Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 146

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
21
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/15/2008
language:
pages:
0
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC Document 146 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION § § § § § Hon. Ronald Clark § § Civil Action No.: 9:06-CV-00158-RC § § § § ANASCAPE, LTD., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP. and NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Defendants. AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER (Patent Case) DEADLINES November 16, 2007 Parties with burden of proof to designate Expert Witnesses other than claims construction experts, and provide their expert witness reports, to include for ALL experts all information set out in Rule 26 (2)(B). Parties to Designate Expert Witnesses on issues for which the parties do not bear the burden of proof, and provide their expert witness reports, to include for ALL experts all information set out in Rule 26(2)(B). Expect discovery deadline. All expert discovery must be completed by this date. December 7, 2007 December 20, 2007 SO ORDERED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28 day of September, 2007. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge NY\1329550.1

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 49
Views: 42  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 34
Views: 42  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 45
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 15
Views: 33  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 32
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 1
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 3
Views: 83  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 119
Views: 42  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 120
Views: 66  |  Downloads: 0
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al - 35
Views: 69  |  Downloads: 0