Acrobat PDF

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al - 38

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
14
downloads:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 38 Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDLDocument 37-2 Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED Document 38 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 1 of 1 Filed 11/26/2007 Page of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § § v. § § GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, § MICROSOFT CORPORATION, § YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, § INC., and A9.COM, INC. § PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-cv-432[LED] JURY DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant YAHOO! INC., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion for an additional extension of its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint until and through December 7, 2007. Such motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant YAHOO! INC. has until and through December 7, 2007 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of November, 2007. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE {A07\7854\0004\W0343839.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
0