

banking houses chosen after consultation with the lending associations

in these areas. More recently, two representatives each of mutual savings

banks and savings and loan associations have been added, to the Committee.

          The National Voluntary Credit Restraint Committee has established

initially 12 subcommittees for banks, one located in each Federal Reserve Dis-

trict, and 4 regional subcommittees each for insurance companies and investment

banking houses. These subcommittees are available for consultation with indi-

vidual financing institutions to assist them in determining the application of

the Program to specific loans for which application has been made to financing

institutions.   Of course, the final decision with respect to making or
                                    - 10 ~

refusing to make any particular loan or loans is wholly within the discretion

of each financing institution, whether or not it has consulted with any of

the subcommittees.

           Members chosen to serve on the national committee as well as on

the various subcommittees have been very carefully selected to provide

broad participation by the financial community. I will submit for the

record a list of the membership of the national and regional committees.

You will agree, I'm sure, that this is an impressive roster of financial

leaders.

           The national committee has issued three bulletins, the first

dealing with means of restraining inventory financing, the second with the

principles to be followed in financing capital expansion programs and

the third with State and local government financing. These bulletins,

together with the Statement of Principles of the Program, have been dis-

tributed to all financing institutions participating in the Program to

provide a common guide for combatting inflationary loan expansion in

their respective fields, Other bulletins as may be appropriate and helpful

will be issued from time to time.

           While there has not yet been time to build up a body of statistical

information to enable the Committee to analyze thoroughly the effects of the

Program, there are indications that the initiation of the Program has

had a salutary effect on the trend of credit. Expansion of bank credit,

which was very sharp during the last half of 1950, has shown some signs
                                      - 11 -


of abating in recent weeks.

           Endorsements of the Program and pledges of wholehearted coopera-

tion have been received from many representative industry groups. In

the circumstances, those connected with the Program are most encouraged,

and it is the Board's view that the authorization for this unique coopera-

tive effort as one means of restraining the further expansion of private

credit should be continued.


V-Loan Program

           Section 301 of the Defense Production Act provides the authority

for the current guaranteed loan program under which loans made by private

financing institutions to defense contractors are guaranteed by

defense procurement agencies. Essentially this program is a revival

of the so-called V-loan program which was successful in helping to

finance war production during World War II.

          Under the present program, there are eight guaranteeing agen-

cies:   the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Commerce, Interior,

and Agriculture, the General Services Administration, and the Atomic

Energy Commission. The twelve Federal Reserve Banks act as fiscal

agents of the United States on behalf of these guaranteeing agencies.

The Board, after consultation with the guaranteeing agencies, has

prescribed regulations governing the guarantee operations of the

Reserve Banks and rates, fees, forms, and procedures to be utilized

in connection with such guarantees.
                                    - 12 -

          One of the special virtues of the V-loan program is the fact

that the procedure for obtaining a guaranteed loan is relatively simple.

Briefly, any defense contractor who requires financing in order to

carry out his contracts first gets in touch with his local bank or

financing institution.   The financing institution, after working

out the terms of the proposed loan, files an application for a

guarantee with the Federal Reserve Bank of its district. The Reserve

Bank makes any necessary credit investigation and submits the loan to

the appropriate agency for approval.   If the guaranteeing agency ap-

proves the application, it authorizes the Reserve Bank as its agent

to execute the guarantee agreement.

          A maximum interest rate of 5 per cent and a schedule of

guarantee fees have been established by the Board after consultation

with the guaranteeing agencies. The higher the percentage of guarantee

requested by the financing institution, the higher the guarantee fee

which it is required to pay.   This encourages financing institutions

to assume as much of the risk as possible and reduces the Government's

contingent liability.

         Up to April 30, 503 applications for guarantees totaling

about 565 million dollars had been received; 327 applications were

approved for about 422 million dollars, 105 applications for about

123 million dollars are under consideration, 57 applications

aggregating about 11 million dollars were declined, and the remaining

few applications were withdrawn.   At present, applications are being

received at a rate of slightly more than 100 a month.
                                    - 13 -

           Because of rulings of the Comptroller General, financing

institutions have been reluctant to take assignments of Government con-

tracts as security for defense loans.   However, this situation will be

remedied by a clarifying amendment to the Assignment of Claims Act re-

cently approved by the. Senate and the House of Representatives.    With

this impediment to lending on defense contracts removed, and with the

anticipated acceleration in the defense production program, there is

every reason to expect that the volume of applications for guaranteed

loans under the V-loan program will increase greatly.

           The basic purpose of the V-loan program is to utilize the pri-

vate banking system so far as possible in financing necessary defense

production. V-loan guarantees are especially useful to smaller con-

tractors who may not be otherwise able to obtain necessary financing

for defense contracts.

Continuing Need for Restraints on Inflation

           Defense production is in the early stages and demand for

civilian goods remains at high levels. Present schedules call for

doubling defense outlays as a percentage of national output within a

year.   In addition, private outlays for new plant and equipment are

expected to increase substantially, adding to inflationary tendencies.

Although recently inflationary pressures appear to have moderated, the

fundamental situation in this country and abroad is still strongly in-

flationary.

          Estimates of possible increases both in total output and in

output of particular products indicate that the defense and other

essential goals cannot be realized unless civilian production and
                                  - Hi -
demand for important types of goods are curtailed. Present and
prospective shortages of steel, copper, and other metals require re-
straint on competing civilian uses of metals, such as automobiles,
appliances, houses, and commercial construction. Unless both public
and private expenditures for nondefense purposes are limited, the only
alternative is a further advance in prices. It is of paramount import-
ance, therefore, that the anti-inflation programs now in operation be
continued and strengthened.

								
To top