Copy of Adult Head and Neck Sarcoma

Reviews
Shared by: sammyc2007
Categories
Stats
views:
65
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/16/2008
language:
Unknown
pages:
0
Adult Head and Neck Sarcoma Grand Rounds SIU Otolaryngology Sarcoma  Definition: Malignant neoplasm of soft tissue or bone arising in fibrous, fatty, muscular, synovial, vascular, or neural tissue, usually first manifested as a painless swelling. Overview      Case presentation Soft tissue sarcoma Chondrosarcoma Osteosarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma – Most common soft tissue sarcoma in children   Ewings Sarcoma – 2nd most common malignant bone tumor in children Kaposi Sarcoma – Soft tissue, skin > mucosal • Epidemic or non-classic • Classic Head and Neck Sarcoma   Approximately 15-20% of all sarcomas occur within the head and neck Unlike SCCA, ETOH and smoking are not risk factors – Genetic syndromes – Li Fraumeni Syndrome – Environmental exposures - radiation – Medical conditions - lymphedema  80% of all sarcomas are of soft tissue origin – 20% arise from bone  80% of head and neck sarcomas present in adults Case Presentation  24 y/o F with 3 month history of palpable L submental mass – Slow enlargement – Tender     Not associated with the thyroid, no cervical LAD, palpable on oral cavity exam No previous infection No previous radiation PHM not significant Case Presentation  FNA: follicular epithelial cells with mild atypia, columnar cells present   Well defined 2cm mass, echogenic central septum Increased vascularity of central solid portion CT Scan Case Presentation Continued   Mass excised in OR – 1cm margins Pathology: – Biphasic synovial sarcoma with glandular tissue surrounded by spindle cell component – Immunohistochemistry + for cytokeratin and epithelial components  Post-op XRT Soft Tissue Sarcoma  Head and neck location rare – 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas – 1% of all head and neck tumors     Variable male preponderance Median age 50-55 yrs (15-93) Most patients initially evaluated for a painless mass (68-95%) Most common primary site – Scalp > face > neck > oral cavity > sinuses, larynx, orbit Soft Tissue Sarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma  Histologic subtypes: – – – – – – – – – – – – Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Angiosarcoma Neurogenic sarcoma (malignant schwannoma, PNST) Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans Fibrosarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Synovial sarcoma Liposarcoma Epithelioid sarcoma Sarcoma NOS Alveolar soft part sarcoma Desmoid (aggressive fibromatosis) - benign Soft Tissue Sarcoma  Diagnostic evaluation: – CT and/or MRI – PET – unclear significance • Useful when pulmonary nodules present – FNA and/or core biopsy – Incisional biopsy  *Soft tissue sarcomas are prone to seeding Soft Tissue Sarcoma  Regional lymph node metastases: – Presentation - 1 of 44 patients (2%) Barker et al. U Iowa – Recurrence - 3 of 60 patients (5%) Kraus et al. MSKCC  Distant metastases: – Related to histologic grade and tumor size – Lung most common • Chest CT and or PET CT – Metastases to other sites unlikely • Brain MRI, bone scan… AJCC 2002 TNM Definition AJCC Staging STAGE GROUPING Stage IA Stage IB Stage IIA Stage IIB Stage III Stage IV or or Low T1a T1b T2a T2b T1a T1b T2a T2b Any T Any T NO N0 N0 N0 N0 N0 N0 N0 N1 Any N NX NX NX NX NX NX NX NX M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M1 G1-2 G1-2 G1-2 G1-2 G3-4 G3-4 G3-4 G3-4 Any G Low Low Low Low High High High High High Low Any G Any G High G1 G1 G1 G1 G2-3 G2-3 G2-3 G2-3 Any G Soft Tissue Sarcomas W.M. Mendenhall et al., Univ of Florida Head and Neck, Oct 2005    Purpose: To determine the optimal treatment for adults with H&N soft tissue sarcoma Methods: Literature review 461 patients, follow-up 3-5 years MSKCC PMH 19821989 N=60 MGH U. Iowa TMH 19721993 N=57 UCSF U. Illinois 19611993 N=65 NCI 19702000 N=44 19811995 N=72 19801988 N=52 1969-1983 19631993 N=53 N=58 Mendenhall et al.  Histologic subtypes Mendenhall et al.  Histologic Grade  Maximum Diameter (%) Treatment  Surgery – Radical resection • Compartmental resection usually not feasible  Surgery + radiotherapy – Low grade with close (<1cm) or + margins – High grade  Radiotherapy – Efficacy difficult to assess  Adjuvant chemotherapy – Efficacy in H&N unclear – Recent extremity data shows improvement in disease-free survival (p=.04) and overall survival (p=.03) Outcomes  5-year overall local control 60-70% – Surgery + RT > surgery > RT • In contrast to 90% for the extremity  Distant tumor recurrence – 10-30% experienced distant metastases Local Control  Surgery +/- RT , 5-year mean follow-up – – – – – – – T1 – 92% T2 – 40% Grade 1 to 2 – 80% Grade 3 to 4 – 48% Negative margins – 74% Microscopically + margins – 70% Gross residual disease – 25% Survival Outcomes    Distant metastasis free survival – 75 – 90% Disease free survival – 45 – 60% Cause-specific survival – 60 – 70%  Overall survival – 60 – 70% Prognostic Factors    Histologic grade T stage Margin status Conclusion   Optimal treatment is complete resection Adjuvant RT likely improves the probability of cure – High-grade, close or positive margins  Efficacy of adjuvant chemo ill defined – Considered in high-grade lesions Cutaneous Angiosarcoma - Outcome • 3 doses doxorubicin • XRT – 3000 cGy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks Pre-treatment 46 months post treatment Chondrosarcoma    Recognized by ACS in 1939 Malignant, tumor cells form chondroid and not osteoid Tissue origin: – Bone – chondroid precursors – Cartilaginous • Most common laryngeal sarcoma – Soft tissue • Cartilaginous differentiation of primitive mesenchymal cells Classification  Tumor tissue origin – Primary vs. secondary  Histologic based microscopic appearance – Conventional ( NOS) – Myxoid – Mesenchymal  Anatomically based – Central – intramedullary – Peripheral – cortex – Juxtacortical – periosteal or soft tissue  Grade Staging  TNM – Skeletal • T1 – confined within bone cortex • T2 – invade beyond bone cortex – Extraskeletal • Soft tissue sarcoma T staging  GSS (general summary stage) – L – locally confined – R – regional spread – D – distant spread National Cancer Database Report on Chondrosarcoma of the Head and Neck    Brenton Koch et al., Univ of Iowa, Head and Neck July 2000 NCDB data on all reported head and neck chondrosarcomas 1985 – 1995 Results - Demographics    355,019 patients 400 (0.1%) chondrosarcoma Median age 51 years Treatment Characteristics   Overall survival – 5 year 77.6%, 10 year 64.3% Disease-specific – 5 year 87.2%, 10 year 70.6% P=0.027   Grade 1 - 2 – 5 year 93.2% Grade 3 - 4 – 5 year 67.3%  5 year survival by site – – – – Head and neck bones – 92.4% Laryngotracheal – 88.0% Sinonasal – 87.5% Soft tissue – 80.2% P=0.006  5 year survival by histologic subtype – Chondro (NOS) – 91.4% – Myxoid – 45% – Mesenchymal – 53.2% Recommended Treatment  *Surgical excision – 1-2 cm margins  Radiation – no survival data – Adjunct (23.6%) – Primary (4.0%)  Chemotherapy – Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (57.5%) – High grade – distant mets, potential errors  Cervical metastases – Overall incidence 5.6% – No prophylactic neck treatment recommended NCDB Chondrosarcoma Negative Prognostic Factors Advanced stage (III-IV)  Higher grade  Myxoid or mesenchymal histology  Osteosarcoma   Relatively small published series 10% of all osteosarcomas occur in the head and neck – Mandible > maxilla > paranasal sinuses > skull  In US: – 900 new cases annually – 1 per year in large cancer centers  Present during 3rd – 4th decade Classification  Origin: – Intramedullary – Surface (cortex) – Extraosseous (soft tissue)  Type: – – – – – Osteoblastic/conventional – High Dedifferentiated - High Telangectatic - High Chondroblastic -Low Fibroblastic - Low Staging  Enneking Staging System Stage IA Grade G1 Tumor T1 Mets M0 T: extent of primary Intra/extra compartmental M: nodal or distant disease IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB G1 G2 G2 G1 or G2 G1 or G2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 M0 M0 M0 M1 M1  TNM Major Risk Factors     Radiation exposure Paget’s disease – Skull Other - fibrous dysplasia, chronic osteomyelitis, myositis ossificans, trauma Survivors of childhood retinoblastoma – XRT – Genetic disposition • p53 and Rb mutation Metastatic Risks  Low grade – Low likelihood of metastases  High grade – Propensity to metastasize • • • • Lung Cervical LN Brain Other bones Effectiveness of Chemotherapy  Efficacy of long bone osteosarcoma neoadjuvant chemo established – Completeness of histologic response ( less than 5%-10% tumor viability at surgical resection) correlated to improved survival – Chemoresistance • p-glycoprotein (p170) multi-drug resistance gene  Head and neck survival benefits not yet established – Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo commonly employed Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Smeele et al., Effect of Chemotherapy on Survival of Craniofacial Osteosarcoma: J Clin Oncol 1996    201 patients, 1974 – 1994 Analysis stratified for use or non-use of chemotherapy Conclusion: – chemotherapy improves survival in craniofacial osteosarcoma – advocated long bone protocols for use in the head and neck University of Washington Experience Oda, Weymuller et al., Head and Neck, 1997     13 patients from 1981– 1996 8 men, 5 women Median age 40.9 years (22–75 years) Mean follow-up 58 months Histology, Grade and Location Treatment  High grade – Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3 cycles) • Doxorubicin and cisplatin – Surgical resection – Adjuvant chemotherapy   Low grade – Surgical excision, +/- chemo Radiation therapy - radioresistance – Positive margins – Unresectibility Cumulative Overall Survival   5-year survival 72% 3/13 (23%) patients had local recurrence – 2 of the 3 deaths Chemotherapy Results One patient chemoresistant  Two patients > 90% tumor necrosis  No development of metastatic disease  University of Washington Conclusion Head and Neck osteosarcoma is more similar than dissimilar to long bone osteosarcoma in terms of response to treatment modalities  Surgical resection with clear margins provided the best chance for survival  Neoadjuvant chemo is of particular value for high grade histology  Head and Neck Sarcoma Summary  Surgical resection is essential for local control – Soft tissue or bone sarcoma   Negative margins improve local control Postoperative radiation – Low grade lesions with close or + margins – All intermediate and high grade lesions – 40 – 70 Gy, external beam, brachy, or both  Role of Chemotherapy unclear – Improved tumor response in osteosarcoma – Consider for high grade lesions or when metastases are present Head and Neck Sarcoma Summary  Management of the Neck – Elective neck dissection is NOT indicated if the neck is not clinically involved • Overall, only 8-10% of sarcomas metastasize to nodes. – “Although certain sarcomas have a higher propensity for nodal metastases such as malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and synovial sarcomas, a neck dissection would not be warranted unless nodes are clinically or radiologically involved.” – Neck irradiation would have similar considerations. American H&N Society; H&N Sarcoma treatment recommendations

Related docs
Other docs by sammyc2007