Gay marriage conflict with what modern Gay marriage conflict with what modern In the West, modern marriage, family law, history dates back to Roman law. Justinian the &quot;Institutions&quot; of marriage and the family there are two basic rules, one, generated by the natural law of man and woman, we call marriage, and thus the proliferation of children and education; Second, marriage or Marriage is a combination of man and woman, it contains has a way of life would never betray each other. Modern family law scholars thus abstract the two basic elements of marriage and family first, a man and a woman&#39;s voluntary integration and common life; Second, family functioning is bearing and rearing offspring. Elements of the previous emphasis on &quot;sex&quot; combination of the latter factor is that human reproduction. Thus, such a definition type will be same-sex &quot;marriage and family&quot; out of the protection of marriage and family law, the non-gay men and women because the combination of style, and, gay only &quot;support&quot; future generations, not &quot;birth&quot; offspring. Homosexuality ancient times, but they are in human &quot;normal life&quot; outside the mainstream society has been marginalized. Their marriage and family law, and no clear identity, because the law is the creation and application of the social mainstream crowd, and as the edge of the crowd of gay and can not be protection of the law, even, for social normal population law, for homosexuals to said, but rather a law of discrimination and oppression. When the human rights movement to infiltrate areas of law when the claim came into being gay, bore the brunt of &quot;homosexual marriage&quot; legal effect, they want their &quot;marriage&quot; be with heterosexual marriage the same legal protection. In Vermont, three pairs of gay partners living together who were 4 to 25 years, including two pairs of partners to adopt a child. They apply for a marriage license to the local government to protect their &quot;spouse&quot; as well as between &quot;parents and children&quot; among the stakeholders. When the government rejected their demands, they in 1999, the government to court, requesting the government to grant them a marriage license. Once a lawsuit filed, public outcry, and the newspapers, radio and television have reported. Supporters argue that not to grant them a marriage license is a legal discrimination; opponents argue that, if endorsed gay marriage and traditional marriage will produce a fatal impact on family ethics. Tong Yang, the judge there were differences of opinion between: marriage certificate if the judge paid by the Government, it Yiwei Zhao pair of &quot;Marriage is both women and men living body&quot; 这一 traditional Piding, Conger can not stop human beings through biotechnology Gaibian gender of Xing Wei; Ru Guo does not support the plaintiff&#39;s claim, it would be with the &quot;equal protection of the law&quot; and &quot;against legal discrimination&quot; in conflict with the principle. A judge or assume, male and female A B C also fell in love with women, they want to marry C wife. A marriage license only if the marriage with the C, B and C are not recognized marriage, then such a marriage is actually legal discrimination based on sex. After various considerations in the comprehensive, the judges reached a compromise. On the one hand, the court determined the plaintiff can &quot;civil association&quot; with the opposite sex of the main qualifications are the same type of legal protection of marriage and family in order to implement the principle of equal protection of the law; on the other hand, the Court does not support the plaintiff obtained a marriage license in order to protect marriage family &quot;of men and women living together to birth and raise offspring&quot; of this cultural tradition. Other states in the United States, also found that such conflict of laws. In Hawaii, 1993, for a pair of gay marriage, has been the state government refused, they filed suit. Court of first instance against marriage equality and legal protection of marriage violated the terms of the case appealed to the Hawaii Supreme Court. The Supreme Court remand, finds constitutional right to privacy and due process clauses do not support gay marriage rights. However, the trial court&#39;s retrial in 1996, still determine the state marriage law violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution. In 1998, Hawaii passed a constitutional amendment provides that &quot;the legislature the power to restrict marriage between heterosexual couples&quot;, and so, in 1999, Hawaii Supreme Court on the lower court&#39;s decision to commute. As compensation, Hawaii legislature passed the &quot;mutual benefit Act Hawaii&quot;, and so act, homosexual partners can be registered as a mutual beneficiary, to enjoy heterosexual marriage can enjoy the same rights and interests. In 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court held, &quot;will be limited to heterosexual marriage, the spouse can not further the interests of the state&quot; and therefore, contrary to due process of law against gay marriage and the legal principle of equal protection. Since then, the Massachusetts Senate tried to amend the state constitution to prohibit &quot;gay marriage&quot;, but a &quot;civil association&quot; form of protection of the rights of homosexual partners. However, the amendment was not adopted, the result is recognized Massachusetts gay marriage. Can be said that gay marriage rights in the fight for the war to go on, but they are not subjected to resistance to small. After all, same-sex marriage and the Western-style Jewish - Christian tradition there was a direct confrontation. Anti-gay religious basis can generally be traced back to &quot;Old Testament Leviticus&quot; (18:22 and 20:13) and &quot;new Yueluo Ma&quot; (the 1:26 and 1:27). In the Bible, homosexuality is considered contrary to the will of God, it is &quot;disgusting&quot; and &quot;shameful indulgence, and&quot; impure acts. In the United States, a group of &quot;new Christian right&quot; of believers who have played: &quot;God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve have created&quot; (&quot;Adam and Steve&quot; is an American film, plot humor, tells a pair of gay men between the sincere emotion). In their view, homosexuality is a disease, and a few people like the &quot;way of life.&quot; This refers both to homosexuals pathological mental decadence, depression and despair, but also help lead to the culprit of AIDS and other chronic disease. In their view, the modern legal system, if endorsed gay marriage, it would be the family system in the West and even deadly to human civilization system threat. In the family system, the gay families will lead to a decline in birth rate, fertility reproduction will no longer be the center of the family; loyalty among homosexual partners is less than heterosexual spouses, which can lead to family and social instability. In the social system, legal recognition of gay marriage, if so, the right to bigamy, polygamy rights and the right to adultery, the same should also be recognized, which means that the bottom line of the challenge of civilization. More extreme view is that homosexuality wave will drown our children in sexual promiscuity, filthy sea, and finally will lead to the destruction of the United States, because the history of Rome, Greece, Pompeii and the demise of Sodom provide us with a similar The lessons of history.