Using Virtual Telepathology Technology to Train Pathology Residents

Reviews
Shared by: sammyc2007
Categories
Stats
views:
297
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Using Virtual Telepathology to Train Pathology Residents Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Allison Tillack, MS Lynne Richter, MT Jeffrey Henderson, MD Achyut Bhattacharyya, MD Katherine Scott, MD Anna Graham, MD Michael Descour, PhD John Davis, MD Ronald S. Weinstein, MD Arizona Telemedicine Program University of Arizona Rationale • Little research in pathology on the nature & development of expertise • Much known in radiology from eyeposition studies with significant differences between novices & experts • Differences similar in pathology? • Can we utilize differences to develop training programs to foster expertise? Virtual Slides • Dmetrix virtual slide processor •Three 80-element 10 x 8 lenslet arrays stacked vertically with 80 each side • Each has 250 micron FOV • Scans @ 3 mm/sec yields 3000 images/sec/array • 58 sec for 2.25 cm2 section • 40X objective detail •1 image = 200 MB – 1 GB storage space Eye-Position Study • • • • 20 virtual slides (breast biopsy) IBM 9-MegaPixel color display Initial resolution only 9 observers – 3 pathologists – 3 pathology residents – 3 medical students • ASL 4000SU Eye Tracker • Pick 3 areas most want to zoom on Marked Zoom Areas Marked Zoom Areas Eye-Tracking Eye-Tracking Data Cluster Saccade Fixation (size = dwell) Med Student Resident Pathologist Viewing Time Mean Total View Time (sec) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Path Res Med F = 29.880, p < 0.0001 All differ significantly Number Fixations 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Path Res Med F = 47.891, p < 0.0001 All differ significantly Mean Number Fixations # Saccades 50 Average Saccades Generated per Image 40 30 20 10 0 Path Res Experience Level Med Benign Malignant F = 36.063, p < 0.0001 All differ significantly Saccade Length 0.6 Saccade Length (sec) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Path Res Med F = 54.761, p < 0.0001 All differ significantly Saccade Distance Saccade Length Deg Visual Angle 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Path Res Med F = 11.975, p < 0.0001 All differ significantly Discussion • Trained pathologists are more efficient at extracting information from virtual slides than less experienced residents or med students • Field of attention expands with expertise taking in more relevant information in the global percept or gist followed by directed focal search Discussion • Possibly use expert scan paths as examples for learners to accelerate the adoption of better search strategies • Possibly utilize expert scans to automatically change magnifications & field selections • Possibly use in self-assessment or proficiency testing scenarios THANK YOU!

Related docs
Introduction to Telepathology
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 1
Telepathology at Fiji School of Medicine
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Veterinary Pathology
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 1
Digital Pathology
Views: 203  |  Downloads: 5
Future of Pathology
Views: 75  |  Downloads: 3
PATHOLOGY 425
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 1
TRAIN INFORMATION
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Pathology Informatics and the Future of Medicine
Views: 206  |  Downloads: 22
premium docs
Other docs by sammyc2007