Treatment of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Antiphospholipid syndrome
autoimmune thrombophilic disorder
antiphospholipid antibodies at least one clinical manifestation
venous thrombosis arterial thrombosis recurrent fetal loss
occurs in isolation as 1° disease or in association w/ CTDx
SLE
Classification criteria (Sapporo, 1999)
clinical criteria
vascular thrombosis pregnancy morbidity anticardiolipin Ab (IgG or IgM) of moderate or high titer lupus anticoagulant
laboratory criteria
Prolonged phospholipid-dependent coagulation aPTT, kaolin clotting time, dilute Russell’s viper venom
Spectrum of disease
Heterogenous clinical picture
Ab positive (AC Ab or LA), asymptomatic women w/ history or pregnancy loss demonstrated thrombosis
increasing risk
arterial or venous
catastrophic APLAS
Allows for stratification of risk and therapeutic options
Therapeutic challenges
Role for prophylaxis in asymptomatic patients and non-gravid women w/ AP pregnancy complications Guidelines for effective anti-coagulation in patients w/ a history of thrombosis
Rate of non gravid vascular thrombosis
(Arthritis and Rheumatism 2001, 44:1466)
retrospective study patients diagnosed w/ 1° or 2° APLAS solely on the basis of pregnancy loss no previous history of non gravid thrombosis use of aspirin obtained from charts follow up time defined as first thrombotic event or last MD visit
Clinical characteristics
Characteristics
Age at initial pregnancy event 1° APS 2° APS Duration of Tx (months)
ASA treated (N = 31)
29 ± 4.9 21 10 49 ± 37
Not treated (N = 34)
28.9 ± 6.2 17 15 NA
29 patients low dose ASA (81mg/d) 2 patients standard dose ASA (325 mg/d)
High incidence of non-pregnancy related thrombosis in APS patients presenting w/ pregnancy loss
Characteristics
No of further events % w/ further events
ASA treated (N = 31)
3 10
Not treated (N = 34)
20 59
ASA prophylaxis beneficial in this APS subgroup
Treatment
antiphospholipid antibodies positive asymptomatic
do not require anticoagulation may consider ASA
Extrapolated from single study in women w/ a history of recurrent fetal loss ASA found to lower the risk of thrombosis
Treatment
clinically active disease requires life long anticoagulation risk of recurrence between 20% and 70% early retrospective studies suggested that INR > 3.0 greater protection
A comparison of two intensities of warfarin for the prevention of recurrent thombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
(NEJM 2003, 349:1133)
Study design
RCT double blind selected patients randomized
moderate intensity warfarin group (INR 2.0 -3.0) high intensity warfarin group (INR 3.1 - 4.0)
Selection criteria
Objective confirmation of arterial and/or venous thromboembolism Positive antiphospholipid Ab testing x 2 with samples drawn > 3 months apart
Positive lupus anticoagulant Positive IgG anticardiolipin Ab (moderate to high titer) Both LCA and ACA positive
Exclusion criteria
bleeding risk (19 %)
thrombocytopenia (< 50) Hx of intracranial hemorrhage or GI bleed or CVA within 3 months
pregnancy or planned pregnancy (21 %) contraindication to coumadin inability to comply with followup history of recurrent thrombosis while receiving coumadin targeted to an INR 2.0 or greater (14 %)
Base line characteristics
Characteristics
No of patients Age (mean) Female Venous thrombosis Thrombosis w/in 6 months of study
INR 3.1 - 4.0
56 43 27 (48 %) 42 (75 %) 16 (29)
INR 2.0 - 3.0
58 41 41 (71 %) 45 (78 %) 21 (36)
Outcome measures
1° study outcome
recurrent arterial and/or venous thrombosis
CVA/TIA AMI peripheral arterial occlusion cerebral vein thrombosis DVT/PE
1° safety outcome was bleeding
Time to first recurrent thrombosis
3.4% recurrence in low intensity group 10.7 % recurrence in high intensity group 7 % recurrence in total study population
Recurrence events in moderate intensity group
Previous event New event AMI and DVT AMI DVT DVT INR 1.6 2.8
Recurrence events in high intensity group
Previous event Periphe ral arterial thrombu s DVT PE DVT CVA AMI
New event DVT
INR 3.1
DVT CVA DVT AMI
3.9 1.0 0.9 1.9
60 % of patients subtherapeutic for limits defined for high and moderate intensity groups
Percentage of time Below Within Above target target target Moderate intensity High intensity
19 % 43 %
71 % 40 %
11 % 17 %
Higher proportion of patients in high intensity group in subtherapeutic range Within subtherapeutic populatin 86% at INR 2.0 - 3.0
Conclusions
Absolute risk of thrombosis low in moderate intensity group Moderate intensity coumadin was as effective as high intensity therapy for selected population