Global Royalties, Ltd. et al v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al - 21

Document Sample
Global Royalties, Ltd. et al v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al - 21 Powered By Docstoc
					Global Royalties, Ltd. et al v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al

Doc. 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The court has before it defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s notice of supplemental 17 authority (doc. 19). In light of our order (doc. 20) granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, 18 the motion to strike is moot. We also note that this motion is not allowed by the rules. 19 Motions to strike under Rule 12(f), Fed. R. Civ. P., are limited to pleadings under Rule 7(a), 20 Fed. R. Civ. P., in contrast to motions and papers under Rule 7(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Because 21 a notice of supplemental authority is not a pleading, defendant may not challenge it by a 22 motion to strike. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED DENYING defendant’s motion to strike 23 (doc. 19). 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:07-cv-00956-FJM Document 21 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Global Royalties, Ltd., et al., Plaintiffs, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV-07-956-PHX-FJM ORDER

DATED this 10th day of October, 2007.


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:21
posted:4/15/2008
language:English
pages:1