professional documents
home
Profile
Upload
docsters
Blogs
Upload
user photo
Tim Stanley
Programmer
Justia
(HC)Kongkham v. Yates Doc. 17 Case 2:07-cv-00088-LKK-CMK Document 17 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2254. vs. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent. / Petitioner brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § The court previously found petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the AMPHONE KONGKHAM, Petitioner, ORDER No. CIV S-07-0088-LKK-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved and respondent was directed to file a response. However, this action was dismissed for petitioner’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address, and the respondent was relieved of his obligation to file a response. This case is now reopened pursuant to the court’s order of September 17, 2007. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner’s application within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00088-LKK-CMK Document 17 Filed 09/24/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing §2254 Cases; 2. service of an answer; 3. If the response to petitioner’s application is a motion, petitioner’s Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. DATED: September 24, 2007. ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2
flag this doc
11
0
not rated
0
4/15/2008
English
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 81

justia 4/16/2008 | 424 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al - 62

justia 4/16/2008 | 325 | 3 | 0 | legal
Preview

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 313 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al - 73

justia 4/16/2008 | 498 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al - 86

justia 4/16/2008 | 588 | 2 | 0 | legal
Preview

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al - 105

justia 4/16/2008 | 290 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al - 51

justia 4/16/2008 | 337 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 78

justia 4/16/2008 | 289 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 79

justia 4/16/2008 | 307 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District - 75

justia 4/16/2008 | 382 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc