Design Review

Document Sample
Design Review Powered By Docstoc
					                                                CBL Quality Checklist
Name of the course:
Delivery method:
Designer name:
Design Review By:                                                                                       Completed on:
Grammar Review By:                                                                                      Completed on:
Technical Review By:                                                                                    Completed on:
All Copyrighted materials have been appropriately cleared:                       Yes         No         Completed on:
R:/ Path for copyright permission:
Date of next review cycle: Pilot:              6 months:
Approved by Client on:
Instructions: Please review materials carefully according to the criteria listed on the Criteria Checklist. If you select No for a specific
item, please comment with appropriate page number and type of change. If you are attaching printed corrections, please make sure to
print the checklist to accompany any corrections.

                                                     Quality Review Criteria
                                              Design/Standards Review                                              Yes/No    Date Fixed
Headers and footers are consistent throughout all materials in terms of font, size and style.
Contact information has been included within first 3 slides or pages.
Content is easy to follow, flows and is well organized.
All content, including sidebars, are visible on the screen without scrolling.
Graphics are relevant to content.
Visuals are accurate and appropriate for the content of the training material.
Source references are accurate and complete.
Source references are listed at the bottom of the respective slides/pages, using font size 8, and/or on the
second to last slide/page of the presentation.
Assessment questions and answers are accurate, complete and relevant to the learning objectives and the
content.
Assessment questions are case or situational based. Learners can apply content knowledge when
answering the questions.
Number of questions is appropriate to content.
If it's the first CBL in a series or a pre-requisite module, it includes an outline of the series/course structure
in the introductory section. Also, next steps are explained on the last page; for example, if you must register
for the ILT after completing the module, that instruction is included on the last page.
If it includes navigation steps, the steps are accurate and easy to follow.
The objectives for the module have been identified and are clearly stated in observable behaviors in the
introductory section.



                                               D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\c00454f0-31e3-4207-ac69-13298954fb87.xls
Objectives are linked to the content and to the practices. For example, if the objective is "explain", there is
an "explanation" provided in the content and there is an opportunity for the learner to "explain" in the
assessment.
Includes UCare principles (service, people, quality, growth, finance), as applicable to the workplace.
Designed to engage the learner and keep him/her motivated. It includes relevant feedback, examples,
assessments, facts and/or testimonials. Has case scenarios of "What's in it for me" (WIIFM). THE WIIFM
SHOULD CLOSELY FOLLOW THE OBJECTIVES.
Challenges the learner to acquire new knowledge by constructive cognitive links instead of testing for
memorization skills. For example, has case scenarios and for learners to think through, instead of close-
ended questions.
Each module/lesson/topic builds on the previous one(s).
Leverages/reinforces the use of appropriate reference system by including references throughout the
course.
Content is divided and is built by function/task.
                                                           Design Issues Found:




                                                D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\c00454f0-31e3-4207-ac69-13298954fb87.xls
                                                     CBL Quality Checklist
Name of the course:
Delivery method:
Designer name:
Design Review By:                                                                                           Completed on:
Grammar Review By:                                                                                          Completed on:
Technical Review By:                                                                                        Completed on:
All Copyrighted materials have been appropriately cleared:                          Yes          No         Completed on:
R:/ Path for copyright permission:
Date of next review cycle:   Pilot:               6 months:
Approved by Client on:
Instructions: Please review materials carefully according to the criteria listed on the Criteria Checklist. If you select No for a specific item,
please comment with appropriate page number and type of change. If you are attaching printed corrections, please make sure to print the
checklist to accompany any corrections.

                                                         Quality Review Criteria
                                                  Editing Review                                              Yes/No            Date Fixed
Spelling has been checked (there are no spelling errors). This includes assessment questions, assessment
answer options, assessment feedback, text poppers, and sidebars.
Content is grammatically correct (there are no grammatical errors and gender is used consistently). Content
includes assessment questions, assessment answer options, assessment feedback, text poppers, and
sidebars.
Font style and size are consistent.
Bold text is used appropriately and is applied to no more than 25% of content.
No text is underlined unless it is a functioning hyperlink.
Visible hyperlink text appropriately describes the destination file or site.
All acrononyms are spelled out the first time they are used and the acrononym is included in parentheses next
to the text.
                                                                      Edits Found:
                                                     CBL Quality Checklist
Name of the course:
Delivery method:
Designer name:
Design Review By:                                                                                           Completed on:
Grammar Review By:                                                                                          Completed on:
Technical Review By:                                                                                        Completed on:
All Copyrighted materials have been appropriately cleared:                          Yes          No         Completed on:
R:/ Path for copyright permission:
Date of next review cycle:   Pilot:               6 months:
Approved by Client on:
Instructions: Please review materials carefully according to the criteria listed on the Criteria Checklist. If you select No for a specific item,
please comment with appropriate page number and type of change. If you are attaching printed corrections, please make sure to print the
checklist to accompany any corrections.

                                                         Quality Review Criteria
                                                   Technical Review                                                 Yes/No      Date Fixed
All inserted files (including graphics, video, audio and other media files) are named using only letters and
numbers. File names do not include spaces and/or special characters.
Visuals are of appropriate size so as to have a clear resolution.
The width or height of inserted images is no larger than 300.
All text is clearly visible and is not hidden by drop boxes or images.
In SoftChalk Activity Options, Display Inline option is selected.
In SoftChalk Activity Options, if activity is scored, learner is warned that this activity must be completed
because it is counted as part of the final assessment.
Total score of assessment/quiz questions equals 100 points.
In SoftChalk QuizPopper Options, Show Question, Inline and Allow Retry options are selected.
All hyperlinks have been tested and work.
Hyperlinks navigate to the correct file path for documents, media files, and websites.
Links open in new window. If Captivate, presentation doesn't move ahead when link/button is clicked to view
URL or file.
In SoftChalk Style Properties for Style, Light Blue style is selected.
In SoftChalk Style Properties for Lesson Title, title matches what will appear in ULearn.
In SoftChalk Style Properties for Footer, content & date modified boxes are checked. Text included reads:
"Created by Department XYZ" and department's contact information.
In SoftChalk Style Properties for Navigation, Arrows box is checked.
Audio flows in a natural conversational manner.
Option is available to skip audio if audio corresponds with text on screen.
Use of appropriate instruction slide
[(Text) R:\PROFESSIONAL_DEVELOPMENT\PROCEDURES -- OPERATIONS\QUALITY_CONTROL]
Videos are playing correctly.
In Captivate, timeline is set to 3 seconds (when not using audio).
In Captivate, objects in timeline are set to remainder of slide (when using audio) with no Next button.
In Captivate, objects in timeline start at 0 seconds.
                                                              Technical Issues Found:
                                              CBL Quality Checklist
Name of the course:
Delivery method:
Designer name:
Design Review By:                                                                                     Completed on:
Grammar Review By:                                                                                    Completed on:
Technical Review By:                                                                                  Completed on:
All Copyrighted materials have been appropriately cleared:                     Yes         No         Completed on:
R:/ Path for copyright permission:
Date of next review cycle: Pilot:              6 months:
Approved by Client on:
Instructions: Please review materials carefully according to the criteria listed on the Criteria Checklist. If you select No for a
specific item, please comment with appropriate page number and type of change. If you are attaching printed corrections, please
make sure to print the checklist to accompany any corrections.

                                                  Quality Review Criteria
                                               Client Review                                                   Yes/No     Date Fixed
All content is correct.
Tests and quizes have correct answers.
Contact information is correct.
Flow of content is appropriate.
Graphics and activities are appropriate.




                           Please sign and date if no changes are needed. A confirmation email is enough




Print Name:                                          Signature:                                    Date:
                                              CBL Quality Checklist
Name of the course:
Delivery method:
Designer name:
Design Review By:                                                                                     Completed on:
Grammar Review By:                                                                                    Completed on:
Technical Review By:                                                                                  Completed on:
ULearn Review By:                                                                                     Completed on:
All Copyrighted materials have been appropriately cleared:                     Yes         No         Completed on:
R:/ Path for copyright permission:
Date of next review cycle: Pilot:              6 months:
Approved by Client on:
Instructions: Please review materials carefully according to the criteria listed on the Criteria Checklist. If you select No for a
specific item, please comment with appropriate page number and type of change. If you are attaching printed corrections, please
make sure to print the checklist to accompany any corrections.

                                                  Quality Review Criteria
                                              ULearn Review                                                    Yes/No     Date Fixed
Once uploaded to ULearn, all aspects of the technical review are tested and working properly.




                      This review is done by the Instructional Designer after the module is uploaded to ULearn.