Acrobat PDF

Croutch v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc. - 3

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
30
downloads:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Croutch v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc. Doc. 3 Case 5:07-cv-00992-FB Document 3 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § v. § § JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC., § § Defendant. § GEORGE AUBREY CROUCH, CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-07-CV-0992 FB ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS and ORDER RETURNING TO DISTRICT COURT The matter before the court is plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, plaintiff reports that he currently receives almost $34,000 (pre-tax) annually from his 401K plan plus another $1,200 a month from Social Security. His wife also receives a small monthly social security benefit. He is purchasing his home which is valued at approximately $200,000. Although he has a number of regular monthly expenses listed in his application, his income is sufficient to absorb those expenses and pay the $350.00 filing fee. While plaintiff need not establish that he is totally destitute before he may be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, after examining his statements concerning expenses and income, I find this plaintiff has the resources to pay the filing fee to initiate this action. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. 2. On or before 30 days from date of this Order, plaintiff shall pay the required filing fee in this cause. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-00992-FB Document 3 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2 3. In the event plaintiff wishes to appeal from my denial of the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he must file his appeal to the District Court from this Order within 10 days of the date of this Order. 4. Plaintiff is advised that in the event that he fails to either pay the filing fee or file an appeal from this Order within the time frames set forth above, the District Court will issue an Order dismissing this cause without prejudice. 5. This matter is returned to the District Court. SIGNED on December 7, 2007. _____________________________________ NANCY STEIN NOWAK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Croutch v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc. - 4
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Sanders - 3
Views: 51  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Pfizer, Inc. - 2
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Bush et al - 3
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
Hughes, #0553981 v. Cooper - 3
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Bush et al - 3
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Reed (INMATE 2) - 3
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
India Brewing Inc v. Miller Brewing Co - 3
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
(PC) Cooper v. Terhune et al - 3
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
COOPER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al - 3
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
Mims v. Central Transport, Inc. - 2
Views: 33  |  Downloads: 0
Cooper v. Jones et al (INMATE 1) - 3
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
0