Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited - 4

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
45
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., et al., Defendants. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cc: Wings Hom Dated: March 13, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On March 10, 2008, Google Inc. filed a motion to quash a third party subpoena, or in the alternative for a protective order. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 72-1, this matter is HEREBY REFERRED to a randomly assigned magistrate judge for resolution. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Google is directed to serve a copy of this Order on all interested parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. No. C 08-80031 JSW ORDER OF REFERRAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 Dockets.Justia.com

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs