Get documents about "RECIPES project country report - Vanuatu
Document Sample
SIXTH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME PRIORITY 3
Underpinning the economic
potential and cohesion of a
larger and more integrated
EU
Project Acronym: RECIPES
Project full title:Renewable
Energy in emerging and
developing countries:
Current sItuation, market
Potential and
recommendations for a win-
win-win for EU industry, the
Environment and local Socio-
economic development
RECIPES project: country report - Vanuatu
Page1 - General
Page2 - Energy overview
Page3 - Energy and policy
Page4 - Energy and industry
Page5 - Future overview
Page6 - Biomass overview
Page7 - Solar thermal
Page8 - PV
Page9 - PV-large
Page10 - Wind
Page11 - Wind off-shore
Page12 - Geo thermal
Page13 - Small hydro
Page14 - Large hydro
Page15 - Biomass
Page16 - Biodiesel-ethanol
Page17 - Small RE systems part I
Page18 - Small RE systems part II
Page19 - Industry special
Page20 - Special issues
Page21 - References
Open as Excel document
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 1: General
Name data suplier Luis Vega
Country area 12200 km² PRISM 2005 www.spc.int/prism
32726 million vatu In
GDP 32726000000 Local currency PRISM 2002
2002, 1 Euro = 133.3 Vatu
Local currency to US$ if
Income/capita 1148 US $ PRISM 2002 PPP factor from WB used:
3,205 Int. $/capita
Variability of income/capita , Data required to estimate
0.000 index
GINI index GINI not available
Forest land is about 75%
of total land area and
Percentage of country area owned by traditional
0.000 % Dpt of Forestry
covered by preserved areas owners (clans) and can
not be sold. There is no
gov. forest estate
Comments
Population
Total population of country 201621.000 PRISM 2002
Percentage of total people
21.500 index PRISM 2000
living in cities
Total density of population 17.000 capita/km² PRISM 2000
Density of population in rural
0.000 capita/km² not available
area
Comments
Percentage of women in total % of total
48.800 PRISM 2000
population population
Economic
Equivalent number of full
employment positions in the estimated as less than
0.020 % PIREP 2004
renewable energy sector 0.02%
(excluded academic)
Comments
Electricity economics
Percentage of people
% of total 61% of Urban Households
connected to the grid 19.000 PRISM 2002
population 7% of Rural Households
(electricity)
or Number of people
connected to the grid 0.000
(electricity)
Efate & Santo Islands
Is the national grid composed
small urban grids Tanna &
of an amount of non Yes PIREP 2004
Malekula Islands rural
interconnected smaller grids?
electrification grids
If yes, how many grids are
4.000
there?
Owners of the electricity grid
% of grid owned by
0.000 %
government
UNELCO: Union
% of grid owned by private
100.000 % 2004 Electrique de Vanuatu
companies
Annual Report
% of grid owned by
0.000 %
associations/cooperatives
Owners of electricity power plants
% of power plants owned by
3.000 % 2004 0.6 MW Capacity (Hydro)
government
% of power plants owned by 21.6 MW Capacity
97.000 % 2004
private companies (Diesel)
% of power plants owned by
0.000 %
associations/cooperatives
Is it possible to sell electricty No, because privately
No
to the grid owned
How is the attitude of larger
owners of power plants
towards RE, f.i. do they have
their own research employers unknown
or ask advice to investigated
possibilities when they have
plans to expand
Comments
Water economics
Percentage of people Vanuatu Briefing
% of total 100% Urban and 65%
connected to a main water 72.000 paper August 2001
population Rural
net 2002
Owners of the water net
Vanuatu Briefing Government supplies rural
% of water net owned by
80.000 % paper August 2001 and urban areas (other
government
2002 than Port Vila)
% of water net owned by Vanuatu Briefing UNELCO supplies Port
private companies paper August Vila (capital city)
20.000 % 2001
2002
% of water net owned by
0.000 %
associations/cooperatives
Comments
Energy cost
Prices conventional produced energy per market
* small consumers are households, offices etc with less then 20.000 kWh /year if your country has another definition
please mention this in the "comments" field.
* if there's a price range instead of one price, please indicate this in the comments" field, including the range and the
reason for this variation in prices."
LC = Local Currency
Electricity - supply-side
Costs of electricity supply- Unknown. UNELCO is a
0.000 LC/kWh
side private company
Costs of electricity small UNELCO Tariff
21.290 LC/kWh 2004 Medium consumer: 31,94
consumer (2004)
Costs of electricity big
58.380 LC/kWh 2004
consumer
Natural gas
205.4 Vatu/kg from Pacific
Costs of natural gas supply- Islands Forum Secretariat
148.830 LC/m3 July 2003
side Fuel Price Monitor (July-
Aug 2003)
Costs of natural gas small 237 Vatu/kg July-Aug
171.730 LC/m3
consumer 2003
Costs of natural gas big
0.000 LC/m3
consumer
Heat by district heating
Costs of district heating
0.000 (LC/GJ) not applicable
supply-side
Costs of district heating small
0.000 (LC/GJ) not applicable
consumer
Costs of district heating big
0.000 (LC/GJ) not applicable
consumer
Electricity cost on the grid
34.230 LC/kWh PIREP/UNELCO 2002
(national average)
End user cost including
36.218 LC/kWh 0.26 Euro/kWh
distribution
Distribution gas cost 0.000 LC/m3 not applicable
End user cost including
0.000 LC/Nm3
distribution
LPG Cylinder Cost 237
Pacific Islands
Gas cylinder cost 237.000 LC/kg July 2003 Vatu/kg (July-Aug 2003)
Forum
1,7 euro/Kg
Pacific Islands
Fuel oil cost 101600.000 LC/m3 July 2003 101.6 Vatu/liter
Forum
Coal cost 0.000 LC/t not applicable
Comments
International Position
Special associations with other countries like..
Special association based on
former colony - enter country
Some OECD countries have special programs to support development
Spearhead of policy - enter
country/countries
Venture industry - enter
country/industry
Others ...
Total External Debt/GDP 37.000 % World Bank 2002 www.worldbank.org/data
Comments
Major moneylenders and funding
Total amount of international
31856924.000 US $ World Bank 2003 www.worldbank.org/data
funding (2004)
World Bank funding 0.000 US $ NA
European Commission
0.000 US $ NA
funding
Other funding (name)
Other funding (amount) 0.000 US $
Part of international funding
0.000 % NA
apointed for energy
Part of international funding
%, smaller than
apointed for sustainable 0.000 NA
precedent
energy
Comments
Social
National Council of Chiefs
operating in parallel with
Approximative percentage of
modern National
villages with peasant 0.000 %
Parliamentary System and
associations/cooperatives
six Provincial
Governments
Approximative percentage of
ad-hoc committees for
these
0.000 % specific tasks (e.g.:
associations/cooperatives
operate diesel gensets)
which are functional
How is the attitude of the
population towards forming
Positive
peasant
associations/cooperatives?
Comments
Education
74% Literacy Rate for
Percentage of people who % of total
18.600 PRISM 2002 population older than 15
finished elementary school population
years (2003 WB)
Percentage of people who % of total
4.800 PRISM 2002
finished high school population
Percentage of people who NA 1.1 % of population
% of total
have a college or university 0.000 attending higher
population
diploma education institutions
N.B. Values given here are for percentage of people enrolled in elementary school
Comments
(18.6%) and high school (4.8%)
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 2: Energy overview
Energy overview
3932 Tera-Joule (TJ) 1990 Reliable
Total primary energy
0.093 Mtoe Data at 18.1 GJ/capita (431
consumption (per year)
kgoe/capita).
1488 TJ 2002 estimate herein from
Oil consumption 668.310 bbl/day PIREP partial data (19.9 GJ/capita;
or, 473 kgoe/capita)
millions short
Coal consumption 0.000
tonnes/year
Value for LPG (liquefied petroleum
Natural gas
0.002 billion m3/year gas) given here in TJ. Natural gas
consumption
not available in vanuatu.
Nuclear power
0.000 TWh/year No nuclear energy in Vanuatu
consumption
Electricity consumption 0.047 TWh/year UNELCO 2002 TWh Production amount
If known electricity consumption by
% electricity
0.000 % Information not available
consumption industry
% electricity
consumption
0.000 %
commercial and public
services
% electricity
0.000 %
consumption residential
% electricty
0.000 %
consumption others
Traditional biomass
0.038 Mtoe 2002 1580000 GJ
consumption
RE biomass
0.019 Mtoe 2002 800000 GJ
consumption
Other energies
0.000 Mtoe
consumption
Percentage of total
Vega March
energy consumption 1.800 % 1990
2000
used for industry
1990 is last year for which there is
enough information to estimate
Percentage of total
consumption by sector. An educated
energy consumption 23.000 %
guess is that distribution remains
used for transportation
similar with about 40% total energy
for residential use.
Percentage of total
energy consumption 28.900 %
used for agriculture
Percentage of total
energy consumption
2.400 %
used for commercial
and public services
Percentage of total
energy consumption 43.900 %
used for residential
Percentage of total
energy consumption 0.000 % included above
used for other purposes
Total oil production 0.000 bbl/day NONE
millions short
Total coal production 0.000 NONE
tonnes/year
Total natural gas
0.000 billion m3/year NONE
production
Total biofuel production 0.000 billion liters NONE
Comments
Electricity production
Total electricity
0.047 TWh UNELCO 2002 47.15 GWh
production (per year)
Percentage of electricity
production from oil 93.200 % 2002 was 90 % in 1999
plants
Percentage of electricity
production from coal 0.000 %
plants
Percentage of electricity
production from natural 0.000 %
gas plants
Percentage of electricity
production from nuclear
0.000 %
power
Percentage of electricity
production from hydro 6.800 % was 10 % in 1999
power
Percentage of electricity
%, smaller than
production from large 0.000 2002
precedent
hydro power (>25MW)
Percentage of electricity
production from medium
0.000 %
hydro power (between
10MW and 25MW)
Percentage of electricity
production from small
0.000 %
hydro power (between
1MW and 10MW)
Percentage of electricity
production from mini
6.800 % 0.6 MW hydro at Sarakata
and micro power
( <1MW)
Percentage of electricity
production from 0.000 %
biomass power
Percentage of electricity
%, smaller than
production from wood 0.000
precedent
burning
Percentage of electricity
production from
0.000 %
digestors and gas
burning
Percentage of electricity
production from agro 0.000 %
industrial waste
Percentage of electricity
production from city
0.000 %
waste (by incineration or
gas )
Percentage of electricity
production from wind 0.000 %
power
Percentage of electricity
Estimate based on installed capacity
production from solar 0.200 %
is less than 0.2 %
power
Percentage of electricity
production from 0.000 %
geothermal power
Percentage of electricity
production from other
0.000 %
renewable energies +
which RE
Import-Export
Electricity export 0.000 TWh/year
Electricity import 0.000 TWh/year
Comments
Energy use residential
Percentage of people
who use electricity for 1.000 % 1999 Census 1999 less than 1 %
cooking
Percentage of people
0.000 % 1999 Census
who use gas for cooking
Percentage of people 13.000 % Mostly LPG
who use fossil fuels for
cooking
Percentage of people
95% rural households use wood or
who use wood for 86.000 %
other biomass
cooking
Percentage of people
who use other fuel for
0.000 % included under wood
cooking (crop burning,
rice bullets,...)
Not available. Hot water not
Percentage of people
commonly used. Hot water mostly
who use electricity for 0.000 %
used in tourist resorts and some
water-heating
urban residents.
Percentage of people
who use gas for water- 0.000 %
heating
Percentage of people
who use fossil fuels for 0.000 % Not available
water-heating
Percentage of people
who use wood for 0.000 % Not available
water-heating
Percentage of people
who use other fuel for
0.000 % Not available
water-heating (crop
burning, rice bullets,...)
Percentage of people
Not available. Space heating not
who use electricity for 0.000 %
common
space heating
Percentage of people
who use gas for space 0.000 %
heating
Percentage of people
who use fossil fuels for 0.000 %
space heating
Percentage of people
who use wood for space 0.000 %
heating
Percentage of people
who use other fuel for
0.000 %
space heating (crop
burning, rice bullets,...)
Estimated available fuel reserves
Fuel reserves - natural
0.000 billion m3 Not used
gas
Fuel reserves - oil 0.000 billion bbl Information not available
Fuel reserves - coal 0.000 billion short tons Not used
Comments
Efficiency
Average efficiency of
electricity production 36.000 % UNELCO 2002
with fossil-fueled plants
Average efficiency of
electricity production 0.000 % Not Applicable
with CHP plants
Average efficiency of
heat production with 0.000 % Not Applicable
CHP plants
Percentage CHP-power
of the total electricity 0.000 %
production capacity
Average efficiency of 0.000 % Not Applicable
heat production with
fossil-fueled plants
Average efficiency of
electricity production
0.000 % Not Applicable
with agro industrial
waste
Average loss by
12.000 % UNELCO 2002
electricity distribution
Average efficiency for
domestic hot water & 0.000 % Not Applicable
space heating
Comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 3: Energy and policy
Policy targets
N.B. Government declared
intention of becoming a
Is there any policy for Hydrogen based economy with
No
sustainable energy? no fossil fuels used by 2010.
This is obviously not realistic and
based on wrong information.
Is there a percentage of
energy production to be
No
reached with sustainable
energy?
If yes: Percentage of total
energy consumption to be % of total energy
0.000
reached with sustainable consumption
energy
... and year for this aim to
0.000
be achieved
If yes: Percentage of total
electricity production to be % of total
0.000
reached with sustainable electricityproduction
energy
... and year for this aim to
0.000
be achieved
If yes: Percentage of total
energy for transport to be % of total energy
0.000
reached with sustainable for transport
energy
... and year for this aim to
0.000
be achieved
Is there a percentage of
grid connected people to 0.000 % no
be reached?
... and year for this aim to
0.000
be achieved
Is the Koyoto agreement
Yes
signed/ratified
Are there intentions or
activities for CDM projects
Yes
(connected with the Kyoto
agreement)
Comments
Planned extension of electricity production
Are there large power
Feasibility studies (Hydro
plants which are already
expansion to double capacity;
planned to be built in this Yes
and, 3 MW geothermal)
country (or extensions of
underway
existing power plants)?
If yes, capacity and year of construction of these new plants (separated by type)
New oil power plants 0.000 MW
Construction year new oil
0.000
power plants
If available; if it's an
estimation please mention
here
New coal power plants 0.000 MW
Construction year new coal
0.000
power plants
If available; if it's an
estimation please mention
here
New natural gas power
0.000 MW
plants
Construction year new gas
0.000
power plants
If available; if it's an
estimation please mention
here
New nuclear power plants 0.000 MW
Construction year new
0.000
nuclear power plants
If available; if it's an
estimation please mention
here
New hydro power plants 0.600 MW Double size of Sarakata
Construction year new
0.000
hydro power plants
If available; if it's an
estimation please mention
here
Comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 4: Energy and industry
Energy and industry; active industry for renewable equipement in 2005
For the following technologies, fill in yes or no
Solar Heat
Main source of information
solar cookers - own industry No for this Section is PIREP
2004 report
solar cookers - imported No
simple solar water heater,
collector and storage often No
combined - own industry
simple solar water heater,
collector and storage often Yes
combined - imported
Solar water heaters
solar water heater: collector -
No
own industry
solar water heater: collector -
Yes
imported
solar water heater: storage - own
No
industry
solar water heater: storage -
Yes
imported
solar water heater: electronic No
components - own industry
solar water heater: electronic
Yes
components - imported
collectors for drying agricultural
No
products - own industry
collectors for drying agricultural
Yes
products - imported
Comments
Solar Electricity
pv-cells
PV complete systems - own
No
industry
PV complete systems - imported Yes
PV cells with frame - own
No
industry
PV cells with frame - imported Yes
PV cells witout frame - own
No
industry
PV cells witout frame - imported No
PV inverters - own industry No
PV inverters - imported Yes
Comments
Wind Waterpumping
small turbine directly coupled with
No
pump - own industry
small turbine directly coupled with
No
pump - imported
Comments
Wind Electricity
small windturbines < 30 kW
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
complete systems - own industry
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
complete systems - imported
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
blades - own industry
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
blades - imported
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
engine - own industry
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
engine - imported
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
electronic components - own No
industry
small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
electronic components - imported
Small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
tower - own industry
Small wind turbines < 30 kW:
No
tower - imported
small windturbines < 1 MW
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
complete systems - own industry
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
complete systems - imported
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
blades - own industry
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
blades - imported No
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
engine - own industry
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
engine - imported
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
electronic components - own No
industry
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
electronic components - imported
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
tower - own industry
Small wind turbines < 1 MW:
No
tower - imported
windturbines > 1MW
Wind turbines > 1 MW: complete
No
systems - own industry
Wind turbines > 1 MW: complete
No
systems - imported
Wind turbines > 1 MW: blades -
No
own industry
Wind turbines > 1 MW: blades -
No
imported
Wind turbines > 1 MW: engine -
No
own industry
Wind turbines > 1 MW: engine -
No
imported
Wind turbines > 1 MW: electronic
No
components - own industry
Wind turbines > 1 MW: electronic
No
components - imported
Wind turbines > 1 MW: tower -
No
own industry
Wind turbines > 1 MW: tower -
No
imported
Comments
Geothermal Heat
Geothermal heat: drilling and
No
piping - own industry
Geothermal heat: drilling and
No
piping - imported
Comments
Geothermal Electricity
Geothermal electricity: small turbines < 5 MW (if you use different power ranges please mention)
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
complete systems - own industry
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
complete systems - imported
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
drilling and piping - own industry
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
drilling and piping - imported
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
turbine - own industry
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
No
turbine - imported
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
electronic components - own No
industry
Geothermal electricity < 5 MW:
electronic components - imported No
turbines > 5MW
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
complete systems - own industry
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
complete systems - imported
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
drilling and piping - own industry
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
drilling and piping - imported
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
turbine - own industry
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
turbine - imported
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
electronic components - own No
industry
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
electronic components - imported
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
tower - own industry
Geothermal electricity > 5 MW:
No
tower - imported
If you use different power ranges
please mention here
Comments
Hydropower Electricity
micro and mini systems < 1 MW
Hydropower < 1 MW: complete 0.6 MW Utility Hydro Plant
No
systems - own industry since 1995. Owned by Gov.
Hydropower < 1 MW: complete Donated by Japan operated
Yes
systems - imported by UNELCO
Hydropower < 1 MW: turbine -
No
own industry
Hydropower < 1 MW: turbine -
Yes
imported
Hydropower < 1 MW: electronic
No
components - own industry
Hydropower < 1 MW: electronic
Yes
components - imported
small systems <10 MW (if you use different power ranges please mention)
Hydropower < 10 MW: complete
No
systems - own industry
Hydropower < 10 MW: complete
No
systems - imported
Hydropower < 10 MW: turbine -
No
own industry
Hydropower < 10 MW: turbine -
No
imported
Hydropower < 10 MW: electronic
No
components - own industry
Hydropower < 10 MW: electronic
No
components - imported
intermediate <25 MW
Hydropower < 25 MW: complete
No
systems - own industry
Hydropower < 25 MW: complete
No
systems - imported
Hydropower < 25 MW: turbine -
No
own industry
Hydropower < 25 MW: turbine -
No
imported
Hydropower < 25 MW: electronic
No
components - own industry
Hydropower < 25 MW: electronic
No
components - imported
If you use different power ranges
please mention
Comments
Biomass Gas
Biomass digestor, small only for gas
Biomass gas: complete systems -
No
own industry
Biomass gas: complete systems -
No
imported
........ - own industry
........ - imported
Comments
Biomass gas and electricity
via digestion
Biomass digestor gas and
electricity: complete systems - No
own industry
Biomass digestor gas and
electricity: complete systems- No
imported
Biomass digestor gas and
No
electricity: engine - own industry
Biomass digestor gas and
No
electricity: engine - imported
Biomass digestor gas and
electricity: electronic components No
- own industry
Biomass digestor gas and
electricity: electronic components No
- imported
Comments
Biomass Heat and Electricity
combustion and gasification agro industrial waste
Biomass heat and electricity:
No
complete systems - own industry
Biomass heat and electricity:
No
complete systems - imported
Biomass heat and electricity:
No
engine - own industry
Biomass heat and electricity:
No
engine - imported
Comments
Biomass Gas
pyrolysis
Pyrolysis: complete systems -
No
own industry
Pyrolysis: complete systems -
No
imported
Pyrolysis: engine - own industry No
Pyrolysis: engine - imported No
Comments
Industry overall view
Please indicate which of the following industries are important in your country
solar cookers No
PV cells No
Solar collectors No
Solar cells No PV Lights in rural sector
Small windturbines No
Medium and large windturbines No
Micro and small hydropower No one 0.6 MW hydro plant
Large hydropower No
Biomass digestors small and
No
medium
Geothermal systems No
Gasturbines No
Pyrolysis systems No
Comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 5: Future overview
Future overview 2010 and 2020 if available
We would like you to enter figures for the years 2010 and 2020 but if you have figures for another year (2012 or 2015)
please mention that and use these figures
Year (preferably
2020.000
2010)
52.9 Billion (10^9) Vatu
Department of Economic & Sector
Planning (DESP). DESP expects
Expected GDP 493931000.000 US $ DESP
average annual GDP growth 2.7%
Average annual population growth
2.6 %
Expected 165185 Vatu/capita 1 US$ : 141.3
1542.340 US $
income/capita Vatu (2002); 112.9 Vatu (2004)
Expected total
Historical Data
population of 320028.000 Historical Data from PRISM
Projection
country
Expected
percentage of total % of total
30.000 Historical Data from PRISM
people living in population
cities
Expected total
19.9 GJ/capita 6368561 GJ using 2002 estimate
primary energy 0.152 Mtoe
(2002 data) of 19.9 GJ/capita
consumption
Expected total
TWh Generation minus 12%
electricity 0.066 TWh
average Transmission Losses
consumption
Expected total
2002 per capita Estimate is 75 GWh using 2002
electricity 0.075 TWh
generation per capita generation
production
Percentage of
electricity expected
to be produced 10.000 % Rough estimate
from renewable
energy
Business as usual assuming all
biomass is renewable. Same
percentage of total as in 2002. In
Expected
addition, Vanuatu has potential to
renewable energies 0.091 Mtoe
displace all diesel fuel imports
use
(60% of total petroleum imports)
with coconut oil biofuel. Not
included here.
Amount of people
expected to be % of total
0.000 No goal has been officially stated.
connected to the population
grid (electricity)
Amount of people
Goal: Presently Urban 100% and
expected to be % of total
0.000 Rural at 65% want to achieve 75%
connected to the population
Rural
main water net
As requested, although estimates imply status quo, 2020 projections are given for consistency with
Comments
other countries in database.
Year (preferably
0.000
2020)
Expected GDP 0.000 US $
Expected
0.000 US $
income/capita
Expected total
population of 0.000
country
Expected
percentage of total % of total
0.000
people living in population
cities
Expected total
primary energy 0.000 Mtoe
consumption
Expected total
electricity 0.000 TWh
consumption
Expected total
electricity 0.000 TWh
production
Percentage of
electricity expected
to be produced 0.000 %
from renewable
energy
Expected
renewable energies 0.000 Mtoe
use
Amount of people
expected to be % of total
0.000
connected to the population
grid (electricity)
Amount of people
expected to be % of total
0.000
connected to the population
main water net
Comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 6: Biomass overview
Biomass overview
Agricultural issues
Total area of cultures in Vanuatu Dpt. of mostly coconut & wood
1000 km²
country Forestry plantations
Main cultures (list at least the 3 main cultures) and percentage of total area
FAO (1997) Vanuatu Forestry
Department Annual Report
main culture - 1 coconut (2002) N.B. Fuelwood is
primary source of fuel for
cooking. Consumption
estimated at 500 kg/person-
year or 100 kt annually
total area - 1 97.000 % 96000 Ha planted
main culture - 2 wood 3100 Ha
N.B. This value is for
plantations only. Forest
total area - 2 3.000 %
coverage is 75 % of total land
area (9,150 km^2)
main culture - 3
total area - 3 0.000 %
main culture - 4
total area - 4 0.000 %
main culture - 5
total area - 5 0.000 %
main culture - 6
total area - 6 0.000 %
main culture - 7
total area - 7 0.000 %
main culture - 8
total area - 8 0.000 %
main culture - 9
total area - 9 0.000 %
Main cultures' average annual production (for cultures that are harvested more than once a year, give the total
production; for cultures which are harvested every two years, divide production by 2)
average annual production
10348.000 t/ha 2002 Coconutoil in tonnes not t/Ha
main culture - 1
average annual production
100000.000 t/ha 2002 Firewood in tonnes
main culture - 2
average annual production
21390.000 t/ha 2002 Copra in tonnes
main culture - 3
Log Production in m^3
(between 1996-1999 36,000
average annual production
20020.000 t/ha 2002 to 41,000 m^3) Vanuatu
main culture - 4
Forestry Department Annual
Report (2002)
average annual production
0.000 t/ha
main culture - 5
average annual production
0.000 t/ha
main culture - 6
average annual production
0.000 t/ha
main culture - 7
average annual production
0.000 t/ha
main culture - 8
average annual production
0.000 t/ha
main culture - 9
Comments
Crop waste
If available, the percentage of crop waste that is
% crop waste used for
0.000 %
fertilisation
% crop waste burned in
0.000 % Majority for copra drying
open fire
% crop waste burned in
0.000 % Some coconut husks
oven
% crop waste used in
0.000 %
digestors
Comments
Cattle
Not Available, although beef
Total national number of is second largest export after
0.000
cattle -cows copra
Total national number of
0.000
goats and sheep
Total national number of
0.000
pigs
Total national number of
0.000
horses
If available, the percentage of manure from cattle that is
% manure burned 0.000 %
% manure dumped 0.000 %
% manure spread on fields 0.000 % Majority
% manure used to feed
0.000 %
cattle
% manure used for
digestion (electricity and 0.000 %
heat production)
Hampered stalling and farm factory
Percentage of cattle (cows)
% of total
raised in hampered stalling 0.000 Minute
amount of cattle
(or inside)
Percentage of goats and % of total
sheep raised in hampered 0.000 amount of goats Minute
stalling (or inside) and cheeps
Percentage of pigs raised
% of total
in hampered stalling (or 0.000 Minute
amount of pigs
inside)
Percentage of horses
% of total
raised in hampered stalling 0.000 Minute
amount of horses
(or inside)
If available, the percentage of manure from farm factories that is
% manure from farm
0.000 %
factories burned
% manure from farm
0.000 %
factories dumped
% manure from farm
0.000 % Majority
factories spread on fields
% manure from farm
factories used for digestion
0.000 %
(electricity and heat
production)
Comments
City waste
How many people have
Urban dwellers: 21.5%
theirs city wastes collected 43350.000
population
in the entire country?
Amount of city wastes
collected per day for the 0.000 t/day not quantified
entire country
Part of the national city
wastes from which the
produced gas is used for
% of total waste
electricity production 0.000
production
and/or waste that is
incinerated directly to
produce electricity
Comments
Agro Industry
Percentage of waste from agro industry that is
% agro waste combusted coconut husk used in copra
100.000 %
and/or gasficiation drying (combusted)
% agro waste dumped 0.000 %
% agro waste spread on
0.000 %
fields
% agro waste used to feed
0.000 %
cattle
% agro waste used for
digestion (electricity and 0.000 %
heat prod.)
Percentage of waste from wood industry that is
% wood production waste most for kiln heat About 9,000
used for combustion and 0.000 % m^3/year of wood residue
gasification from mills
% wood production waste
0.000 % Small
dumped
Percentage of manure from factory farming
% factory farming manure
used for combustion and 0.000 %
gasification
% factory farming manure
0.000 %
used for spread on fields
% factory farming manure
used for use for digestion 0.000 %
(electricity production)
Comments
Wood
Percentage of wood used as energy source coming from
% waste from wood
industry used as energy 0.000 % see above
source
% waste from natural forest
exploitation used as energy 0.000 %
source
% of waste from
exploitation of forest with
0.000 %
sustanaible maintenance
used as energy source
Percentage of country % of country
75.000
surface covered with forest surface
Regeneration time of wood
0.000 years Unknown
plantation
Main type of wood in Whitewood
forests & Milk Tree
Comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 7: Solar thermal
Solar thermal
General for this technology-market combination
Ministry for Lands,
Is solar thermal technology present in Geology, Mines,
Yes
the country? Energy, Environment
and Water Resources
Customs Data indicates
that hundreds of units
Numbers of solar heaters in country 0.000 Customs data
have been imported
over the years.
Total capacity installed of solar
0.000 m² Not available
thermal technology
For which reason is solar thermal technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
solar thermal technology chosen
No
because: only available resource y/n
% solar thermal chosen because:
0.000 %
only available resource
solar thermal technology chosen
Yes
because: least expensive y/n
% solar thermal technology chosen
0.000 %
because: least expensive
solar thermal technology chosen
because: stimulated by national No
government y/n
% solar thermal technology chosen
because: stimulated by national 0.000 %
government
solar thermal technology chosen
No
because: internationally funded y/n
% solar thermal technology chosen
0.000 %
because: internationally funded
solar thermal technology chosen
because: ideology, ambition to use Yes
RE y/n
% solar thermal technology chosen
because: ideology, ambition to use 0.000 %
RE
Solar thermal technology chosen
because: other reason
% solar thermal technology chosen
0.000 %
because of other reasons
Who has invested in the technology?
Investment in solar thermal: user=
100.000 %
owner= investor (%)
Investment in solar thermal: user
0.000 %
borrows from investor (%)
Investment in solar thermal: if user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment in solar thermal -
0.000 %
Government
% investment in solar thermal -
0.000 %
international organisation
% investment in solar thermal - local
0.000 %
private companies
% investment in solar thermal - other
0.000 %
sources
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Solar thermal produced within the
country y/n
Solar thermal % produced within the
0.000 %
country
Solar thermal - imported from North
America y/n
Solar thermal - % imported from
0.000 %
North America
Solar thermal - imported from Europe
y/n
Solar thermal - % imported from
0.000 %
Europe
Solar thermal - imported from Asia
y/n
Solar thermal - % imported from Asia 0.000 %
Solar thermal - imported from Yes
Australia y/n
Solar thermal - % imported from
100.000 % Rough estimate
Australia
Solar thermal - imported - other
countries
Solar thermal - % imported - other 0.000 %
Comments
Potential Technical
Is (generally) sufficient free space
available near the dwellings to
implement solar thermal? In the
Yes
comments: please make the
difference between cities and other
residentials, if possible in %
Are the dwellings (generally) strong
enough to place solar thermal
technology on the roof? In the
Yes
comments: please make the
difference between cities and other
residentials, if possible in %
Comments
Potential Socio-economic
Are there long-term activities for
No
installing solar thermal?
Who organises long-term activities to install solar thermal?
% long term solar thermal activity
organised by: international No
moneylenders
% long term solar thermal activity
No
organised by: Governmental
% long term solar thermal activity
organised by: Semi-governmental No
associations
% long term solar thermal activity
No
organised by: Co-operatives
% long term solar thermal activity
No
organised by: Private organisations
% long term solar thermal activity
organised by: Commercial Yes
organisations
% long term solar thermal activity
organised by: Non-profit No
organisations
long term solar thermal activity
organised by other organisations?
Equivalent number of full A few people. Two
employment positions in solar 0.000 hardware stores sell
thermal SWHs
Are there maintenance activities for
Yes Minimal
technology?
How is the general attitude of people
towards this technology? PE;
negative if it is a second choice if it
No Opinion
would be possible they use
something else or positve if they
would use it if they can afford it
Comments
Solar heat market
Percentage of hot water at his moment generated from (if available, a global estimation will be oke):
is available, an global
% hot water produced with: oil 0.000 %
estimation will be okay
% hot water produced with: coal 0.000 %
% hot water produced with: natural
0.000 %
gas
% hot water produced with: electricity 99.800 % Rough estimate
% hot water produced with: biomass 0.000 %
Solar thermal 0.200 % Rough estimate
Other technologies that are important
in your country for hot water
production
Percentage other 0.000 %
Which technologies are currently used to generate hot water?
% hot water produced with: fire pits 0.000 %
% hot water produced with: stove 0.000 %
% hot water produced with: furnace 0.000 %
% hot water produced with: gas water
0.000 %
heater
% hot water produced with: electrical
99.800 %
water heater
Other technologies that are important solar
in your country for water heating 0.2%
Which RE-technologies are currently implemented to generate hot water? (More than one answer is possible)
% hot water produced with: biomass
% hot water produced with: solar
Yes 0.2%
heat
% hot water produced with: other RE
sources
Since when are solar water heaters
1990 year
used?
What would be the effect on time
needed for hot water production if the
current technology for hot water
production is replaced by solar heat none because electric
energy? (eg in the current situation it 0.000 minutes/day water heaters would
takes half an hour to collect wood, replaced
with the use of solar heat it takes only
5 minutes so the effect is minus 25
minutes)
Comments
Cost-benefit
Please, if the data you have is per capita (or other), write the unit used in the "comments" field.
Not available N.B.
Majority urban dwellers
do not use hot water.
Average amount of hot water used Basically no rural
0.000 LC/household
per household per day dwellers use hot water
Hot water mostly used
in hotels and by affluent
residents
What are the energy costs for the hot
waterproduction with standard 0.000 LC/household Not available
technologies?
What are the costs for new
equipment based on standard 0.000 LC/household Not available
technologies?
What are the costs for maintenance
of equipment based on standard 0.000 LC/(hh.year) Not available
technology?
What are the energycosts for the use
of hot water production with solar 0.000 LC/(hh.year) Not available
heat?
What are the costs for new standard 0.000 LC/household Not available
equipment based on solar heat?
What are the costs for maintenance
0.000 LC/household Not available
of equipment based on solar heat?
comments
Environment
What is the CO2-emission due to the
most common hot water production 0.000 kg (hh.year) Not available
with standard technologies?
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 8: PV
PV
General for this technology-market combination
Ministry for Lands,
Geology, Mines,
Is this technology present in the
Yes Energy, Environment
country?
and Water
Resources
Total capacity installed of this
0.063 MW PIREP
technology
Present electricity production from
0.115 GWh/year
this technology (per year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
PV chosen because: only available
No
resource (y/n)
PV chosen because: only available
0.000 %
resource (%)
PV chosen because: least in some remote
Yes
expensive (y/n) locations
PV chosen because: least
0.000 %
expensive (%)
PV chosen because: stimulated by
Yes
national government (y/n)
PV chosen because: stimulated by
0.000 %
national government (%)
PV chosen because: internationally
Yes
funded (y/n)
PV chosen because: internationally
0.000 %
funded (%)
PV chosen because: ideology,
Yes
ambition to use RE (y/n)
PV chosen because: ideology,
0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reasons to choose PV
other reasons to choose PV (%) 0.000 %
Who has invested in the technology
Who has invested in PV: User= a few user purchase
0.000 %
owner= investor (%) off-grid
Who has invested in PV: User
0.000 %
borrows from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
PV investment: % by government 48.000 %
PV investment: % international
50.000 %
organisations
PV investment: % by local private small lighting kits <10
2.000 %
companies W each
PV investment: % by other sources 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?
PV manufactured within the
No
country? (y/n)
PV manufactured within the
0.000 %
country? (%)
PV imported from North America
Yes
(y/n)
PV imported from North America
0.000 %
(%)
PV imported from Europe (y/n) Yes
PV imported from Europe (%) 0.000 %
PV imported from Asia (y/n) Yes
PV imported from Asia (%) 0.000 %
PV imported from Australia (y/n) Yes
PV imported from Australia (%) 0.000 %
PV imported from other countries?
PV imported from other countries
0.000 %
(%)
comments
Potential Technical
Is (generally) sufficient free space
available near the dwellings to Yes
implement the technology?
Are the dwellings (generally) strong
enough to place technology Yes
systems on the roof in the cities?
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Are there long-term activities for
Yes
installing this technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long-term activities organised by:
No
international moneylenders (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
Yes
governmental (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
semi-governmental associations No
(y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
No
co-operatives (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
No
private organisations (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
No
commercial organisations (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
Yes includes Aid
non-profit organisations (y/n)
Long-term activities organised by:
other organisations?
Equivalent number of full
including large
employment positions in this RE 10.000
systems, next sheet
technology
Are there maintenance activities for
Yes
this technology?
How is the general attitude of
people towards this technology?
PE; negative if it is a second choice Positive
if it would be possible they use
something else or positve if they
would use it if they can afford it
comments
PV-market
Which part of the users of pv
100.000 %
systems are not grid-connected?
Which part of the users of pv
systems are connected to a local 0.000 %
grid?
Which part of the users of pv
systems are connected to a 0.000 %
regional or national grid?
Is there a specific target for this
No
technology?
if yes, percentage of total electricity
production to be reached with this 0.000 %
technology
or GWh electricity to be reached 0.000 GWh
and year for this aim to be achieved 0 year
comments
Cost-benefit
17,000 to 23,000
$US/ kW according
Cost for the installation of a pv
2321000.000 LC/(kW installed) to the Vanuatu
system
Energy Unit within
Ministry.
13 $US/month In
remote villages
Cost for maintenance of a pv
18000.000 LC/(kW installed) monthly 1500 Vatu
system
per (100W) Solar
Home System unit
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 9: PV-large
PV-large
General for this technology-market combination
Is this technology present in the country? No
Total capacity installed of this technology 0.000 MW
Present electricity production from this technology
0.000 GWh/year
(per year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose PV large: stimulated by national
government (y/n)
Reason to choose PV large: internationally funded
(y/n)
Other reasons to choose PV-large
Who has invested in the technology? (if you cannot give the % please mention with yes/no)
% investment by Government 0.000 %
% investment by International organisation 0.000 %
% investment by local electricity company 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other sources 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
% produced within the country 0.000 %
Produced within the country (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
Imported from other countries?
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
comments
Potential
Is there a study calculating the potential?
If yes, potential for this technology 0.000 GWh/year
Which barriers are defined by this calculation?
Is there a specific target for this technology?
if yes, percentage of total electricity production to
0.000 %
be reached with this technology
or GWh electricity 0.000 GWh
and year for this aim to be achieved 0 year
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 10: Wind
Wind
attention: the small stand alone trubines can be filled in the small Re sheet
General for this technology-market combination
Is this technology present in the country? No
Total capacity installed of this technology 0.000 MW
Present electricity production from this technology
0.000 GWh/year
(per year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology: only available
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: only available
0.000 %
resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology: least
expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: least
0.000 %
expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated by
0.000 %
national government (%)
Reason to choose this technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: internationally
0.000 %
funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reasons to choose this technology
Other reasons to choose this technology (%) 0.000 %
Who has invested in the technology (if you cannot give the % please mention with yes/no)
Investment in wind: user= owner= investor (%) 0.000 %
Investment in wind: user borrows from investor
0.000 %
(%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international organisations 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other sources 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?
Produced within the country (y/n)
% produced within the country 0.000 %
Imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
Imported from other countries?
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
If specific parts of windtechnology are imported,
please mention here
comments
Potential Technical
Are there hurricane problems? Yes
If yes, which part of the country troughout
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Are there long-term activities for installing this
No
technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities organised by: international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: government
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by: semi-
governmental associations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: co-operatives
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by: private
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: non-profit
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by other
organisations?
Equivalent number of full employment positions in
0.000
this RE technology
Are there maintenance activities for this
technology?
How is the general attitude of people towards this
technology? PE; negative if it is a second choice if
No Opinion
it would be possible they use something else or
positve if they would use it if they can afford it
comments
Wind Market
Please answer the following question in percentage of the total production or number of windmills
Which part of the wind systems are not grid-
0.000 %
connected, only to some houses?
Which part of the wind systems are for
0.000 %
predominantly for (small) industries?
Which part of the users of wind systems are
0.000 %
connected to a local grid?
Which part of the wind systems are connected to
a regional or national grid? (in percentage of the 0.000 %
total production of number of windmills)
Is there a windmap available? No
Is there a specific target for this technology?
if yes, percentage of total electricity production to
0.000 %
be reached with this technology
or GWh electricity 0.000 GWh
How is this target divided over the systems size?
% of target to be reached with systems <100 kW 0.000 %
% of target to be reached with systems between
0.000 %
100 kW and 15 MW
% of target to be reached with systems > 15 MW 0.000 %
and year for this aim to be achieved 0 year
comments
Cost-benefit
Costs for the installation of a wind system 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
If possible give variation in kW range of windpower
Costs per kW - systems <100 kW 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
Costs per kW - systems between100 kW - 15 MW 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
Costs per kW - systems > 15 MW 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
Costs for maintenance of a wind system 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 11: Wind off-shore
Wind off-shore
General for this technology-market combination
Is this technology present in the country? No
Total capacity installed of this technology 0.000 MW
Present electricity production from this technology
0.000 GWh/year
(per year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reasons to choose this technology
Who has invested in the technology (if you cannot give the % please mention with yes/no)
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international organisations 0.000 %
% investment by local electricity company 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other sources 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?
Technology manufactured within the country (y/n)
% manufactured within the country 0.000 %
Imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries?
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
If specific parts of windtechnology are imported,
please mention here
comments
Wind Market
Is there a study calculating the potential? No
If yes, potential for this technology 0.000 GWh/year
Which barriers are defined by this calculation?
Is there a specific target for this technology?
if yes, percentage of total electricity production to
0.000 %
be reached with this technology
or GWh electricity 0.000 GWh
and year for this aim to be achieved 0 year
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 12: Geo thermal
Geothermal
General for this technology-market combination
Is this technology
present in the No
country?
Total capacity
installed of this 0.000 MW
technology
Present heat use
from this
technology (per
0.000 GJ/year
year) for systems
not producing
electricity
Present electricity
production from 0.000 GWh/year
this technology
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose
this technology:
only available
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose
this technology:
least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to choose
this technology:
stimulated by
national
government (y/n)
Reason to choose
this technology:
Internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reasons to
choose this
technology
Who has invested in the technology?
Investment in this
technology: user=
0.000 %
owner= investor
(%)
Investment in this
technology: user
0.000 %
borrows from
investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by
0.000 %
Government
% investment by
international 0.000 %
organisations
% investment by
local private 0.000 %
companies
% investment by
0.000 %
other sources
Where is the technology product manufactered?
% technology
manufactured 0.000 %
within the country
% imported from
0.000 %
North America
% imported from
0.000 %
Europe
% imported from
0.000 %
Asia
% imported from
0.000 %
Australia
% imported from
other countries
Percentage other 0.000 %
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Feasibility studies conducted since the
70s. Apparently, significant resource in
Efate Island. Private USA/Australian
Consortium (EGJV) negotiating power-
Are there long-term purchase with UNELCO (private
activities for monopoly) EGJV offered to sell at
Yes
installing this UNELCO's diesel generation avoided
technology? cost. UNELCO claims avoided cost (2000)
was 0.1 US$/kWh while two independent
studies estimated 0.1174 and 0.119
US$/kWh respectively. Presently, there
exist an unresolved impasse.
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities
organised by:
international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by:
government (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by:
semi-governmental
associations (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by:
private
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by:
commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
organised by: non-
profit organisations
(y/n)
Long term activities
organised by other
organisations?
Equivalent number
of full employment
0.000
positions in this RE
technology
comments
Geothermal market
Percentage of the
systems that are
% of total
stand alone or
0.000 geothermal
connected to a
capacity
small local
electricity grids?
Which part of the
systems are % of total
connected to one 0.000 geothermal
of the main capacity
electricity grids?
3 MW proposed by EGJV followed by 1
Is there a study
MW increments. Installed cost of 3 MW
calculating the Yes
estimated to range between 10 to 15
potential?
million US$
If yes, potential for
0.000 GWh/year not defined
this technology
part of the potential
producing 100.000 %
electricity
part of the potential
producing only 0.000 %
heat
Is the efficiency
improvement for
existing systems
calculated
if efficiency
improvement
0.000 %
calculated: from
approximately (%)
if efficiency
improvement 0.000 %
calculated: to (%)
Is there a specific
target for this No
technology?
if yes, percentage
of total electricity
production to be 0.000 %
reached with this
technology
or GWh electricity
to be reached with 0.000 GWh
this technology
and year for this
0 year
aim to be achieved
if yes, total heat
production to be
0.000 GJ/year
reached with this
technology
and year for this
0 year
aim to be achieved
comments
Cost-benefit
Cost for the
<5000 US$ /kW Estimate for proposed 3
installation of a 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
MW system
geothermal system
if possible give variation in function of the installation's power
Costs/ KW: small
systems <10 MW
mostly Organic 0.000 LC/(kW installed)
Ranking Cycle
turbines
Costs/ KW: larger
systems 5 -
0.000 LC/(kW installed)
100MW; using
geothermal steam
Cost for
LC/(MW
maintenance of a 0.000
installed)
geothermal system
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 13: Small hydro
Small Hydro
Attention: if it's common in Energy Unit: Ministry for
your county to define small Lands, Geology, Mines,
Yes
hydro till 15 MW please Energy, Environment and
indicate "yes" here. Water Resources
General for this technology-market combination
Is this technology present in
Yes
the country?
Total capacity installed of this Sarakata System (2 x
0.600 MW
technology 300kW)
Present electricity production UNELCO 2002
3.200 GWh/year
from this technology (per year) Report
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this
technology: only available No
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this 0.000 %
technology: only available
resource (%)
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive Yes
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive 0.000 %
(%)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by Yes
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by 0.000 %
national government (%)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally Yes Gov. of Japan Donation
funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally 0.000 %
funded (%)
Other reasons to choose this
0.000 %
technology (%)
Who has invested in the technology (if you cannot give the % please mention with yes/no)
Investment in the technology:
0.000 %
user= owner= investor (%)
Investment in the technology:
user borrows from investor 0.000 %
(%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
Gov. of Japan Donation to
% investment by government 0.000 %
Vanuatu Government
% investment by international
100.000 % Gov. of Japan Donation.
organisations
% investment by local private
0.000 %
companies
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
Where is the technology product manufactered?
% manufactured within the
0.000 % no
country
% imported from North
0.000 % no
America
% imported from Europe 0.000 % no
Gov. of Japan
% imported from Asia 100.000 % yes
Donation
% imported from Australia 0.000 % no
imported from other
countries?
% imported from other
0.000 %
countries
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Are there long-term activities
Yes
for installing this technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long-term activities organised
by: international No
moneylenders (y/n)
Long-term activities organised
Yes
by: government (y/n)
Long-term activities organised No
by: semi-governmental
associations (y/n)
Long-term activities organised
No
by: co-operatives (y/n)
Long-term activities organised
No
by: private organisations (y/n)
Long-term activities organised
by: commercial organisations No
(y/n)
Long-term activities organised
by: non-profit organisations No
(y/n)
Long-term activities organised
by other organisations?
600 kW system owned by
Equivalent number of full
Gov. (Japan donation) and
employment positions in this 5.000
operated by UNELCO
RE technology
(private utility)
If you can separate between
small and large hydro (next
No
sheet) please do and mention
here
Are there maintenance
Yes
activities for this technology?
How is the general attitude of
people towards this Positive
technology?
comments
Hydro market
Which part of the systems are % in kWh total
connected to local electricity 0.000 production or kW
grids? installed
Which part of the systems are % in kWh total
To one of the four grids
connected to one of the main 100.000 production or kW
owned by UNELCO
electricity grids? installed
Is there a study calculating the
Yes
potential?
Double Sarakata system for
If yes, potential for this
3.200 GWh/year new annual production of
technology
6.4 GWh
How is this potential divided over the systems size?
Potential for systems from 100
100.000 %
kW - 1 MW
Potential for systems from 1
0.000 %
MW - 15 MW
Is there a specific target for
No
this technology?
if yes, percentage of total
electricity production to be 0.000 %
reached with this technology
or GWh electricity to be
0.000 GWh
reached with this technology
How is this target divided over the systems size
Target for systems from100
0.000 %
kW to 1 MW
Target for systems from 1 MW
0.000 %
- 10 MW
and year for this aim to be
0 year
achieved
comments
Cost-benefit
4522 US $ /kW 2002
Cost for the installation of a estimate for 75 kW hydro
500000.000 LC/(kW installed)
small hydro system scheme
If possible give variation in KW range of power
Costs per kW for installation of
0.000 LC/(kW installed)
systems 1-100 kW
Costs per kW for installation of
0.000 LC/(kW installed)
systems 1 MW - 10 MW
Cost for the maintenance of a
0.000 LC/(kW installed) Not available
small hydro system
If possible give variation in KW range of power
Costs per kW of maintenance
0.000 LC/(kW installed)
for installations of 1-100 kW
Costs per kW of maintenance
0.000 LC/(kW installed)
for systems of 1 MW - 10 MW
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 14: Large hydro
Large Hydro
Energy Unit: Ministry for Lands,
Please indicate what the limit
Geology, Mines, Energy,
for small hydro in your county 0.000 MW
Environment and Water
is (if other than 10MW)
Resources
General for this technology-market combination
Is/are there a large hydro
No
plant(s)
Since when is large hydro
0 year
used
Total capacity installed of this
0.000 MW
technology
Present electricity production
from this technology (per 0.000 GWh/year
year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reasons to choose this
technology
Who has invested in the technology?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international
0.000 %
funds
Other 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
% manufactured within the
0.000 %
country
Manufactured within the
country (y/n)
% imported from North
0.000 %
America
imported from North America
(y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
Imported from other countries
% imported from other
0.000 %
countries
Environmental impact
hectares of land lost 0.000 ha
changes on water distribution
Social impact
Number of people who had to
0.000
re-settle
wealth of movers
comments
Potential Hydro large
Per Energy Unit Large Hydro
Is there a study calculating
No resource not practical in
the potential?
Vanuatu
If yes, percentage of total
electricity production to be 0.000 %
reached with this technology
What is the calculated
0.000 GWh
potential for large hydro?
How many plants? 0.000
Is there a specific target for
this technology?
if yes, percentage of total
electricity production to be 0.000 %
reached with this technology
or GWh electricity to be
0.000 GWh
realised
and year for this aim to be
0 year
achieved
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 15: Biomass
Biomass
General for this technology-market combination
Energy Unit: Ministry for Lands,
Is this technology present in Geology, Mines, Energy,
No
the country? Environment and Water
Resources
Total capacity installed of this
0.000 MW
technology
Present gas production from
0.000 GJ/year
this technology (per year)
Present electricity production
from this technology (per 0.000 GWh/year
year)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: only available
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reasons to choose this
technology
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in biomass: user=
0.000 %
owner= investor (%)
Investment in biomass: user
0.000 %
borrows from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested? (if you cannot give the % please mention with yes/no)
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international
0.000 %
organisations
% investment by local private
0.000 %
companies
% investment by other
0.000 %
sources
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Manufactured within the
country (y/n)
% manufactured within the
0.000 %
country
imported from North America
(y/n)
% imported from North
0.000 %
America
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries
(y/n)
% imported from other
0.000 %
countries
comments
Potential Technical
Is wood (from forest and
pantation) burned for No
electricity in the country?
If yes is it:
is wood burned directly for
electricity (y/n)
is wood burned, mixed with
other fuels, for electricity (y/n)
is wood used for electricity by
means of gasification (y/n)
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Equivalent number of full
employment positions in this 0.000
RE technology
comments
Biomass market
Is there a study calculating
No
the potential?
If yes
what is the calculated
0.000 GWh/year
potential for this technology?
what are the restrictions in
this study ( land availibility,
...)?
Is there a specific target for
No
this technology?
if yes, percentage of total
% of total energy
electricity consumption to be 0.000
consumption
reached with this technology
or GWh to be reached with
this technology
and year for this aim to be
0 year
achieved
comments
Cost-benefit
Cost for the installation of a
0.000 LC/(kW installed) not available
wood fueled electricity plant
Cost for maintenance compared with other type of plant
biomass plant compared to oil % of oil plant
0.000 not available
plant maintenance maintenance
biomass plant compared to % of gas plant
0.000
gas plant maintenance maintenance
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 16: Biodiesel-ethanol
Biodiesel-ethanol
Ethanol
General for this technology-market combination
No ethanol in Vanuatu for Biodiesel see
Is this technology
below. Energy Unit: Ministry for Lands,
present in the No
Geology, Mines, Energy, Environment
country?
and Water Resources
Since when is the
technology 0 year
present?
Present fuel
production from this 0.000 million l/year
technology
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
international 0.000 %
organism
% investment by
local private 0.000 %
companies
% investment by
0.000 %
other organisations
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Are there long-term
activities for
installing this No
technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities
planned by:
No
international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: No
government (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: private No
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by:
No
commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: non-
No
profit organisations
(y/n)
Long term activities
planned by other
organisations
Equivalent number
of full employment
0.000
positions in this RE
technology
comments
Ethanol market
Is there a study
calculating the No
potential
If yes
what is the potential
0.000 million l/year
for this technology?
what are the
restrictions in the
market potential
study ( land
availibility,...)?
Is there a specific
target for this No
technology?
if yes, quantity
amount of biofuel to
0.000 million l/year
be produced per
year
and year for this
0 year
aim to be achieved
comments
Biodiesel
General for this technology-market combination
Biodiesel from Coconut Oil. Energy Unit:
Is this technology
Ministry for Lands, Geology, Mines,
present in the Yes
Energy, Environment and Water
country?
Resources
There are two relatively small producers
of coconut oil as biodiesel fuel. In 2002
Since when is this combined sales for transportation were
technology present 1990 year 4,000 liters/week. Price was below diesel
in the country? but in 2003 at the urging of UNELCO the
Gov. imposed the equivalent of the diesel
import duty to sales of coconut oil as fuel
Present fuel
production from this 0.208 million l/year 2002 See above
technology
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
international 0.000 %
organisations
% investment by
local private 100.000 %
companies
% investment by
0.000 %
other organisations
comments
Potential Socio-economic
Private sector experience shows that with
Are there long-term
Gov. support (no equivalent diesel tax
activities for
Yes added) coconut oil could be used as fuel
installing this
for transportation and electricity
technology?
generation
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities
planned by:
international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by:
government (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: private Yes
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by:
Yes
commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities
planned by: non-
profit organisations
(y/n)
Long term activities
planned by other
organisations
Equivalent number
of full employment Not available but probably no more than
0.000
positions in this RE about five to ten people.
technology
comments
Biodiesel market
Is there a study
calculating the No
potential for
biodiesel
If yes
what is the market
potential for
0.000 million l/year
biodiesel (if
studied)?
what are the
restrictions in this
study ( land
availibility,...)?
Is there a specific
target for this No
technology?
if yes, quantity of
biofuel to be 0.000 million l/year
produced per year
and year for this
0 year
aim to be achieved
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 17: Small RE systems part I
Small RE systems
Solar cookers
Is this technology present in the
No
country?
Number of solar cookers in the
0.000
country
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology:
only available resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
only available resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
least expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
least expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
stimulated by national government
(y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
stimulated by national government 0.000 %
(%)
Reason to choose this technology:
internationally funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
internationally funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
ideology, ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
ideology, ambition to use RE (%)
Other reasons to choose this
technology
Other reasons to choose this
0.000 %
technology (%)
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in the technology: user=
0.000 %
owner= investor (%)
Investment in the technology: user
0.000 %
borrows from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international
0.000 %
organisations
% investment by local private
0.000 %
companies
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Technology manufactured within
the country (y/n)
Technology manufactured within
0.000 %
the country (%)
Imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries (y/n)
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
Are there long-term activities for
installing this technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities organised by:
international moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
government (y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
semi-governmental associations
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
co-operatives (y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
private organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
commercial organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by:
non-profit organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by
other organisations
Are there maintenance activities for
this technology?
How is the general attitude of
people towards this technology?
comments
Micro hydro power
Included under Small
Is this technology present in the
Yes Hydro See small hydro
country?
section
Number of micro-hydro turbines in
0.000
the country
Total electricity produced 0.000 GWh
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology:
only available resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
only available resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
least expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
least expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
stimulated by national government
(y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
stimulated by national government 0.000 %
(%)
Reason to choose this technology:
internationally funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
internationally funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
ideology, ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
ideology, ambition to use RE (%)
Other reasons to choose this
technology
Other reasons to choose this
0.000 %
technology (%)
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in the technology: user=
0.000 %
owner= investor (%)
Investment in the technology: user
0.000 %
borrows from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international
0.000 %
organisation
% investment by local private
0.000 %
companies
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Technology manufactured within
the country (y/n)
Technology manufactured within
0.000 %
the country (%)
imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries (y/n)
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
Are there long-term activities for
installing this technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities planned by:
international moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities planned by:
government (y/n)
Long term activities planned by:
semi-governmental associations
(y/n)
Long term activities planned by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities planned by:
private organisations (y/n)
Long term activities planned by:
commercial organisations (y/n)
Long term activities planned by:
non-profit organisations (y/n)
Long term activities planned by
other organisations
Are there maintenance activities for
this technology?
How is the general attitude of
people towards this technology?
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 18: Small RE systems part II
Small bio-digestors
Is this technology present in the country? No
Number of small bio-digestors in the country
0.000
that produce only gas or gas and electricty
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology: only
available resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: only
0.000 %
available resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology: least
expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: least
0.000 %
expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
by national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
0.000 %
by national government (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
internationally funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
internationally funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reasons to choose this technology
Other reasons to choose this technology (%) 0.000 %
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in the technology: user= owner=
0.000 %
investor (%)
Investment in the technology: user borrows
0.000 %
from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international organisations 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other organisations 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Technology is manufactured within the country
(y/n)
Technology is manufactured within the country
0.000 %
(%)
imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries (y/n)
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
Are there long-term activities for installing this
technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities organised by: international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: government
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by: semi-
governmental associations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: private
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: non-profit
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by other
organisations
Are there maintenance activities for this
technology?
How is the general attitude of people towards
this technology?
comments
Water heaters (mostly collector and storage combined)
See Solar
Is this technology present in the country? Yes
Thermal
Number of systems in the country 0.000
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology: only
available resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: only
0.000 %
available resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology: least
expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: least
0.000 %
expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
by national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
0.000 %
by national government (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
internationally funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
internationally funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reason to choose this technology
Other reason to choose this technology (%) 0.000 %
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in this technology: user= owner=
0.000 %
investor (%)
Investment in this technology: user borrows
0.000 %
from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international organisation 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other organisations 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Technology manufactured in this country (y/n)
Technology manufactured in this country (%) 0.000 %
imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries (y/n)
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
Are there long-term activities for installing this
technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities organised by: international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: government
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by: semi-
governmental associations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: private
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: non-profit
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by other
organisations
Are there maintenance activities for this
technology?
How is the general attitude of people towards
this technology?
comments
Small windturbines < 30 Kw mostly stand alone
Is this technology present in the country? No
Number of these systems in the country 0.000
Total electricity produced 0.000 GWh
For which reason is this technology chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to choose this technology: only
available resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: only
0.000 %
available resource (%)
Reason to choose this technology: least
expensive (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: least
0.000 %
expensive (%)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
by national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: stimulated
0.000 %
by national government (%)
Reason to choose this technology:
internationally funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology:
0.000 %
internationally funded (%)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to choose this technology: ideology,
0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reason to choose this technology
Other reason to choose this technology (%) 0.000 %
Who has invested in the technology
Investment in this technology: user= owner=
0.000 %
investor (%)
Investment in this technology: user borrows
0.000 %
from investor (%)
If user is not investor, who has invested?
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international organisation 0.000 %
% investment by local private companies 0.000 %
% investment by other organisations 0.000 %
Where is the technology product manufactered?
(if the technology is imported from more than one country can you give the % instead of yes or no?)
Technology manufactured within the country
(y/n)
Technology manufactured within the country
0.000 %
(%)
imported from North America (y/n)
% imported from North America 0.000 %
imported from Europe (y/n)
% imported from Europe 0.000 %
imported from Asia (y/n)
% imported from Asia 0.000 %
imported from Australia (y/n)
% imported from Australia 0.000 %
imported from other countries (y/n)
% imported from other countries 0.000 %
Are there long-term activities for installing this
technology?
Who organised these activities?
Long term activities organised by: international
moneylenders (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: government
(y/n)
Long term activities organised by: semi-
governmental associations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: co-
operatives (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: private
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: commercial
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: non-profit
organisations (y/n)
Long term activities organised by: other
organisations
Are there maintenance activities for this
technology?
How is the general attitude of people towards
this technology?
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 19: Industry special
Industry special
Solar dryers
Is this technology used in
No
the industry in the country?
Number of industries using
0.000
this technology
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: only available
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reason to choose this
technology (y/n)
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by industry 0.000 %
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
0.000 %
international organisation
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
comments
Waste combustion
Ministry for Lands, Geology,
Number of industries using
2.000 Mines, Energy, Environment
this technology
and Water Resources
wood waste used as fuel
Which industries: name copra drying during milling process and
most important branches and wood coconut husks for copra
(specify agro, wood, ...) mills drying
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive Yes
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by No
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally No
funded (y/n)
Other reason to choose this
No
technology (y/n)
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by industry 100.000 %
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
0.000 %
international organisation
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
What is the yearly energy
production with this 1136.000 TJ/year
technology?
% of total
% heat produced of total production with
100.000
energy production waste from
(agro)industry
% of total
% electricity produced of production with
0.000
total energy production waste from
(agro)industry
What impulses would
increase this technology?
comments
Wind Turbines
* if you can specify this, if not please comine this with the general windsheet
Is this technology used in
No
the industry in the country?
Number of industries using
0.000
this technology
Which industries: please
name the most importants
kinds
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: only available
resource (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: ideology (y/n)
Other reason to choose this
technology (y/n)
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by industry 0.000 %
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
0.000 %
international organisation
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
What is the yearly energy
producuction with this 0.000
technology?
What impulses would
increase this technology?
comments
Geothermal, heat, low enthalpie
Is this technology used in
the industry in your No
country?
Number of industry using
0.000
this technology
Which industries: name
most importants kinds
(specify agro, ...)
For which reason is this technology chosen?
Reason to choose this
technology: least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to choose this
technology: internationally
funded (y/n)
Other reason to choose this
technology (y/n)
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by industry 0.000 %
% investment by
0.000 %
government
% investment by
0.000 %
international organisation
Other 0.000 %
What is the yearly energy
production with this 0.000
technology?
What impulses would
increase this technology?
comments
Question Answer Unit Source of data Year Comment
Page 20: Special issues
Special issues
Official data does not list this
Is desalination a technology technology but some systems
No
used in your country? might be available at tourist
resorts
0.000
Number of desalination
systems in the country
Quantity of fresh water
produced from desalination 0.000 million l/year
systems per year
Are there desalination
systems which are based on No
RE in the country?
If yes, which RE technology is
used for desalination
Number of these RE
desalination systems in the 0.000
country
Quantity of fresh water
produced from these RE 0.000 million l/year
desalination systems per year
For which reason is this technology combined with RE chosen?
(if you can global divide the reasons in % please do)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: only available No
resource (y/n)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: only available 0.000 %
resource (%)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: least expensive
(y/n)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: least expensive 0.000 %
(%)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: stimulated by
national government (y/n)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: stimulated by 0.000 %
national government (%)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: internationally
funded (y/n)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: internationally 0.000 %
funded (%)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: ideology,
ambition to use RE (y/n)
Reason to opt for RE for
desalination: ideology, 0.000 %
ambition to use RE (%)
Other reason to opt for RE for
desalination
Other reason to opt for RE for
0.000 %
desalination (%)
Who has invested in the technology
% investment by industry 0.000 %
% investment by government 0.000 %
% investment by international
0.000 %
organisation
% investment by other
0.000 %
organisations
Is there a specific target for
No
desalination?
If yes, what is the target of 0.000 million l/year
quantity of fresh water to be
produced?
Is there a specific target for
desalination combined with No
RE?
if yes, percentage of total
water production to be 0.000 %
reached with this technology
and year for this aim to be
0 year
achieved
comments
number reference author year ISBN url organisation category
Page 21: References
Pacific Regional Links to Bureau of
Information Statistics of
1 2000 www.spc.int/prism
System Pacific Island
(PRISM) Nations
World
2 World Bank Development 2000 www.worldbank.org/data
Indicators
Human
3 UNDP Development 2005
Report 2005
Pacific Islands:
Renewable
Energy
4 Luis A. Vega 2000 available from author vegakwh@hawaii.rr.com
Resources and
Electricity
Demand
Vanuatu Country
Briefing Paper:
Obtained from SOPAC
From Vision to
(Suva) Library. Per
Water Action, Towards
5 2000 Vanuatu Gov. this is the
Information Sustainable
latest documentation of
Water Resources
situation in country
Management in
the Pacific
Provided copy of:
Vanuatu National
Report, Pacific
Islands
Reuben Bakeo,
Renewable
Vanuatu
Energy Project
Ministry of
6 (PIREP) prepared 2004 rbakeo@vanuatu.gov.vu
Agriculture,
for South Pacific
Forestry and
Regional
Fisheries
Environmental
Programme
(SPREP),
October 2004
Anare Matakiviti,
SOPAC, Suva,
7 2000 anare@sopac.org.fj
Fiji (PIREP
consultant)
Kalpapau
Mangawai,
Energy Unit,
Confirmed
Ministry of
References 5 and
8 Lands, Geology, 2000
6 are latest
Mines, Energy,
information
Environment
and Water
Resources
Union Electrique
de Vanuatu Ltd,
owned by the
Suez Group of
France
(UNELCO):
Private
company
9 2000
operating power
plants and
national grid
through long-
term
concessions
beginning in
1939.
Related docs
