VIEWS: 427 PAGES: 17 CATEGORY: Investment Research POSTED ON: 8/26/2010
Recently, attention is being devoted to the utilization of water hyacinth since the efforts to control plant growth by chemical; biological and mechanical means have met with little success. The real challenge is not how to get rid of this weeds but how to benefit from it and turn it into a crop. Thus the issue of water hyacinth should be looked from a different view. In this article the potential uses of water hyacinth are classified and discussed.
Water Hyacinth: Available and Renewable resource M.F.Abdel-sabour Recycling and Environment consultant E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: Recently, attention is being devoted to the utilization of water hyacinth since the efforts to control plant growth by chemical; biological and mechanical means have met with little success. The real challenge is not how to get rid of this weeds but how to benefit from it and turn it into a crop. Thus the issue of water hyacinth should be looked from a different view. In this article the potential uses of water hyacinth are classified and discussed. Data indicated that the application of water hyacinth co-compost as soil amendments especially to the sandy soils, can improve some soil hydro- physical and chemical parameters and supplies the growing crops with several nutrients. On the other hand, if the composted water hyacinth was collected from a clean water bodies the levels of heavy metals would be lower than other common organic fertilizers in the market. Water hyacinth removed various pollutants through the absorption and uptake of toxic organic matter and heavy metals. Water hyacinth has drawn attention as a plant of rapid growth and high biomass production, and capable of removing pollutants from domestic and industrial waste effluents. Reduction of heavy metals in situ by plants may be a useful detoxification mechanism for phytoremediation. Therefore, water hyacinth could be employed for biological treatment of contaminated water. Water hyacinth rhizomes and roots could help in the removal of heavy metals from the aquatic habitat or constructed wet-land. Therefore, it is undesirable to involve contaminated rhizomes and roots in fodder or co-compost organic fertilizer. From these results the contaminated water hyacinth may be dry ashed and heavy metals could be extracted and recycled. Background: Water hyacinth (Eichlorina cassipes (Mart. sol ms), was introduced to Egypt in 1879, and was cultivated in ponds of public gardens, then it found its way to water canals. Nowadays it is hardly possible to find a water habitat in Egypt -particularly in delta- not menaced by this plant. Huge floating islands of this weed mixed later with other sub-emergent and emergent aquatic weeds are common in huge areas in Upper Egypt, Dammiata and Rossata branches of the Nile, drainage canals as well as El-Manzalla Lake. The productive potential of water hyacinth is reported to be tremendous Hussein, (1992) reported that in 50 days, a single plant produces 43 offsets which produce 1894 offsets in another 50 days and after 200 days from the start, one expects to have 3,418,800 new offsets. He indicated that about 20 dry tons per hectare can be harvested from standing water hyacinth plants, wherease a 5 to 8 harvests can be collected per year. Water hyacinth causes serious harms and has an adverse effect on water resources, fisheries, irrigation, drainage canals and public health. (Hussein, 1992, Obeid, 1984; Batanouny and EL- Fiky, 1984 and Sculthrope, 1967) Methods to control water hyacinth can be classified into: chemical, biological and mechanical methods. Chemical control methods depend on several herbicides to control the plant. However, these methods have several disadvantages such as the adverse effect on the environment and public health. (Obeid, 1984) .the biological control methods on a trial bases have been carried out to control water hyacinth using some pests as fungal pathogens, mites, snails or insects and certain grass-eating fish species, however, the results were not satisfactory. Moreover, introducing new pests to the environment may disturb the natural balance and the biological diversity (Wright and Centor, 1984). Finally, several reports recommended the mechanical control methods by using different machinery devices (e.g. mechanical mooring and rolling machines, conveyers…ect.). Recently, attention is being devoted to the utilization of water hyacinth since the efforts to control plant growth by chemical; biological and mechanical means have met with little success. Utilization of water hyacinth Utilization plans do not suggest the cultivation of the plant, since it is considered as a pest. The real challenge is not how to get rid of this weeds but how to benefit from it and turn it into a crop. The most important consideration in the utilization of water hyacinth is its high growth rate and dry matter production, there for the harvesting rate should equal to or more than the growth rate. Several studies in Egypt and worldwide have been carried out to investigate the efficient ways to utilize this weeds. In this article the potential uses are classified and discussed. 1) Animal feed and animal production Trials employ water hyacinth for feeding cattle; goats, pigs and rabbits have been carried out in several countries (Shoukry, 1982, El-Serafy et. al., 1981, Osman et. al.,1981). The results showed that non-ruminants (pigs and rabbits) can better utilize water hyacinth than cows and goats. The efficiency of utilization was greater for rabbits. Several studies reported that dried water hyacinth was successfully used in feeding poultry and ducks. Recently, Costa-pierce (1998) studied the feasibility of using a designed integrated aqua culture-wetland ecosystem (AWE) for experimental food production and inorganic nitrogen removal from tertiary-treated wastewater. The AWE connected poly-culture aquaculture ponds with in-pond aquatic plant systems (water hyacinths, Eichhornia crassipes, and Chinese water spinach, Ipomea aquatica), a solar energy aeration system, and an artificial wetland. Ponds were stocked with hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus X urolepis hornorum), common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), and red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), and were flushed weekly with new wastewater at 20%. Fish were fed a 32% protein floating ratio at 1% fish body weight per day, and wheat bran was added at 1 mg 1-1 when water conductivities exceeded 900 mmhos cm-1. Plants were allowed to grow until they reached approximately 50% of the pond surface area, and then maintained at this area by manual harvesting. The results indicate that water hyacinth could play a significant role in wetland systems. Jantrarotai (1991) indicated that water hyacinth has potential as a roughage source for ruminants because its dry matter has high crude protein (18%) and low acid detergent fiber (33%) contents. However, the high moisture content of the plant (95%) may make their use as forage uneconomical. He reported that where grass crop (Ctenopharyngodon idella) were fed diets containing from 0 to 100% water hyacinth meal, weight gain, and protein efficiency ratio decreased as the amount of water hyacinth meal increased. 2- Organic fertilizer (green manure or compost) or mulching materials: One of the important use of water hyacinth residues is as a compost and mulch (Mukhopadyay and Hossain, 1990), because water hyacinth contains high concentrations of plant nutrients such as N, P, Ca, Mg and K. Goel et. al., (1989) Indicated that it concentrates these nutrients from water by factors ranging from 36 to 14000 folds. Table (1) shows the averages of common elemental content in water hyacinth tissues and its nutritional values (from several studies). The plant leaves were reported to contain 15.9, 13.9, 8.8 and 8.5 mg of Ca, K, Mg, P and N per gram of dry weight, respectively. Also, the laminae had higher concentrations of K and P than the petioles (Oke and Elmo, 1990). Water hyacinth would be very desirable to be used as a green manure since the release of the nutrients was reported to be easier, compared to other plants residues (Para and Hortenstine, 1974). Table (1) Nutrational and elemental content of water hyacinth tissues (general means from several studies on non-polluted plants. Shoots Roots Whole plant Crude protein % 14.8 9.3 11.4 Crude fiber % 15.6 110.0 63.9 Ash % 22.5 49.6 36.8 Phosphorus % 0.5 0.48 0.51 K% 3.16 0.83 1.99 Ca % 2.13 3.27 2.70 Mg % 1.69 2.77 2.23 Fe ppm 7854 14825 10676 Mn ppm 693 2790 1669 Zn ppm 18.4 93.6 55.80 Cu ppm 32.5 53.5 40.00 Co ppm 10.8 32.1 21.40 Cr ppm 31.8 66.5 49.00 Ni ppm 2.5 7.3 4.90 Cd ppm 0.7 2.1 1.60 Pb ppm 26.9 74.7 51.21 Hg ppm 0.2 0.40 0.39 1) Moreover, the tremendous amount of mechanically removed water hyacinth from water streams could be utilized as compost. Co-composts of water hyacinth with other organic residues (crop residues, sewage sludge, municipal solid waste … ect.) were found to increase the yields, protein and neutron content of several crops (Singh and Yadav, 1986,Ahmed et. al., 1992, Rabie et. al., 1995, Abdel-sabour and Abo El-Seoud, 1996). They reported that single application of different tested composts had resulted in a remarkable increase in dry matter yield, seed yields, protein content, neutron content and chlorophyll in plant tissue (corn, sesame, sunflower, and common bean. The results of Rabie, et. Al., (1995); Abdel-Sabour and El-Seoud, 1996; Abdel-Sabour et. al., 1997, and Abdel –Sabour et. al.,1997b, showed the superiority of water hyacinth compost compared to other tested composts (sewage sludge or municipal solid waste co- composts. Their data indicated that the application of water hyacinth co- compost as soil amendments especially to the sandy soils, can improve some soil hydro-physical and chemical parameters and supplies the growing crops with several nutrients. On the other hand, if the composted water hyacinth was collected from a clean water bodies the levels of heavy metals would be lower than other common organic fertilizers in the market. Another potential usage was reported by Soerjaini, (1984). A substrate from water hyacinth petioles mixed with rice barn and lime (100:10:5) and with urea and phosphate fertilizers (up to 1.5% of medium weight) was composted for 4-5 days, spread over shelves, sterilized and then used as substrate for mushroom cultivations. This substrate gave after 10 days a very satisfactory harvest, which ranged from 20 to 25% of the weight of the used substrate medium. 3- Biogas production: In several countries water hyacinth is successfully used for biogases production in fermentators of different capacities (Ikhtyar and Shamsuzzaman, 1984, Dhahiyat et al., 1984 and Haripada Sarker et. al., 1984). They concluded that a mixture of 25% cow doing and 75% of dry water hyacinth yield best rates of methane production. Their results indicate the huge potential of water hyacinth as a non-conventional energy source. They estimated that one-ton of dry water hyacinth could yield 370,000 L of biogas. 4- phytoremediation : Water hyacinth has drawn attention as a plant of rapid growth and high biomass production, and capable of removing pollutants from domestic and industrial waste effluents. Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) has demonstrated its ability to remove nutrients and other chemical elements from sewage and industrial effluents (Saltabas and Akcin, 1994). In their study, 10.00 ppm chromium, 35.00 ppm copper and 14.00 ppm nickel solutions were used, and absorption ability of water hyacinth was observed. Due to the positive experimental results on the removal of chromium, copper and nickel, they suggested that water hyacinth may be used for industrial effluents. Haselow et. al., (1992) indicated that managed growth and harvesting of water hyacinth can be utilized for water quality improvement in lakes, but only if the plants are mechanically removed from the system. Aoyama and Nishizaki (1991) evaluated the practical use of water hyacinth grown in natural water channels or ponds for water purification. They recommended a shorter harvesting interval to obtain more yield of the biomass. Jebanesan (1997) indicated that water hyacinth was found to be more effective in the treatment of dairy wastewater. The wastewater from a dairy was treated with the water hyacinth for a retention period of 25 days, Water various physico-chemical parameters were analyzed at 0, 5,10, 15, 20 and 25 days after treatment. After the retention period of 25 days, water total solids, Ca, Mg and total hardness were reduced by 37, 5, 47.5, 54 and 33%, respectively. Water chloride, Cr, nitrous nitrogen, nitric nitrogen, pH, alkalinity, COD, BOD, bicarbonates and specific conductance were also reduced considerably than the control. In another investigation on natural shallow eutrophicated wetland receiving influx of domestic sewage and agricultural rub-off of the watershed, heavily infested with water hyacinth, located in Ujjain city, Madhya Pradesh, State in India was studied (Billore et al., 1998). The aims of the study were to determine the role of dense growth of hyacinth in the removal of particulate matter attached to root system, and nitrogen as contained in the root attached particulate matter (RAPM) and in the plant tissue. The recorded hyacinth density was 79 plants per square meter with 1.549 kg dry plant tissue. They found that the plant in one square meter could retain 663 g RAPM (about 42% of dry plant tissue), which potentially removed upon the mechanical harvest of the plants on per meter square basis. In addition to the significant amount of RAPM, the harvested hyacinth plant also brought about removal of 1.396 g of organic matter, 0.536 g of total nitrogen, 0.482 g of ammoniacal nitrogen, and 0.338 g of nitrate nitrogen per m2 waterscape basis. In other words, when the hyacinth plants are manually/mechanically removed from the wetland, potentiality of total nitrogen removal is 37.32 kg through the plant tissue + 5.36 kg nitrogen/hectare in the RAPM, besides 6630 kg/h of particulate matter through roots attachment (RAMP). The extensive root systems of the hyacinth provide a huge surface area for attached particulate matter and microorganisms, acting as ‘suspended sediment layer’ and rich in nitrogen. Thus, for a eutrophicated wetland receiving wastewater rich in particulate matter, the hyacinth growth has substantial potential for the removal of particulate matter and nitrogen through their attachment to roots, in addition to the nitrogen concentrated in the plant tissue. Another important usage for water hyacinth is its use as biological treatment for raw sewage effluent. Ayade (1998) reported that pioneering research efforts in the handling of municipal sewage in developing countries have involved the use of water hyacinth to purify sewage for possible domestic purposes re-use. The ability of water hyacinth to remove pollutant from raw sewage effluent has been found to be impaired by sewage toxicity. Trials were therefore carried out to adapt water hyacinth to toxicity and thereby increase its ability to remove pollutants from raw sewage. The plants were adapted using an active bio-degrader consisting of different bacteria species such as, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella ozaenae, Klebsiella edwardsiella and Baccillus subtilis. The adaptation progressed through 20, 40, 60 and 80% sewage dilution until plants capable of growth in 100% raw sewage were obtained. Plants were observed for morphological growth and at four weeks, samples were collected for tissue analysis. The plants progressively absorbed nutrients from sewage up to the fourth week, when signs of toxicity were observed (through wilting, loss of turgidity and reduction in leaf number). However, plants that survived through a series of adaptations under various sewage dilutions exhibited luxuriant growth on raw sewage. In synergy with the active bio-degrader, the efficiency of the adapted water hyacinth to remove pollutants (nutrients) from raw sewage was enhanced by 93%. I) Removal of heavy metals: Water hyacinth (eichhorina cassipes) has drawn attention as a plant capable of removing pollutants, including toxic metals from surface water (Kelly et al., 1999). Reduction of heavy metals in situ by plants may be a useful detoxification mechanism for phytoremediation Studies were conducted to determine the phytotoxic effect and uptake capacity of heavy metals by water hyacinth (Delgado et al., 1993, Akcine et. al., 1994, Abdel-Sabour et. al.,1996 and lytle et. al., 1998). Shine et. al., (1998) investigated lake Chpala, mexico (1990-1991 ) historically the lake has received poorly characterized domestic, industrial and agriculture wastes. Heavy metals (i.e. As, Cd, Pb, Cr and Zn) displayed high levels during the dried seasons (presumably, due to high evaporation). They reported high levels of both Cd and Pb, which were above the chronic criteria according to EPA standards for protection of aquatic ecosystem health. A Study case: In a case study (unpublished data) the bioaccumulation of both Cd and Pb in water hyacinth was investigated in greenhouse experiment. Plants were exposed to water containing different levels of Cd ranging from 0 up to 20 ppm and its possible combination with different levels of Pb ranging from 0 up to 100 ppm in complete randomized blocks with three replicates. The aim of the study was to determine the accumulation, translocation, interaction and removal capacity of Cd and Pb by water hyacinth plants. The data showed that water hyacinth accumulated both Cd and Pb mainly in the roots. No adverse effect or phyto-toxicity symptoms on plant were observed due to increasing levels of both Cd and Pb in water. A positive significant effect of tested element on its accumulation in different plant parts and simple linear or polynomial regression equations between plant tissue content of element in question and its levels in solutions were observed as shown in Figs (1-2). As it could seen from the Figures roots retained higher levels of Cd or Pb than leaves or stems. Cadmium content in whole plant was enhanced by both Cd and Pb addition (synergetic effect) however, an antagonistic effect was noticed between Pb whole plant content and Cd application. As shown in Table (2) the enrichment ratio (ER = metal content in treated plant / metal content in control plant) varied widely according to plant part (leaves, stems and roots) and tested metal interactions (Cd and Pb). The application of Cd drastically increased Cd-ER ratios for all testd plant parts at any levels of Pb. As expected the ER values were always higher in case of roots > stems > leaves. Cd-ER ratios for whole plant showed a remarkable increase up to 427 times than control treatment however, in case of Pb-ER ratios it was only 40.78 times higher than its relevant treatment. It is worth mentioning, that the increasing levels of Cd in solution reduced the value of Pb-ER ratio for any tested plant part, which again confirm the antagonistic effect of Cd on Pb uptake. The relative high increase in Cd-plant tissue compared to the corresponding values for Pb-plant tissue (as determined by ER ratio) may indicate the high plant affinity for Cd uptake. Delgado et al. (1993) indicated that after 24 days of growth, Cd, Cr, Zn in water were depleted totally from the nutritive solution suggesting complete absorption of these metals by the plants. Table (2) Cadmium or lead enrichment in water hyacinth tissues as affected by Cd and Pb treatments. Cd rate mg/L Plant part Pb rate mg/L 0 5 50 100 Cd-ratio 0 L 1 0.99 0.91 0.92 S 1 3.01 1.22 1.14 R 1 1.17 2.32 6.47 W 1 1.13 1.18 1.34 5 L 12.10 10.82 12.92 8.31 S 38.87 32.36 32.36 21.79 R 295.90 308.10 326.40 409.30 W 59.08 58.24 62.00 68.05 10 L 17.58 35.02 32.01 42.65 S 51.13 60.57 60.47 58.11 R 547.20 535.90 596.20 652.8 W 100.70 112.10 306.30 132.00 20 L 34.52 40.36 73.42 97.03 S 133.90 127.40 131.40 126.40 R 1332.0 1579.00 1628.00 2642.00 W 243.20 279.00 306.3 472.90 Pb-ratio 0 L 1 3.46 5.29 9.82 S 1 1.52 3.34 7.09 R 1 7.09 10.77 53.50 W 1 5.99 9.41 40.78 5 L 0.92 2.34 4.15 6.73 S 0.41 1.46 2.99 4.23 R 0.51 6.73 10.51 41.40 W 0.63 5.73 8.91 31.23 10 L 0.49 2.29 4.63 6.70 S 0.31 1.40 2.96 4.15 R 0.49 6.39 10.19 41.20 W 0.51 5.25 8.78 30.87 20 L 0.48 2.11 3.99 6.59 S 0.27 1.33 2.87 4.09 R 0.49 6.29 9.91 41.1 W 0.51 5.13 8.44 29.79 To evaluate the translocation of both Cd and Pb from roots to stems and leaves, the ratio between total metal content in leaves divided by total metal content in roots (L/R) was calculated and presented in Table (3). Similarly, total metal content in stems compared by its relevant value in root (S/R) and sum of L+S compared to R are presented in Table (3). The inspection of the Table suggested that Cd is more mobile and could be translated form roots to leaves and stems than Pb. Generally, Water hyacinth rhizomes and roots could help in the removal of heavy metals from the aquatic habitat or constructed wet-land. Therefore, it is undesirable to involve contaminated rhizomes and roots in fodder or co-compost organic fertilizer. From these results the contaminated water hyacinth may be dry ashed and heavy metals could be extracted and recycled. Table (3) Cadmium or lead ratios in water hyacinth tissues as affected by Cd and Pb treatments. Cd rate mg/L Ratio Pb rate mg/L 0 5 50 100 Cd-ratio 0 L/R 1.05 1.02 0.84 0.35 S/R 0.96 0.71 0.77 0.33 L+S/R 2.02 1.73 1.62 0.69 5 L/R 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.11 S/R 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.09 L+S/R 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 10 L/R 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.06 S/R 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.12 L+S/R 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.19 20 L/R 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.07 S/R 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.06 L+S/R 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.13 Pb-ratio 0 L/R 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.02 S/R 0.22 0.05 0.10 0.03 L+S/R 0.29 0.11 0.17 0.06 5 L/R 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.03 S/R 0.25 0.06 0.08 0.03 L+S/R 0.45 0.10 0.13 0.06 10 L/R 0.11 0.03 0.06 0.02 S/R 0.20 0.05 0.10 0.03 L+S/R 0.31 0.09 0.16 0.05 20 L/R 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.02 S/R 0.18 0.06 0.09 0.03 L+S/R 0.29 0.10 0.13 0.05 Water hyacinth is not only capable to absorb and accumulate heavy metals, but also it could tolerate its toxicity by converting it from chemically- active toxic stat to inactive and nontoxic stat. Lenzi et al., (1994) evaluated the removal of chromium (III) from aqueous solution by water hyacinth. The results showed that there was good removal of Cr at rate of 10 mg Cr/1 solution (the recovery was 87.52%), but for higher concentrations (50 or 100 mg/1), the water hyacinth did not appear to be a good absorbent. It was also seen that, higher rations of water hyacinth mass/solution volume lead to higher solution decontamination. The absorption of Cr (III) by the water hyacinth was lower by decreasing the pH solution. They indicated that Cr (III) removal by water hyacinth was not influenced by the temperature in the range 17.5 to 26.0 degree C, or by the dissolved oxygen concentration in the solution between 4.71 to 6.77 mg/l. Kelley et al., (1999) investigated the capacity of the water hyacinth to remediate aquatic environments that have been contaminated with the lanthanide metal, europium Eu(III). Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) they have been able to determine that Eu(III) is adsorbed onto the surface of the roots and the highest concentration of Eu(III) was found on the root hairs. In their study X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) techniques were used to speciate the Eu(III) adsorbed onto the surface of the roots. The XAS data for Eu-contaminated water hyacinth roots provides evidence of a Eu-oxygen environment wherease Eu(III) is coordinated to 10-11 oxygen atoms at a distance of 2.44 Angstrom. This likely involves binding of Eu(III) to the root via carboxylate groups and hydration of Eu(III) at the root surface. Zhu et al., (1999) demonstrated the potential of water hyacinth for the phytoremediation of six trace elements. These plants are being used successfully for the phytoremediation of trace elements in natural and constructed wetlands. The ability of water hyacinth to take up and translocation six trace elements-As (V), Cd(II), Cr(VI), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Se (VI)-was studied under controlled conditions. They indicated that water hyacinth accumulated Cd and Cr at a higher levels, then Se and Cu at moderate levels, however water hyacinth was a poor accumulator for As and Ni. The highest levels of Cd found in shoots and roots were 371 and 6103 mg kg-1) dry wt., respectively, and those of Cr were 119 and 3951 mg kg-1 dry wt., respectively. Cadmium, Cr, Cu, Ni, and As were more highly accumulated in roots than in shoots. In contrast, Se was accumulated more in shoots than in roots at most external concentrations. Water hyacinth had high trace element bioconcentration factors when supplied with low external concentrations of all six elements, particularly Cd (highest BCF = 2150), Cr (1823), and Cu(595). They conclude that water hyacinth is a promising candidate for phytoremediation of wastewater polluted with Cd, Cr, Cu, and Se. Therefore, water hyacinth could be very efficient for phytoextracting trace elements from wastewater containing low concentrations of these elements. Lytle et al., (1998) Using X-ray spectroscopy, to show that water hyacinth, supplied with Cr (VI) in nutrient culture, accumulated nontoxic Cr (III) in root and shoot tissues. Their data indicated that the reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) appeared to occur in the fine lateral roots, then Cr (III) was subsequently translocated to leaf tissues. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure of Cr in leaf and petiole differed when compared to Cr in roots. In roots, Cr (III) was hydrated by water, but in petiole and more so in leaf, a portion of the Cr (III) may be bound to oxalate ligands. This suggests that E. crassipes detoxified Cr (VI) upon root uptake and transported a portion of the detoxified Cr to leaf tissues. Cr-rich crystalline structures were observed on the leaf surface. The chemical species of Cr in other plants, collected from wetlands that contained. Cr (VI)- contaminated wastewater was also found to be Cr (III). They proposed that this plant-based reduction of Cr (VI) by E. crassipes has the potential to be used for the in situ detoxification of Cr (VI)-contaminated wastestreams. Eichhornia crassipes has been grown in the presence of a number of complexes of the platinum group metals (Farago and Parsons, 1994). Those compounds that are taken up by the plants in larger quantities are the more toxic one and they reported the relative order of toxicities determined from visual appraisal and in terms of oxidation states, to be Pt(II), Pd(II) > Ru(III) similar to Ru(II) similar to Ir(III)> Pt(IV) similar to Os(IV)>> Rh(III). In most cases the metals are accumulated in the roots, and where the toxic symptoms were observed when the metal is translocated to the tops. Root elongation and biomass studies confirm that Eichhornia is more tolerant to Rh(III) and Pt(IV) than to Pt(II). Treatment with a Rh and three Pt complexes produced little differences in the concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn in treated plants compared with controls. Sequential extractions of tissue from plants treated with [Pt(NH3)2Cl2] showed that in the leaves and floats almost half the platinum is insoluble and associated with alph-cellulose and lignin. They reported 16% of the metal was removed by the enzyme pronase and can be considered to be associated with proteins or amino acids. In the roots, about a third of the Pt is insoluble and 9.5% is removed by pronase. More Pt in the roots appeared in the fraction containing water-soluble low molecular weight materials. B- removal of organic contaminant: Water hyacinth was employed for wastewater treatment in many parts of the world. By planting water hyacinth in wastewater pond, part of the gaseous oxygen produced by photosynthetic activity of the green leaves is translocated to the stems and roots and to the water body ; this oxygen is used by the aerobic and facultative bacteria in biodegrading organic matter contained in the wastewater. Two groups of bacteria normally exists in a water hyacinth pond (WHP), namely the suspended bacteria which are present in the liquid portion and the biofilm bacteria which are attached on the surfaces of the roots of the water hyacinth plants and on the side walls and bottom layers of the pond itself. Current design criteria for WHPs do not emphasize the roles of these two groups of bacteria, but they are based on either empirical relationships or first- order reaction rate and complete-mix flow condition. Chongrak and Raj (1998) studied the significance of both the suspended and biofilm bacteria and the flow hydraulics (based on dispersion number) in the reduction of organic matter in the WHP system. Kinetic coefficient of the suspended bacteria was calculated from a first-order reaction rate including the effect of organic loading rate. For the biofilm bacteria, the reaction rate was also first-order and based on the substrate flux into the biofilm. The integrated kinetic model proposed for the WHP incorporates the activities of both the suspended and biofilm bacteria and the hydraulic dispersion number. The model was found to be satisfactory in predicting biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal in a full-scale WHP treating an anaerobic pond effluent. The model is useful to achieve improvement in BOD removal efficiency. Nor (1994) investigated the removal of phenols in the presence of copper and zinc by Eichhornia crassipes was in order to assess its ability to clean up industrial wastewaters. Results indicated that Eichhornia has tremendous capacity to absorb phenolic compounds as well as Cu and Zn simultaneously from test solutions containing these substances. The presence of Cu or Zn resulted in decreased phenol uptake during the first 0.5 d, while the presence of Cu and Zn in combination resulted in higher phenol uptake. After 1 d exposure, however, little or no differences could be discerned. Similarly, absorption of Cu and zn in the presence of phenols did not seem to be adversely affected by different combinations of Cu/Zn concentrations. In fact, some synergistic effect could be detected between Cu and Zn absorption by Eichhornia crassipes. Bioassays involving filtered Eichhornia root extract indicated that phenol was also removed by the aqueous root extracts indicating that cellular constituents of roots were involved in the process. Cyanide degradation by water hyacinths in solutions containing 3-300 mg/l cyanide was investigated in batch tests (Granato, 1993). Water hyacinth was more efficient to remove free cyanide in the first 8 hours, compared to cyanide controls (free of plant). Gold mill synthetic effluents containing free cyanide (9 to 20 mg/l), thiocyanate (14 to 23 mg/l), and metallocyanides (iron, copper and zinc) was fed to a continuous lab. Scale unit (61/h) to confirm the ability of water hyacinth to degrade free cyanide and that it can remove zinc and small amounts of iron. Copper and thiocyanate remained untouched in the solution. Water hyacinth is only suitable to be used in conjunction with other cyanide wastewater treatments. Water hyacinth can grow in oil-refinery wastewater after the water has undergone an initial treatment of oil-separation, flotation and aeration (Tang and Xian-wen, 1993). They indicated that the optimum COD under which E. crassipes can be used to oxidize oil-refinery wastewater is between 65 and 131 mg/l and the highest possible COD is 262 mg/l. They reported that Eichhornia crassipes, grown in two 3750-m2 oil-refinery wastewater oxidation ponds, improved the quality and transparency of the outlet water. After 2 to 4 days retention in oxidation ponds, turbidity decreased by 32%, phenol oil decreased by 18%, COD decreased by 8-13%, nitrogen decreased by 6-18%, phosphorus decreased by 12-24%, and several heavy metals decreased by 3-54% more than the un-vegetated control. In addition, its oxygenated root zone helps to bring about flotation and flocculation of oil residue, increased aerobic degradation, and a large microbial population to stimulate decomposition. Bio-sorption: Low et al., (1994) Reported the potential use of Biomass of non-living dried water hyacinth roots (Eichhornia crassipes) for sorption of copper from aqueous solutions. Maximum sorption was 20.90 mg Cu/g as determined for Langmuir isotherm. Several factors affecting sorption were investigated. They include effect of pH, initial concentrations, presence of chelators and other metals. They suggested using this material in a packed-bed system for removing copper from electroplating waste. Biological indicators The water hyacinth samples collected from three Egyptian water bodies and analyzed for major elements, essential and non-essential elements using prompt gamma ray neutron activation analysis technique (PGNAA) to evaluate water hyacinth as a bioindicator for pollution (Abdel-Sabour et. Al., 1996 and 1997). Results showed that plant sample analysis showed good response to the heavy metal pollutant level in water bodies. They suggested that there is a potential use of such plant as a biological indicator. They indicate also, the biological accumulation factor (BAF) has reflected the levels of pollutant in the surrounding environment. Water hyacinth stems and leaves, have been successfully used as indicators of heavy metal pollution in tropical countries (Gonzalez et al., 1989). They reported that the uptake of heavy metals in this plant is stronger in the roots than in the floating shoots. To study the bioconcentration of cadmium in water hyacinth, the plants were exposed to water containing 2 mu g Cd (2+) /ml for extended periods of time (Xiang et al, 1994). Three strains from several exposures during a 30-day period were sampled for the analyses of cadmium and thiol group. The data showed that the plant concentrates cadmium mainly in the roots and that the cadmium uptake is proportional to the increase of the thiol group content. The latter suggests the possibility of using the thiol group content to assess the bioconcentration of heavy metal ions in water hyacinth and as a general parameter for monitoring the heavy metal pollution of water. References 1. Abdel-Sabour, M.F.; A.S. Abdel-Haleem and E.E. Zohny, (1996) Chemical composition of water hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes), A comparison indication of heavy metal pollution in Egyptian water bodies I) Major and trace element levels., Proc. 6th Conf. Nuclear Sci. and Applications, Vol.IV:102-112. 2. Abdel Sabour, M.F., M.A. Abo El-Seoud, (1996). Effect of organic waste compost addition on sesame growth, yield and chemical composition, Agric. Ecosy. And Environ. 60:157-164. 3. Abdel-Sabour, M.F.; A.S. Ismail and R.M. Radwan, (1996). Tolerance index and transfer factor coefficient of Zn, Cu, and Co for water hyacinth plant, Egypt J. soil Sci. 36:355-364. 4. Abdel-Sabour, M.F.; C.B. Ogden and R.W. El-Gendi (1997)., Conditioning effect of organic waste composts on hydro-physical properties of Inshas sandy soils., Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 37, No.3, pp. 1-11. 5. Abdel Sabour, M.F., M.A. Abo El-Seoud and M.A.Rizk (1997) Physiological and chemical response of sunflower to previous organic waste composts application to sandy soil. Environmental Management and Health Vol. 8/4, pp.128-132. 6. Abdel-Sabour, M.F.; H.Abdel-Shafy and T.M. Mosalem, (1997). Evaluation of heavy metals absorption as affected by water hyacinth compost applied to sandy soil as soil conditioner, Zagazig J. Agric. Res. Vol. 24:719-725. 7. Abdel-Sabour, M.F.; A.S. Abdel-Haleem, A. Sorror and E. Zohny, (1997). Investigation of water hyacinth samples by prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis. A comparison indication of pollution in Egyptian water bodies, Environ. Prot. Eng. 23:5-12. 8. Ahmed, S.A.: El-Doesoky, M.A. and Gameh,M.A. (1992) Utilization of water hyacinth as a soil amendement: growth and content of N, P and K of wheat. Proc. National Sympo. On Water Hyacinth, Assiut Univ. pp. 11- 24. 9. Akcin, G.; O. Saltabas and H. Afsar (1994). Removal of lead by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), J. Environ. Sci. Health, part A, Vol.A29 no 10, pp. 2177 – 2183. 10. Aoyama, I. And H. Nishizaki. (1991). Uptake of nitrogen and phosphate and water purification by water hyacinth. Water Sci. and Technol. Vol.28, no.7 pp. 47-53. 11. Ayade, B. (1998). Development of toxicity tolerant water hyacinth for effective treatment of raw sewage. Acta Biotechnol., vol.18, no.1, pp. 43-50. 12. Billore, S.; R. Bharadia and A. Kumar. (1998). Potential removal of particulate matter and nitrogen through roots of water hyacinth in a tropical natural wetland. Current Sci., vol.74, no. 2, pp. 154-156. 13. Batanouny , K.H. and A.M. El-Fiky. (1984). Water hyacinth in Egypt: distribution and problem magnitude. Proceedings of the International Conference on water hyacinth. Hyderabad. India . United Nations environment program.pp.127- 138. 14. Chongrak, P. and K. Nawa Raj. (1998). An integrated kinetic model for water hyacinth ponds used for wastewater treatment. Water Res., vol.32, no.1, pp. 179 – 185. 15. Costa-Pierce, B.A. (1998). Preliminary investigation of an integrated aquaculture-wetland ecosystem using tertiary-treated municipal wastewater in Los Angeles County, California. Ecological Engineering, vol. 10, no.4,pp. 341-354. 16. Delgado, M.; M. Bigeriego and E. Guardiola (1993). Uptake of Zn, Cr and Cd by water hyacinths. Water Res., vol. 27, no 2, pp. 269 – 272. 17. Dhahiyat, Y. Siregar, H. Indriati and F. Salem. (1984). Studies on the uses of water hyacinth as biogas energy resource in the dam of curag (west java). Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth .Hyderabad, India, February 7 –11 ,1983. pp. 604-624. 18. Ding, X.; J. Jiang; W. Yingyan; W. Wenqing and R. Bingeng. (1994). Bioconcentration of cadmium in water hyacinth in relation to thiol group content. Environ. Pollut., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 93 – 96. 19. El-Serafy, A.M. , H.S. Soliman, H.M. Khattab, A.M. El-Ashry and F.Z. Swidan. (1981). Dry matter intake and nutrients digestibility of water hyacinth hay , haylage and silage by buffalo steers. India J. Anim. Sci. 51; 698-706.Farago, M. and P. Parsons (1994). The effects of various platinum metal species on the water plant Eichhornia crassipes. Chem. Speciation and Bioavailability, vol.6,no.1, pp. 1-12. 20. Goel, P.K.; S.D. Khatavkar and A.Y. Kulkarini, (1989) Chemical compostion and concentration factors of water hyacinth growing in shallow polluted pond. Inter. J. Ecology and Environmental Sci. 15: 141-144. 21. Gonzalez, H.; M. Lodenius and M.Otero. (1989). Water hyacinth as indicator of heavy metal pollution in the tropics. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 910 - 914. 22. Granato, M. (1993). Cyanide degradation by water hyacinth. Biotechnology Letters, vol. 15, no. 10 pp. 1085 – 1090. 23. Haselow, D.; J. Shuman and W. DeBusk. ( 1992). Effect of aquatic plants on the environment: The use of water hyacinths and other aquatic plants for nutrient reduction in lakes. Proc. Inter. Sympos. On The Biology and Management of Aquatic Plnts., p. 10. 24. Hharibada Sarker, K.H. Haque, A.K. Alam and R.Slam. (1984).Production of biogas from water hyacinth. Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth. Hyderabad, India, pp. 489- 492. 25. Hussein, A.M. (1992). Industrial utilization of water hyacinth as complement to mechanical control. Proc. National Sympo. On Water Hyacinth, Assiut Univ. pp. 103- 117. 26. Ikhtyar, O. and F. Shmsuzzamana. (1984). Kinetics of gas formation from water hyacinth biomass. Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth , Hyderabad, India , pp. 475-485. 27. Ismail, A.S.; M.F. Abdel-Sabour and R.M.Radwan, (1996).Water Hyacinth as an indicator for heavy metals pollution in different selected sites and water bodies around greater Cairo, Egypt J. soil Sci. 36:343-354. 28. Jantrarotia, P. (1991). Water hyaconth and water pennywort use in treatment of poultry wastewater. Diss. Abst. Int. B-Sci. & Eng., vol. 51, no. 11. 29. Jebanesan, A. (1997). Bilological treatment of dairy waste by Eichhornia crassipes Solms. Environ. Ecol., vol. 15, no.3, pp.. 521-523. 30. Kelley, C.; R. Mielke; D. Dimaquibo; A. Curtis and J. Dewitt. (1999). Adsorption of Eu(III) onto roots of water hyacinth. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol.33, no,9,pp.1439-1443. 31. Lenzi, E.; E. Luchese and S. Barbosa de Lima. (1994). Improvement of the Eichhornia crassipes-water hyacinth-use in the decontamination of chromium contaminated solution.Arq. Biol. Technol., vol.37, no.3, pp. 603-609. 32. Low, K.; C.Lee and C.Tai. (1994). Biosorption of copper by water hyacinth roots. J. Environ. Sci. Health, part A:Environ.Sci. Eng. Pp.171- 188. 33. Lytle, C.; F.Lytle; N. Yang; J.Qian; D.Hansen and A.Zayed. Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by wetland plants: Potential for in situ heavy metal detoxification. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol.32, no.20, pp. 3087-3093. 34. Mukhopadyay, S.K. and A Hossain. (1990). Management and utilization of water hyacinth vegetation as natural resourse in India for the benefit of agriculture. Indian J. Agro. 35: 218-223. 35. Nor,Y. (1994). Phenol removal by Eichhornia crassipes in the presence of trace metals. Water Res.,vol.28, no.5,pp.1161-1166. 36. Obeid, M. (1984). Water hyacinth, (Eichhorina crassipes Mart.) solms. In sudan. Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth . Hyderabad , India, pp. 145-148. 37. Oke, O. A. and B. O. Elmo. (1990) Elemental analysis of waterhyacinth growing in the Badagry lagoon of Lagos state, Nigeria. Nigerian J. Weed Sci. 3:67-70. 38. Osman, H.E. ,G.A. Elhag and M.M. Osman. (1981). Studies on the nutritive value of water hyacinth (Eichhorina crassipes (Mart.) solms). Aquatic weeds in the Sudan, National Council for Research. Khartoum, Sudan, pp. 104-128. 39. Parra, J.V. and C.C. Hortenstine. (1974). Plant nutriential content of some Florida waterhyacinths and response by pearl millet incorporation of waterhyacinths. Hyacinth Control J. 12; 85-90. 40. Saltabas, O. and G. Akcin. (1994). Removal of chromium, copper and nickel by water hyacinth. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., vol. 41, no.3-4, pp. 131-134. 41. Rabie, M.H., A.M. El-Saadani, M.F. Abdel-Sabour, and I.A.I Mousa. (1995) The use of water hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes) as an organic manure to amend soils, Egypt J. Soil Sci.,35:pp. 105-116. 42. Sculthrope, C.D. (1967). The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold Ltd. London. 43. Shoukry, M.M. (1982). Optimum utilization of water hyacinth plants in feeding ruminants. Ph.. D. Thesis, Ain shams Univ., Fac. Of Agric. 44. Singh, R.D. and D.V.Yadav. (1986). Evaluation of low grade rock phosphate composted with some agricultural wastes for use in a crop rotation. Agric. Wastes 18: 73-79. 45. Soerjani, M. (1984). Indonesian experience in water hyacinth utilization. Proc. of the Intern. Conf. on Water hyacinth. Hyderabad ,India, pp.165-178. 46. Tang, S. and L. Xian-wen (1993) The use of Eichhornia crassipes to cleanse oil-refinery wastewater in China. Ecological Engineering, vol.2, no.3, pp. 243 – 251. 47. Wright, A.D. and T.D. Centor. (1984). Biological control; its place in the management of water hyacinth. Proceedings of the international conference on water hyacinth. Hyderabad, India, pp. 703-721. 48. Zhu, Y.; A. Zayed; J.Qian; M. de Souza and N. Terry (1999). Phytoaccumulation of trace elements by wetland plants: II water hyacinth. J. Environ. Qual., vol.28,no. 1, pp. 339 – 344. 4 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 c o n t e n t 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 g 1 0 0 0 d k g m C ( ) 5 0 0 / 0 -5 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 400 350 300 c o n t e n t 250 200 150 100 m g C d k g ( ) 50 / 0 9 0- 5 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 8 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 c o n t e n t 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 g C d k g m 2 0 0 0 ( ) / 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 12000 10000 C d c o n te n t 8000 6000 4000 m g / g 2000 k ( ) 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 C d r a te (u g /g ) 0 -P b 1 0 -P b 2 0 -P b 4 0 -P b Fig (1) Effect of Cd and Pb on Cd content in different plant tissue (mg/kg) 800 700 600 500 P b c o nte nt 400 300 200 100 ug 0 g ( ) / 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 8 0 0 7 0 0 c o n t e n t 6 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 P b u g 2 0 0 g ( ) / 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 c o n t e n t 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 P b u g 2 0 0 0 0 g ( ) / 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 70000 60000 P b c o n te n t 50000 40000 30000 20000 u g g ( ) 10000 / 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 P b r a te (u g /g ) 0 -C d 2 -C d 4 -C d 8_C d Fig (2) Effect of Cd and Pb on Pb content in different plant tissue (mg/kg)
Pages to are hidden for
"Water Hyacinth: Available and Renewable resource"Please download to view full document