Docstoc

Qutteineh v. Litton Loan Servicing - 2

Document Sample
Qutteineh v. Litton Loan Servicing - 2 Powered By Docstoc
					Qutteineh v. Litton Loan Servicing

Doc. 2

Case 3:07-mc-80250-CRB

Document 2

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMAD B. QUTTEINEH, Plaintiff, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING, et al., Defendants. /

No. Misc. C 07-80250 CRB ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action against “LITTON LOAN SERVICING, US Vessel DOES, ROES, and MOES 1-100 et al, US Vessel” as a miscellaneous action. Plaintiff’s papers are incomprehensible and it is impossible for the Court to discern the basis for plaintiff’s lawsuit. It appears that plaintiff is demanding approximately $30 million from Litton Loan Servicing, but even that fact is unclear and the Court cannot discern the basis for the demand. Accordingly, plaintiff’s “action” is DISMISSED with 20 days leave to amend. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, plaintiff must file a complaint that clearly identifies the parties and the claims that plaintiff is making and the facts that support his or // // //

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-mc-80250-CRB

Document 2

Filed 10/31/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

her claims. Citation to random legal authorities is not sufficient to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2007 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\CRBALL\2007\80250misc\orderdismissal1.wpd

2


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:76
posted:4/15/2008
language:English
pages:2