CERCLA Section 107 Liable Parties (
Document Sample


FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL
(CERCLA) LIABILITY
Mary C. Johnson
Associate Regional Counsel
EPA, Region 4
November 2007
CERCLA Section 107
Liable Parties (PRPs)
Pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §
9607(a), potentially responsible parties include:
(1) current owners or operators of a facility;
(2) past owners or operators who owned or
operated the facility at the time hazardous
substances were disposed at the facility;
(3) persons who arranged for the disposal of
hazardous substances (usually known as
generators); and
(4) persons who transported hazardous substances
and selected the site for disposal.
1
How to Buy a Superfund Site
without becoming a Section 107
owner,”
“current owner,” and thus liable ?
The “Brownfields Amendments of 2002
provide important liability limitations
for landowners that qualify as a (an):
1. bona fide prospective purchaser;
2. contiguous property owner; or
3. innocent landowner.
Small Business Liability Relief
and Brownfields Revitalization
Act (Brownfields Amendments)
Enacted on January 11, 2002
EPA’
Established EPA’s Brownfields Grants
Program
– Provides funding to assess and clean up
Brownfields sites
– Provides funding to enhance state and tribal
cleanup programs
Clarified CERCLA liability provisions for
certain landowners
2
Brownfields Amendments
Liability Provisions
New liability protections for:
- Bona fide prospective purchasers (BFPPs)
CERCLA 107(r) and 101(40)
- Contiguous property owners
CERCLA 107(q)
Revised provision for Innocent Landowner
– CERCLA 107(b)(3) & 101(35)(A)(i) – amended
know”
definition of “reason to know” (all appropriate
inquiries) in CERCLA 101(35)(B)
Bona Fide Prospective
Purchaser (BFPP)
CERCLA 107(r), the bona fide prospective
purchaser (BFPP) provision provides a new
landowner liability protection and limits
EPA’
EPA’s recourse for unrecovered response
costs to a lien on the property for the
increase in the fair market value attributable
EPA’
to EPA’s response action.
To qualify as a BFPP, a person must meet
the criteria set forth in CERCLA Section
101(40).
3
COMMON ELEMENTS
1. all appropriate inquiry
2. no affiliation with a liable party
3. compliance w/ land use restrictions and
institutional controls
4. taking reasonable steps with respect to
hazardous substances on property
5. cooperation, assistance, and access
6. compliance with information requests and
administrative subpoenas
7. providing legally required notices
8. buy property after January 11, 2002 (BFPP)
EPA Guidance on BFPP
www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/p
olicies/cleanup/superfund/common-
elem-ref.pdf
Contact Staff Attorney for Superfund
Site regarding Region 4’s Prospective
Purchaser Inquiry Process
4
Innocent Landowner
Defense
Party must demonstrate that hazardous
substance release was by a third party with
whom he had no direct or indirect
contractual relationship. CERCLA 107(b)(3)
relationship”
“contractual relationship” – defined in
101(35)(A)(i)
Includes virtually all land transfers unless
(among other exceptions), property was
acquired after disposal occurred and party can
establish that he did not know or had no “reason
know”
to know” that hazardous substance was
disposed of on, in, or at the facility
Innocent Landowner
Defense
know”
“Reason to know” – 101(35)(B)
– Must demonstrate that, prior to
purchasing property, he conducted AAI
“into the previous ownership and uses of
the facility in accordance with generally
accepted good commercial and customary
practices”
standards and practices”
5
Innocent Landowner
Defense
Must also demonstrate compliance
with additional CERCLA 107(b)(3)
requirements upon and after
purchase:
care”
– exercise “due care” with respect to the
hazardous substances
steps”
– take “reasonable steps” and precautions
against acts or omissions of third party
Contiguous Property
Owner Exemption
Owners of contiguous property (and properties
situated”
“otherwise similarly situated”) not considered to be
operator,
owner or operator, if:
– property contaminated solely due to release from property
owned by someone else
– did not cause, contribute, or consent to release or
threatened release
– after conducting AAI prior to purchase, did not know or
have reason to know that property was or could be
contaminated by a release from the neighboring property
– “protects parties that are essentially victims of pollution
neighbor’ actions.”
incidents caused by their neighbor’s actions.” S. Rep. No.
107-2, at 10 (2001).
6
ALL APPROPRIATE
INQUIRY (AAI)
CERCLA Section 101(35)(B)
Amended by Brownfields Amendments
Applicability
– Liability Protection
BFPPs
Contiguous Property Owners
Innocent Landowners
– Brownfields Assessment Grant Recipients
EPA’
Parties who receive grants under EPA’s Brownfields
Grant program to assess and characterize properties
Parties applying for Brownfields grants who must
establish BFPP status
AAI-linked Liability
Protection
Innocent Landowners, Contiguous Property
Owners, and BFPPs all must conduct AAI
prior to purchase
If know, or have reason to know, that
property is contaminated prior to purchase,
cannot qualify as Innocent Landowners or
Contiguous Property Owners
BFPP can purchase property with knowledge
of contamination and maintain protection
from liability
7
All Appropriate Inquiry
(AAI)
Brownfields Amendments:
– required EPA to develop regulations
establishing standards and practices for
how to conduct AAIs
– list 10 criteria EPA required to include in
regulations
- November 1, 2006 New AAI Regulations
Effective
Interim AAI Standard
Properties purchased prior to May 31, 1997,
court shall take into account in determining
AAI:
– Specialized knowledge of defendant
– Commonly known information on property
– Value of property if clean compared to purchase
price
– Obviousness of presence or likely presence of
contamination
– Ability of defendant to detect contamination
8
Interim AAI Standard
Properties purchased after May 31, 1997:
– the procedures of American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM), including ASTM Standard
E1527-97
EPA Clarification of Interim Standard
– Final Rule May 9, 2003 (68 FR 24888)
– ASTM E1527-00 also satisfies interim standard
Interim standard remains effective through
November 1, 2006
Scope of AAI /
Contaminants of Concern
for CERCLA liability protection
– to identify releases and threatened releases of
hazardous substances
for Brownfields grants
site”
– “brownfields site” includes properties
contaminated with substances not included in
substances”
definition of “hazardous substances”
– includes petroleum and petroleum products,
controlled substances, and pollutants and
contaminants
9
Residential Property
exemption
Statute provides exemption from completing
full AAI only in instances where a non-
governmental, non-commercial party buying
residential property for residential use
(CERCLA 101(40)(B)(iv))
Site inspection and title search sufficient
AAI required only if site inspection reveals
reason to look further
AAI Final Rule
40 CFR Part 312 – “Standards and Practices
Inquiry”
for All Appropriate Inquiry”
Effective date is November 1, 2006, one
year after publication in Federal Register
Until November 1, 2006, either the final
regulation (or ASTM E 1527-05) or the
interim standard (ASTM E1527-00 or E1527-
97) can be used to satisfy AAI
After November 1, 2006, parties must follow
the provisions of the final rule or the ASTM
E1527-05 standard.
10
Applicable AAI Standard
Purchase Date Standard
before 5/31/97 five statutory factors
6/1/97 to 11/1/05 ASTM E1527-97
5/9/03 to 11/1/05 ASTM E1527-97 or 00
11/1/05 to 11/1/06 ASTM E1527-97, 00, 05 or
AAI Rule (40 CRF Part 312)
After 11/1/06 AAI Rule or ASTM E1527-05
When Must AAI be
performed?
Must perform AAI prior to acquiring the property
Must be conducted or updated within one year prior
to date of acquisition
Certain aspects must be conducted or updated w/in
180 days prior to acquisition (interviews, records
review, site inspection, lien search)
Previously-conducted AAIs may be used as sources
of information, even if more than a year old
11
Who can perform AAI?
Person who supervises or oversees the
conduct of AAI must meet the
definition of Environmental
Professional (EP)
Person who does not qualify as an EP
may assist conduct of AAI if under the
supervision or responsible charge of
an EP
Definition of Environmental
Professional
Person who has:
(1) Sufficient specific education, training,
and experience to exercise professional
judgment to develop opinions and
conclusions regarding the presence or
releases or threatened releases of
hazardous substances; AND
12
Definition of Environmental
Professional
(2a) holds a professional engineer or
professional geologist license, or other state
or federal government certification or
environmental professional license and has
3 years of relevant full-time experience; OR
(2b) has a degree in science or engineering
and 5 years of relevant full-time experience;
OR
(2c) has 10 years of relevant full-time
experience.
Definition of Environmental
Professional
Relevant Experience:
– Participation in the performance of AAI
investigations, environmental site
assessments, or other site investigations
that may include environmental analyses,
investigations, and remediation which
involve the understanding of surface and
subsurface environmental conditions and
the processes used
13
AAI Performance Factors
Gather information required to meet
standards that is:
– publicly available
– obtainable within reasonable time and cost
constraints, and
– can be practically reviewed
– 312.20(f)(1)
Review and evaluate thoroughness and
reliability of information gathered
(312.20(f)(2)
AAI Objectives
AAI objective is to result in identification
of conditions indicative of releases and
threatened releases
– of hazardous substances (312.20(e))
CERCLA liability
– Of hazardous substances, pollutants,
contaminants, petroleum and petroleum
products, and controlled
scubstances(312.20(e)(2))
Grant recipients
14
Interviews
Current owners/occupants must be
interviewed (312.23(a),(b))
Past owners/occupants and others, if
necessary to meet objectives and
performance factors (312.23(c))
Neighboring property owners, if
property abandoned (at least one
neighbor required) (312.23(d))
Review of Historical Sources
of Information
Historical documents and records must
be reviewed (312.24(a))
– Records may include, but are not limited
to: aerial photos, fire insurance maps,
building department records, chain of
title, land use records
Review records covering a period of
property’
time back to the property’s obvious
first developed use (312.24(b))
15
Review of Government
Records
Must review federal, state, and local
government records (or databases
containing government records) for subject
and nearby properties
– Subject property (312.26(b))
– Nearby and adjoining properties with reported
releases (312.26(c)(1))
– Nearby and adjoining properties previously
identified or regulated by government entity
(312.26(c)(2))
Must review tribal records if property is
located on or near tribal-owned lands
Government Records
(continued)
AAI regulation lists government records that
should be reviewed (312.26(b) and (c)) and
specifies the minimum search distance for
each record (312.26(d))
– Modification of the minimum search distance
must be documented (312.26(d))
Records can include CERCLIS, registries of
institutional and engineering controls
(limited to subject property), and leaking
USTs
16
Visual Inspections
On-site visual inspection of subject property
required (312.27(a)(1))
– Limited exemptions (312.27(c))
Visual inspection of adjoining properties
from nearest vantage point (312.27(a)(2))
EPA strongly recommends that EP perform
the visual inspection (312 Description of
Rule)
Search for Cleanup Liens
Search for recorded environmental cleanup
liens filed or recorded under federal, state,
tribal or local law (312.25(a))
Property owner may provide lien search
information to EP (312.25(b))
EP not required to perform the lien search
(312.21(b))
17
Retention of Previous AAI
Requirements (SARA)
AAI rule still retains all AAI requirements
from previous innocent landowner
provisions (under SARA):
– Relationship btwn purchase price vs. value of
property, if not contaminated
– Specialized knowledge
– Commonly known and reasonable ascertainable
information
– Degree of obviousness and ability to detect
Must consider all of these factors
Relationship between
Purchase Price and Clean
Value of Property
Must consider whether the purchase
price reflects the fair market value of
the property, if not contaminated
(312.29(a))
If price does not reflect value, should
consider whether differential is due to
presence of contamination (312.29(b)
and (c))
18
Specialized Knowledge
Purchasers and persons conducting
AAI must take into account (312.28):
– Their specialized knowledge of:
Subject property
Area surrounding property
Conditions of adjoining properties; and
– Any other experience relevant to the
inquiry
Commonly Known or Reasonably
Ascertainable Information
Must consider information that is
commonly known and reasonably
ascertainable within the local
community (312.30(a))
Information may be obtained from
(312.30(c)):
– Current owners or occupants
– Local and state government officials
– Other sources (e.g. newspapers, local
libraries, historical societies)
19
Degree of Obviousness and
Ability to Detect
Contamination
Persons conducting AAI must take into account all
information collected and consider:
– The degree of obviousness of the presence of releases or
threatened releases at subject property (312.31(a)), and
– The ability to detect contamination by appropriate
investigation (312.31(b))
If necessary, should include an opinion regarding
additional appropriate investigation, if any
(312.31(b)).
– No opinion needs to be provided if EP does not think that
these factors warrant additional investigation
Delineation of Responsibility
Activities done by EP or under the
Supervision of EP
– Interviews
– Record Reviews
– Visual inspection
– Commonly known or reasonably
ascertainable info
– Degree of obviousness of presence of
contamination
20
Delineation of Responsibility
Landowner responsible for “additional
inquiries”
inquiries”
– Specialized knowledge or experience
– Relationship of purchase price to FMV, if not
contaminated
– Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable
info
– Search for cleanup liens
Landowner not required to provide
inquiry”
“additional inquiry” info to EP
– EP should assess the impact on ability to render
opinion regarding site conditions
– If impacts ability, EP should document as data
gap
Written Report
Must include, at a minimum:
EP’
– EP’s opinion as to whether the inquiry has “identified
conditions indicative of releases or threatened
releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the
property.”
subject property.” (312.21(c)(1))
– Identification of data gaps (312.21(c)(2))
– Qualifications of the EP (312.21(c)(3)
Must be signed by the EP (312.21(d))
Format, structure, length of the written report not
specified in rule (ASTM 1527-05 does provide a
recommended format)
21
Data Gaps
EP must identify data gaps that affect
his or her ability to identify conditions
indicative of releases or threatened
releases of hazardous substances on,
at, in, or to the subject property
EP must comment on significance of
data gaps
Shelf Life of the Written
Report
One year, with updates required after
180 days for the following activities
(must actually perform these activities
during the 180 day period prior to
purchase):
– Interviews
– Visual inspection of the subject property
– Historical records review
– Search for recorded environmental
cleanup liens
22
Disclosure Obligations
AAI rule does not include any new reporting
or disclosure obligations
Limited documentation requirements
intended to enhance the inquiries by
requiring EPs to record the results and
conclusions regarding conditions indicative
of releases
Rule does not require that report be
submitted to EPA or retained by landowner
Compliance with AAI
EPA not necessarily involved in performance
or review for completeness of AAI
performed
Written AAI report may allow person
claiming CERCLA liability protection to offer
documentation in support of claim that AAI
conducted in compliance with CERCLA
AAI rule does not affect admissibility of
report as evidence
23
Continuing Obligations
Compliance with land use restrictions and
does not impede effectiveness of
institutional controls
steps”
Taking “reasonable steps” with respect to
hazardous substances
Provides full cooperation, assistance, and
access
Compliance with CERCLA requests and
subpoenas for information
Provides all legally required notices
Compliance with Land
Use Restrictions
Compliance required even if restrictions not
in place at time of purchase
May require property owner to take steps to
implement controls (record deed notice,
agree to easement or covenant)
If IC does not successfully implement a land
use restriction relied on in connection with
response action, landowner still required to
comply with restriction
24
Cooperation, Assistance,
and Access
To conduct response actions or natural
resource restoration
Includes cooperation and access necessary
for the installation, integrity, operation, and
maintenance of any complete or partial
response action or natural resource
restoration
CERCLA 101(4)(E), 107(q)(1)(A)(iv),
101(35)(A)
Compliance with Info
Requests
BFPPs and contiguous property owners
Timely, accurate, and complete
responses
Inconsequential response errors – EPA
may in its discretion still consider party
protected from liability if meet all other
conditions
25
Provide Legally Required
Notices
BFPPs and contiguous property owners
May include notices required under federal,
state, and local law
Federal notice examples: CERCLA 103,
RCRA 9002, EPCRA 304
Party has burden of ascertaining applicable
notice requirements
EPA may require self-certification
Ongoing obligation
“Reasonable Steps”
Stop continuing releases,
Prevent threatened future releases,
and
Prevent or limit human,
environmental, or natural resource
exposure to earlier hazardous
substance releases
26
“Reasonable Steps”
Same legal standard for the three
landowner provisions, but obligations may
differ
BFPP may have greater reasonable steps
obligations because BFPP can purchase with
knowledge of contamination and
opportunity to plan
New contamination gives rise to full CERCLA
liability
“Reasonable Steps”
Site-specific, fact-based inquiry
Care”
“Due Care” CERCLA 107(b)(3)(a)
care”
Statutory language differs for “due care”
steps,”
and “reasonable steps,” but existing due
care case law may be good reference
Courts addressing due care generally
require landowner to take some positive or
affirmative step(s) with respect to
hazardous substances
27
“Reasonable Steps”
Examples / General Guidance
– Notification
– Site Restrictions
– Containing Releases or Threatened
Releases
– Remediation
– Site Investigation
– Performance of EPA Approved Remedy
“Reasonable Steps”
Comfort/Status Letters Addressing
Reasonable Steps
– Site-specific, discretionary, upon request
– typically limited to sites with significant
EPA involvement
– used to facility cleanup/ redevelopment of
brownfields; when realistic probability of
Superfund liability; no other mechanism
party’
to address party’s concerns
28
DISCLAIMER
This presentation is intended for
informational purposes only and
creates no substantive rights for any
persons. It is not a regulation and
does not impose any legal obligations.
It is not intended as a substitute for
guidance(s)
reading the statute or the guidance(s)
itself.
EPA Contact Information
Mary C. Johnson
Associate Regional Counsel
EPA Region 4
404.562.9526
johnson.maryc@epa.gov
Karen Singer
Associate Regional Counsel
EPA Region 4
404.562.9540
singer.karen@epa.gov
29
Related docs
Get documents about "