High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Uptown Dog Club Inc - 1

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
30
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/16/2008
language:
pages:
0
High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Uptown Dog Club Inc Doc. 1 Case 2:07-cv-00888-TSZ Document 1 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. UPTOWN DOG CLUB,INC, a Texas Corporation, Defendant HIGH MAINTENANCE BITCH, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ) Case No.: ) ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch, LLC (“HMB”) complains against defendant Uptown Dog Club, Inc. (“Uptown”), and for causes of action alleges as follows. THE PARTIES Plaintiff HMB is a Washington State limited liability company, with its principal place of business at 10015 Lake City Way, NE, Box 315, Seattle, Washington, 98125. 2. HMB is the owner of United States Patent No. D475,163 (“HMB Patent 1”), reproduced as Exhibit A hereto. 3. HMB is the owner of United States Patent No. D468,491 (“HMB Patent 2”), reproduced as Exhibit B hereto. Complaint Page 1 of 5 VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206)281-0795 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00888-TSZ Document 1 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4. HMB is the owner of United States Patent No. D475,162 (“HMB Patent 3”), reproduced as Exhibit C hereto. 5. Uptown is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Texas, with its principal place of business at 9188 Chivalry Court, Frisco, Texas, 75034. Jurisdiction 6. Uptown. 7. This court has original subject matter jurisdiction over HMB’s This is a civil action for patent infringement committed by claims for relief, which arise under the laws of the United States and more particularly Title 35 of the United States Code, Pursuant to 28 USC § 1331. 8. This court has original subject matter jurisdiction over HMD’s Claims for relief, which arise under act of Congress relating to patents, pursuant to 28 USC § 1338(a). Factual Background 9. Uptown has made, used, sold, and/or offered for sale products that implement designs that are within the scope of the claims of HMB Patent 1, HMB Patent 2, and HMB Patent 3. 10. HMB has not licensed or assigned any of its patents to Uptown. Causes of Action COUNT I (Direct Infringement of HMB Patent 1) 11. By this reference HMB incorporates and re-alleges, as though 23 fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1 through 10 above. 24 12. 25 for sale goods within the scope of the claims of HMB Patent 1. 26 13. Complaint Page 2 of 5 Uptown without authority has made, used, sold, and/or offered The conduct of Uptown as set forth above gives rise to a VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206)281-0795 Case 2:07-cv-00888-TSZ Document 1 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 cause of action for direct infringement of HMB Patent 1, pursuant to 35 USC §§ 271(a), 281, and 289. 14. HMB alleges that Uptown will continue to infringe HMB Patent 1 unless enjoined by the court. 15. By reason of the foregoing HMB is entitled to injunctive and monetary relief against Uptown, pursuant to 35 USC §§ 283-285, as more fully set forth below. COUNT II (Direct Infringement of HMB Patent 2) 16. By this reference HMB incorporates and re-alleges, as though 11 fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1 through 15 above. 12 17. 13 for sale goods within the scope of the claims of HMB Patent 2. 14 18. 15 cause of action for direct infringement of HMB Patent 2, pursuant to 35 USC 16 §§ 271(a), 281, and 289. 17 19. 18 2 unless enjoined by the court. 19 20. 20 monetary relief against Uptown, pursuant to 35 USC §§ 283-285, as more fully 21 set forth 22 23 24 25 26 21. COUNT III (Direct Infringement of HMB Patent 3) By this reference HMB incorporates and re-alleges, as though below. By reason of the foregoing HMB is entitled to injunctive and HMB alleges that Uptown will continue to infringe HMB Patent The conduct of Uptown as set forth above gives rise to a Uptown, without authority has made, used, sold, and/or offered fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1 through 20 above. 22. Uptown, without authority has made, used, sold, and/or offered for sale goods within the scope of the claims of HMB Patent 3. Complaint Page 3 of 5 VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206)281-0795 Case 2:07-cv-00888-TSZ Document 1 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 23. The conduct of Uptown as set forth above gives rise to a cause of action for direct infringement of HMB Patent 3, pursuant to 35 USC §§ 271(a), 281, and 289. 24. HMB alleges that Uptown will continue to infringe HMB Patent 3 unless enjoined by the court. 25. By reason of the foregoing HMB is entitled to injunctive and monetary relief against Uptown, pursuant to 35 USC §§ 283-285, as more fully set forth below. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, HMB prays for judgment against Uptown as follows: A. An order of this court temporarily, preliminarily, and permanently 12 enjoining Uptown Dog Club, Inc., its agents and servant, and any and all 13 parties acting in concert with any of them from directly or indirectly 14 infringing in any manner HMB Patent 1, HMB Patent 2, and HMB Patent3, whether 15 by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell infringing products, 16 pursuant to at least 35 USC § 283; 17 B. An award of damages to HMB, in an amount to be proven at trial, 18 pursuant to at least 35 USC § 284; 19 C. 20 D. 21 least 35 USC § 285; and 22 E. 23 and equitable. 24 DEMAND FOR JURY 25 Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch, LLC demands TRIAL BY JURY of all 26 causes so triable. Complaint Page 4 of 5 VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206)281-0795 Prejudgment interest pursuant to at least 35 USC § 284; An award of HMB’s attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to at For such other and further relief as the court deems just, proper Case 2:07-cv-00888-TSZ Document 1 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Dated this June 8, 2007 /Daniel M Bronski/ VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 219-0515 Daniel M. Bronski 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 James J. Ruttler, of Counsel (US Patent Reg. No. 56,919) Complaint Page 5 of 5 VeriTrademark 216 First Ave S #210 Seattle, WA 98104 (206)281-0795

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs